Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:34:40 +0100,    group: uk.transport.london        back       
Re: How much was a ticket for the underground in the 60s?   
In message <32M9k.71126$GF6.64850@newsfe27.ams2>, hounslow3@yahoo.co.uk 
writes
>> At the time, I remember a lot of complaints that the new 50p and 2s/10p
>> were too similar and could be confused, especially by older people.  I
>> think originally the only difference was that the 50p was very slightly
>> larger and had the pointy sides whereas the 2s/10p was round.

>As far as the 2s and 10p coins were concerned, would it have really been an
>issue? I mean, the 10p coin was the same size as the 2s coin and had the
>same value for about 10 years, if memory serves.

That wasn't the complaint - I referred to the 2s/10p coins together to 
indicate them being considered a single entity - the complaint was 
between these and the new 50p.
-- 
Steve Fitzgerald has now left the building.
You will find him in London's Docklands, E16, UK
(please use the reply to address for email)
date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:34:40 +0100   author:   Steve Fitzgerald

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us