Re: Overground
On 18 Sep, 13:48, rosenst...@cix.compulink.co.uk wrote:
> In article
> ,
>
> mizte...@gmail.com (Mizter T) wrote:
> > Both London Overground and Merseyrail (the electric lines) are
> > "concessions" as opposed to franchises, and the DfT has delegated
> > responsibility away in both cases - for LO, to TfL, and for
> > Merseyrail, to Merseytravel (the PTA - well actually it's an ITA now -
> > Intergrated Transport Authority). Merseyrail is however a somewhat
> > different type of arrangement - for example, the operator (a Serco-
> > NedRailways joint venture) takes the revenue risk.
>
> Don't Merseyrail also maintain the tack, unlike London Overground where
> Notwork Rail still do it?
>
> It's Integrated, not Intergrated, BTW.
If there isn't such a word, there should be.
Then LU lines could be integrated with each other and intergrated with
Overground.
date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
author: MIG
|