Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:14:26 +0100,    group: uk.transport.london        back       
Re: Whoops!   
On Sun, 6 Jul 2008 18:24:15 +0100, "dB"  wrote
this gibberish:

>
>"Roland Perry"  wrote in message 
>news:feuWysIBtNcIFA5H@perry.co.uk...
>> In message <-6WdnZcMDd_VTO3VnZ2dnUVZ8gidnZ2d@posted.plusnet>, at 15:05:48 
>> on Sun, 6 Jul 2008, dB  remarked:
>>>I do live in London and use public transport every day. It's considerably
>>>better than the public transport elsewhere in this country.
>>
>> That's a fairly bold assertion. Having experienced both at close quarters, 
>> I think the public transport in Nottingham is at least as good. And having 
>> been many places in the World, there are plenty where public transport is 
>> cheaper and cleaner than in London.
>> -- 
>> Roland Perry
>
>A generalisation, yes. As always there are exceptions and Nottingham has 
>always had fairly good bus services. That's not true of some other large 
>cities though. If I had to live without a car, of all the places I've lived 
>in, London would be the easiest place to do it (followed by Nottingham). I 
>agree about the cleanliness, although to be fair that's not just a public 
>transport issue. 

Personally I've lived in Plymouth, York, Edinburgh, Newcastle and now
London and this is the only place I've been happy to not have a car so
I'm inclined to agree.
yes it could be better on oh so many ways.
yes it is already pretty good.
-- 
Mark Varley
www.MarkVarleyPhoto.co.uk
www.TwistedPhotography.co.uk
London, England.
date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:14:26 +0100   author:   MarkVarley - MVP mr.nice@*nospam*softhome.net

Re: Whoops!   
thagor2008@googlemail.com wrote 
> On Jul 7, 7:18 am, MIG  wrote:
> > In most other UK towns and cities, it doesn't say anything on the
> > tin.  Try to find a route diagram on display in most places, for
 
> Unfortunately true, though at least some tram systems have sprung up
> in the last decade or so in various places though these are hardly
[...]

Huh ? I had no difficulty in Guildford, Woking, Andover, Bournemouth,
Bath, York and Lincoln. In every case I acquired a timetable booklet,
usually free - max 50p, with excellent maps and diagrams. The biggest
problem was when this said the last bus was 20:08.

-- 
Mike D
date: 7 Jul 2008 23:05:57 GMT   author:   Michael R N Dolbear

Re: Whoops!   
MIG  wrote 
> On Jul 8, 12:05 am, "Michael R N Dolbear"  wrote:

>> Huh ? I had no difficulty in Guildford, Woking, Andover,
Bournemouth,
>> Bath, York and Lincoln. In every case I acquired a timetable
booklet,
>> usually free - max 50p, with excellent maps and diagrams. The
biggest
>> problem was when this said the last bus was 20:08.

> That pretty much illustrates the point.  I can't remember when I last
needed to get any kind of timetable booklet in London because,
firstly, I know that any route is likely to run frequently till late,
if not all night and, secondly, there will be timetables and diagrams
at the bus stop.

Well *I* needed and got a booklet in Kingston (did you know it has
*two* bus stations) and because there are both Tfl and Surrey buses the
diagrams were  confusing, in some respects wrong and also chopped off
at unhelpful points.

I was responding to "what is says on the tin" --- "there is no tin".

-- 
Mike D
date: 11 Jul 2008 15:11:24 GMT   author:   Michael R N Dolbear

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us