|
|
|
date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 02:21:35 -0700 (PDT),
group: uk.transport
back
Doug, when did you become an anarchist?
I only ask, Doug, because as recently as 1999 you were espousing old-
fashioned socialist principles. In response to the assertion that "no
one I know will surrender his wealth without a fight", you responded
"With suitable taxation they will have to" and "Those with a higher
income should pay proportionately higher taxes"
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.misc/msg/c0f41ea19bda0c01?hl=en&dmode=source
Not very anarchic is it? When did you decide to become an "anarchist"?
date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 02:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
author: BrianW
|
Re: Doug, when did you become an anarchist?
"never" is the correct answer to your question Brian.
Mike P
date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 11:06:37 +0100
author: Mike P
|
Re: Doug, when did you become an anarchist?
On 2 Sep, 11:06, "Mike P" wrote:
> "never" is the correct answer to your question Brian.
What, are you suggesting that Mr Bollen is a liar?
date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 03:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
author: BrianW
|
Re: Doug, when did you become an anarchist?
BrianW wrote:
> I only ask, Doug, because as recently as 1999 you were espousing old-
> fashioned socialist principles. In response to the assertion that "no
> one I know will surrender his wealth without a fight", you responded
> "With suitable taxation they will have to" and "Those with a higher
> income should pay proportionately higher taxes"
>
> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.misc/msg/c0f41ea19bda0c01?hl=en&dmode=source
>
> Not very anarchic is it? When did you decide to become an "anarchist"?
Yes but was that Doug or Doug.
--
Tony the Dragon
date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:34:29 +0100
author: Tony Dragon
|
Re: Doug, when did you become an anarchist?
On 2 Sep, 13:34, Tony Dragon wrote:
> BrianW wrote:
> > I only ask, Doug, because as recently as 1999 you were espousing old-
> > fashioned socialist principles. In response to the assertion that "no
> > one I know will surrender his wealth without a fight", you responded
> > "With suitable taxation they will have to" and "Those with a higher
> > income should pay proportionately higher taxes"
>
> >http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.misc/msg/c0f41ea19bda0c01?hl=en&d.> > Not very anarchic is it? When did you decide to become an "anarchist> Yes but was that Doug or Doug.
Doug, I think.
date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 07:10:17 -0700 (PDT)
author: BrianW
|
Re: Doug, when did you become an anarchist?
In message
,
BrianW writes
>On 2 Sep, 13:34, Tony Dragon wrote:
>> BrianW wrote:
>> > I only ask, Doug, because as recently as 1999 you were espousing old-
>> > fashioned socialist principles. In response to the assertion that "no
>> > one I know will surrender his wealth without a fight", you responded
>> > "With suitable taxation they will have to" and "Those with a higher
>> > income should pay proportionately higher taxes"
>>
>> >http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.misc/msg/c0f41ea19bda0c01?hl=en&d...
>>
>> > Not very anarchic is it? When did you decide to become an "anarchist"?
>>
>> Yes but was that Doug or Doug.
>
>Doug, I think.
But was that Doug the Stalinist, Doug the Castroist, Doug the socialist,
Doug the "anarcho-socialist" or Doug the "anarchist"?
--
Ed Banger
date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 16:59:10 +0100
author: Ed Banger
|
Re: Doug, when did you become an anarchist?
Ed Banger wrote:
> In message
> ,
> BrianW writes
>> On 2 Sep, 13:34, Tony Dragon wrote:
>>> BrianW wrote:
>>>> I only ask, Doug, because as recently as 1999 you were espousing
>>>> old- fashioned socialist principles. In response to the assertion
>>>> that "no one I know will surrender his wealth without a fight",
>>>> you responded "With suitable taxation they will have to" and
>>>> "Those with a higher income should pay proportionately higher
>>>> taxes"
>>>
>>>> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.misc/msg/c0f41ea19bda0c01?hl=en&d...
>>>
>>>> Not very anarchic is it? When did you decide to become an
>>>> "anarchist"?
>>>
>>> Yes but was that Doug or Doug.
>>
>> Doug, I think.
>
> But was that Doug the Stalinist, Doug the Castroist, Doug the
> socialist, Doug the "anarcho-socialist" or Doug the "anarchist"?
Maybe it was Doug the "I'm not Doug Bollen".
date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 17:17:48 +0100
author: Brimstone
|
Re: Doug, when did you become an anarchist?
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 16:59:10 +0100, Ed Banger wrote:
>In message
>,
>BrianW writes
>>On 2 Sep, 13:34, Tony Dragon wrote:
>>> BrianW wrote:
>>> > I only ask, Doug, because as recently as 1999 you were espousing old-
>>> > fashioned socialist principles. In response to the assertion that "no
>>> > one I know will surrender his wealth without a fight", you responded
>>> > "With suitable taxation they will have to" and "Those with a higher
>>> > income should pay proportionately higher taxes"
>>>
>>> >http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.misc/msg/c0f41ea19bda0c01?hl=en&d...
>>>
>>> > Not very anarchic is it? When did you decide to become an "anarchist"?
>>>
>>> Yes but was that Doug or Doug.
>>
>>Doug, I think.
>
>But was that Doug the Stalinist, Doug the Castroist, Doug the socialist,
>Doug the "anarcho-socialist" or Doug the "anarchist"?
It was the well known Catford "Doug the arse wipe"
--
Only some ghastly, dehumanised moron would want to get rid of the Routemaster.
Ken Livingstone 2001.
PeterT - "Reply to" address is a spam trap - all replies to the group please
date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:53:09 +0100
author: Petert
|
|
|
