|
|
|
date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 17:02:23 +0100,
group: uk.transport.london
back
Streetmap curiosity
Today, the highest detail level is giving a patchwork of map tiles, half
from the most recent map and half from the previous one... the colouring is
different, so it is easy to tell which tiles are newer and which are older,
particularly if the boundary between new and old runs through Euston
Station. Every time you hit Refresh (F5) you get a different selection, and
the two coloured halves of Euston swap around.
date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 17:02:23 +0100
author: John Rowland
|
Re: Streetmap curiosity
"John Rowland" wrote in message
news:g7kf2f$q9d$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
>
> Today, the highest detail level is giving a patchwork of map tiles, half
> from the most recent map and half from the previous one... the colouring
> is different, so it is easy to tell which tiles are newer and which are
> older, particularly if the boundary between new and old runs through
> Euston Station. Every time you hit Refresh (F5) you get a different
> selection, and the two coloured halves of Euston swap around.
Looks OK to me.
http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.srf?x=529291&y=182773&z=1
--
David Biddulph
date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 18:59:10 +0100
author: David Biddulph groups [at] biddulph.org.uk
|
Re: Streetmap curiosity
David Biddulph wrote:
> "John Rowland" wrote in
> message news:g7kf2f$q9d$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
>>
>> Today, the highest detail level is giving a patchwork of map tiles,
>> half from the most recent map and half from the previous one... the
>> colouring is different, so it is easy to tell which tiles are newer
>> and which are older, particularly if the boundary between new and
>> old runs through Euston Station. Every time you hit Refresh (F5) you
>> get a different selection, and the two coloured halves of Euston
>> swap around.
>
> Looks OK to me.
> http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.srf?x=529291&y=182773&z=1
Even if you hit Refresh multiple times? Maybe it's a caching problem at
Demon.
date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 20:18:30 +0100
author: John Rowland
|
Re: Streetmap curiosity
David Biddulph wrote:
> "John Rowland" wrote in
> message news:g7kf2f$q9d$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
>>
>> Today, the highest detail level is giving a patchwork of map tiles,
>> half from the most recent map and half from the previous one... the
>> colouring is different, so it is easy to tell which tiles are newer
>> and which are older, particularly if the boundary between new and
>> old runs through Euston Station. Every time you hit Refresh (F5) you
>> get a different selection, and the two coloured halves of Euston
>> swap around.
>
> Looks OK to me.
> http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.srf?x=529291&y=182773&z=1
I've just clicked on the above URL and found Euston station in two colours.
I clicked "Large Map" to widen the area and found that St Pancras and King's
Cross were similarly two-tone. Then I clicked refresh and the tones on all
three stations were swapped!
--
Richard J.
(to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address)
date: Sat, 09 Aug 2008 20:06:42 GMT
author: Richard J.
|
Re: Streetmap curiosity
"Richard J." wrote in message
news:mNmnk.39999$E41.28604@text.news.virginmedia.com...
> David Biddulph wrote:
>> "John Rowland" wrote in
>> message news:g7kf2f$q9d$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
>>>
>>> Today, the highest detail level is giving a patchwork of map tiles,
>>> half from the most recent map and half from the previous one... the
>>> colouring is different, so it is easy to tell which tiles are newer
>>> and which are older, particularly if the boundary between new and
>>> old runs through Euston Station. Every time you hit Refresh (F5) you
>>> get a different selection, and the two coloured halves of Euston
>>> swap around.
>>
>> Looks OK to me.
>> http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.srf?x=529291&y=182773&z=1
>
> I've just clicked on the above URL and found Euston station in two
> colours. I clicked "Large Map" to widen the area and found that St Pancras
> and King's Cross were similarly two-tone. Then I clicked refresh and the
> tones on all three stations were swapped!
> --
> Richard J.
> (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address)
It's OK here. Whatever I do doesn't replicate the symptoms you report. Might
be worth clearing your browser's cache, if you haven't already tried that.
date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 21:41:53 +0100
author: dB
|
Re: Streetmap curiosity
"dB" wrote in message
news:j5adnVp9fLyPnAPVRVnyiwA@posted.plusnet...
>
> "Richard J." wrote in message
> news:mNmnk.39999$E41.28604@text.news.virginmedia.com...
>> David Biddulph wrote:
>>> "John Rowland" wrote in
>>> message news:g7kf2f$q9d$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
>>>>
>>>> Today, the highest detail level is giving a patchwork of map tiles,
>>>> half from the most recent map and half from the previous one... the
>>>> colouring is different, so it is easy to tell which tiles are newer
>>>> and which are older, particularly if the boundary between new and
>>>> old runs through Euston Station. Every time you hit Refresh (F5) you
>>>> get a different selection, and the two coloured halves of Euston
>>>> swap around.
>>>
>>> Looks OK to me.
>>> http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.srf?x=529291&y=182773&z=1
>>
>> I've just clicked on the above URL and found Euston station in two
>> colours. I clicked "Large Map" to widen the area and found that St
>> Pancras and King's Cross were similarly two-tone. Then I clicked refresh
>> and the tones on all three stations were swapped!
>> --
>> Richard J.
>> (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address)
>
> It's OK here. Whatever I do doesn't replicate the symptoms you report.
> Might be worth clearing your browser's cache, if you haven't already tried
> that.
why would clearing the cache work for a site that I have never been to
before?
I have just been there (for the first every time) and I have a two-tone
Euston as well
tim
date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 21:57:54 +0100
author: tim.....
|
Re: Streetmap curiosity
"John Rowland" wrote in message
news:g7kqi7$adl$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
> David Biddulph wrote:
>> "John Rowland" wrote in
>> message news:g7kf2f$q9d$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
>>>
>>> Today, the highest detail level is giving a patchwork of map tiles,
>>> half from the most recent map and half from the previous one... the
>>> colouring is different, so it is easy to tell which tiles are newer
>>> and which are older, particularly if the boundary between new and
>>> old runs through Euston Station. Every time you hit Refresh (F5) you
>>> get a different selection, and the two coloured halves of Euston
>>> swap around.
>>
>> Looks OK to me.
>> http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.srf?x=529291&y=182773&z=1
>
> Even if you hit Refresh multiple times? Maybe it's a caching problem
> at Demon.
It appears to depend on what browser you use. On IE7 I get a mix of the
old and new tiles but on Firefox 3 I only get the new tiles.
Peter Smyth
date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 22:48:37 +0100
author: Peter Smyth
|
Re: Streetmap curiosity
Peter Smyth wrote:
> "John Rowland" wrote in
> message news:g7kqi7$adl$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
>> David Biddulph wrote:
>>> "John Rowland" wrote in
>>> message news:g7kf2f$q9d$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
>>>>
>>>> Today, the highest detail level is giving a patchwork of map tiles,
>>>> half from the most recent map and half from the previous one... the
>>>> colouring is different, so it is easy to tell which tiles are newer
>>>> and which are older, particularly if the boundary between new and
>>>> old runs through Euston Station. Every time you hit Refresh (F5)
>>>> you get a different selection, and the two coloured halves of
>>>> Euston swap around.
>>>
>>> Looks OK to me.
>>> http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.srf?x=529291&y=182773&z=1
>>
>> Even if you hit Refresh multiple times? Maybe it's a caching problem
>> at Demon.
>
> It appears to depend on what browser you use. On IE7 I get a mix of
> the old and new tiles but on Firefox 3 I only get the new tiles.
It quite often seems to lock on to either the new or old map, but at other
times produces a different mixture of old and new tiles with each refresh.
I've seen both behaviours on IE6 and Firefox.
--
Richard J.
(to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address)
date: Sat, 09 Aug 2008 23:27:59 GMT
author: Richard J.
|
Re: Streetmap curiosity
"tim....." wrote in message
news:6g6em4Feh3sbU1@mid.individual.net...
>
> why would clearing the cache work for a site that I have never been to
> before?
As this is the first post you've made on the subject, I would I know that
this is your first visit to the site? I don't do telepathy. As none of the
other posters have indicated that this is their first visit, I was simply
making a suggestion. Regardless of browser or number of refreshes, I don't
see the symptoms that are reported.
>
> I have just been there (for the first every time) and I have a two-tone
> Euston as well
>
> tim
>
>
>
date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 07:26:09 +0100
author: dB
|
Re: Streetmap curiosity
On Sat, 9 Aug 2008, Richard J. wrote:
> David Biddulph wrote:
>> "John Rowland" wrote in
>> message news:g7kf2f$q9d$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
>>>
>>> Today, the highest detail level is giving a patchwork of map tiles,
>>> half from the most recent map and half from the previous one... the
>>> colouring is different, so it is easy to tell which tiles are newer
>>> and which are older, particularly if the boundary between new and old
>>> runs through Euston Station. Every time you hit Refresh (F5) you get a
>>> different selection, and the two coloured halves of Euston swap
>>> around.
>>
>> Looks OK to me.
>> http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.srf?x=529291&y=182773&z=1
>
> I've just clicked on the above URL and found Euston station in two
> colours. I clicked "Large Map" to widen the area and found that St
> Pancras and King's Cross were similarly two-tone. Then I clicked
> refresh and the tones on all three stations were swapped!
For me, Euston looked normal, but St Pancras was a weird mish-mash of old
and new.
So, no change there then. BOOM BOOM!
Er, anyway, yes, Firefox 3 on a Mac via Demon, FWIW.
tom
--
What we learn about is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our
methods of questioning. -- Werner Heisenberg
date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:28:08 +0100
author: Tom Anderson
|
|
|