Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 21:52:25 +0100,    group: uk.transport.air        back       
Re: BAA and Rip Off Britain - airport prices higher than High Street   
In message <3d2e3c1e4f%rail@greywall.demon.co.uk>, at 20:46:08 on Thu, 6 
Sep 2007, Graeme Wall  remarked:
>> >> No, that can't be right. Doesn't have enough simultaneous runways!
>> >
>> >I'm just quoting what is writted, and not on Wkipedia either.
>>
>> Where ? The wiki figures are the same as the ACI:
>
><www.flightmapping.com>  However it is a little vague on actual numbers.

I can't see anything there comparing number of movements, however I note 
they talk about "WAS" as being Dulles, BWI (Baltimore) and Washington 
Reagan National together.

I wonder if we added all three up if it would top the league? ... hmm 
960K, which would put that "virtual airport" at right between the 
current No1 and No2.
-- 
Roland Perry
date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 21:52:25 +0100   author:   Roland Perry

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us