On 7 Sep, 09:00, BrianW  wrote:
> On 7 Sep, 07:43, Doug  wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 6 Sep, 17:48, Derek  wrote:> On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 17:10:20 퍝, Clive 
> > > wrote:
>
> > > >In message
> > > >,
> > > >Doug  writes
> > > >>Which answer to the need for a level playing field and a single law
> > > >>covering all killings regardless of location or weapon?
> > > >So an armed police officer who shoots dead a man carrying a table leg,
> > > >should get life?
>
> > > A surgeon who nicks a blood vessel that was hidden in an obese
> > > patients fat ?
>
> > So is the conclusion that certain people are immune from punishment
> > for killing others, due to the nature of their job?
>
> <sigh>
>
> It would help if you knew even the basics of this subject on which you
> like to expound.
>
> Go and look up the leading case of R v Adomako.  There's tons of stuff
> on t'internet about it - a starter for ten ishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manslaughter_in_English_law), and then
> come back and we can discuss it.

Why are you confusing the issue with corporate manslaughter? This is
about indiduals being held accountable for their actions not
companies. Do try to keep up.


--
UK Radical Campaigns
www.zing.icom43.net
One man's democracy is another man's regime.