On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:15:33 +0100, "Brimstone"
 wrote:

>Palindrome wrote:
>> Brimstone wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> Not necessarily. The passing of a vehicle that fails to show the
>>> correct details on the central database can trigger an event.
>>
>> So, the data captured by the ANPR is always transferred to the central
>> system, formed into a record and that record is compared with the
>> existing data in the database to determine if a trigger event should
>> happen or not.
>>
>>> There is no need to
>>> record that the vehicle was there at that time nor is there any need
>>> to record the passing of vheicles that do not trigger the sending of
>>> such a ticket.
>>
>> The record is by then already in the database - it is now a question
>> of whether it is deleted, or retained. Why delete it? There is no
>> need to.
>> Other actions may be needed, should the database compare action
>> produce particular results. Or no other action may be needed. But
>> delete the record, rather than write it into the permanent database?
>> Why would they?
>
>Because the cost and effort in retaining details of all such movement would 
>outweigh any benefits. 
>
It costs very little to store the few bytes of data needed to record
the position and time of a car.


http://www.silicon.com/publicsector/0,3800010403,39155717,00.htm

On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:48:43 +0100, Conor 
wrote:

>In article <hyjsk.23920$3s.1875@newsfe10.ams2>, ®i©ardo says...
>
>> Well, word on the street has it that the rich are getting richer even 
>> faster in Gordie's land, whilst the poor are getting even poorer. 
>
>Bullshit. How many poor have Sky TV, a mobile phone and a car? Most of 
>them.
Only by going out thieving every night of the week the honest poor do
not have these things .
www.buspassheaven.co.uk