Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:16:23 +0100,    group: uk.transport        back       
Re: HEAT !!!   
In <48601ce0$0$2490$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk>
"GB"  wrote:

> "Depresion" <127.0.0.1> wrote in message 
> news:d-idnfFkWKhUYMLVnZ2dnUVZ8uadnZ2d@posted.plusnet...
> >
> >> It further generates "heat", carbon dioxide and water,
> >
> > So what, unless you are stupid enough to believe the tiny, and it
> > is absolutely tiny, amount of heat, CO2 or water released will have
> > anything but a negligible impact. But that would require a complete
> > ignorance of the basic laws of nature.
> 
> The amount of heat mankind produces is truly small compared to the
> amount from the sun. Water is not an issue. However, CO2 is
> undoubtedly a greenhouse gas.

Why is water not an issue? Everybody knows that there's a huge
difference between a cloudy night and a clear night in winter, and we
are heating up tonnes of it and dumping it into the atmosphere. Is the
difference between that and evaporation of the oceans far greater than
the difference between artificial and natural CO2 emissions (if you
count our own breathing as natural, seeing as none of the global warming
hand wavers are suggesting overpopulation might be a problem)?

-- 
TH * http://www.realh.co.uk
date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:16:23 +0100   author:   Tony Houghton

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us