|
|
|
date: 25 Sep 2008 08:50:08 GMT,
group: uk.transport
back
Re: Superfuels 'are just a waste of money' that don't improve cars or save the environment
Doug wrote:
> If its not one thing bothering motorists its another. LOL!
Is it? How would you know, you're not a motorist?
--
Paul - xxx
'96/'97 Landrover Discovery 300 Tdi 'Big and Butch'
Dyna Tech Cro-Mo comp "When I feel fit enough'
ebay stuff http://shop.ebay.co.uk/merchant/paul-xxx
date: 25 Sep 2008 08:50:08 GMT
author: Paul - xxx
|
Re: Superfuels 'are just a waste of money' that don't improve cars or save the environment
"Paul - xxx" wrote in message >
> Is it? How would you know, you're not a motorist?
>
Your response?
The angry, violent threats from others in the group when Doug mentions
things that happen in the "REAL" world that may effect petrolheads?
Personally I find Shell superunleaded gives a very slight boost in an old
mazda, BP s/ul in a Honda CRV auto gives a 2mpg benefit
date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:02:30 +0100
author: Tommy
|
Re: Superfuels 'are just a waste of money' that don't improve cars or save the environment
Tommy wrote:
>
> "Paul - xxx" wrote in message >
> > Is it? How would you know, you're not a motorist?
> >
> Your response?
How does my response work within the context of what I'm asking and
replying to? Your snipping of the line I was replying to makes your
reply nonsensical> (which is, I guess, as good as it gets for you
anyway.)
> The angry, violent threats from others in the group when Doug
> mentions things that happen in the "REAL" world that may effect
> petrolheads?
Citations?
> Personally I find Shell superunleaded gives a very slight boost in an
> old mazda, BP s/ul in a Honda CRV auto gives a 2mpg benefit
So you think he's wrong too. Heheheh, whilst I _know_ you're a fuckwit
of the first order you were his only, it seems, support. Now you've
taken even that flimsy support away, LOL.
--
Paul - xxx
'96/'97 Landrover Discovery 300 Tdi 'Big and Butch'
Dyna Tech Cro-Mo comp "When I feel fit enough'
ebay stuff http://shop.ebay.co.uk/merchant/paul-xxx
date: 25 Sep 2008 10:40:14 GMT
author: Paul - xxx
|
Re: Superfuels 'are just a waste of money' that don't improve cars or save the environment
"Paul - xxx" wrote in message
news:6k184eF5fhgeU1@mid.individual.net...
>
> So you think he's wrong too. Heheheh, whilst I _know_ you're a fuckwit
> of the first order you were his only, it seems, support. Now you've
> taken even that flimsy support away, LOL.
Not sure about the 3 kisses sweetie but I am fairly sure that Doug is not
also known as WHICH :)
date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:52:26 +0100
author: Tommy
|
Re: Superfuels 'are just a waste of money' that don't improve cars or save the environment
true as aerodynamic pork :)
"BrianW" wrote in message
news:9fda56e2-fb81-47b3-99c1-ee1c8481fe1b@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On 25 Sep, 11:02, "Tommy" wrote:
> "Paul - xxx" wrote in message >> Is it? How
> would you know, you're not a motorist?
>
> Your response?
>
> The angry, violent threats from others in the group when Doug mentions
> things that happen in the "REAL" world that may effect petrolheads?
Hehe. Next you'll be writing "BUT The you are fuxxin dangerous little
angry manwho does not like
"discussion" but threatning and killing people who do not agree with
your POV".
Oh, hang on, you already did ...
date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:43:24 +0100
author: Tooomy
|
Re: Superfuels 'are just a waste of money' that don't improve cars or save the environment
"BrianW" wrote in message
news:2b57047c-162e-48b9-a929-eaa3d9b37fd3@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
It creases me that Gollum's sole supporter is a trolling,
incomprehensible, retarded fuckwitt. Mind you, I don't suppose it
could be otherwise.
Even funnier you supporting Dougs' POV?
date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:44:22 +0100
author: Tooomy
|
Re: Superfuels 'are just a waste of money' that don't improve cars or save the environment
Tooomy wrote:
> true as aerodynamic pork :)
>
> "BrianW" wrote in message
> news:9fda56e2-fb81-47b3-99c1-ee1c8481fe1b@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> On 25 Sep, 11:02, "Tommy" wrote:
>> "Paul - xxx" wrote in message >> Is it?
>> How would you know, you're not a motorist?
>>
>> Your response?
>>
>> The angry, violent threats from others in the group when Doug
>> mentions things that happen in the "REAL" world that may effect
>> petrolheads?
>
> Hehe. Next you'll be writing "BUT The you are fuxxin dangerous little
> angry manwho does not like
> "discussion" but threatning and killing people who do not agree with
> your POV".
>
> Oh, hang on, you already did ...
> true as aerodynamic pork :)
We ALL know you wrote it, you drooling retard... In fact most retards I've
come across (with a mother and brother working in Psychiatry I've met more
than a few) have FAR more intelligence than you, you fuckwit.
Mike P
date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:45:13 +0100
author: Mike P
|
Re: Superfuels 'are just a waste of money' that don't improve cars or save the environment
Tooomy wrote:
> "BrianW" wrote in message
> news:2b57047c-162e-48b9-a929-eaa3d9b37fd3@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>
> It creases me that Gollum's sole supporter is a trolling,
> incomprehensible, retarded fuckwitt. Mind you, I don't suppose it
> could be otherwise.
>
> Even funnier you supporting Dougs' POV?
And when has that happened you moron?
Mike P
date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:45:40 +0100
author: Mike P
|
Re: Superfuels 'are just a waste of money' that don't improve cars or save the environment
Tommy wrote:
>
> "Paul - xxx" wrote in message
> news:6k184eF5fhgeU1@mid.individual.net...
> >
> > So you think he's wrong too. Heheheh, whilst I know you're a
> > fuckwit of the first order you were his only, it seems, support.
> > Now you've taken even that flimsy support away, LOL.
>
>
> Not sure about the 3 kisses sweetie but I am fairly sure that Doug is
> not also known as WHICH :)
You mean the three x's in my sig? I've been known by that since I
started on Usenet a the reasons for it are well documented.
So, you prove you're not only a fool, but you also can't be bothered to
check facts first before writing bollocks. As usual then.
--
Paul - xxx somewhere different ...
'96/'97 Landrover Discovery 300 Tdi
Dyna Tech Cro-Mo comp
ebay stuff http://shop.ebay.co.uk/merchant/paul-xxx
date: 25 Sep 2008 15:26:10 GMT
author: Paul - xxx
|
Re: Superfuels 'are just a waste of money' that don't improve cars
or save the environment
Tommy wrote:
> "Paul - xxx" wrote in message >
>> Is it? How would you know, you're not a motorist?
>>
> Your response?
>
> The angry, violent threats from others in the group when Doug mentions
> things that happen in the "REAL" world that may effect petrolheads?
Gordon Bennett - appropriate in this sense. There have been no repeat no
angry, violent threats.
--
John Wright
"What would happen if you eliminated the autism genes from the gene pool?
You would have a bunch of people standing around in a cave, chatting and
socialising and not getting anything done!" - Professor Temple Grandin
date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:12:13 +0100
author: John Wright
|
Re: Superfuels 'are just a waste of money' that don't improve cars or save the environment
I love the restricted level of argument this group suffers from
Lets take insulting and threatning Doug as a given- Doug is wrong, no one
apart from him believes in global warming,and fuel is cheaper than ever and
motorists are looked up to as gods - OK?
I reply to someone and someone else pretends to take umbrage,
Someone disagrees with me and asks for proof- I give a link and - You cannot
believe whats found on the electric interweb
PS There is a babelfish website you know :)
>
> And when has that happened you moron?
>
> Mike P
>
date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:16:52 +0100
author: Tooommy
|
Re: Superfuels 'are just a waste of money' that don't improve cars or save the environment
Tooommy wrote:
> I love the restricted level of argument this group suffers from
>
It's only Doug that keeps it so restricted.
date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:32:08 +0100
author: Brimstone
|
Re: Superfuels 'are just a waste of money' that don't improve cars or save the environment
Paul - xxx wrote:
> > Personally I find Shell superunleaded gives a very slight boost in an
> > old mazda, BP s/ul in a Honda CRV auto gives a 2mpg benefit
>
> So you think he's wrong too. Heheheh, whilst I _know_ you're a fuckwit
> of the first order you were his only, it seems, support. Now you've
> taken even that flimsy support away, LOL.
How odd that Toomy's previous claims about being a Range Rover owner
have now mutated into a clapped out Mazda and a shagged Honda wannabee
4WD of the hairdresser variety.
date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:35:40 +0100
author: %steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth)
|
|
|