Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 20:46:08 +0100,    group: uk.transport.air        back       
Re: BAA and Rip Off Britain - airport prices higher than High Street   
In message 
          Roland Perry  wrote:

> In message <b5d261e4f%rail@greywall.demon.co.uk>, at 16:47:50 on Thu, 6 
> Sep 2007, Graeme Wall  remarked:
> >> No, that can't be right. Doesn't have enough simultaneous runways!
> >
> >I'm just quoting what is writted, and not on Wkipedia either.
> 
> Where ? The wiki figures are the same as the ACI:

<www.flightmapping.com>  However it is a little vague on actual numbers.

> 
> http://www.aci-na.org/asp/traffic.asp?page=90
> 
> (I'm glad I found that because it has a spreadsheet for the top 190 
> airports in the USA, and IAD is 40th (in the USA) at 276K vs 976K)

-- 
Graeme Wall
This address is not read, substitute trains for rail.
Transport Miscellany at <http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/index.html>
date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 20:46:08 +0100   author:   Graeme Wall

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us