Consider the evidence:

1. They are both drooling retards;
2. Neither of them can ever admit to being wrong;
3. They are both delusional;
4. They are both habitual liars;
5. They never seek to back up their wild claims, preferring to run
away and then repeat the same old lies later;
6. Dung never attacks Toomy, even when Toomtard admits to being a GW-
sceptic and motorist.

I wonder whether "Toomy" is therefore an alter ego of Gollum, who
surfaces from time to time out of the fetid swamp that is Gollum's
"mind".

BrianW  gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying:

> Consider the evidence:
> 
> 1. They are both drooling retards;
> 2. Neither of them can ever admit to being wrong; 3. They are both
> delusional;
> 4. They are both habitual liars;
> 5. They never seek to back up their wild claims, preferring to run away
> and then repeat the same old lies later; 6. Dung never attacks Toomy,
> even when Toomtard admits to being a GW- sceptic and motorist.
> 
> I wonder whether "Toomy" is therefore an alter ego of Gollum, who
> surfaces from time to time out of the fetid swamp that is Gollum's
> "mind".

Whilst it's possible, Duhg is at least approximately literate.

Duhg-not-Bollen is most certainly a figment of Doug Bollen's imagination, 
though.

Adrian wrote:
> BrianW  gurgled happily, sounding much
> like they were saying:
>
>> Consider the evidence:
>>
>> 1. They are both drooling retards;
>> 2. Neither of them can ever admit to being wrong; 3. They are both
>> delusional;
>> 4. They are both habitual liars;
>> 5. They never seek to back up their wild claims, preferring to run
>> away and then repeat the same old lies later; 6. Dung never attacks
>> Toomy, even when Toomtard admits to being a GW- sceptic and motorist.
>>
>> I wonder whether "Toomy" is therefore an alter ego of Gollum, who
>> surfaces from time to time out of the fetid swamp that is Gollum's
>> "mind".
>
> Whilst it's possible, Duhg is at least approximately literate.

I suspect the Toomy arises from Doug stream of consciousness after a session 
on the wacky baccy, or something similar.

> Duhg-not-Bollen is most certainly a figment of Doug Bollen's
> imagination, though.

Indeed, perhaps he should just keep on with the illicit substances and let 
Toomy speak for him.

In message , Brimstone 
 writes
>Adrian wrote:
>> BrianW  gurgled happily, sounding much
>> like they were saying:
>>
>>> Consider the evidence:
>>>
>>> 1. They are both drooling retards;
>>> 2. Neither of them can ever admit to being wrong; 3. They are both
>>> delusional;
>>> 4. They are both habitual liars;
>>> 5. They never seek to back up their wild claims, preferring to run
>>> away and then repeat the same old lies later; 6. Dung never attacks
>>> Toomy, even when Toomtard admits to being a GW- sceptic and motorist.
>>>
>>> I wonder whether "Toomy" is therefore an alter ego of Gollum, who
>>> surfaces from time to time out of the fetid swamp that is Gollum's
>>> "mind".
>>
>> Whilst it's possible, Duhg is at least approximately literate.
>
>I suspect the Toomy arises from Doug stream of consciousness after a session
>on the wacky baccy, or something similar.

You could be right. But the main objection to the idea of Duhg having 
multiple personalities would be that he doesn't appear to have one at 
all.


-- 
Ed Banger

See Duhg admit to being Doug Bollen:
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.transport/msg/c7c992ee0d86b40b

On 11 Jul, 14:52, Ed Banger  wrote:
> In message , Brimstone
>  writes
>
>
>
>
>
> >Adrian wrote:
> >> BrianW  gurgled happily, sounding much
> >> like they were saying:
>
> >>> Consider the evidence:
>
> >>> 1. They are both drooling retards;
> >>> 2. Neither of them can ever admit to being wrong; 3. They are both
> >>> delusional;
> >>> 4. They are both habitual liars;
> >>> 5. They never seek to back up their wild claims, preferring to run
> >>> away and then repeat the same old lies later; 6. Dung never attacks
> >>> Toomy, even when Toomtard admits to being a GW- sceptic and motorist.
>
> >>> I wonder whether "Toomy" is therefore an alter ego of Gollum, who
> >>> surfaces from time to time out of the fetid swamp that is Gollum's
> >>> "mind".
>
> >> Whilst it's possible, Duhg is at least approximately literate.
>
> >I suspect the Toomy arises from Doug stream of consciousness after a session
> >on the wacky baccy, or something similar.
>
> You could be right. But the main objection to the idea of Duhg having
> multiple personalities would be that he doesn't appear to have one at
> all.

I think the problem is that the little personality that Gollum
possesses has to be shared between the various characters in his
head.  There are at least three: Doug Bollen, Doug not-Bollen and
Toomy.  It therefore gets spread very thinly, leading to an appearance
of none at all in each case.  The same could be said for Gollum's
intelligence - the two brain cells that still (just about) work are
rather overstretched - hence Doug not-Bollen's risible attempts at
maths and science, and Toomtard's maniacal dribbling gibberish.

On 11 jul, 16:24, BrianW  wrote:
> On 11 Jul, 14:52, Ed Banger  wrote:
>
>
>
> > In message , Brimstone
> >  writes
>
> > >Adrian wrote:
> > >> BrianW  gurgled happily, sounding much
> > >> like they were saying:
>
> > >>> Consider the evidence:
>
> > >>> 1. They are both drooling retards;
> > >>> 2. Neither of them can ever admit to being wrong; 3. They are both
> > >>> delusional;
> > >>> 4. They are both habitual liars;
> > >>> 5. They never seek to back up their wild claims, preferring to run
> > >>> away and then repeat the same old lies later; 6. Dung never attacks
> > >>> Toomy, even when Toomtard admits to being a GW- sceptic and motorist.
>
> > >>> I wonder whether "Toomy" is therefore an alter ego of Gollum, who
> > >>> surfaces from time to time out of the fetid swamp that is Gollum's
> > >>> "mind".
>
> > >> Whilst it's possible, Duhg is at least approximately literate.
>
> > >I suspect the Toomy arises from Doug stream of consciousness after a session
> > >on the wacky baccy, or something similar.
>
> > You could be right. But the main objection to the idea of Duhg having
> > multiple personalities would be that he doesn't appear to have one at
> > all.
>
> I think the problem is that the little personality that Gollum
> possesses has to be shared between the various characters in his
> head.  There are at least three: Doug Bollen, Doug not-Bollen and
> Toomy.  It therefore gets spread very thinly, leading to an appearance
> of none at all in each case.  The same could be said for Gollum's
> intelligence - the two brain cells that still (just about) work are
> rather overstretched - hence Doug not-Bollen's risible attempts at
> maths and science, and Toomtard's maniacal dribbling gibberish.

Which Doug was MrNatural?  Has MrNatural's voice died away? Furthur
who owned DougX and is he now dead?

NM

On 11 Jul, 15:45, NM  wrote:
> On 11 jul, 16:24, BrianW  wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 11 Jul, 14:52, Ed Banger  wrote:
>
> > > In message , Brimstone
> > >  writes
>
> > > >Adrian wrote:
> > > >> BrianW  gurgled happily, sounding much
> > > >> like they were saying:
>
> > > >>> Consider the evidence:
>
> > > >>> 1. They are both drooling retards;
> > > >>> 2. Neither of them can ever admit to being wrong; 3. They are both
> > > >>> delusional;
> > > >>> 4. They are both habitual liars;
> > > >>> 5. They never seek to back up their wild claims, preferring to run
> > > >>> away and then repeat the same old lies later; 6. Dung never attacks
> > > >>> Toomy, even when Toomtard admits to being a GW- sceptic and motorist.
>
> > > >>> I wonder whether "Toomy" is therefore an alter ego of Gollum, who
> > > >>> surfaces from time to time out of the fetid swamp that is Gollum's
> > > >>> "mind".
>
> > > >> Whilst it's possible, Duhg is at least approximately literate.
>
> > > >I suspect the Toomy arises from Doug stream of consciousness after a session
> > > >on the wacky baccy, or something similar.
>
> > > You could be right. But the main objection to the idea of Duhg having
> > > multiple personalities would be that he doesn't appear to have one at
> > > all.
>
> > I think the problem is that the little personality that Gollum
> > possesses has to be shared between the various characters in his
> > head.  There are at least three: Doug Bollen, Doug not-Bollen and
> > Toomy.  It therefore gets spread very thinly, leading to an appearance
> > of none at all in each case.  The same could be said for Gollum's
> > intelligence - the two brain cells that still (just about) work are
> > rather overstretched - hence Doug not-Bollen's risible attempts at
> > maths and science, and Toomtard's maniacal dribbling gibberish.
>
> Which Doug was MrNatural?  Has MrNatural's voice died away? Furthur
> who owned DougX and is he now dead?

All good questions.

One other thing - it is clear that Doug not-Bollen and Toomtard both
believe there are two types of ozone - I wonder whether Doug Bollen
also believes it as well.

Oh Brian, Brian Brian

have your nasty likkle ramblings EVER achieved anything?

come to think of it have you ever achieved anything :(

(and yes there are K's in there - look up glokal . chav or oik :)  - I got 
you using the word irony so i guess I've achieved something, now IF you knew 
what it meant :)

- and I'll give you a clue  -

It does not disagreeing with (or is that from - duh ?)

On 12 Jul, 12:06, "Tommy"  wrote:

> It does not disagreeing with (or is that from - duh ?)

WTF??

What a retarded cunt you are.  Or, in Toomyspeak:

BUT The you are fuxxin retarded little cunt.

Tommy wrote:
> Oh Brian, Brian Brian
> 
> have your nasty likkle ramblings EVER achieved anything?
> 
> come to think of it have you ever achieved anything :(
> 
> (and yes there are K's in there - look up glokal . chav or oik :)  - I got 
> you using the word irony so i guess I've achieved something, now IF you knew 
> what it meant :)
> 
> - and I'll give you a clue  -
> 
> It does not disagreeing with (or is that from - duh ?) 
> 
> 

Yes of course, I've worked it out now.
Every time I read on of your posts I'm pissed, but only when reading 
your posts.

-- 
Tony the Dragon

better limit myself to 21 units (or postings) a week ;-)

 PS  IF  I'm just a voice, just imagine how LOUD it must be in Brains head 
for him to get so ANGRY

"Tony Dragon"  wrote in message 
news:rvqdne8o3oIpCOXVnZ2dnUVZ8tLinZ2d@bt.com...
> Tommy wrote:
>> Oh Brian, Brian Brian
>>
>> have your nasty likkle ramblings EVER achieved anything?
>>
>> come to think of it have you ever achieved anything :(
>>
>> (and yes there are K's in there - look up glokal . chav or oik :)  - I 
>> got you using the word irony so i guess I've achieved something, now IF 
>> you knew what it meant :)
>>
>> - and I'll give you a clue  -
>>
>> It does not disagreeing with (or is that from - duh ?)
>
> Yes of course, I've worked it out now.
> Every time I read on of your posts I'm pissed, but only when reading your 
> posts.
>
> -- 
> Tony the Dragon

On 13 Jul, 07:12, "Tommy"  wrote:
> better limit myself to 21 units (or postings) a week ;-)
>
> �PS �IF �I'm just a voice, just imagine how LOUD it must be in Brains head
> for him to get so ANGRY

It does not disagreeing with (or is that from - duh ?)

"BrianW"  wrote in message 
news:6527bd03-fa0e-4db7-859d-eca2b296d029@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
On 13 Jul, 07:12, "Tommy"  wrote:
> better limit myself to 21 units (or postings) a week ;-)
>
> ?PS ?IF ?I'm just a voice, just imagine how LOUD it must be in Brains head
> for him to get so ANGRY

It does not disagreeing with (or is that from - duh ?)

You are a very naught boy! Y?

Thanks for making me feel special but posting things very similar to what 
I've posted is telling everyone more about you dearheart

On 14 Jul, 08:07, "Tommy"  wrote:
> "BrianW"  wrote in message
>
> news:6527bd03-fa0e-4db7-859d-eca2b296d029@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
> On 13 Jul, 07:12, "Tommy"  wrote:
>
> > better limit myself to 21 units (or postings) a week ;-)
>
> > ?PS ?IF ?I'm just a voice, just imagine how LOUD it must be in Brains head
> > for him to get so ANGRY
>
> It does not disagreeing with (or is that from - duh ?)
>
> You are a very naught boy! Y?
>
> Thanks for making me feel special but posting things very similar to what
> I've posted is telling everyone more about you dearheart

BUT The you are fuxxin dangerous little angry manwho does not like
"discussion" but threatning and killing people who do not agree with
your
POV