On Sep 6, 4:52 pm, Roland Perry  wrote:
> In message <3d2e3c1e4f%r...@greywall.demon.co.uk>, at 20:46:08 on Thu, 6
> Sep 2007, Graeme Wall  remarked:
>
> >> >> No, that can't be right. Doesn't have enough simultaneous runways!
>
> >> >I'm just quoting what is writted, and not on Wkipedia either.
>
> >> Where ? The wiki figures are the same as the ACI:
>
> ><www.flightmapping.com>  However it is a little vague on actual numbers.
>
> I can't see anything there comparing number of movements, however I note
> they talk about "WAS" as being Dulles, BWI (Baltimore) and Washington
> Reagan National together.
>
> I wonder if we added all three up if it would top the league? ... hmm
> 960K, which would put that "virtual airport" at right between the
> current No1 and No2.


I don't think it would top a combination of New York's three airports
JFK, LGA and EWR.  Or London's five airports.  Or Tokyo's two airports.