Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 01:31:58 -0700 (PDT),    group: uk.transport.london        back       
Re: Whoops!   
On Jul 7, 7:18 am, MIG  wrote:
> In most other UK towns and cities, it doesn't say anything on the
> tin.  Try to find a route diagram on display in most places, for

Unfortunately true, though at least some tram systems have sprung up
in the last decade or so in various places though these are hardly a
replacement for a proper metro. Personally I think the french VAL
system is a nice compromise - its cheaper to build than a conventional
metro and has at a guess the same capacity as a tram system , but is
fully automated with a very frequent service and naturally doesn't get
stuck in traffic. Though this would have meant previous governments
investing in public transport which neither labour nor the tories ever
really wanted to do. Ironic how in france a cities such as Rennes and
Lille have underground VAL systems when there populations are under
half a mil, yet a city like birmingham has one cut price tram line.
Says it all really.

B2003
date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 01:31:58 -0700 (PDT)   author:   unknown

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us