Some sod keeps deleting the section on Doug Bollen, and the page has
now been locked pending a resolution of this dispute.  Please go to
the page and put your comments in the "Talk" section if you agree that
Mr Bollen is worthy of a mention in a page on notable usenet
personalities.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_personalities

On 2 Sep, 17:25, BrianW  wrote:
> Some sod keeps deleting the section on Doug Bollen, and the page has
> now been locked pending a resolution of this dispute.  Please go to
> the page and put your comments in the "Talk" section if you agree that
> Mr Bollen is worthy of a mention in a page on notable usenet
> personalities.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_personalities

There are two problems here.
First is that there has been an edit war involving the Michael E.
Schmidt section, where it appears Micheal may have been editing it
himself.
Secondly the Doug section is too long.

I think there is some support for the Doug bit, but having been caught
up in the MES war it has just been deleted by admins.

NotMe wrote:
> On 2 Sep, 17:25, BrianW  wrote:
>> Some sod keeps deleting the section on Doug Bollen, and the page has
>> now been locked pending a resolution of this dispute.  Please go to
>> the page and put your comments in the "Talk" section if you agree that
>> Mr Bollen is worthy of a mention in a page on notable usenet
>> personalities.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_personalities
> 
> There are two problems here.
> First is that there has been an edit war involving the Michael E.
> Schmidt section, where it appears Micheal may have been editing it
> himself.
> Secondly the Doug section is too long.
> 
> I think there is some support for the Doug bit, but having been caught
> up in the MES war it has just been deleted by admins.

The problem could also be that it was written by sad and pathetic people.

Brian.

Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying:

>> There are two problems here.
>> First is that there has been an edit war involving the Michael E.
>> Schmidt section, where it appears Micheal may have been editing it
>> himself.
>> Secondly the Doug section is too long.
>> 
>> I think there is some support for the Doug bit, but having been caught
>> up in the MES war it has just been deleted by admins.

> The problem could also be that it was written by sad and pathetic
> people.
> 
> Brian.

I do believe Glug's jealous, because nobody's suggested he gets a mention.

News for you, mate. You're nowhere _near_ Toomtard's level, let alone 
that of the Maestro.

Adrian wrote:
> Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> gurgled happily, sounding much like
> they were saying:
>
>>> There are two problems here.
>>> First is that there has been an edit war involving the Michael E.
>>> Schmidt section, where it appears Micheal may have been editing it
>>> himself.
>>> Secondly the Doug section is too long.
>>>
>>> I think there is some support for the Doug bit, but having been
>>> caught up in the MES war it has just been deleted by admins.
>
>> The problem could also be that it was written by sad and pathetic
>> people.
>>
>> Brian.
>
> I do believe Glug's jealous, because nobody's suggested he gets a
> mention.
>
> News for you, mate. You're nowhere _near_ Toomtard's level, let alone
> that of the Maestro.

Poor dear.

On Sep 2, 9:25�pm, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
> NotMe wrote:
> > On 2 Sep, 17:25, BrianW  wrote:
> >> Some sod keeps deleting the section on Doug Bollen, and the page has
> >> now been locked pending a resolution of this dispute. �Please go to
> >> the page and put your comments in the "Talk" section if you agree that
> >> Mr Bollen is worthy of a mention in a page on notable usenet
> >> personalities.
>
> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_personalities
>
> > There are two problems here.
> > First is that there has been an edit war involving the Michael E.
> > Schmidt section, where it appears Micheal may have been editing it
> > himself.
> > Secondly the Doug section is too long.
>
> > I think there is some support for the Doug bit, but having been caught
> > up in the MES war it has just been deleted by admins.
>
> The problem could also be that it was written by sad and pathetic people.

<chuckle>

Yeah, Brian, we all *really* look up to you as an example of a success
story.

Brian Robertson wrote:
> NotMe wrote:
>> On 2 Sep, 17:25, BrianW  wrote:
>>> Some sod keeps deleting the section on Doug Bollen, and the page has
>>> now been locked pending a resolution of this dispute.  Please go to
>>> the page and put your comments in the "Talk" section if you agree that
>>> Mr Bollen is worthy of a mention in a page on notable usenet
>>> personalities.
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_personalities
>>
>> There are two problems here.
>> First is that there has been an edit war involving the Michael E.
>> Schmidt section, where it appears Micheal may have been editing it
>> himself.
>> Secondly the Doug section is too long.
>>
>> I think there is some support for the Doug bit, but having been caught
>> up in the MES war it has just been deleted by admins.
> 
> The problem could also be that it was written by sad and pathetic people.
> 
Quite right, Brian. Okay, hands up all you pathetic tossers with drink 
drive convictions, especially those in charge of vehicles carrying the 
farepaying public!

On 2 Sep, 17:25, BrianW  wrote:
> Some sod keeps deleting the section on Doug Bollen, and the page has
> now been locked pending a resolution of this dispute.  Please go to
> the page and put your comments in the "Talk" section if you agree that
> Mr Bollen is worthy of a mention in a page on notable usenet
> personalities.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_personalities

I wouldn't bother.  Wikipedia seems to have become a victom of its own
success.
I've heard of people sending a lot of time putting well researched
pages in only for some admin to delete them without allowing any
arguement.

Its on a slow decline and its only a matter of time before google does
its version and finishes it off.

Fod

On 2 Sep, 17:25, BrianW  wrote:
> Some sod keeps deleting the section on Doug Bollen, and the page has
> now been locked pending a resolution of this dispute.  Please go to
> the page and put your comments in the "Talk" section if you agree that
> Mr Bollen is worthy of a mention in a page on notable usenet
> personalities.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_personalities

You are apparently mistaken that a poster called Gollum is
contributing to this newsgroup, though Bollen sometimes seems to. What
is very strange though is your ongoing obsession with both people. Can
you explain it?

Maybe it is deleted from Wikipedia because it is your usual rubbish.
What does Bollen think?

--
World Carfree Network
http://www.worldcarfree.net/
Help for your car-addicted friends in the U.K.

Doug wrote:
> On 2 Sep, 17:25, BrianW  wrote:
>> Some sod keeps deleting the section on Doug Bollen, and the page has
>> now been locked pending a resolution of this dispute. Please go to
>> the page and put your comments in the "Talk" section if you agree
>> that Mr Bollen is worthy of a mention in a page on notable usenet
>> personalities.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_personalities
>
> You are apparently mistaken that a poster called Gollum is
> contributing to this newsgroup, though Bollen sometimes seems to. What
> is very strange though is your ongoing obsession with both people. Can
> you explain it?
>
> Maybe it is deleted from Wikipedia because it is your usual rubbish.
> What does Bollen think?

Why don't you tell us what you think Mr Bollen?

On 3 Sep, 08:28, Doug  wrote:

> Maybe it is deleted from Wikipedia because it is your usual rubbish.

Au contraire, Mr Bollen, the wikipedia entry in question contains
*your* rubbish, such as "two ozones" and "digging up corpses to
blackmail people is OK".

> What does Bollen think?

Why don't you let us know, Gollum?

On 2 Sep, 22:37, My name isn't Phil Lee  wrote:
> Brian Robertson wrote:
> > NotMe wrote:
> >> On 2 Sep, 17:25, BrianW  wrote:
> >>> Some sod keeps deleting the section on Doug Bollen, and the page has
> >>> now been locked pending a resolution of this dispute.  Please go to
> >>> the page and put your comments in the "Talk" section if you agree that
> >>> Mr Bollen is worthy of a mention in a page on notable usenet
> >>> personalities.
>
> >>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_personalities
>
> >> There are two problems here.
> >> First is that there has been an edit war involving the Michael E.
> >> Schmidt section, where it appears Micheal may have been editing it
> >> himself.
> >> Secondly the Doug section is too long.
>
> >> I think there is some support for the Doug bit, but having been caught
> >> up in the MES war it has just been deleted by admins.
>
> > The problem could also be that it was written by sad and pathetic people.
>
> Quite right, Brian. Okay, hands up all you pathetic tossers with drink
> drive convictions, especially those in charge of vehicles carrying the
> farepaying public!

Ah, but you are forgetting that (apparently) everyone else did it at
the time, so that made it OK.  A man of very high morals, is Mr Begg-
Robertson

In message , Brimstone 
 writes
>Doug wrote:
>> On 2 Sep, 17:25, BrianW  wrote:
>>> Some sod keeps deleting the section on Doug Bollen, and the page has
>>> now been locked pending a resolution of this dispute. Please go to
>>> the page and put your comments in the "Talk" section if you agree
>>> that Mr Bollen is worthy of a mention in a page on notable usenet
>>> personalities.
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_personalities
>>
>> You are apparently mistaken that a poster called Gollum is
>> contributing to this newsgroup, though Bollen sometimes seems to. What
>> is very strange though is your ongoing obsession with both people. Can
>> you explain it?
>>
>> Maybe it is deleted from Wikipedia because it is your usual rubbish.
>> What does Bollen think?
>
>Why don't you tell us what you think Mr Bollen?

Is it an act of generosity that Catford shares its idiot with the global 
village? Or an act of spite?


-- 
Ed Banger

BrianW wrote:
> On 3 Sep, 07:12, Fod  wrote:
>> On 2 Sep, 17:25, BrianW  wrote:
>>
>>> Some sod keeps deleting the section on Doug Bollen, and the page has
>>> now been locked pending a resolution of this dispute. Please go to
>>> the page and put your comments in the "Talk" section if you agree
>>> that Mr Bollen is worthy of a mention in a page on notable usenet
>>> personalities.
>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_personalities
>>
>> I wouldn't bother. Wikipedia seems to have become a victom of its own
>> success.
>> I've heard of people sending a lot of time putting well researched
>> pages in only for some admin to delete them without allowing any
>> arguement.
>>
>> Its on a slow decline and its only a matter of time before google
>> does its version and finishes it off.
>
> I think you are right.  It seems to me that wikipedia has fallen under
> the control of a bunch of officious sods, who treat it as their own
> personal fiefdom.  Isn't that always the problem with any attempt to
> install what is effectively an anarchic system?

But, but, Doug tells us that anarchy is the way forward for the world, 
everyone will be nice to everyone else, treating them with consideration and 
respect and everything in the garden will be lovely.

You're not suggesting there might be another outcome are you?

Oh dear, I'm not sure I could cope with the prospect of Mr Bollen being 
wrong...

Oh, silly me!!! There's no problem is there, because Mr Bollen, Doug to his 
friends, is never wrong is he?

Ed Banger wrote:
> In message , Brimstone
>  writes
>> Doug wrote:
>>> On 2 Sep, 17:25, BrianW  wrote:
>>>> Some sod keeps deleting the section on Doug Bollen, and the page
>>>> has now been locked pending a resolution of this dispute. Please
>>>> go to the page and put your comments in the "Talk" section if you
>>>> agree that Mr Bollen is worthy of a mention in a page on notable
>>>> usenet personalities.
>>>>
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_personalities
>>>
>>> You are apparently mistaken that a poster called Gollum is
>>> contributing to this newsgroup, though Bollen sometimes seems to.
>>> What is very strange though is your ongoing obsession with both
>>> people. Can you explain it?
>>>
>>> Maybe it is deleted from Wikipedia because it is your usual rubbish.
>>> What does Bollen think?
>>
>> Why don't you tell us what you think Mr Bollen?
>
> Is it an act of generosity that Catford shares its idiot with the
> global village? Or an act of spite?

I think that, typicallly for a deprived inner London area, most of Catford 
doesn't give a damn about what goes on outside their own area and where 
everyone else is treated with contempt and derision. A mould that Doug fits 
perfectly.

On Sep 3, 8:28 am, Doug  wrote:
> On 2 Sep, 17:25, BrianW  wrote:
>
> > Some sod keeps deleting the section on Doug Bollen, and the page has
> > now been locked pending a resolution of this dispute.  Please go to
> > the page and put your comments in the "Talk" section if you agree that
> > Mr Bollen is worthy of a mention in a page on notable usenet
> > personalities.
>
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_personalities
>
> You are apparently mistaken that a poster called Gollum is
> contributing to this newsgroup, though Bollen sometimes seems to. What
> is very strange though is your ongoing obsession with both people. Can
> you explain it?
>
> Maybe it is deleted from Wikipedia because it is your usual rubbish.
> What does Bollen think?
>
> --
> World Carfree Networkhttp://www.worldcarfree.net/
> Help for your car-addicted friends in the U.K.

Why do i think the next line ( if he'd kept on going) would have been
"My precious...."

Fod

In message 
, Fod 
 writes
>On 2 Sep, 17:25, BrianW  wrote:
>> Some sod keeps deleting the section on Doug Bollen, and the page has
>> now been locked pending a resolution of this dispute.  Please go to
>> the page and put your comments in the "Talk" section if you agree that
>> Mr Bollen is worthy of a mention in a page on notable usenet
>> personalities.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_personalities
>
>I wouldn't bother.  Wikipedia seems to have become a victom of its own
>success.
>I've heard of people sending a lot of time putting well researched
>pages in only for some admin to delete them without allowing any
>arguement.
>
>Its on a slow decline and its only a matter of time before google does
>its version and finishes it off.

They've been working on their own version for a while called Knol, see 
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/knol-is-open-to-everyone.html


-- 
Ed Banger

In message 
, Fod 
 writes
>On Sep 3, 8:28 am, Doug  wrote:
>> On 2 Sep, 17:25, BrianW  wrote:
>>
>> > Some sod keeps deleting the section on Doug Bollen, and the page has
>> > now been locked pending a resolution of this dispute.  Please go to
>> > the page and put your comments in the "Talk" section if you agree that
>> > Mr Bollen is worthy of a mention in a page on notable usenet
>> > personalities.
>>
>> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_personalities
>>
>> You are apparently mistaken that a poster called Gollum is
>> contributing to this newsgroup, though Bollen sometimes seems to. What
>> is very strange though is your ongoing obsession with both people. Can
>> you explain it?
>>
>> Maybe it is deleted from Wikipedia because it is your usual rubbish.
>> What does Bollen think?
>>
>> --
>> World Carfree Networkhttp://www.worldcarfree.net/
>> Help for your car-addicted friends in the U.K.
>
>Why do i think the next line ( if he'd kept on going) would have been
>"My precious...."

Them cheating Bagginses stole his precious, hates them forever he does. 
I guess they must be the cabal he keeps going on about.


-- 
Ed Banger

BrianW  wrote:

> 
> Ah, but you are forgetting that (apparently) everyone else did it at
> the time, so that made it OK.  A man of very high morals, is Mr Begg-
> Robertson

One may judge his morality independently by looking at the headers of
his post - he stated that he was giving up on Virgin as an ISP several
months ago. A look at the electoral roll also shows his morality. He
claimed he didn't live in a poxy flat in Stockport but he keeps on
registering himself and his wife on the electoral roll at that address.

He's a fuckwit of a different order to Toomy and Duhng but a fuckwit he
most certainly is.

BrianW  wrote:

> It seems to me that wikipedia has fallen under
> the control of a bunch of officious sods, who treat it as their own
> personal fiefdom.

Only in the UK as far as I can see. The Italian Wiki permits the
creation of biographies for individuals.

On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 09:38:56 +0100, Brimstone wrote
(in article ):

> Ed Banger wrote:
>> In message , Brimstone
>>  writes
>>> Doug wrote:
>>>> On 2 Sep, 17:25, BrianW  wrote:
>>>>> Some sod keeps deleting the section on Doug Bollen, and the page
>>>>> has now been locked pending a resolution of this dispute. Please
>>>>> go to the page and put your comments in the "Talk" section if you
>>>>> agree that Mr Bollen is worthy of a mention in a page on notable
>>>>> usenet personalities.
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_personalities
>>>> 
>>>> You are apparently mistaken that a poster called Gollum is
>>>> contributing to this newsgroup, though Bollen sometimes seems to.
>>>> What is very strange though is your ongoing obsession with both
>>>> people. Can you explain it?
>>>> 
>>>> Maybe it is deleted from Wikipedia because it is your usual rubbish.
>>>> What does Bollen think?
>>> 
>>> Why don't you tell us what you think Mr Bollen?
>> 
>> Is it an act of generosity that Catford shares its idiot with the
>> global village? Or an act of spite?
> 
> I think that, typicallly for a deprived inner London area, most of Catford 
> doesn't give a damn about what goes on outside their own area and where 
> everyone else is treated with contempt and derision. A mould that Doug fits 
> perfectly. 
> 
> 

Apart from one notorious sink estate Catford is a reasonable South London 
suburb, not a deprived Inner London area.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

nik.morgan wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 09:38:56 +0100, Brimstone wrote
> (in article ):
>
>> Ed Banger wrote:
>>> In message , Brimstone
>>>  writes
>>>> Doug wrote:
>>>>> On 2 Sep, 17:25, BrianW  wrote:
>>>>>> Some sod keeps deleting the section on Doug Bollen, and the page
>>>>>> has now been locked pending a resolution of this dispute. Please
>>>>>> go to the page and put your comments in the "Talk" section if you
>>>>>> agree that Mr Bollen is worthy of a mention in a page on notable
>>>>>> usenet personalities.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_personalities
>>>>>
>>>>> You are apparently mistaken that a poster called Gollum is
>>>>> contributing to this newsgroup, though Bollen sometimes seems to.
>>>>> What is very strange though is your ongoing obsession with both
>>>>> people. Can you explain it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe it is deleted from Wikipedia because it is your usual
>>>>> rubbish. What does Bollen think?
>>>>
>>>> Why don't you tell us what you think Mr Bollen?
>>>
>>> Is it an act of generosity that Catford shares its idiot with the
>>> global village? Or an act of spite?
>>
>> I think that, typicallly for a deprived inner London area, most of
>> Catford doesn't give a damn about what goes on outside their own
>> area and where everyone else is treated with contempt and derision.
>> A mould that Doug fits perfectly.
>
> Apart from one notorious sink estate Catford is a reasonable South
> London suburb, not a deprived Inner London area.
>
It is in Inner London, falling within the remit of the former London County 
Council which became the area covered by the Inner London Education 
Authority. Whether or not it is deprived depends on what one is measuring. 
It is certainly not deprived of Doug Bollen about whom my previous comment 
was made.

BrianW wrote:
> Some sod keeps deleting the section on Doug Bollen, and the page has
> now been locked pending a resolution of this dispute.  Please go to
> the page and put your comments in the "Talk" section if you agree that
> Mr Bollen is worthy of a mention in a page on notable usenet
> personalities.
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_personalities

Someone called AndonicO has deleted this, I suspect he was also the 
person who put a lock on the page. This sad person deleted Duhg's entry 
before locking the page... Some people.

Its still there in the history for whenever the lock is removed - 
probably not far off when a sensible admin looks in there and kicks 
AndonicO off the system.

-- 
John Wright

"What would happen if you eliminated the autism genes from the gene pool?

You would have a bunch of people standing around in a cave, chatting and
socialising and not getting anything done!" - Professor Temple Grandin

Doug wrote:
> On 2 Sep, 17:25, BrianW  wrote:
>> Some sod keeps deleting the section on Doug Bollen, and the page has
>> now been locked pending a resolution of this dispute.  Please go to
>> the page and put your comments in the "Talk" section if you agree that
>> Mr Bollen is worthy of a mention in a page on notable usenet
>> personalities.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_personalities
> 
> You are apparently mistaken that a poster called Gollum is
> contributing to this newsgroup, though Bollen sometimes seems to. What
> is very strange though is your ongoing obsession with both people. Can
> you explain it?
> 
> Maybe it is deleted from Wikipedia because it is your usual rubbish.
> What does Bollen think?

Most of the stuff there comes from your posts. You do post as 
jagmad@riseup.net do you not?
-- 
John Wright

"What would happen if you eliminated the autism genes from the gene pool?

You would have a bunch of people standing around in a cave, chatting and
socialising and not getting anything done!" - Professor Temple Grandin

Steve Firth wrote:
> BrianW  wrote:
> 
>> Ah, but you are forgetting that (apparently) everyone else did it at
>> the time, so that made it OK.  A man of very high morals, is Mr Begg-
>> Robertson
> 
> One may judge his morality independently by looking at the headers of
> his post - he stated that he was giving up on Virgin as an ISP several
> months ago. A look at the electoral roll also shows his morality. He
> claimed he didn't live in a poxy flat in Stockport but he keeps on
> registering himself and his wife on the electoral roll at that address.
> 
> He's a fuckwit of a different order to Toomy and Duhng but a fuckwit he
> most certainly is.

Really? lol Now that IS funny. Which flat am I still registered at, by 
the way? Most people on here with an ounce of sense have learnt to take 
the information on services like 192.com with a pinch of salt, Stevie 
old boy.

Brian.

oh dear how sad - cyber bullying failing?

Tommy wrote:
> oh dear how sad - cyber bullying failing? 
> 
> 

Got it in one! Have you ever known a bigger collection of losers? And 
they slag us off lol

Brian.

On Sep 4, 12:08 pm, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
> Tommy wrote:
> > oh dear how sad - cyber bullying failing?
>
> Got it in one! Have you ever known a bigger collection of losers?

You, Tommy and Doug.

> And
> they slag us off lol
>

Yes, with good reason.

Fod

On Sep 4, 11:12 am, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
> Steve Firth wrote:
> > BrianW  wrote:
>
> >> Ah, but you are forgetting that (apparently) everyone else did it at
> >> the time, so that made it OK.  A man of very high morals, is Mr Begg> >> Robertson
>
> > One may judge his morality independently by looking at the headers of
> > his post - he stated that he was giving up on Virgin as an ISP several
> > months ago. A look at the electoral roll also shows his morality. He
> > claimed he didn't live in a poxy flat in Stockport but he keeps on
> > registering himself and his wife on the electoral roll at that address.
>
> > He's a fuckwit of a different order to Toomy and Duhng but a fuckwit he
> > most certainly is.
>
> Really? lol Now that IS funny. Which flat am I still registered at, by
> the way? Most people on here with an ounce of sense have learnt to take
> the information on services like 192.com with a pinch of salt, Stevie
> old boy.

Yeah things like 192 are unreliable.  The electoral role probably
isn't as reliable as it should be either.  But IIRC its an offense to
give inaccurate info to it.  I'm sure thats not the kind of think
you'd do however.

Fod

In message <RkPvk.74989$Ff2.31027@newsfe13.ams2>, Brian Robertson 
<me@[nospam].com> writes
>Tommy wrote:
>> oh dear how sad - cyber bullying failing?
>
>Got it in one! Have you ever known a bigger collection of losers?

Says "Glug", the former train driver who has to drive buses, a job which 
he hates, because he was too pathetic to stay sober on duty.

Toomy is the retired buy-to-let landlord who claims a private school 
education but can't even master the art of writing in coherent 
sentences.

Both are disciples of Duhg, the coffin-dodging lifelong failure who is 
the laughing stock of Usenet.


Glug, Duhg and Toomy - the Three Stooges of uk.transport

-- 
Ed Banger

Fod wrote:
> On Sep 4, 11:12 am, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
>> Steve Firth wrote:
>>> BrianW  wrote:
>>>> Ah, but you are forgetting that (apparently) everyone else did it at
>>>> the time, so that made it OK.  A man of very high morals, is Mr Begg-
>>>> Robertson
>>> One may judge his morality independently by looking at the headers of
>>> his post - he stated that he was giving up on Virgin as an ISP several
>>> months ago. A look at the electoral roll also shows his morality. He
>>> claimed he didn't live in a poxy flat in Stockport but he keeps on
>>> registering himself and his wife on the electoral roll at that address.
>>> He's a fuckwit of a different order to Toomy and Duhng but a fuckwit he
>>> most certainly is.
>> Really? lol Now that IS funny. Which flat am I still registered at, by
>> the way? Most people on here with an ounce of sense have learnt to take
>> the information on services like 192.com with a pinch of salt, Stevie
>> old boy.
> 
> Yeah things like 192 are unreliable.  The electoral role probably
> isn't as reliable as it should be either.  But IIRC its an offense to
> give inaccurate info to it.  I'm sure thats not the kind of think
> you'd do however.
> 
> Fod

Oh dear! At least, as a rule, Steve can spell.

Brian.

Ed Banger  gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying:

> Toomy is the retired buy-to-let landlord 

...and radio playwright...

> who claims a private school education 

That I can believe, actually.

> but can't even master the art of writing in coherent sentences.

On 4 Sep, 12:00, "Tommy"  wrote:
> oh dear how sad - cyber bullying failing?

Hey, Toomtard, I was unable to find the news feed that you say "TFL
tries to keep congestion charge increases total CO2 in London" came
from.  Would you be so kind as to provide a link?

On 4 Sep, 12:08, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
> Tommy wrote:
> > oh dear how sad - cyber bullying failing?
>
> Got it in one! Have you ever known a bigger collection of losers?

<snigger>

Yet another example of the three retards on the group projecting their
failings onto others.  Doug "two ozones" Bollen often calls people
"scientifically illiterate".  Tommy "TFL tried to keep congestion
charge increases total CO2 in London" Fuckwitt accuses others of
having poor English.  And now Brian "lost his train driving job due to
being a pisshead and now drives a bus, a job he hates" Begg-Robertson
is calling people "losers".

You couldn't make it up.  Oh, hang on, Doug, Tommy and Glug just
did ...

In message , Adrian 
 writes
>Ed Banger  gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
>saying:
>
>> Toomy is the retired buy-to-let landlord
>
>...and radio playwright...
>
>> who claims a private school education
>
>That I can believe, actually.

I'm indifferent to it either way, I'm neither a snob nor an inverted 
snob. I am sure that any school would be ashamed to admit having Toomy 
among its alumni.

-- 
Ed Banger

BrianW wrote:
> On 4 Sep, 12:08, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
>> Tommy wrote:
>>> oh dear how sad - cyber bullying failing?
>> Got it in one! Have you ever known a bigger collection of losers?
> 
> <snigger>
> 
> Yet another example of the three retards on the group projecting their
> failings onto others.  Doug "two ozones" Bollen often calls people
> "scientifically illiterate".  Tommy "TFL tried to keep congestion
> charge increases total CO2 in London" Fuckwitt accuses others of
> having poor English.  And now Brian "lost his train driving job due to
> being a pisshead and now drives a bus, a job he hates" Begg-Robertson
> is calling people "losers".
> 
> You couldn't make it up.  Oh, hang on, Doug, Tommy and Glug just
> did ...

Quite right. Everyone else who might hold a differing opinion from you 
and your petrol headed friends has been scared away. No other decent 
people would show themselves up by talking to unpleasant individuals 
like you.

Brian.

On Sep 4, 12:40 pm, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
> Fod wrote:
> > On Sep 4, 11:12 am, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
> >> Steve Firth wrote:
> >>> BrianW  wrote:
> >>>> Ah, but you are forgetting that (apparently) everyone else did it at
> >>>> the time, so that made it OK.  A man of very high morals, is Mr Begg-
> >>>> Robertson
> >>> One may judge his morality independently by looking at the headers of
> >>> his post - he stated that he was giving up on Virgin as an ISP several
> >>> months ago. A look at the electoral roll also shows his morality. He
> >>> claimed he didn't live in a poxy flat in Stockport but he keeps on
> >>> registering himself and his wife on the electoral roll at that address.
> >>> He's a fuckwit of a different order to Toomy and Duhng but a fuckwit he
> >>> most certainly is.
> >> Really? lol Now that IS funny. Which flat am I still registered at, by
> >> the way? Most people on here with an ounce of sense have learnt to take
> >> the information on services like 192.com with a pinch of salt, Stevie
> >> old boy.
>
> > Yeah things like 192 are unreliable.  The electoral role probably
> > isn't as reliable as it should be either.  But IIRC its an offense to
> > give inaccurate info to it.  I'm sure thats not the kind of think
> > you'd do however.
>
> > Fod
>
> Oh dear! At least, as a rule, Steve can spell.
>

Brian, last time someone did the spelling fascist role it was against
you and your moaned like a little baby about someone pulling you up on
a spelling mistake.

As a rule I can spell, I just can't always keep up with my typing...

Like I said, I've no doubts someone of such fine moral character as
yourself wouldn't be trying to give false information on the electoral
role.

Fod

Fod wrote:
> On Sep 4, 12:40 pm, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
>> Fod wrote:
>>> On Sep 4, 11:12 am, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
>>>> Steve Firth wrote:
>>>>> BrianW  wrote:
>>>>>> Ah, but you are forgetting that (apparently) everyone else did it at
>>>>>> the time, so that made it OK.  A man of very high morals, is Mr Begg-
>>>>>> Robertson
>>>>> One may judge his morality independently by looking at the headers of
>>>>> his post - he stated that he was giving up on Virgin as an ISP several
>>>>> months ago. A look at the electoral roll also shows his morality. He
>>>>> claimed he didn't live in a poxy flat in Stockport but he keeps on
>>>>> registering himself and his wife on the electoral roll at that address.
>>>>> He's a fuckwit of a different order to Toomy and Duhng but a fuckwit he
>>>>> most certainly is.
>>>> Really? lol Now that IS funny. Which flat am I still registered at, by
>>>> the way? Most people on here with an ounce of sense have learnt to take
>>>> the information on services like 192.com with a pinch of salt, Stevie
>>>> old boy.
>>> Yeah things like 192 are unreliable.  The electoral role probably
>>> isn't as reliable as it should be either.  But IIRC its an offense to
>>> give inaccurate info to it.  I'm sure thats not the kind of think
>>> you'd do however.
>>> Fod
>> Oh dear! At least, as a rule, Steve can spell.
>>
> 
> Brian, last time someone did the spelling fascist role it was against
> you and your moaned like a little baby about someone pulling you up on
> a spelling mistake.
> 
> As a rule I can spell, I just can't always keep up with my typing...
> 
> Like I said, I've no doubts someone of such fine moral character as
> yourself wouldn't be trying to give false information on the electoral
> role.
> 
> Fod

If I am caught out making a typo then so be it. The only person moaning 
like a baby is you.

Now why don't you stop taking up my valuable time and report me to the 
police for the offence of falsifying my entry on the electoral register. 
Go on, you know you want to ;-)

Brian.

On 4 Sep, 13:53, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
> BrianW wrote:
> > On 4 Sep, 12:08, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
> >> Tommy wrote:
> >>> oh dear how sad - cyber bullying failing?
> >> Got it in one! Have you ever known a bigger collection of losers?
>
> > <snigger>
>
> > Yet another example of the three retards on the group projecting their
> > failings onto others.  Doug "two ozones" Bollen often calls people
> > "scientifically illiterate".  Tommy "TFL tried to keep congestion
> > charge increases total CO2 in London" Fuckwitt accuses others of
> > having poor English.  And now Brian "lost his train driving job due to
> > being a pisshead and now drives a bus, a job he hates" Begg-Robertson
> > is calling people "losers".
>
> > You couldn't make it up.  Oh, hang on, Doug, Tommy and Glug just
> > did ...
>
> Quite right. Everyone else who might hold a differing opinion from you
> and your petrol headed friends has been scared away.

99% of the attacks are on Doug, Toomy and you.
Why do people attack Doug?  Because he's a lying, hypocritical
terrorist-supporting old loon.  You have said as much yourself.  Why
do people attack Tommy?  Because he is a trolling, illiterate loon.
Why do people attack you?  I couldn't possibly comment, but you may
like to ask yourself the question.

> No other decent
> people would show themselves up by talking to unpleasant individuals
> like you.

More projection, Brian?  Coming from someone who has publicly wished
cancer on other posters to this group, and who recently posted " ... I
admit that an agonising death (Some kind of cancer perhaps) would be
preferable ...", that seems quite an incredible claim.  In fact, I'd
go so far as to say it might be a tad, um, hypocritical of you to
describe other people as "unpleasant individuals".  But hey, I
couldn't care less what you think.

In message 
, 
BrianW  writes
>On 4 Sep, 13:53, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
>> No other decent
>> people would show themselves up by talking to unpleasant individuals
>> like you.
>
>More projection, Brian?  Coming from someone who has publicly wished
>cancer on other posters to this group, and who recently posted " ... I
>admit that an agonising death (Some kind of cancer perhaps) would be
>preferable ...", that seems quite an incredible claim.  In fact, I'd
>go so far as to say it might be a tad, um, hypocritical of you to
>describe other people as "unpleasant individuals".  But hey, I
>couldn't care less what you think.

Best exchange involving Glug has to be this one: 
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.transport/msg/5903abbde7523ba5

LMAO


-- 
Ed Banger

On 4 Sep, 14:34, Ed Banger  wrote:
> In message
> ,
> BrianW  writes
>
> >On 4 Sep, 13:53, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
> >> No other decent
> >> people would show themselves up by talking to unpleasant individuals
> >> like you.
>
> >More projection, Brian?  Coming from someone who has publicly wished
> >cancer on other posters to this group, and who recently posted " ... I
> >admit that an agonising death (Some kind of cancer perhaps) would be
> >preferable ...", that seems quite an incredible claim.  In fact, I'd
> >go so far as to say it might be a tad, um, hypocritical of you to
> >describe other people as "unpleasant individuals".  But hey, I
> >couldn't care less what you think.
>
> Best exchange involving Glug has to be this one:http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.transport/msg/5903abbde7523ba5
>
> LMAO

A good one.  My favourite (and I can't be bothered to find it) was
when Glug criticised people on the group for speeding, and claimed
that he had never been prosecuted for a driving offence relating to
his standard of driving.  On further questioning, he admitted that he
had however been done for drink driving and for driving a car in an
unfit mechanical condition.  35 in a 30 mph area - bad.  Driving
whilst pissed in a car with bald tyres - OK.  Only in GlugWorld ...

BrianW wrote:
> On 4 Sep, 14:34, Ed Banger  wrote:
>> In message
>> ,
>> BrianW  writes
>>
>>> On 4 Sep, 13:53, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
>>>> No other decent
>>>> people would show themselves up by talking to unpleasant individuals
>>>> like you.
>>> More projection, Brian?  Coming from someone who has publicly wished
>>> cancer on other posters to this group, and who recently posted " ... I
>>> admit that an agonising death (Some kind of cancer perhaps) would be
>>> preferable ...", that seems quite an incredible claim.  In fact, I'd
>>> go so far as to say it might be a tad, um, hypocritical of you to
>>> describe other people as "unpleasant individuals".  But hey, I
>>> couldn't care less what you think.
>> Best exchange involving Glug has to be this one:http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.transport/msg/5903abbde7523ba5
>>
>> LMAO
> 
> A good one.  My favourite (and I can't be bothered to find it) was
> when Glug criticised people on the group for speeding, and claimed
> that he had never been prosecuted for a driving offence relating to
> his standard of driving.  On further questioning, he admitted that he
> had however been done for drink driving and for driving a car in an
> unfit mechanical condition.  35 in a 30 mph area - bad.  Driving
> whilst pissed in a car with bald tyres - OK.  Only in GlugWorld ...

I don't admit to ANYTHING. I state things. You make what you want from 
it and come round and complain to my face. But I reckon your balloon 
knot would be twitching a little much for you to do that.

;-)

Brian.

On 4 Sep, 19:29, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
> BrianW wrote:
> > On 4 Sep, 14:34, Ed Banger  wrote:
> >> In message
> >> ,
> >> BrianW  writes
>
> >>> On 4 Sep, 13:53, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
> >>>> No other decent
> >>>> people would show themselves up by talking to unpleasant individuals
> >>>> like you.
> >>> More projection, Brian?  Coming from someone who has publicly wished
> >>> cancer on other posters to this group, and who recently posted " ... I
> >>> admit that an agonising death (Some kind of cancer perhaps) would be
> >>> preferable ...", that seems quite an incredible claim.  In fact, I'd
> >>> go so far as to say it might be a tad, um, hypocritical of you to
> >>> describe other people as "unpleasant individuals".  But hey, I
> >>> couldn't care less what you think.
> >> Best exchange involving Glug has to be this one:http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.transport/msg/5903abbde7523ba5
>
> >> LMAO
>
> > A good one.  My favourite (and I can't be bothered to find it) was
> > when Glug criticised people on the group for speeding, and claimed
> > that he had never been prosecuted for a driving offence relating to
> > his standard of driving.  On further questioning, he admitted that he
> > had however been done for drink driving and for driving a car in an
> > unfit mechanical condition.  35 in a 30 mph area - bad.  Driving
> > whilst pissed in a car with bald tyres - OK.  Only in GlugWorld ...
>
> I don't admit to ANYTHING. I state things. You make what you want from
> it and come round and complain to my face. But I reckon your balloon
> knot would be twitching a little much for you to do that.

Yeah, Glug, I'd be *really* terrified of meeting you.  Mke Tyson would
have nothing on a forty something pisshead.

Brian Robertson wrote:
> Fod wrote:
>> On Sep 4, 12:40 pm, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
>>> Fod wrote:
>>>> On Sep 4, 11:12 am, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
>>>>> Steve Firth wrote:
>>>>>> BrianW  wrote:
>>>>>>> Ah, but you are forgetting that (apparently) everyone else did it at
>>>>>>> the time, so that made it OK.  A man of very high morals, is Mr 
>>>>>>> Begg-
>>>>>>> Robertson
>>>>>> One may judge his morality independently by looking at the headers of
>>>>>> his post - he stated that he was giving up on Virgin as an ISP 
>>>>>> several
>>>>>> months ago. A look at the electoral roll also shows his morality. He
>>>>>> claimed he didn't live in a poxy flat in Stockport but he keeps on
>>>>>> registering himself and his wife on the electoral roll at that 
>>>>>> address.
>>>>>> He's a fuckwit of a different order to Toomy and Duhng but a 
>>>>>> fuckwit he
>>>>>> most certainly is.
>>>>> Really? lol Now that IS funny. Which flat am I still registered at, by
>>>>> the way? Most people on here with an ounce of sense have learnt to 
>>>>> take
>>>>> the information on services like 192.com with a pinch of salt, Stevie
>>>>> old boy.
>>>> Yeah things like 192 are unreliable.  The electoral role probably
>>>> isn't as reliable as it should be either.  But IIRC its an offense to
>>>> give inaccurate info to it.  I'm sure thats not the kind of think
>>>> you'd do however.
>>>> Fod
>>> Oh dear! At least, as a rule, Steve can spell.
>>>
>>
>> Brian, last time someone did the spelling fascist role it was against
>> you and your moaned like a little baby about someone pulling you up on
>> a spelling mistake.
>>
>> As a rule I can spell, I just can't always keep up with my typing...
>>
>> Like I said, I've no doubts someone of such fine moral character as
>> yourself wouldn't be trying to give false information on the electoral
>> role.
>>
>> Fod
> 
> If I am caught out making a typo then so be it. The only person moaning 
> like a baby is you.
> 
> Now why don't you stop taking up my valuable time and report me to the 
> police for the offence of falsifying my entry on the electoral register. 
> Go on, you know you want to ;-)
> 
I'd prefer reporting you for being an irritating tosser. Much easier for 
the conviction rate

Brian Robertson wrote:
> Tommy wrote:
>> oh dear how sad - cyber bullying failing?
>>
> 
> Got it in one! Have you ever known a bigger collection of losers? And 
> they slag us off lol
> 
"Us"? Shit, Robertson, I knew you were desperate for friends, but *Toomy*???

On Sep 4, 2:10 pm, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
> Fod wrote:
> > On Sep 4, 12:40 pm, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
> >> Fod wrote:
> >>> On Sep 4, 11:12 am, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
> >>>> Steve Firth wrote:
> >>>>> BrianW  wrote:
> >>>>>> Ah, but you are forgetting that (apparently) everyone else did it at
> >>>>>> the time, so that made it OK.  A man of very high morals, is Mr Begg-
> >>>>>> Robertson
> >>>>> One may judge his morality independently by looking at the headers of
> >>>>> his post - he stated that he was giving up on Virgin as an ISP several
> >>>>> months ago. A look at the electoral roll also shows his morality. He
> >>>>> claimed he didn't live in a poxy flat in Stockport but he keeps on
> >>>>> registering himself and his wife on the electoral roll at that address.
> >>>>> He's a fuckwit of a different order to Toomy and Duhng but a fuckwit he
> >>>>> most certainly is.
> >>>> Really? lol Now that IS funny. Which flat am I still registered at, by
> >>>> the way? Most people on here with an ounce of sense have learnt to take
> >>>> the information on services like 192.com with a pinch of salt, Stevie
> >>>> old boy.
> >>> Yeah things like 192 are unreliable.  The electoral role probably
> >>> isn't as reliable as it should be either.  But IIRC its an offense to
> >>> give inaccurate info to it.  I'm sure thats not the kind of think
> >>> you'd do however.
> >>> Fod
> >> Oh dear! At least, as a rule, Steve can spell.
>
> > Brian, last time someone did the spelling fascist role it was against
> > you and your moaned like a little baby about someone pulling you up on
> > a spelling mistake.
>
> > As a rule I can spell, I just can't always keep up with my typing...
>
> > Like I said, I've no doubts someone of such fine moral character as
> > yourself wouldn't be trying to give false information on the electoral
> > role.
>
> > Fod
>
> If I am caught out making a typo then so be it. The only person moaning
> like a baby is you.

Oh the irony...

I did think about posting the many many posts where you've done so...
But what would it prove?  Everyone here has an accurate opinion of
you.

> Now why don't you stop taking up my valuable time and report me to the
> police for the offence of falsifying my entry on the electoral register.
> Go on, you know you want to ;-)

Did I say you had?  No.  I'm surprised you're not calling me out
behind the bike sheds like you did earlier with Brian.

Fod

On Sep 4, 7:29 pm, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
> BrianW wrote:
> > On 4 Sep, 14:34, Ed Banger  wrote:
> >> In message
> >> ,
> >> BrianW  writes
>
> >>> On 4 Sep, 13:53, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
> >>>> No other decent
> >>>> people would show themselves up by talking to unpleasant individuals
> >>>> like you.
> >>> More projection, Brian?  Coming from someone who has publicly wished
> >>> cancer on other posters to this group, and who recently posted " ... I
> >>> admit that an agonising death (Some kind of cancer perhaps) would be
> >>> preferable ...", that seems quite an incredible claim.  In fact, I'd
> >>> go so far as to say it might be a tad, um, hypocritical of you to
> >>> describe other people as "unpleasant individuals".  But hey, I
> >>> couldn't care less what you think.
> >> Best exchange involving Glug has to be this one:http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.transport/msg/5903abbde7523ba5
>
> >> LMAO
>
> > A good one.  My favourite (and I can't be bothered to find it) was
> > when Glug criticised people on the group for speeding, and claimed
> > that he had never been prosecuted for a driving offence relating to
> > his standard of driving.  On further questioning, he admitted that he
> > had however been done for drink driving and for driving a car in an
> > unfit mechanical condition.  35 in a 30 mph area - bad.  Driving
> > whilst pissed in a car with bald tyres - OK.  Only in GlugWorld ...
>
> I don't admit to ANYTHING. I state things.

I recall you being in a state and admitting to lots of things.  Such
as being drunk while in charge of a train.

Its funny how we see things differently.

Fod

On 5 Sep, 10:01, Fod  wrote:
> On Sep 4, 2:10 pm, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Fod wrote:
> > > On Sep 4, 12:40 pm, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
> > >> Fod wrote:
> > >>> On Sep 4, 11:12 am, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
> > >>>> Steve Firth wrote:
> > >>>>> BrianW  wrote:
> > >>>>>> Ah, but you are forgetting that (apparently) everyone else did it at
> > >>>>>> the time, so that made it OK.  A man of very high morals, is Mr Begg-
> > >>>>>> Robertson
> > >>>>> One may judge his morality independently by looking at the headers of
> > >>>>> his post - he stated that he was giving up on Virgin as an ISP several
> > >>>>> months ago. A look at the electoral roll also shows his morality. He
> > >>>>> claimed he didn't live in a poxy flat in Stockport but he keeps on
> > >>>>> registering himself and his wife on the electoral roll at that address.
> > >>>>> He's a fuckwit of a different order to Toomy and Duhng but a fuckwit he
> > >>>>> most certainly is.
> > >>>> Really? lol Now that IS funny. Which flat am I still registered at, by
> > >>>> the way? Most people on here with an ounce of sense have learnt to take
> > >>>> the information on services like 192.com with a pinch of salt, Stevie
> > >>>> old boy.
> > >>> Yeah things like 192 are unreliable.  The electoral role probably
> > >>> isn't as reliable as it should be either.  But IIRC its an offense to
> > >>> give inaccurate info to it.  I'm sure thats not the kind of think
> > >>> you'd do however.
> > >>> Fod
> > >> Oh dear! At least, as a rule, Steve can spell.
>
> > > Brian, last time someone did the spelling fascist role it was against
> > > you and your moaned like a little baby about someone pulling you up on
> > > a spelling mistake.
>
> > > As a rule I can spell, I just can't always keep up with my typing...
>
> > > Like I said, I've no doubts someone of such fine moral character as
> > > yourself wouldn't be trying to give false information on the electoral
> > > role.
>
> > > Fod
>
> > If I am caught out making a typo then so be it. The only person moaning
> > like a baby is you.
>
> Oh the irony...
>
> I did think about posting the many many posts where you've done so...
> But what would it prove?  Everyone here has an accurate opinion of
> you.
>
> > Now why don't you stop taking up my valuable time and report me to the
> > police for the offence of falsifying my entry on the electoral register> > Go on, you know you want to ;-)
>
> Did I say you had?  No.  I'm surprised you're not calling me out
> behind the bike sheds like you did earlier with Brian.

Pathetic, isn't he?  Mind you, remember the last time he did that,
with Steve Firth?  ISTR Glug came the worse out of that encounter,
much to everyone elses' amusement.

"BrianW"  wrote in message 
news:2f49fcea-608e-4d8c-a840-4b21ef4e6a41@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
> On 4 Sep, 12:00, "Tommy"  wrote:
>> oh dear how sad - cyber bullying failing?
>
> Hey, Toomtard, I was unable to find the news feed that you say "TfL
> tries to keep congestion charge increases total CO2 in London" came
> from.  Would you be so kind as to provide a link?

Once bitten old darling,

I did once and then you come out with cannot believe anything you read on 
the electric interweb (that does
 not support your extremely bigoted POV)

(I know that makes me ilitarate rather than ironic :)

"BrianW"  wrote in message 
news:95087f0e-4680-4a1e-b411-.

Yeah, Glug, I'd be *really* terrified of meeting you.  Mke Tyson would
have nothing on a forty something pisshead.

and your reply is to deny what an unpleasent little turd you are?

Bri just doesn't get it does he :(

On 5 Sep, 15:53, "Tommy"  wrote:
> "BrianW"  wrote in message
>
> news:2f49fcea-608e-4d8c-a840-4b21ef4e6a41@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On 4 Sep, 12:00, "Tommy"  wrote:
> >> oh dear how sad - cyber bullying failing?
>
> > Hey, Toomtard, I was unable to find the news feed that you say "TfL
> > tries to keep congestion charge increases total CO2 in London" came
> > from.  Would you be so kind as to provide a link?
>
> Once bitten old darling,
>
> I did once and then you come out with cannot believe anything you read on
> the electric interweb (that does
>  not support your extremely bigoted POV)
>
> (I know that makes me ilitarate rather than ironic :)

Um, it would have been quicker for you to say "Sorry I can't provide
such a link because I was lying".

What is it with you, Dung and Glug - are you all habitual liars as
well as fuckwitts?

Fod  wrote:

> Its funny how we see things differently.

Possibly because your view is not interrupted by beer goggles.

On Sep 5, 3:56�pm, "Tommy"  wrote:
> "BrianW"  wrote in message
>
> news:95087f0e-4680-4a1e-b411-.
>
> Yeah, Glug, I'd be *really* terrified of meeting you. �Mke Tyson would
> have nothing on a forty something pisshead.
>
> and your reply is to deny what an unpleasent little turd you are?
>
> Bri just doesn't get it does he :(

Mmmm.  There is one thing I don't get, and I wonder whether you can
help me out.  Are you really as clueless a cunt as your posts make you
appear, or are you just pretending to be a clueless cunt?  Given that
only someone clueless would pretend to be clueless, and you are
undeniably a cunt, it probably doesn't make any real difference, but
it would be interesting to know.

Fod wrote:
> On Sep 4, 7:29 pm, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
>> BrianW wrote:
>>> On 4 Sep, 14:34, Ed Banger  wrote:
>>>> In message
>>>> ,
>>>> BrianW  writes
>>>>> On 4 Sep, 13:53, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
>>>>>> No other decent
>>>>>> people would show themselves up by talking to unpleasant individuals
>>>>>> like you.
>>>>> More projection, Brian?  Coming from someone who has publicly wished
>>>>> cancer on other posters to this group, and who recently posted " ... I
>>>>> admit that an agonising death (Some kind of cancer perhaps) would be
>>>>> preferable ...", that seems quite an incredible claim.  In fact, I'd
>>>>> go so far as to say it might be a tad, um, hypocritical of you to
>>>>> describe other people as "unpleasant individuals".  But hey, I
>>>>> couldn't care less what you think.
>>>> Best exchange involving Glug has to be this one:http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.transport/msg/5903abbde7523ba5
>>>> LMAO
>>> A good one.  My favourite (and I can't be bothered to find it) was
>>> when Glug criticised people on the group for speeding, and claimed
>>> that he had never been prosecuted for a driving offence relating to
>>> his standard of driving.  On further questioning, he admitted that he
>>> had however been done for drink driving and for driving a car in an
>>> unfit mechanical condition.  35 in a 30 mph area - bad.  Driving
>>> whilst pissed in a car with bald tyres - OK.  Only in GlugWorld ...
>> I don't admit to ANYTHING. I state things.
> 
> I recall you being in a state and admitting to lots of things.  Such
> as being drunk while in charge of a train.
> 
> Its funny how we see things differently.
> 
> Fod

Thousands of times, mate. The night before I was done, I was doing 60 
through Rochdale station (40 m.p.h. speed restriction) and throwing 
empty cans out of the cab window. Happy days.

Brian.

Steve Firth wrote:
> Fod  wrote:
> 
>> Its funny how we see things differently.
> 
> Possibly because your view is not interrupted by beer goggles.

What about your view of my address, Steve? When are you going to have 
the bottle to publish my place of residence? Afraid you might make a 
fool of yourself because you are too thick to do even basic research on 
the net?

Brian.

Tommy wrote:
> "BrianW"  wrote in message 
> news:2f49fcea-608e-4d8c-a840-4b21ef4e6a41@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
>> On 4 Sep, 12:00, "Tommy"  wrote:
>>> oh dear how sad - cyber bullying failing?
>> Hey, Toomtard, I was unable to find the news feed that you say "TfL
>> tries to keep congestion charge increases total CO2 in London" came
>> from.  Would you be so kind as to provide a link?
> 
> Once bitten old darling,
> 
> I did once and then you come out with cannot believe anything you read on 
> the electric interweb (that does
>  not support your extremely bigoted POV)
> 
> (I know that makes me ilitarate rather than ironic :) 
> 
> 

They only believe the links that suit their "let's shut down the 
railways and destroy the world with our cars" point of view. Take that 
crap about the ice caps not melting on the basis of some spurious 
satellite images. That's like saying the sun isn't going to rise today 
simply because you have a picture taken at night.

Brian.

Brian Robertson wrote:
> Tommy wrote:
>> "BrianW"  wrote in message 
>> news:2f49fcea-608e-4d8c-a840-4b21ef4e6a41@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
>>> On 4 Sep, 12:00, "Tommy"  wrote:
>>>> oh dear how sad - cyber bullying failing?
>>> Hey, Toomtard, I was unable to find the news feed that you say "TfL
>>> tries to keep congestion charge increases total CO2 in London" came
>>> from.  Would you be so kind as to provide a link?
>>
>> Once bitten old darling,
>>
>> I did once and then you come out with cannot believe anything you read 
>> on the electric interweb (that does
>>  not support your extremely bigoted POV)
>>
>> (I know that makes me ilitarate rather than ironic :)
>>
> 
> They only believe the links that suit their "let's shut down the 
> railways and destroy the world with our cars" point of view. Take that 
> crap about the ice caps not melting on the basis of some spurious 
> satellite images. That's like saying the sun isn't going to rise today 
> simply because you have a picture taken at night.
> 
> Brian.

You are bitter today, get out of the wrong side of the bed?

-- 
Tony the Dragon

Tony Dragon wrote:
> Brian Robertson wrote:
>> Tommy wrote:
>>> "BrianW"  wrote in message
>>> news:2f49fcea-608e-4d8c-a840-4b21ef4e6a41@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
>>>> On 4 Sep, 12:00, "Tommy"  wrote:
>>>>> oh dear how sad - cyber bullying failing?
>>>> Hey, Toomtard, I was unable to find the news feed that you say "TfL
>>>> tries to keep congestion charge increases total CO2 in London" came
>>>> from.  Would you be so kind as to provide a link?
>>>
>>> Once bitten old darling,
>>>
>>> I did once and then you come out with cannot believe anything you
>>> read on the electric interweb (that does
>>>  not support your extremely bigoted POV)
>>>
>>> (I know that makes me ilitarate rather than ironic :)
>>>
>>
>> They only believe the links that suit their "let's shut down the
>> railways and destroy the world with our cars" point of view. Take
>> that crap about the ice caps not melting on the basis of some
>> spurious satellite images. That's like saying the sun isn't going to
>> rise today simply because you have a picture taken at night.
>>
>> Brian.
>
> You are bitter today, get out of the wrong side of the bed?

More likely that he didn't get that far before lapsing into unconsciousness.

In message , Brimstone 
 writes
>Tony Dragon wrote:
>> Brian Robertson wrote:
>>> Tommy wrote:
>>>> "BrianW"  wrote in message
>>>> news:2f49fcea-608e-4d8c-a840-4b21ef4e6a41@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
>>>>> On 4 Sep, 12:00, "Tommy"  wrote:
>>>>>> oh dear how sad - cyber bullying failing?
>>>>> Hey, Toomtard, I was unable to find the news feed that you say "TfL
>>>>> tries to keep congestion charge increases total CO2 in London" came
>>>>> from.  Would you be so kind as to provide a link?
>>>>
>>>> Once bitten old darling,
>>>>
>>>> I did once and then you come out with cannot believe anything you
>>>> read on the electric interweb (that does
>>>>  not support your extremely bigoted POV)
>>>>
>>>> (I know that makes me ilitarate rather than ironic :)
>>>>
>>>
>>> They only believe the links that suit their "let's shut down the
>>> railways and destroy the world with our cars" point of view. Take
>>> that crap about the ice caps not melting on the basis of some
>>> spurious satellite images. That's like saying the sun isn't going to
>>> rise today simply because you have a picture taken at night.
>>>
>>> Brian.
>>
>> You are bitter today, get out of the wrong side of the bed?
>
>More likely that he didn't get that far before lapsing into unconsciousness.
>
>
"They only believe the links that suit their ... point of view."

and then in the very next sentence:

"...spurious satellite images".


Yet another own goal for Glug. *snigger*

Do you think if we hand out pots and pans to ukt's Three Stooges, 
they'll start clobbering each other like their namesakes?


-- 
Ed Banger

Ed Banger wrote:

> Do you think if we hand out pots and pans to ukt's Three Stooges,
> they'll start clobbering each other like their namesakes?

I'd prefer shotguns - last one standing is a sissy.

Tony Dragon  wrote:

> You are bitter today, get out of the wrong side of the bed?

Heck it's difficult to imagine why someone with Glug's record would wake
up in a foul mood and posting like a bear with a sore head.

On 6 Sep, 14:16, %ste...@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote:
> Tony Dragon  wrote:
> > You are bitter today, get out of the wrong side of the bed?
>
> Heck it's difficult to imagine why someone with Glug's record would wake
> up in a foul mood and posting like a bear with a sore head.

What creases me is that, for all his boasting and posturing, the only
person he harmed by his boozing is ... him.  Had he been able to keep
off the bottle and keep his train driving job, he would now be in a
highly-paid, well-respected job that he enjoys.  Instead, he is in a
badly-paid job that he hates and is regarded with contempt by most
people.  I draw two conclusions - first, it is easy to see why he is
so bitter, and second, it is nice to see that there is some justice in
the world.

BrianW  wrote:

> it is nice to see that there is some justice in
> the world.

That is the most refreshing thing about the whole sorry tale. I could
almost become convinced of the existence of $DEITY by the fact that the
punishment seems to be so fitting.

On 6 Sep, 20:52, %ste...@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote:
> BrianW  wrote:
> > it is nice to see that there is some justice in
> > the world.
>
> That is the most refreshing thing about the whole sorry tale. I could
> almost become convinced of the existence of $DEITY by the fact that the
> punishment seems to be so fitting.

Allah is great, but not (in this case) merciful.  Hahahahaha.

On 6 Sep, 05:30, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
> Fod wrote:
> > On Sep 4, 7:29 pm, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
> >> BrianW wrote:
> >>> On 4 Sep, 14:34, Ed Banger  wrote:
> >>>> In message
> >>>> ,
> >>>> BrianW  writes
> >>>>> On 4 Sep, 13:53, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
> >>>>>> No other decent
> >>>>>> people would show themselves up by talking to unpleasant individuals
> >>>>>> like you.
> >>>>> More projection, Brian?  Coming from someone who has publicly wished
> >>>>> cancer on other posters to this group, and who recently posted " ... I
> >>>>> admit that an agonising death (Some kind of cancer perhaps) would be
> >>>>> preferable ...", that seems quite an incredible claim.  In fact, I'd
> >>>>> go so far as to say it might be a tad, um, hypocritical of you to
> >>>>> describe other people as "unpleasant individuals".  But hey, I
> >>>>> couldn't care less what you think.
> >>>> Best exchange involving Glug has to be this one:http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.transport/msg/5903abbde7523ba5
> >>>> LMAO
> >>> A good one.  My favourite (and I can't be bothered to find it) was
> >>> when Glug criticised people on the group for speeding, and claimed
> >>> that he had never been prosecuted for a driving offence relating to
> >>> his standard of driving.  On further questioning, he admitted that he
> >>> had however been done for drink driving and for driving a car in an
> >>> unfit mechanical condition.  35 in a 30 mph area - bad.  Driving
> >>> whilst pissed in a car with bald tyres - OK.  Only in GlugWorld ...
> >> I don't admit to ANYTHING. I state things.
>
> > I recall you being in a state and admitting to lots of things.  Such
> > as being drunk while in charge of a train.
>
> > Its funny how we see things differently.
>
> > Fod
>
> Thousands of times, mate. The night before I was done, I was doing 60
> through Rochdale station (40 m.p.h. speed restriction) and throwing
> empty cans out of the cab window. Happy days.
>

Yet to me that says dangerous drunk in charge of people lives.
To you its the good old days before you were forced to stop drinking
on the job.

Never the twain...

Fod

On 6 Sep, 05:31, Brian Robertson <me@[nospam].com> wrote:
> Afraid you might make a
> fool of yourself because you are too thick to do even basic research on
> the net?
>

I hate it when I snort coffee through my nose this early in the
morning.  Still I've not laughed like that for a long time.

Fod

On 6 Sep, 10:39, Ed Banger  wrote:
> In message , Brimstone
>  writes
>
>
>
> >Tony Dragon wrote:
> >> Brian Robertson wrote:
> >>> Tommy wrote:
> >>>> "BrianW"  wrote in message
> >>>>news:2f49fcea-608e-4d8c-a840-4b21ef4e6a41@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>> On 4 Sep, 12:00, "Tommy"  wrote:
> >>>>>> oh dear how sad - cyber bullying failing?
> >>>>> Hey, Toomtard, I was unable to find the news feed that you say "TfL
> >>>>> tries to keep congestion charge increases total CO2 in London" came
> >>>>> from. �Would you be so kind as to provide a link?
>
> >>>> Once bitten old darling,
>
> >>>> I did once and then you come out with cannot believe anything you
> >>>> read on the electric interweb (that does
> >>>> �not support your extremely bigoted POV)
>
> >>>> (I know that makes me ilitarate rather than ironic :)
>
> >>> They only believe the links that suit their "let's shut down the
> >>> railways and destroy the world with our cars" point of view. Take
> >>> that crap about the ice caps not melting on the basis of some
> >>> spurious satellite images. That's like saying the sun isn't going to
> >>> rise today simply because you have a picture taken at night.
>
> >>> Brian.
>
> >> You are bitter today, get out of the wrong side of the bed?
>
> >More likely that he didn't get that far before lapsing into unconsciousness.
>
> "They only believe the links that suit their ... point of view."
>
> and then in the very next sentence:
>
> "...spurious satellite images".
>
> Yet another own goal for Glug. *snigger*
>
> Do you think if we hand out pots and pans to ukt's Three Stooges,
> they'll start clobbering each other like their namesakes?

Whereas in the old days, people used to go to Bedlam to play "poke the
mong with a sharp stick", on uk.transport we can play "watch the mongs
poke themselves with sharp sticks".