Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:18:08 +0100,    group: uk.transport        back       
Re: Train ticket checks   
In message , at 13:04:08 on 
Sat, 7 Jun 2008, Alasdair  remarked:
>>And what does one do when the exact circumstances in question have never
>>created a binding precedent?
>>
>>Go to a court and ask, I assume - but this is simply evidence that you
>>can't look everything up in "documents" in advance, and therefore be
>>sure that everything you do is 'legal'). That's all. Nothing more
>>sinister than that.
>
>The law is not an exact science like maths or physics so that every
>possible action or failure to act in every possible set of
>circumstances is covered.  Were it otherwise, there would be no need
>for court cases and the lawyers would go out of business.

Thankyou. That's exactly the same sentiment as I'm trying to express.

In other words, you can't find every answer in "all the law from every 
source" (or anywhere else) a lot of the time.
-- 
Roland Perry
date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 13:49:35 +0100   author:   Roland Perry

Re: Train ticket checks   
In message 
          keith  wrote:

> On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 14:10:40 +0100, Roland Perry 
> wrote:
> 
> >In message , at 13:56:04 on 
> >Sat, 7 Jun 2008, Peter Masson  remarked:
> >>> Therefore unless you are in circumstances which *are* covered by the
> >>> bylaws I  would  still say that you do not have to have a ticket.
> >>
> >>You take that line if you like, and if you are prepared to argue it to
> >>magistrates. I will retain my ticket until it is officially collected or I
> >>am off railway premises. Maybe over cautious, but erring on the safe side.
> >
> >"Keith" has been given this advice several times now, but fails to 
> >accept it.
> 
> It may be advice - but it was not what I was really looking for.
> 
> I would not take issue with Peter - he has offered it as straight
> common sense advice.  You however have offered a point of view
> regarding the actual legal position which I have now asked you to back
> up and you can't.
> 
> I was posting in uk.legal as I was looking for a legal point of view.
> 

When does your case come up?  Do let us know what happens.

-- 
Graeme Wall
This address is not read, substitute trains for rail.
Transport Miscellany at <http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/index.html>
date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:18:08 +0100   author:   Graeme Wall

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us