Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:08:10 -0700 (PDT),    group: uk.transport.london        back       
Re: Overground   
On 18 Sep, 13:48, rosenst...@cix.compulink.co.uk wrote:
> In article
> ,
>
> mizte...@gmail.com (Mizter T) wrote:
> > Both London Overground and Merseyrail (the electric lines) are
> > "concessions" as opposed to franchises, and the DfT has delegated
> > responsibility away in both cases - for LO, to TfL, and for
> > Merseyrail, to Merseytravel (the PTA - well actually it's an ITA now -
> > Intergrated Transport Authority). Merseyrail is however a somewhat
> > different type of arrangement - for example, the operator (a Serco-
> > NedRailways joint venture) takes the revenue risk.
>
> Don't Merseyrail also maintain the tack, unlike London Overground where
> Notwork Rail still do it?
>
> It's Integrated, not Intergrated, BTW.

If there isn't such a word, there should be.

Then LU lines could be integrated with each other and intergrated with
Overground.
date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:08:10 -0700 (PDT)   author:   MIG

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us