Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:19:44 -0700 (PDT),    group: uk.transport        back       
Re: Arms Protest Ends in Riot   
On 10 Jun, 09:08, David Hansen 
wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 23:16:15 -0700 (PDT) someone who may be Doug
>  wrote this:-
>
> >Nope, in this case the police were acting as censors.
>
> Indeed. They chose the time of their interventions very carefully,
> so that there was not enough time to counter the intervention and
> the venues were put in a  difficult position.
>
> However, their censorship did have the effect of making the film far
> more well known than it would have been otherwise. One can download
> it from <http://www.smashedo.org.uk> and see why the police tried to
> ban it.

How on earth can you say it was the police who censored it, when it
was the film makers who had failed to get a certificate?
date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:19:44 -0700 (PDT)   author:   BrianW

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us