Has anyone else noticed that the retards on this group often attack
other posters for the very thing that is their own weakest point.

For example, Duhg often accuses others of being scientifically
illiterate, when he must be the most pig-ignorant person in the world
when it comes to all matters scientific.  Toomtard likes to accuse
people of muddled thinking, when his own postings show that he is
incapable of clear thought.  And Glug used to accuse people of being
stupid ... need I say more on that one?

Is this is phenomenon seen in other newsgroups?  If so, does it have a
name, cf. Godwin's law?

BrianW wrote:
> Has anyone else noticed that the retards on this group often attack
> other posters for the very thing that is their own weakest point.
> 
> For example, Duhg often accuses others of being scientifically
> illiterate, when he must be the most pig-ignorant person in the world
> when it comes to all matters scientific.  Toomtard likes to accuse
> people of muddled thinking, when his own postings show that he is
> incapable of clear thought.  And Glug used to accuse people of being
> stupid ... need I say more on that one?
> 
> Is this is phenomenon seen in other newsgroups?  If so, does it have a
> name, cf. Godwin's law?

Perhaps the new 'law' could be named after one of the Dougs.

-- 
Tony the Dragon

On 20 Jun, 12:03, Tony Dragon  wrote:
> BrianW wrote:
> > Has anyone else noticed that the retards on this group often attack
> > other posters for the very thing that is their own weakest point.
>
> > For example, Duhg often accuses others of being scientifically
> > illiterate, when he must be the most pig-ignorant person in the world
> > when it comes to all matters scientific.  Toomtard likes to accuse
> > people of muddled thinking, when his own postings show that he is
> > incapable of clear thought.  And Glug used to accuse people of being
> > stupid ... need I say more on that one?
>
> > Is this is phenomenon seen in other newsgroups?  If so, does it have a
> > name, cf. Godwin's law?
>
> Perhaps the new 'law' could be named after one of the Dougs.

Gollum's law?

In message 
, 
BrianW  writes
>Has anyone else noticed that the retards on this group often attack
>other posters for the very thing that is their own weakest point.
>
>For example, Duhg often accuses others of being scientifically
>illiterate, when he must be the most pig-ignorant person in the world
>when it comes to all matters scientific.  Toomtard likes to accuse
>people of muddled thinking, when his own postings show that he is
>incapable of clear thought.  And Glug used to accuse people of being
>stupid ... need I say more on that one?
>
>Is this is phenomenon seen in other newsgroups?  If so, does it have a
>name, cf. Godwin's law?

All is explained here...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection


-- 
Ed Banger

BrianW  wrote:

> Is this is phenomenon seen in other newsgroups?  If so, does it have a
> name, cf. Godwin's law?

Bollum's Law?

Ed Banger  wrote:

> In message 
> , 
> BrianW  writes
> >Has anyone else noticed that the retards on this group often attack
> >other posters for the very thing that is their own weakest point.
> >
> >For example, Duhg often accuses others of being scientifically
> >illiterate, when he must be the most pig-ignorant person in the world
> >when it comes to all matters scientific.  Toomtard likes to accuse
> >people of muddled thinking, when his own postings show that he is
> >incapable of clear thought.  And Glug used to accuse people of being
> >stupid ... need I say more on that one?
> >
> >Is this is phenomenon seen in other newsgroups?  If so, does it have a
> >name, cf. Godwin's law?
> 
> All is explained here...
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

Interesting that such 'projection' is a symptom of Antisocial
personality disorder, which is the condition that Doug "noid" Bollen was
diagnosed as having ooh back in the dark ages when Usenet was powered by
candles.

In message <1iiu26w.bzupsd1rn7wslN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk>, Steve Firth 
<%steve%@malloc.co.uk> writes
>Ed Banger  wrote:
>
>> In message
>> ,
>> BrianW  writes
>> >Has anyone else noticed that the retards on this group often attack
>> >other posters for the very thing that is their own weakest point.
>> >
>> >For example, Duhg often accuses others of being scientifically
>> >illiterate, when he must be the most pig-ignorant person in the world
>> >when it comes to all matters scientific.  Toomtard likes to accuse
>> >people of muddled thinking, when his own postings show that he is
>> >incapable of clear thought.  And Glug used to accuse people of being
>> >stupid ... need I say more on that one?
>> >
>> >Is this is phenomenon seen in other newsgroups?  If so, does it have a
>> >name, cf. Godwin's law?
>>
>> All is explained here...
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
>
>Interesting that such 'projection' is a symptom of Antisocial
>personality disorder, which is the condition that Doug "noid" Bollen was
>diagnosed as having ooh back in the dark ages when Usenet was powered by
>candles.

Interesting, I didn't know he'd been given an actual diagnosis.


Antisocial Personality Disorder diagnostic criteria:

Three or more of the following are required:

    1. Failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful 
behaviours as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds 
for arrest;
    2. Deceitfulness, as indicated by repeatedly lying, use of aliases, 
or conning others for personal profit or pleasure;
    3. Impulsivity or failure to plan ahead;
    4. Irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical 
fights or assaults;
    5. Reckless disregard for safety of self or others;
    6. Consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to 
sustain consistent work behaviour or honour financial obligations;
    7. Lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or 
rationalising having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another.


Crikey, that's him all over.


-- 
Ed Banger

On 20 Jun, 12:31, Ed Banger  wrote:
> In message <1iiu26w.bzupsd1rn7wslN%%ste...@malloc.co.uk>, Steve Firth
> <%ste...@malloc.co.uk> writes
>
>
>
>
>
> >Ed Banger  wrote:
>
> >> In message
> >> ,
> >> BrianW  writes
> >> >Has anyone else noticed that the retards on this group often attack
> >> >other posters for the very thing that is their own weakest point.
>
> >> >For example, Duhg often accuses others of being scientifically
> >> >illiterate, when he must be the most pig-ignorant person in the world
> >> >when it comes to all matters scientific.  Toomtard likes to accuse
> >> >people of muddled thinking, when his own postings show that he is
> >> >incapable of clear thought.  And Glug used to accuse people of being
> >> >stupid ... need I say more on that one?
>
> >> >Is this is phenomenon seen in other newsgroups?  If so, does it have a
> >> >name, cf. Godwin's law?
>
> >> All is explained here...
>
> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
>
> >Interesting that such 'projection' is a symptom of Antisocial
> >personality disorder, which is the condition that Doug "noid" Bollen was
> >diagnosed as having ooh back in the dark ages when Usenet was powered by
> >candles.
>
> Interesting, I didn't know he'd been given an actual diagnosis.
>
> Antisocial Personality Disorder diagnostic criteria:
>
> Three or more of the following are required:
>
>     1. Failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful
> behaviours as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds
> for arrest;
>     2. Deceitfulness, as indicated by repeatedly lying, use of aliases,
> or conning others for personal profit or pleasure;
>     3. Impulsivity or failure to plan ahead;
>     4. Irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical
> fights or assaults;
>     5. Reckless disregard for safety of self or others;
>     6. Consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to
> sustain consistent work behaviour or honour financial obligations;
>     7. Lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or
> rationalising having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another.
>
> Crikey, that's him all over.

Yup, that's the Bollum we know and, er, know.

There is also a list of typical symptoms:

Persistent lying or stealing
Recurring difficulties with the law
Tendency to violate the rights and boundaries of others (property,
physical, sexual, emotional, legal)
Substance abuse
Aggressive, often violent behavior; prone to getting involved in
fights
A persistent agitated or depressed feeling (dysphoria)
Inability to tolerate boredom
Disregard for the safety of self or others
A childhood diagnosis of conduct disorders - this is not a symptom but
"a history of"
Lack of remorse, related to hurting others
Superficial charm
Impulsiveness
A sense of extreme entitlement
Inability to make or keep friends
Recklessness, impulsivity
People with a diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder often
experience difficulties with authority figures.

I'd go along with most of them, apart from the "Superficial charm" ...

On 20 Jun, 12:20, %ste...@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote:
> Ed Banger  wrote:
> > In message
> > ,
> > BrianW  writes
> > >Has anyone else noticed that the retards on this group often attack
> > >other posters for the very thing that is their own weakest point.
>
> > >For example, Duhg often accuses others of being scientifically
> > >illiterate, when he must be the most pig-ignorant person in the world
> > >when it comes to all matters scientific.  Toomtard likes to accuse
> > >people of muddled thinking, when his own postings show that he is
> > >incapable of clear thought.  And Glug used to accuse people of being
> > >stupid ... need I say more on that one?
>
> > >Is this is phenomenon seen in other newsgroups?  If so, does it have a
> > >name, cf. Godwin's law?
>
> > All is explained here...
>
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
>
> Interesting that such 'projection' is a symptom of Antisocial
> personality disorder, which is the condition that Doug "noid" Bollen was
> diagnosed as having ooh back in the dark ages when Usenet was powered by
> candles.-

OK, so that's Duhg explained.  I think we all know why Glug used to
behave as he did.  So that just leaves the Toomtard.  Anyone got an
explanation for his bizarre behaviour?

On Jun 20, 2:07 pm, BrianW  wrote:
> On 20 Jun, 12:20, %ste...@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote:
>
>
>
> > Ed Banger  wrote:
> > > In message
> > > ,
> > > BrianW  writes
> > > >Has anyone else noticed that the retards on this group often attack
> > > >other posters for the very thing that is their own weakest point.
>
> > > >For example, Duhg often accuses others of being scientifically
> > > >illiterate, when he must be the most pig-ignorant person in the world
> > > >when it comes to all matters scientific.  Toomtard likes to accuse
> > > >people of muddled thinking, when his own postings show that he is
> > > >incapable of clear thought.  And Glug used to accuse people of being
> > > >stupid ... need I say more on that one?
>
> > > >Is this is phenomenon seen in other newsgroups?  If so, does it have a
> > > >name, cf. Godwin's law?
>
> > > All is explained here...
>
> > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
>
> > Interesting that such 'projection' is a symptom of Antisocial
> > personality disorder, which is the condition that Doug "noid" Bollen was
> > diagnosed as having ooh back in the dark ages when Usenet was powered by
> > candles.-
>
> OK, so that's Duhg explained.  I think we all know why Glug used to
> behave as he did.  So that just leaves the Toomtard.  Anyone got an
> explanation for his bizarre behaviour?

He's as thick as shit?


Francis

On 20 Jun, 14:19, francis  wrote:
> On Jun 20, 2:07�pm, BrianW  wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 20 Jun, 12:20, %ste...@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote:
>
> > > Ed Banger  wrote:
> > > > In message
> > > > ,
> > > > BrianW  writes
> > > > >Has anyone else noticed that the retards on this group often attack
> > > > >other posters for the very thing that is their own weakest point.
>
> > > > >For example, Duhg often accuses others of being scientifically
> > > > >illiterate, when he must be the most pig-ignorant person in the world
> > > > >when it comes to all matters scientific. �Toomtard likes to accuse
> > > > >people of muddled thinking, when his own postings show that he is
> > > > >incapable of clear thought. �And Glug used to accuse people of being
> > > > >stupid ... need I say more on that one?
>
> > > > >Is this is phenomenon seen in other newsgroups? �If so, does it have a
> > > > >name, cf. Godwin's law?
>
> > > > All is explained here...
>
> > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
>
> > > Interesting that such 'projection' is a symptom of Antisocial
> > > personality disorder, which is the condition that Doug "noid" Bollen was
> > > diagnosed as having ooh back in the dark ages when Usenet was powered by
> > > candles.-
>
> > OK, so that's Duhg explained. �I think we all know why Glug used to
> > behave as he did. �So that just leaves the Toomtard. �Anyone got an
> > explanation for his bizarre behaviour?
>
> He's as thick as shit?

Probably as good an explanation as any.

"francis"  wrote in message 
news:779d1892-79b9-4fd9-ab2a-321fa11fbe5b@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 20, 2:07 pm, BrianW  wrote:
> On 20 Jun, 12:20, %ste...@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote:
>
>
>
> > Ed Banger  wrote:
> > > In message
> > > ,
> > > BrianW  writes
> > > >Has anyone else noticed that the retards on this group often attack
> > > >other posters for the very thing that is their own weakest point.
>
> > > >For example, Duhg often accuses others of being scientifically
> > > >illiterate, when he must be the most pig-ignorant person in the world
> > > >when it comes to all matters scientific. Toomtard likes to accuse
> > > >people of muddled thinking, when his own postings show that he is
> > > >incapable of clear thought. And Glug used to accuse people of being
> > > >stupid ... need I say more on that one?
>
> > > >Is this is phenomenon seen in other newsgroups? If so, does it have a
> > > >name, cf. Godwin's law?
>
> > > All is explained here...
>
> > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
>
> > Interesting that such 'projection' is a symptom of Antisocial
> > personality disorder, which is the condition that Doug "noid" Bollen was
> > diagnosed as having ooh back in the dark ages when Usenet was powered by
> > candles.-
>
> OK, so that's Duhg explained. I think we all know why Glug used to
> behave as he did. So that just leaves the Toomtard. Anyone got an
> explanation for his bizarre behaviour?

> He's as thick as shit?

I can't argue with that  :)

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:35:18 -0700 (PDT), BrianW
 wrote:

>Has anyone else noticed that the retards on this group often attack
>other posters for the very thing that is their own weakest point.
>
>For example, Duhg often accuses others of being scientifically
>illiterate, when he must be the most pig-ignorant person in the world
>when it comes to all matters scientific.  Toomtard likes to accuse
>people of muddled thinking, when his own postings show that he is
>incapable of clear thought.  And Glug used to accuse people of being
>stupid ... need I say more on that one?
>
>Is this is phenomenon seen in other newsgroups?  If so, does it have a
>name, cf. Godwin's law?

Well Boyles law deals with gases, so i would like to suggest Bollens
Law - the law of the two Ozone Gases
-- 
Only some ghastly, dehumanised moron would want to get rid of the Routemaster.
Ken Livingstone 2001.

PeterT - "Reply to" address is a spam trap - all replies to the group please

Its a pity that instead of shooting the messenger about more cameras, more 
duty, green brigade  etc etc they try and convert people with  discussion 
and reasoning

OH NO ITS SHOUTING< SWEARING<INSULTING<DARWINISM IN ACTION  - KIDS DEAD HA 
HA- ITS OUR FREEDOM TO DO WHAT WE WANT IN OUR CARS     (really like little 
boys brought up in an unstable one parent families believing that acting 
like thugs are a sign of adulthood)

Why don't some of you silly chaps contact your MP, local councillor about 
issues that affect/effect the petrol head - just one   tip - Don't write 
EVERY day, dont  threaten their family or themselves with death, tell them 
"I know where you live"  or  call them names,

You never know it might work - certainly more than the daily insult :)

You do know what a retard is by the way? someone who slows progress, an 
impediment or someone who hinders  (the case FOR cars as a mass form of 
transit in our case)   - whooooooooooooooosh

Brimy the pedant - I know  the word can also be applied "mechanically" but I 
don't believe that was the thrust of the argument

Tooomy wrote:
> Its a pity that instead of shooting the messenger about more cameras, more 
> duty, green brigade  etc etc they try and convert people with  discussion 
> and reasoning
> 
> OH NO ITS SHOUTING< SWEARING<INSULTING<DARWINISM IN ACTION  - KIDS DEAD HA 
> HA- ITS OUR FREEDOM TO DO WHAT WE WANT IN OUR CARS     (really like little 
> boys brought up in an unstable one parent families believing that acting 
> like thugs are a sign of adulthood)
> 
> Why don't some of you silly chaps contact your MP, local councillor about 
> issues that affect/effect the petrol head - just one   tip - Don't write 
> EVERY day, dont  threaten their family or themselves with death, tell them 
> "I know where you live"  or  call them names,
> 
> You never know it might work - certainly more than the daily insult :)
> 
> You do know what a retard is by the way? someone who slows progress, an 
> impediment or someone who hinders  (the case FOR cars as a mass form of 
> transit in our case)   - whooooooooooooooosh
> 
> Brimy the pedant - I know  the word can also be applied "mechanically" but I 
> don't believe that was the thrust of the argument
> 
> 

Wow, that told us, at least I think it was meant to, not sure though.
Bugger it, can anybody help me here?

-- 
Tony the Dragon

In message <6m37k.31349$GF6.8875@newsfe27.ams2>, Tooomy 
 writes
>Its a pity that instead of shooting the messenger about more cameras, more
>duty, green brigade  etc etc they try and convert people with  discussion
>and reasoning
>
>OH NO ITS SHOUTING< SWEARING<INSULTING<DARWINISM IN ACTION  - KIDS DEAD HA
>HA- ITS OUR FREEDOM TO DO WHAT WE WANT IN OUR CARS     (really like little
>boys brought up in an unstable one parent families believing that acting
>like thugs are a sign of adulthood)
>
>Why don't some of you silly chaps contact your MP, local councillor about
>issues that affect/effect the petrol head - just one   tip - Don't write
>EVERY day, dont  threaten their family or themselves with death, tell them
>"I know where you live"  or  call them names,
>
>You never know it might work - certainly more than the daily insult :)
>
>You do know what a retard is by the way? someone who slows progress, an
>impediment or someone who hinders  (the case FOR cars as a mass form of
>transit in our case)   - whooooooooooooooosh
>
>Brimy the pedant - I know  the word can also be applied "mechanically" but I
>don't believe that was the thrust of the argument

Cause and effect, mate. If Duhg will insist on bombarding the group with 
daily cut and pastes to further his particular agenda, then he's bound 
to provoke a reaction. He posts in order to provoke a reaction, so he 
can't really complain when he gets one.

Duhg has been posting on Usenet for a long, long time and has frequently 
entangled himself in his own webs of deceit. His problem here is that he 
is fundamentally dishonest and, unfortunately for him, his many 
self-contradictions are all archived through Google Groups. This, 
coupled with his inability to live up to the standards he sets for 
everyone else, makes him a laughing stock.

This is a problem entirely of Duhg's own making. He gets the reaction he 
does because he rubs everyone up the wrong way. He even manages to 
alienate people who are on his 'side', e.g. cyclists and 
environmentalists.

And yet, when he posted a few months ago to say that he had been 
involved in a road accident (as a cyclist) with a car, he got an 
overwhelming response of sympathy and compassion. This clearly threw him 
for a while, as this was not the reaction he expected at all.

There was a period not too long ago when Duhg didn't post for almost two 
years. There was speculation that he'd died, or maybe finally got a 
life, but then one day he suddenly returned, same old Duhg as he ever 
was. In his absence, the group was much quieter but was a far more civil 
place to be.

Like I said, Toomy, it's cause and effect.


-- 
Ed Banger

Tooomy wrote:
> Its a pity that instead of shooting the messenger about more cameras, more 
> duty, green brigade  etc etc they try and convert people with  discussion 
> and reasoning
> 
> OH NO ITS SHOUTING< SWEARING<INSULTING<DARWINISM IN ACTION  - KIDS DEAD HA 
> HA- ITS OUR FREEDOM TO DO WHAT WE WANT IN OUR CARS     (really like little 
> boys brought up in an unstable one parent families believing that acting 
> like thugs are a sign of adulthood)
> 
> Why don't some of you silly chaps contact your MP, local councillor about 
> issues that affect/effect the petrol head - just one   tip - Don't write 
> EVERY day, dont  threaten their family or themselves with death, tell them 
> "I know where you live"  or  call them names,
> 
> You never know it might work - certainly more than the daily insult :)
> 
> You do know what a retard is by the way? someone who slows progress, an 
> impediment or someone who hinders  (the case FOR cars as a mass form of 
> transit in our case)   - whooooooooooooooosh
> 
> Brimy the pedant - I know  the word can also be applied "mechanically" but I 
> don't believe that was the thrust of the argument
> 
> 

That's it, get rid of all that bile from inside you. Do you feel better 
now, little man?

-- 
Moving things in still pictures!

On 21 Jun, 09:55, "Tooomy"  wrote:
> Its a pity that instead of shooting the messenger about more cameras, more> duty, green brigade �etc etc they try and convert people with �discussion
> and reasoning
>
> OH NO ITS SHOUTING< SWEARING<INSULTING<DARWINISM IN ACTION �- KIDS DEAD HA
> HA- ITS OUR FREEDOM TO DO WHAT WE WANT IN OUR CARS � � (really like little
> boys brought up in an unstable one parent families believing that acting
> like thugs are a sign of adulthood)
>
> Why don't some of you silly chaps contact your MP, local councillor about
> issues that affect/effect the petrol head - just one � tip - Don't write
> EVERY day, dont �threaten their family or themselves with death, tell them
> "I know where you live" �or �call them names,
>
> You never know it might work - certainly more than the daily insult :)
>
> You do know what a retard is by the way? someone who slows progress, an
> impediment or someone who hinders �(the case FOR cars as a mass form of
> transit in our case) � - whooooooooooooooosh
>
> Brimy the pedant - I know �the word can also be applied "mechanically" but I
> don't believe that was the thrust of the argument

<Snigger>

What was it that someone said about Toomy, thick as shit wasn't it?

"Tony Dragon"  wrote in message 
news:loqdnflih-58W8HVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@bt.com...
> Tooomy wrote:
>> Its a pity that instead of shooting the messenger about more cameras, 
>> more duty, green brigade  etc etc they try and convert people with 
>> discussion and reasoning
>>
>> OH NO ITS SHOUTING< SWEARING<INSULTING<DARWINISM IN ACTION  - KIDS DEAD 
>> HA HA- ITS OUR FREEDOM TO DO WHAT WE WANT IN OUR CARS     (really like 
>> little boys brought up in an unstable one parent families believing that 
>> acting like thugs are a sign of adulthood)
>>
>> Why don't some of you silly chaps contact your MP, local councillor about 
>> issues that affect/effect the petrol head - just one   tip - Don't write 
>> EVERY day, dont  threaten their family or themselves with death, tell 
>> them "I know where you live"  or  call them names,
>>
>> You never know it might work - certainly more than the daily insult :)
>>
>> You do know what a retard is by the way? someone who slows progress, an 
>> impediment or someone who hinders  (the case FOR cars as a mass form of 
>> transit in our case)   - whooooooooooooooosh
>>
>> Brimy the pedant - I know  the word can also be applied "mechanically" 
>> but I don't believe that was the thrust of the argument
>>
>>
>
> Wow, that told us, at least I think it was meant to, not sure though.
> Bugger it, can anybody help me here?

Dunno, I couldn't be bothered wasting 2 minutes of my life reading yet more 
incomprehensible bullshit by the resident retard.

"BrianW"  wrote in message 
news:292fba1b-f7e1-409e-aaf2-f61a00be7347@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
What was it that someone said about Toomy, thick as shit wasn't it?

I look forward to you showing that all Doug (and a few others  peoples') 
comments have not got you in a tizzy by another bilious attack tomorrow :)

PS I bet you were on tenterhooks all day  to insult me - see! my pointing 
out that sad ikkle idiots who post off a reply within 5 minutes (24/7) 
worked

In message <LKa7k.33967$312.23629@newsfe12.ams2>, Tooomy 
 writes
>
>"BrianW"  wrote in message
>news:292fba1b-f7e1-409e-aaf2-f61a00be7347@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>What was it that someone said about Toomy, thick as shit wasn't it?
>
>I look forward to you showing that all Doug (and a few others  peoples')
>comments have not got you in a tizzy by another bilious attack tomorrow :)
>
>PS I bet you were on tenterhooks all day  to insult me - see! my pointing
>out that sad ikkle idiots who post off a reply within 5 minutes (24/7)
>worked

There, there, of course Toomy.

When someone replies quickly, of course it's all down to your expert 
trolling. It has nothing to do with newsreaders being configured to 
receive and send posts in real time, oh no.

And when they don't reply quickly, that's all down to your expert 
trolling too. All hail Toomy the sub-literate attention-seeker..

Have you creamed your pants now?


-- 
Ed Banger

On 21 Jun, 18:19, "Tooomy"  wrote:
> "BrianW"  wrote in message
>
> news:292fba1b-f7e1-409e-aaf2-f61a00be7347@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> What was it that someone said about Toomy, thick as shit wasn't it?
>
> I look forward to you showing that all Doug (and a few others �peoples')
> comments have not got you in a tizzy by another bilious attack tomorrow :Yeah, right, Toomy, you really get me worked up.  Not.  I'm posting
this whilst sipping a glass of wine, perfectly relaxed.

> PS I bet you were on tenterhooks all day �to insult me - see! my pointing
> out that sad ikkle idiots who post off a reply within 5 minutes (24/7)
> worked

What on earth are you on about now, you retarded wankstain?

Tooomy wrote:
> "BrianW"  wrote in message 
> news:292fba1b-f7e1-409e-aaf2-f61a00be7347@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> What was it that someone said about Toomy, thick as shit wasn't it?
> 
> I look forward to you showing that all Doug (and a few others  peoples') 
> comments have not got you in a tizzy by another bilious attack tomorrow :)

Umm yes, or no, or whatever.
> 
> PS I bet you were on tenterhooks all day  to insult me - see! my pointing 
> out that sad ikkle idiots who post off a reply within 5 minutes (24/7) 
> worked 
> 
> 

Am I to late to miss the five minute deadline?
Or must I try harder.

-- 
Tony the Dragon

On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 09:55:26 +0100, "Tooomy" 
wrote:

>Its a pity that instead of shooting the messenger about more cameras, more 
>duty, green brigade  etc etc they try and convert people with  discussion 
>and reasoning
>
>OH NO ITS SHOUTING< SWEARING<INSULTING<DARWINISM IN ACTION  - KIDS DEAD HA 
>HA- ITS OUR FREEDOM TO DO WHAT WE WANT IN OUR CARS     (really like little 
>boys brought up in an unstable one parent families believing that acting 
>like thugs are a sign of adulthood)

I think you really should consider enrolling in a remedial reading
class. I've checked my post, the one you've replied to, and cannot
find any swearing or insulting. I did note that I had made a joke (not
a very good one, I admit) about a person (or is that persons?) who
post to this NG and in the past have postulated a theory about there
being two types of ozone.
>
>Why don't some of you silly chaps contact your MP, local councillor about 
>issues that affect/effect the petrol head - just one   tip - Don't write 
>EVERY day, dont  threaten their family or themselves with death, tell them 
>"I know where you live"  or  call them names,

My MP is Peter Hain, and I have to be honest, I wouldn't feeol
confident in getting a truthful reply if I were to ask him what day it
was. probably best that I don't mention the recent discovery in
Catford of a second type of ozone
>
>You never know it might work - certainly more than the daily insult :)
>
>You do know what a retard is by the way? someone who slows progress, an 
>impediment or someone who hinders  (the case FOR cars as a mass form of 
>transit in our case)   - whooooooooooooooosh

I am becoming more confident by the minute about my understanding of
what (and indeed, who) a retard is

-- 
Only some ghastly, dehumanised moron would want to get rid of the Routemaster.
Ken Livingstone 2001.

PeterT - "Reply to" address is a spam trap - all replies to the group please

Tooomy wrote:
> Its a pity that instead of shooting the messenger about more cameras, more 
> duty, green brigade  etc etc they try and convert people with  discussion 
> and reasoning
> 
> OH NO ITS SHOUTING< SWEARING<INSULTING<DARWINISM IN ACTION  - KIDS DEAD HA 
> HA- ITS OUR FREEDOM TO DO WHAT WE WANT IN OUR CARS     (really like little 
> boys brought up in an unstable one parent families believing that acting 
> like thugs are a sign of adulthood)
> 
> Why don't some of you silly chaps contact your MP, local councillor about 
> issues that affect/effect the petrol head - just one   tip - Don't write 
> EVERY day, dont  threaten their family or themselves with death, tell them 
> "I know where you live"  or  call them names,
> 
> You never know it might work - certainly more than the daily insult :)
> 
> You do know what a retard is by the way? someone who slows progress, an 
> impediment or someone who hinders  (the case FOR cars as a mass form of 
> transit in our case)   - whooooooooooooooosh
> 
> Brimy the pedant - I know  the word can also be applied "mechanically" but I 
> don't believe that was the thrust of the argument

Class - I want to know WHO forged that post. You can't get away with it, 
because it's simply too perfect an example of Tommy's work to be true.

I'm waiting.

<taps foot>

You'll get tired of this before I do ...

Ta, taken as compliment :)
"JNugent"  wrote in message 
news:k4OdnWRalcWC6MDVnZ2dnUVZ8rKdnZ2d@pipex.net...
> Tooomy wrote:
>> Its a pity that instead of shooting the messenger about more cameras, 
>> more duty, green brigade  etc etc they try and convert people with 
>> discussion and reasoning
>>
>> OH NO ITS SHOUTING< SWEARING<INSULTING<DARWINISM IN ACTION  - KIDS DEAD 
>> HA HA- ITS OUR FREEDOM TO DO WHAT WE WANT IN OUR CARS     (really like 
>> little boys brought up in an unstable one parent families believing that 
>> acting like thugs are a sign of adulthood)
>>
>> Why don't some of you silly chaps contact your MP, local councillor about 
>> issues that affect/effect the petrol head - just one   tip - Don't write 
>> EVERY day, dont  threaten their family or themselves with death, tell 
>> them "I know where you live"  or  call them names,
>>
>> You never know it might work - certainly more than the daily insult :)
>>
>> You do know what a retard is by the way? someone who slows progress, an 
>> impediment or someone who hinders  (the case FOR cars as a mass form of 
>> transit in our case)   - whooooooooooooooosh
>>
>> Brimy the pedant - I know  the word can also be applied "mechanically" 
>> but I don't believe that was the thrust of the argument
>
> Class - I want to know WHO forged that post. You can't get away with it, 
> because it's simply too perfect an example of Tommy's work to be true.
>
> I'm waiting.
>
> <taps foot>
>
> You'll get tired of this before I do ...
>

On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:10:37 +0100, "Tooomy" 
wrote:

>Ta, taken as compliment :)

Hmm, remedial classes in comprhension also needed
-- 
Only some ghastly, dehumanised moron would want to get rid of the Routemaster.
Ken Livingstone 2001.

PeterT - "Reply to" address is a spam trap - all replies to the group please

"Peter Thomas"  wrote in message 
news:pens54hv6q8nd23ojt0rccbeskn23uugbt@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:10:37 +0100, "Tooomy" 
> wrote:
>
>>Ta, taken as compliment :)
>
> Hmm, remedial classes in comprhension also needed
> -- 
What's comprhension ?

On 23 Jun, 13:59, "Tooomy"  wrote:
> "Peter Thomas"  wrote in message
>
> news:pens54hv6q8nd23ojt0rccbeskn23uugbt@4ax.com...> On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:10:37 +0100, "Tooomy" 
> > wrote:
>
> >>Ta, taken as compliment :)
>
> > Hmm, remedial classes in comprhension also needed
> > --
>
> What's comprhension ?

Tee hee, the retard tries to correct someone's spelling.

The thing is, Toomtard, that it is easy to understand what Peter was
saying, his typo notwithstanding.  Contrast this to one of your
efforts:

"TfL tried to keep congestion charge increases total CO2 in London"

Complete retarded gibberish.

"BrianW"  wrote in message 
news:b5e38ff9-0349-4742-b401->
> "TfL tried to keep congestion charge increases total CO2 in London"
>
> Complete retarded gibberish.

Ofcourse it is IF you take out a couple of words from the original sentence

Maybe the misses can point out where they took out the NOT  so that the 
bible  states you shall commit adultery :)

And IF you keep repeating it - It will  come true in Briland - nowhere else 
mind :(

On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:20:39 +0100, "Tooomy" 
wrote:

>
>"BrianW"  wrote in message 
>news:b5e38ff9-0349-4742-b401->
>> "TfL tried to keep congestion charge increases total CO2 in London"
>>
>> Complete retarded gibberish.
>
>Ofcourse it is IF you take out a couple of words from the original sentence
>
>Maybe the misses can point out where they took out the NOT  so that the 
>bible  states you shall commit adultery :)
>
>And IF you keep repeating it - It will  come true in Briland - nowhere else 
>mind :( 
>

Remedial english, remedial writing, remedial comprehension - you
really need them all
-- 
Only some ghastly, dehumanised moron would want to get rid of the Routemaster.
Ken Livingstone 2001.

PeterT - "Reply to" address is a spam trap - all replies to the group please

On 24 Jun, 13:20, "Tooomy"  wrote:
> "BrianW"  wrote in message
>
> news:b5e38ff9-0349-4742-b401->
>
> > "TfL tried to keep congestion charge increases total CO2 in London"
>
> > Complete retarded gibberish.
>
> Ofcourse it is IF you take out a couple of words from the original sentence
>
> Maybe the misses can point out where they took out the NOT  so that the
> bible  states you shall commit adultery :)
>
> And IF you keep repeating it - It will  come true in Briland - nowhere else
> mind :(

Just as there are two types of ozone, perhaps there are two types of
Toomtard on this group.  If so, it must have been the other Toomtard
who posted the "sentence" I cut and pasted above:

http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.rec.driving/msg/8dcc755907ca4eca?hl=en&dmode=source

Or perhaps Toomtard is such a drooling retard that he can't remember
what he posts.  Hmmm, I wonder which is more likely?

I have to hand it to you, Toomy - you make Dung look intelligent,
which is a real achievement.  Congratulations!

BrianW wrote:
> On 24 Jun, 13:20, "Tooomy"  wrote:
>> "BrianW"  wrote in message
>>
>> news:b5e38ff9-0349-4742-b401->
>>
>>> "TfL tried to keep congestion charge increases total CO2 in London"
>>> Complete retarded gibberish.
>> Ofcourse it is IF you take out a couple of words from the original sentence
>>
>> Maybe the misses can point out where they took out the NOT  so that the
>> bible  states you shall commit adultery :)
>>
>> And IF you keep repeating it - It will  come true in Briland - nowhere else
>> mind :(
> 
> Just as there are two types of ozone, perhaps there are two types of
> Toomtard on this group.  If so, it must have been the other Toomtard
> who posted the "sentence" I cut and pasted above:
> 
> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.rec.driving/msg/8dcc755907ca4eca?hl=en&dmode=source
> 
> Or perhaps Toomtard is such a drooling retard that he can't remember
> what he posts.  Hmmm, I wonder which is more likely?
> 
> I have to hand it to you, Toomy - you make Dung look intelligent,
> which is a real achievement.  Congratulations!

I'm not sure that "look" is the right word in Doug's case in that he 
looks absolutely dreadful - something out of a nightmare!  "Seem" may be 
better.

;-)

-- 
Moving things in still pictures!

On 24 Jun, 14:04, Peter Thomas
 wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:20:39 퍝, "Tooomy" 
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >"BrianW"  wrote in message
> >news:b5e38ff9-0349-4742-b401->
> >> "TfL tried to keep congestion charge increases total CO2 in London"
>
> >> Complete retarded gibberish.
>
> >Ofcourse it is IF you take out a couple of words from the original sentence
>
> >Maybe the misses can point out where they took out the NOT �so that the
> >bible �states you shall commit adultery :)
>
> >And IF you keep repeating it - It will �come true in Briland - nowhere else
> >mind :(
>
> Remedial english, remedial writing, remedial comprehension - you
> really need them all

You can almost visualise the dribble running down Toomy's chin when
you read his gibberish.  He is a genuine drooling retard, and a
clueless cunt to boot.

BrianW  wrote:

> > > "TfL tried to keep congestion charge increases total CO2 in London"
> >
> > > Complete retarded gibberish.
> >
> > Ofcourse it is IF you take out a couple of words from the original sentence
> >
> > Maybe the misses can point out where they took out the NOT  so that the
> > bible  states you shall commit adultery :)

So the word "not" is missing from your "sentence" is it Toomtard? Shall
we try to remedy that?

Not TfL tried to keep congestion charge increases total CO2 in London.
TfL not tried to keep congestion charge increases total CO2 in London
TfL tried not to keep congestion charge increases total CO2 in London
TfL tried to not keep congestion charge increases total CO2 in London
TfL tried to keep not congestion charge increases total CO2 in London
TfL tried to keep congestion not charge increases total CO2 in London
TfL tried to keep congestion charge not increases total CO2 in London
TfL tried to keep congestion charge increases not total CO2 in London
TfL tried to keep congestion charge increases total not CO2 in London
TfL tried to keep congestion charge increases total CO2 not in London
TfL tried to keep congestion charge increases total CO2 in not London
TfL tried to keep congestion charge increases total CO2 in London not

No, every single variation is still complete and utter retarded
gibberish. Here's a challenge for you Toomtard. Write the sentence
inserting the work "not" where you think it makes the sentence have
meaning or indeed insert any word(s) that you allege were removed from
that sentence which has, as Google will show, been reproduced verbatim.

I'm sure such a noted radio play author as yourself who can command £10K
repeat fees fron the BBC will find it a doddle to post a version of that
sentence in your native language.

"Steve Firth" <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote in message 
news:1ij27iv.ee4im71vod3kdN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk...
> BrianW  wrote:
SNIP
OK I may as well retaliate after all the little sniping I've had to suffer

Steve you're not stupid JUST a TROLL - eight homes at the last count , fleet 
of upmarket cars - no car, young and old ,pro and anti GW, retired with half 
a dozen careers  blah di blah

You form of character assasination is to usually make statements which you 
know are lies or exaggeration  and a couple of "people" support your 
comments

You in the past stated  my english was rubbish due to examples such as 
"tintwerweb" or the electric interweb - You know these remarks are a jest or 
a common term used - the same as Manchester Rovers - You remember comedy, 
jokes jesting  ?
(Look in the mirror sweetie If It can stand the shock :)

Other examples I've been slated for are aural - spelt wrong  - Duh!  , told 
that things can not GO on fire they have to CATCH fire.

And I only got £1.5k  after all it was Radio7 (named after the number of 
listeners I guess - sadly :)

HOWEVER may  I congratulate you for pointing out someones' trolling message 
a couple of months ago which stated something like - If you cannot be 
rescued from your car within one hour, and its a main route you will be 
bulldozed off the road in the interests of other motorists
Others - myself included stated it was a troll BUT only once you said it was 
a troll did the folks ( aka amorphous mass of stupidity:)   stop agreeing 
with the  "proposed plans"

On 25 Jun, 12:17, "Tommy"  wrote:

[a load of retarded drivel]

Toomy, people on here take the piss out you because you are a witless
moron.  We post things about you that are true (e.g. reposting
gibberish you have written).  This makes you look like a retard.  You
"retaliate" by making up demented lies about people.  The result
is ... you look like a retard.

Anyway, you provide entertainment of the "poke the mong with a sharp
stick" variety, so do keep it up.

BrianW  wrote:

> On 25 Jun, 12:17, "Tommy"  wrote:
> 
> [a load of retarded drivel]

Christ now I'll have to go and read it to see if he even attempted to
answer the question.

Tommy  wrote:

> "Steve Firth" <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote in message 
> news:1ij27iv.ee4im71vod3kdN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk...
> > BrianW  wrote:
> SNIP
> OK I may as well retaliate after all the little sniping I've had to suffer

What you could have done was answer what was, a very simple question.
Not only did I ask you to clarify your statement, I also took your
sugestion that the word "not" had been edited from your reply and quoted
every single possible variation on that sentence that contained the word
"not". I could not make sense of any of the variants. I then asked you
clearly and simply to correct the sentence using either the word "not"
or indeed any other words of your choice so that the sentence could be
understood.

It was a fair and generous offer. I'm doing you the respect of assuming
that you wanted to communicate something and I'm giving you the chance
to communicate whatever it is that you wish to communicate. I'm also
taking at face value your claim to be a noted
author/director/producer/contributor (whatever) to Radio 7 and, since
radio is entirely a medium of communication in speech, assuming that you
are indeed capable of expressing yourself in your native language.

So I ask again, what meaning did you intend the following sentence:

"TfL tried to keep congestion charge increases total CO2 in London"

to convey?

Don't try to argue that I have changed that sentence, I haven't. It's
quoted verbatim. Don't try to bluster or snip or abuse or tell lies
about me or anyone else. Simply explain or correct the sentence above.

It's not that hard to do, is it?

> Steve you're not stupid JUST a TROLL

That's a lie. Asking you to explain yourself is not trolling.

> - eight homes at the last count ,

Another lie.

> fleet of upmarket cars

Another lie.

> - no car,

Yet another lie.

> young and old ,pro and anti GW, retired with half a dozen careers  blah di
> blah

And yet more lies.

 
> You form of character assasination is to usually make statements which you
> know are lies or exaggeration  and a couple of "people" support your
> comments

More lies.
 
> You in the past stated  my english was rubbish due to examples such as
> "tintwerweb" or the electric interweb - You know these remarks are a jest
> or a common term used - the same as Manchester Rovers - You remember
> comedy, jokes jesting  ? (Look in the mirror sweetie If It can stand the
> shock :)

Firstly your statement is a lie. I have stated that your command of
English is rubbish. But not for the reasons that you cite. I state that
your command of English is rubbish because you are incapable of
expressing yourself in a coherent sentence.
 
> Other examples I've been slated for are aural - spelt wrong  - Duh!  ,
> told that things can not GO on fire they have to CATCH fire.

Were those comments made by me?
 
> And I only got £1.5k  after all it was Radio7 (named after the number of
> listeners I guess - sadly :)

I still consider your statement to be a lie, unless your involvement was
playing "incoherent mumbling youth" in a play about chavs.
 
> HOWEVER may  I congratulate you for pointing out someones' trolling message
> a couple of months ago which stated something like - If you cannot be
> rescued from your car within one hour, and its a main route you will be
> bulldozed off the road in the interests of other motorists
> Others - myself included stated it was a troll BUT only once you said it was
> a troll did the folks ( aka amorphous mass of stupidity:)   stop agreeing
> with the  "proposed plans"

You may lie down and get fisted with a Belisha Beacon for all I care
Toomy. Your outpourings on this group have shown you to be a sadly
deluded and somewhat pathetic nobody. You utter complete and utter
fantasy and *always* run away when challenged. Then you repeat the same
old lies, over and over again.

Now, you have a simple task. One sentence, correct it so that it makes
sense in your native language.

Steve Firth wrote:
> Tommy  wrote:
>
>> "Steve Firth" <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:1ij27iv.ee4im71vod3kdN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk...
>>> BrianW  wrote:
>> SNIP
>> OK I may as well retaliate after all the little sniping I've had to
>> suffer

> Now, you have a simple task. One sentence, correct it so that it makes
> sense in your native language.

"Twll tin pob Toomy"

Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote:

> You utter complete and utter fantasy and *always* run away when
> challenged. Then you repeat the same old lies, over and over again.

And now, Toomtard proves me right by failing to address even one point
in the list given.

thanx for the name cheque, don't forget its "evening standard" not moi

"BrianW"  wrote in message 
news:415ac102-dc0c-49d2-9da7-4cbf1262fdf1@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On 24 Jun, 14:04, Peter Thomas
 wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:20:39 +0100, "Tooomy" 
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >"BrianW"  wrote in message
> >news:b5e38ff9-0349-4742-b401->
> >> "TfL tried to keep congestion charge increases total CO2 in London"
>
> >> Complete retarded gibberish.
>
> >Ofcourse it is IF you take out a couple of words from the original 
> >sentence
>
> >Maybe the misses can point out where they took out the NOT ?so that the
> >bible ?states you shall commit adultery :)
>
> >And IF you keep repeating it - It will ?come true in Briland - nowhere 
> >else
> >mind :(
>
> Remedial english, remedial writing, remedial comprehension - you
> really need them all

You can almost visualise the dribble running down Toomy's chin when
you read his gibberish.  He is a genuine drooling retard, and a
clueless cunt to boot.

On 10 Jul, 16:43, "Tommy"  wrote:
> thanx for the name cheque, don't forget its "evening standard" not moi

Toomy the retarded cunt talks gibberish again.

BrianW wrote:

> "Tommy"  wrote:

>> thanx for the name cheque, don't forget its "evening standard" not moi

> Toomy the retarded cunt talks gibberish again.

That's legal language, is it, Brian?

On 10 Jul, 22:15, JNugent  wrote:
> BrianW wrote:
> > "Tommy"  wrote:
> >> thanx for the name cheque, don't forget its "evening standard" not moi
> > Toomy the retarded cunt talks gibberish again.
>
> That's legal language, is it, Brian?

Of sorts.  Frankly, no other word seems adequate when describing Toomy.