Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 12:47 +0100 (BST),    group: uk.transport.london        back       
Re: London Broadgate station and that old fashioned 'junction' suffix   
In article , roland@perry.co.uk (Roland
Perry) wrote:

> In message , 
> at 09:52:00 on Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Colin Rosenstiel 
>  remarked:
> >Last time I was there trains which run from Peterborough to Liverpool
> >St were not advertised beyond Colchester at Peterborough.
> 
> I've seen them advertised to Shenfield.

You could be right. I don't see one at Peterborough very often. The last
time I was there there were no such trains because of the bridge at Ely.

> And I agree there won't be many people wanting "The Liverpool St 
> train", and pointing at a northbound DMU and asking "is that the 
> Liverpool train"; but if there were, then the advertised 
> destination of the other one isn't relevant. Indeed, failing to 
> advertise it to "Liverpool St" would actually make the situation 
> worse.

They don't advertise it to Liverpool St because any sane person (I used
to think that included you, Roland), would take the first train to King's
Cross and the tube to reach Liverpool St.

-- 
Colin Rosenstiel
date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 12:47 +0100 (BST)   author:   (Colin Rosenstiel)

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us