Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:25:36 +0100,    group: uk.transport        back       
More vehicle-based attacks against pedestrians   
Doug, in your frenzy to start as many car-related threads as you could today 
(incidentally one of which is not UK-related, so therefore OT, and one is a 
non-story anyway, as the tanker drivers dispute is no more), you have once 
again missed cases of real vehicle-based intimatation and violence on our 
streets, like you managed the other day by ignoring the bus driver who 
knocked down a pedestrian. This time it's attacks on children:

Cyclist sought after girl injured: 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/sussex/7460594.stm
Cyclist mows down boy near Seaford: 
http://www.theargus.co.uk/mostpopular.var.2328265.mostcommented.cyclist_mows_down_boy_near_seaford.php

So, Doug, Can I have your confirmation that, by your own standards, these 
incidents are evidence of cyclist terrorism? Two similar stories obviously 
has the implication that cyclists are a danger to all children and severe 
curtailment of all cyclists' priviledges of being allowed to ride their bike 
should be imposed immediately.

Surely you would agree? There is as much basis and evidence for my argument 
here as you produce when branding all motorists as terrorists and killers.
date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:25:36 +0100   author:   Graculus

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us