|
|
|
date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:35:55 -0700 (PDT),
group: uk.transport
back
For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
It doesn't surprise me one bit.
"· People in busy roads more likely to be ill, says study
· Lack of traffic promotes sense of community
Mrs A lives in Dovercourt Road in north Bristol and considers five
people on her street as friends. But Mrs B, who is roughly the same
age and lives round the corner in a very similar house in Muller
Street, has only one friend.
The difference, says a study, has nothing to do with personality, but
is because of the weight of traffic. Fewer than 150 vehicles a day
pass down Dovercourt Road, compared with more than 21,130 a day on
Muller Street.
New research, based on interviews with households on three Bristol
streets, has found that people who live with high levels of motor
traffic are far more likely to be socially disconnected and even ill
than people who live in quiet, clean streets..."
"..."Growing car dependence is creating an epidemic of deteriorated
mental and physical health associated with air and noise pollution,
inactivity and road deaths and injuries."
More:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/sep/19/ethicalliving.automotive
--
World Carfree Network
http://www.worldcarfree.net/
Help for your car-addicted friends in the U.K.
date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
author: Doug
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
"Doug" wrote in message
news:74337eab-8c8b-40a9-bc1d-1f7582acc823@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
It doesn't surprise me one bit.
"· People in busy roads more likely to be ill, says study
· Lack of traffic promotes sense of community
----
Oh look, 3 _new_ threads in just over 10 minutes, and not even all on topic.
How about some follow-up to all the bilge you started yesterday, including
responding to the feedback to your own point of 'something should be done
about texting while driving'? You seem to have gone all quiet when it was
pointed out that something has been done.
date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:53:13 +0100
author: Graculus
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
On Sep 19, 7:35 am, Doug wrote:
> It doesn't surprise me one bit.
busy street you live in is it?
Fod
date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 02:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
author: Fod
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
"Fod" wrote in message
news:7b26be50-06f3-4953-9e0d-2de2ab1e95a8@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 19, 7:35 am, Doug wrote:
> It doesn't surprise me one bit.
busy street you live in is it?
Poor Steve Gizmo firth - going by his list of friends he must live on the
dividing strip on the M25 :)
date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:34:31 +0100
author: Tommy
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
On 19 Sep, 15:34, "Tommy" wrote:
> "Fod" wrote in message
>
> news:7b26be50-06f3-4953-9e0d-2de2ab1e95a8@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 19, 7:35 am, Doug wrote:
>
> > It doesn't surprise me one bit.
>
> busy street you live in is it?
>
> Poor Steve Gizmo firth - going by his list of friends he must live on the
> dividing strip on the M25 :)
Who is Steve-Gizmo-firth?
Are you saying they are the same, if so please post proof.
Francis
date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
author: francis
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
Oh Franky?
accessing these NGs via berlin and prophesing a "real" e-mail address?
Now Iwonder who you are in real life
LOL
"francis" wrote in message
news:e74329ea-43c5-4f20-8fcc-d97c10043bd0@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> On 19 Sep, 15:34, "Tommy" wrote:
>> "Fod" wrote in message
>>
>> news:7b26be50-06f3-4953-9e0d-2de2ab1e95a8@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>> On Sep 19, 7:35 am, Doug wrote:
>>
>> > It doesn't surprise me one bit.
>>
>> busy street you live in is it?
>>
>> Poor Steve Gizmo firth - going by his list of friends he must live on the
>> dividing strip on the M25 :)
>
> Who is Steve-Gizmo-firth?
> Are you saying they are the same, if so please post proof.
>
> Francis
date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:47:09 +0100
author: Tommy
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
On Sep 19, 3:47 pm, "Tommy" wrote:
> Oh Franky?
>
> accessing these NGs via berlin and prophesing a "real" e-mail address?
>
> Now Iwonder who you are in real life
>
> LOL
>
> "francis" wrote in message
>
> news:e74329ea-43c5-4f20-8fcc-d97c10043bd0@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On 19 Sep, 15:34, "Tommy" wrote:
> >> "Fod" wrote in message
>
> >>news:7b26be50-06f3-4953-9e0d-2de2ab1e95a8@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com.> >> On Sep 19, 7:35 am, Doug wrote:
>
> >> > It doesn't surprise me one bit.
>
> >> busy street you live in is it?
>
> >> Poor Steve Gizmo firth - going by his list of friends he must live on the
> >> dividing strip on the M25 :)
>
> > Who is Steve-Gizmo-firth?
> > Are you saying they are the same, if so please post proof.
>
> > Francis
Oh dear more like. Another day of posts that make little sense that
reply to the wrong people. There isn't much point asking you for
evidence for your Steve Firth conspiracy is there? You'll just
pretend to have posted it or go quiet.
I'll let you get back to pretending to provide the output for radio
2...
Fod
date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
author: Fod
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
Fod wrote:
> Oh dear more like. Another day of posts that make little sense that
> reply to the wrong people. There isn't much point asking you for
> evidence for your Steve Firth conspiracy is there? You'll just
> pretend to have posted it or go quiet.
I'm wondering where he claims to have got this "list of friends" from. I
suppose it will be another round of silence from Toomy in that respect
as well.
date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 16:08:41 +0100
author: %steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth)
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
Tommy wrote:
> "Fod" wrote in message
> news:7b26be50-06f3-4953-9e0d-2de2ab1e95a8@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 19, 7:35 am, Doug wrote:
>> It doesn't surprise me one bit.
>
> busy street you live in is it?
>
> Poor Steve Gizmo firth - going by his list of friends he must live on
> the dividing strip on the M25 :)
Hah, what are you babbling on about now Toomtard?
Mike P
date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 16:17:34 +0100
author: Mike P
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
Steve Firth wrote:
> Fod wrote:
>
>> Oh dear more like. Another day of posts that make little sense that
>> reply to the wrong people. There isn't much point asking you for
>> evidence for your Steve Firth conspiracy is there? You'll just
>> pretend to have posted it or go quiet.
>
> I'm wondering where he claims to have got this "list of friends"
> from. I suppose it will be another round of silence from Toomy in
> that respect as well.
I should start posting as Mike P from the three VM machines I've got running
on this Windows box using different IPs, that would confuse him even more.
Which friends list is he on about anyway?
Mike P
date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 16:21:03 +0100
author: Mike P
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
Mike P wrote:
> Which friends list is he on about anyway?
Ghod knows, trying to make sense of ToomyPosts is something ICBA to do.
He scrawled "Poor Steve Gizmo firth - going by his list of friends he
must live on the dividing strip on the M25 :)"
So presumably he's claiming to have seen a list of my friends,
somewhere.
date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 16:58:27 +0100
author: %steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth)
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
Tommy wrote:
>
>
> "francis" wrote in message
> news:e74329ea-43c5-4f20-8fcc-d97c10043bd0@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>> On 19 Sep, 15:34, "Tommy" wrote:
>>> "Fod" wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:7b26be50-06f3-4953-9e0d-2de2ab1e95a8@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Sep 19, 7:35 am, Doug wrote:
>>>
>>>> It doesn't surprise me one bit.
>>> busy street you live in is it?
>>>
>>> Poor Steve Gizmo firth - going by his list of friends he must live on the
>>> dividing strip on the M25 :)
>> Who is Steve-Gizmo-firth?
>> Are you saying they are the same, if so please post proof.
>>
>> Francis
>
>
> Oh Franky?
>
> accessing these NGs via berlin and prophesing a "real" e-mail address?
>
> Now Iwonder who you are in real life
>
> LOL
>
Are you saying that Francis is in Berlin?
From his various posts I would think he was in the UK probably in the
London area, but I am open to correction.
I await your answer, & can you make it in English.
--
Tony the Dragon
date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:14:03 +0100
author: Tony Dragon
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
Tony Dragon wrote:
> Tommy wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> "francis" wrote in message
>> news:e74329ea-43c5-4f20-8fcc-d97c10043bd0@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>>> On 19 Sep, 15:34, "Tommy" wrote:
>>>> "Fod" wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> news:7b26be50-06f3-4953-9e0d-2de2ab1e95a8@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>>>> On Sep 19, 7:35 am, Doug wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It doesn't surprise me one bit.
>>>> busy street you live in is it?
>>>>
>>>> Poor Steve Gizmo firth - going by his list of friends he must live
>>>> on the dividing strip on the M25 :)
>>> Who is Steve-Gizmo-firth?
>>> Are you saying they are the same, if so please post proof.
>>>
>>> Francis
>>
>>
>> Oh Franky?
>>
>> accessing these NGs via berlin and prophesing a "real" e-mail
>> address? Now Iwonder who you are in real life
>>
>> LOL
>>
>
> Are you saying that Francis is in Berlin?
> From his various posts I would think he was in the UK probably in the
> London area, but I am open to correction.
> I await your answer, & can you make it in English.
Toomtard probably thinks he's in Berlin. The rest of us know that he's just
using the same german news server many posters here do...
Mike P
date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:15:17 +0100
author: Mike P
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
Tony Dragon wrote:
> From his various posts I would think he was in the UK probably in the
> London area, but I am open to correction.
The headers of his posts make it clear that he's osting from inside the
UK. Toomy is simply falling over himself to show what a fuckwit he is.
I wonder if it was his public school education that taught him the
meaning of "prophesing"?
date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:43:49 +0100
author: %steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth)
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
"Doug" wrote in message
news:74337eab-8c8b-40a9-bc1d-1f7582acc823@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> "· People in busy roads more likely to be ill, says study
> · Lack of traffic promotes sense of community
>
> Mrs A lives in Dovercourt Road in north Bristol and considers five
> people on her street as friends. But Mrs B, who is roughly the same
> age and lives round the corner in a very similar house in Muller
> Street, has only one friend.
>
> The difference, says a study, has nothing to do with personality, but
> is because of the weight of traffic. Fewer than 150 vehicles a day
> pass down Dovercourt Road, compared with more than 21,130 a day on
> Muller Street.
I live in a cul-de-sac with virtually no traffic. I just about recognise
four of my neighbours by sight. I wouldn't count any of them as friends.
Colin Bignell
date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:54:46 +0100
author: nightjar cpb@insert my surname here.me.uk
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
maybe they just dont like you :-P
"nightjar .me.uk>" <cpb@<insert my surname here> wrote in message
news:fvqdnbhOC-7VRE7V4p2dnAA@giganews.com...
>
> "Doug" wrote in message
> news:74337eab-8c8b-40a9-bc1d-1f7582acc823@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>> "· People in busy roads more likely to be ill, says study
>> · Lack of traffic promotes sense of community
>>
>> Mrs A lives in Dovercourt Road in north Bristol and considers five
>> people on her street as friends. But Mrs B, who is roughly the same
>> age and lives round the corner in a very similar house in Muller
>> Street, has only one friend.
>>
>> The difference, says a study, has nothing to do with personality, but
>> is because of the weight of traffic. Fewer than 150 vehicles a day
>> pass down Dovercourt Road, compared with more than 21,130 a day on
>> Muller Street.
>
> I live in a cul-de-sac with virtually no traffic. I just about recognise
> four of my neighbours by sight. I wouldn't count any of them as friends.
>
> Colin Bignell
>
date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:40:37 +0100
author: tt
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
On 19 Sep, 15:47, "Tommy" wrote:
> Oh Franky?
>
> accessing these NGs via berlin and prophesing a "real" e-mail address?
>
> Now Iwonder who you are in real life
>
> LOL
Fuck me, Timmy, I knew you were a retarded cunt, but even by your
standards this is dumb.
date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
author: BrianW
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
"Doug" wrote in message
news:74337eab-8c8b-40a9-bc1d-1f7582acc823@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
It doesn't surprise me one bit.
"· People in busy roads more likely to be ill, says study
· Lack of traffic promotes sense of community
FOADQ
date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 07:47:04 +0100
author: Ian
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
On 19 Sep, 07:53, "Graculus"
wrote:
> "Doug" wrote in message
>
> news:74337eab-8c8b-40a9-bc1d-1f7582acc823@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> It doesn't surprise me one bit.
>
> "· People in busy roads more likely to be ill, says study
> · Lack of traffic promotes sense of community
>
> ----
>
> Oh look, 3 _new_ threads in just over 10 minutes, and not even all on topic.
>
> How about some follow-up to all the bilge you started yesterday, including
> responding to the feedback to your own point of 'something should be done
> about texting while driving'? You seem to have gone all quiet when it was
> pointed out that something has been done.
You are quite wrong as usual. I pointed out that punishments for
killer motorists are far too lenient so something is not being done.
--
World Carfree Network
http://www.worldcarfree.net/
Help for your car-addicted friends in the U.K.
date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 23:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
author: Doug
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
"Doug" wrote
You are quite wrong as usual.
While we're on the subject of being wrong, is oil $200 a barrel at the
moment Doug?
Oh, and what do you think of my new signature?
--
Regards, Vince.
"To have masses of mouse droppings all over your food and utensils is very
unpleasant" ( Doug Bollen)
date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 07:56:56 +0100
author: Knight Of The Road
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
On 20 Sep, 07:49, Doug wrote:
> On 19 Sep, 07:53, "Graculus"
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Doug" wrote in message
>
> >news:74337eab-8c8b-40a9-bc1d-1f7582acc823@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com..> > It doesn't surprise me one bit.
>
> > "� People in busy roads more likely to be ill, says study
> > � Lack of traffic promotes sense of community
>
> > ----
>
> > Oh look, 3 _new_ threads in just over 10 minutes, and not even all on topic.
>
> > How about some follow-up to all the bilge you started yesterday, including
> > responding to the feedback to your own point of 'something should be done
> > about texting while driving'? You seem to have gone all quiet when it was
> > pointed out that something has been done.
>
> You are quite wrong as usual. I pointed out that punishments for
> killer motorists are far too lenient so something is not being done.
Read that case yet, Gollum, you clueless old cunt?
date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 00:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
author: BrianW
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
"Doug" wrote in message
news:026a35f8-b4ca-45a9-b7ba-2bc7afbf0e72@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On 19 Sep, 07:53, "Graculus"
wrote:
> "Doug" wrote in message
>
> news:74337eab-8c8b-40a9-bc1d-1f7582acc823@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> It doesn't surprise me one bit.
>
> "· People in busy roads more likely to be ill, says study
> · Lack of traffic promotes sense of community
>
> ----
>
> Oh look, 3 _new_ threads in just over 10 minutes, and not even all on
> topic.
>
> How about some follow-up to all the bilge you started yesterday, including
> responding to the feedback to your own point of 'something should be done
> about texting while driving'? You seem to have gone all quiet when it was
> pointed out that something has been done.
You are quite wrong as usual. I pointed out that punishments for
killer motorists are far too lenient so something is not being done.
---
Which was not the point you initially brought up. You started the thread by
saying should be done about texting while driving. It was pointed out that
it's illegal. That was nothing to do with killer motorists, as the story you
quoted was about research, and nothing to do with road deaths. So you
changed the point, and claimed that it was responding to the question of
what the "something" is. Remember, sending a text is not the same as mowing
someone down.
So, once again, what do you think should be done about people who text while
driving, considering that it's already illegal?
date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 08:23:39 +0100
author: Graculus
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
On 20 Sep, 08:23, "Graculus"
wrote:
> "Doug" wrote in message
>
> news:026a35f8-b4ca-45a9-b7ba-2bc7afbf0e72@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> On 19 Sep, 07:53, "Graculus"
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Doug" wrote in message
>
> >news:74337eab-8c8b-40a9-bc1d-1f7582acc823@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com..> > It doesn't surprise me one bit.
>
> > "· People in busy roads more likely to be ill, says study
> > · Lack of traffic promotes sense of community
>
> > ----
>
> > Oh look, 3 _new_ threads in just over 10 minutes, and not even all on
> > topic.
>
> > How about some follow-up to all the bilge you started yesterday, including
> > responding to the feedback to your own point of 'something should be done
> > about texting while driving'? You seem to have gone all quiet when it was
> > pointed out that something has been done.
>
> You are quite wrong as usual. I pointed out that punishments for
> killer motorists are far too lenient so something is not being done.
>
> ---
>
> Which was not the point you initially brought up. You started the thread by
> saying should be done about texting while driving. It was pointed out that
> it's illegal. That was nothing to do with killer motorists, as the story you
> quoted was about research, and nothing to do with road deaths. So you
> changed the point, and claimed that it was responding to the question of
> what the "something" is. Remember, sending a text is not the same as mowing
> someone down.
>
> So, once again, what do you think should be done about people who text while
> driving, considering that it's already illegal?
>
Since texting while driving puts lives in danger it has everything to
do with killer motorists. The penalties for texting while driving are
ludicrously light, as are most penalties for dangerous motorists.
Presumably you don't consider that deliberately putting lives at risk
on our roads is at all serious?
--
World Carfree Network
http://www.worldcarfree.net/
Help for your car-addicted friends in the U.K.
date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 00:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
author: Doug
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
Doug wrote:
> On 19 Sep, 07:53, "Graculus"
> wrote:
>> "Doug" wrote in message
>>
>> news:74337eab-8c8b-40a9-bc1d-1f7582acc823@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>> It doesn't surprise me one bit.
>>
>> "· People in busy roads more likely to be ill, says study
>> · Lack of traffic promotes sense of community
>>
>> ----
>>
>> Oh look, 3 _new_ threads in just over 10 minutes, and not even all on topic.
>>
>> How about some follow-up to all the bilge you started yesterday, including
>> responding to the feedback to your own point of 'something should be done
>> about texting while driving'? You seem to have gone all quiet when it was
>> pointed out that something has been done.
>
> You are quite wrong as usual. I pointed out that punishments for
> killer motorists are far too lenient so something is not being done.
>
> --
> World Carfree Network
> http://www.worldcarfree.net/
> Help for your car-addicted friends in the U.K.
And as usual you were wrong.
--
Tony the Dragon
date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 10:00:39 +0100
author: Tony Dragon
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
On 20 Sep, 08:40, Doug wrote:
> On 20 Sep, 08:23, "Graculus"
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Doug" wrote in message
>
> >news:026a35f8-b4ca-45a9-b7ba-2bc7afbf0e72@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> > On 19 Sep, 07:53, "Graculus"
> > wrote:
>
> > > "Doug" wrote in message
>
> > >news:74337eab-8c8b-40a9-bc1d-1f7582acc823@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> > > It doesn't surprise me one bit.
>
> > > "� People in busy roads more likely to be ill, says study
> > > � Lack of traffic promotes sense of community
>
> > > ----
>
> > > Oh look, 3 _new_ threads in just over 10 minutes, and not even all on
> > > topic.
>
> > > How about some follow-up to all the bilge you started yesterday, including
> > > responding to the feedback to your own point of 'something should be done
> > > about texting while driving'? You seem to have gone all quiet when it was
> > > pointed out that something has been done.
>
> > You are quite wrong as usual. I pointed out that punishments for
> > killer motorists are far too lenient so something is not being done.
>
> > ---
>
> > Which was not the point you initially brought up. You started the thread by
> > saying should be done about texting while driving. It was pointed out that
> > it's illegal. That was nothing to do with killer motorists, as the story you
> > quoted was about research, and nothing to do with road deaths. So you
> > changed the point, and claimed that it was responding to the question of
> > what the "something" is. Remember, sending a text is not the same as mowing
> > someone down.
>
> > So, once again, what do you think should be done about people who text while
> > driving, considering that it's already illegal?
>
> Since texting while driving puts lives in danger it has everything to
> do with killer motorists. The penalties for texting while driving are
> ludicrously light, as are most penalties for dangerous motorists.
> Presumably you don't consider that deliberately putting lives at risk
> on our roads is at all serious?
Read that case yet, Gollum?
date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 02:00:58 -0700 (PDT)
author: BrianW
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
enforce the law? make the punishment a deterrent?
"Graculus" wrote in message
news:6jjmnqF3m2k4U1@mid.individual.net...
> "Doug" wrote in message
> news:026a35f8-b4ca-45a9-b7ba-2bc7afbf0e72@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> On 19 Sep, 07:53, "Graculus"
> wrote:
>> "Doug" wrote in message
>>
>> news:74337eab-8c8b-40a9-bc1d-1f7582acc823@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>> It doesn't surprise me one bit.
>>
>> "· People in busy roads more likely to be ill, says study
>> · Lack of traffic promotes sense of community
>>
>> ----
>>
>> Oh look, 3 _new_ threads in just over 10 minutes, and not even all on
>> topic.
>>
>> How about some follow-up to all the bilge you started yesterday,
>> including
>> responding to the feedback to your own point of 'something should be done
>> about texting while driving'? You seem to have gone all quiet when it was
>> pointed out that something has been done.
>
> You are quite wrong as usual. I pointed out that punishments for
> killer motorists are far too lenient so something is not being done.
>
> ---
>
> Which was not the point you initially brought up. You started the thread
> by saying should be done about texting while driving. It was pointed out
> that it's illegal. That was nothing to do with killer motorists, as the
> story you quoted was about research, and nothing to do with road deaths.
> So you changed the point, and claimed that it was responding to the
> question of what the "something" is. Remember, sending a text is not the
> same as mowing someone down.
>
> So, once again, what do you think should be done about people who text
> while driving, considering that it's already illegal?
date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 10:59:26 +0100
author: tt
|
Re: For good neighbours, live in a quiet, car-free street
On 20 Sep, 08:40, Doug wrote:
> On 20 Sep, 08:23, "Graculus"
> wrote:
>
> > "Doug" wrote in message
>
> >news:026a35f8-b4ca-45a9-b7ba-2bc7afbf0e72@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> > On 19 Sep, 07:53, "Graculus"
> > wrote:
>
> > > "Doug" wrote in message
>
> > >news:74337eab-8c8b-40a9-bc1d-1f7582acc823@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> > > It doesn't surprise me one bit.
>
> > > "· People in busy roads more likely to be ill, says study
> > > · Lack of traffic promotes sense of community
>
> > > ----
>
> > > Oh look, 3 _new_ threads in just over 10 minutes, and not even all on
> > > topic.
>
> > > How about some follow-up to all the bilge you started yesterday, including
> > > responding to the feedback to your own point of 'something should be done
> > > about texting while driving'? You seem to have gone all quiet when it was
> > > pointed out that something has been done.
>
> > You are quite wrong as usual. I pointed out that punishments for
> > killer motorists are far too lenient so something is not being done.
>
> > ---
>
> > Which was not the point you initially brought up. You started the thread by
> > saying should be done about texting while driving. It was pointed out that
> > it's illegal. That was nothing to do with killer motorists, as the story you
> > quoted was about research, and nothing to do with road deaths. So you
> > changed the point, and claimed that it was responding to the question of
> > what the "something" is. Remember, sending a text is not the same as mowing
> > someone down.
>
> > So, once again, what do you think should be done about people who text while
> > driving, considering that it's already illegal?
>
> Since texting while driving puts lives in danger it has everything to
> do with killer motorists. The penalties for texting while driving are
> ludicrously light, as are most penalties for dangerous motorists.
> Presumably you don't consider that deliberately putting lives at risk
> on our roads is at all serious?
>
> --
> World Carfree Networkhttp://www.worldcarfree.net/
> Help for your car-addicted friends in the U.K.
presumably you didn't read any of the replies and just made up what
you thought others would say?
Fod
date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 03:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
author: Fod
|
|
|