One of Toomtard's posts has got me wondering:

http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.transport/msg/4867a39bbbdd2839?hl=en&dmode=source

Just as multiplying a negative number by another negative number gives
a positive number, when a drooling retard like Toomy calls someone
stupid, does this in fact mean that the recipient of the remark is
being commended for their intelligence?

On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:30:34 +0100, BrianW wrote
(in article 
):

> One of Toomtard's posts has got me wondering:
> 
> 
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.transport/msg/4867a39bbbdd2839?hl=en&dmode

> =source
> 
> Just as multiplying a negative number by another negative number gives
> a positive number, when a drooling retard like Toomy calls someone
> stupid, does this in fact mean that the recipient of the remark is
> being commended for their intelligence?

Only if the remark is addressed to another drooling retard.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

On 30 Jun, 16:19, nik.morgan  wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:30:34 +0100, BrianW wrote
> (in article
> ):
>
> > One of Toomtard's posts has got me wondering:
>
> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.transport/msg/4867a39bbbdd2839?hl...
>
> > =source
>
> > Just as multiplying a negative number by another negative number gives
> > a positive number, when a drooling retard like Toomy calls someone
> > stupid, does this in fact mean that the recipient of the remark is
> > being commended for their intelligence?
>
> Only if the remark is addressed to another drooling retard.

Nah, that would surely be a triple negative, which is a still a
negative.