Re: Energy saving better than alternative energy.
Conor wrote:
[snip]
> ANSWER THE FUCKING QUESTION,
I have, it seems that you're too dumb to understand the answer.
> why would I end up with 400V?
(L-N)*SQRT(3)
Where L=230 or 240 in old money and N=0.
How many times do I need to repeat that there is 400V between phases?
date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 16:40:50 +0100
author: %steve%@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth)
|
Re: Energy saving better than alternative energy.
In article <1in9mix.175y72iel3eoN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk>, Steve Firth
says...
> Conor wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > ANSWER THE FUCKING QUESTION,
>
> I have, it seems that you're too dumb to understand the answer.
>
> > why would I end up with 400V?
>
> (L-N)*SQRT(3)
>
> Where L=230 or 240 in old money and N=0.
>
> How many times do I need to repeat that there is 400V between phases?
>
ROFLMAO. It wouldn't matter a fucking jot because if you plug it into a
power supply on a different phase, the PD is still 240V and the neutral
is common across all three phases so all that'd happen is that the
input terminals on the power supply transformer in the kit would still
see 240V but the peak of that sinewave would be later than the one on
the other phase. The PSU would still work the same.
The only way you could come anywhere near 400V is to wire the live wire
from the mains lead into the live of a supply from one phase and the
neutral wire from the same mains lead into the live of a supply from
another phase which is hardly fucking likely to happen is it?
So once again, how would I end up with 400V except in the extreme
strawgrasping scenario I've just mentioned?
--
Conor
I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't
looking good either. - Scott Adams
date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:16:11 +0100
author: Conor
|