Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 22:37 +0100 (BST),    group: uk.transport.london        back       
Re: Ticket Office staff to be retained   
In article , roland@perry.co.uk (Roland
Perry) wrote:

> In message <CQKak.206141$1B6.181530@newsfe21.ams2>, at 13:50:42 on 
> Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Tom Barry  remarked:
> >Roland Perry wrote:
> >> In message , at 12:25:56 on
> >> From the BBC's earlier story, linked on that page:
> >>          "From March 2008, about 240 staff will be redeployed from 
> >>         the least busy stops to the busiest stations.
> >>  Although the massive queues at KX/StP presumably indicate that
> >> rather more than 3% of that station's passengers are buying tickets:
> >>          "Fewer than 3% of Tube journeys are now made on single and
> >>         return tickets, with Oyster accounting for more than 60% of
> >>         all trips, said TfL. "
> >
> >This presumably means that that transfer of staff to big stations like

> >KXSP won't happen?
> 
> That's a guess, yes.
> 
> >  KXSP presumably has a higher proportion of over-the-counter 
> > sales than, say, my local station Chiswick Park* (which was to 
> > have lost office staff) so presumably could have done with some 
> > more staff. Alternatively, did Boris promise to increase funding 
> > for staff to fill the gap?
> 
> They should increase the staffing at places like KX/StP regardless, 
> in order to provide an acceptable service to the public.
> 
> Why is it that only Post Offices and Railway Stations seem 
> incapable of taking money off people who are desperately thrusting 
> it at them?

Cambridge station is a lot better on that score since you left.

-- 
Colin Rosenstiel
date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 22:37 +0100 (BST)   author:   (Colin Rosenstiel)

Re: Ticket Office staff to be retained   
In article ,
Colin Rosenstiel  wrote:
>In article , roland@perry.co.uk (Roland
>Perry) wrote:
> 
>> Why is it that only Post Offices and Railway Stations seem 
>> incapable of taking money off people who are desperately thrusting 
>> it at them?
>
>Cambridge station is a lot better on that score since you left.

The Perry Effect on train running applying to ticket offices too,
perhaps ? :-)

Nick
-- 
Serendipity: http://www.leverton.org/blosxom (last update 6th June 2008)
        "The Internet, a sort of ersatz counterfeit of real life"
                -- Janet Street-Porter, BBC2, 19th March 1996
date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 23:30:37 +0000 (UTC)   author:   Nick Leverton

Re: Ticket Office staff to be retained   
"Roland Perry"  wrote in message 
news:bXmHwW593IbIFAR9@perry.co.uk...
> In message , at 
> 22:37:00 on Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Colin Rosenstiel  
> remarked:
>>> Why is it that only Post Offices and Railway Stations seem
>>> incapable of taking money off people who are desperately thrusting
>>> it at them?
>>
>>Cambridge station is a lot better on that score since you left.
>
> Must be my patent "interrupter field", which ensures that no building, in 
> any town I'm in, can also contain more than three people selling railway 
> tickets or Post Office services :)

Is the 'close buffets early' mode a recent enhancement then?

Paul
date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 09:43:05 +0100   author:   Paul Scott

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us