Jose wrote:

> In my case, that's good enough for outgoing calls to landline numbers,
> only; doesn't work for calls to mobiles, neither for incoming VoIP
> calls :-(
> 
> Maybe the SPA-3103 wil do it, or some other manufacturer sees a niche
> there ;-)

An orchid dialler box is very cheap. It's the obvious solution, except 
that unless you use the version with a PSU, you may lose incoming CLI.

On Tue, 6 May 2008 15:45:07 UTC, Iain  wrote:

> Jose wrote:
> 
> > In my case, that's good enough for outgoing calls to landline numbers,
> > only; doesn't work for calls to mobiles, neither for incoming VoIP
> > calls :-(
> > 
> > Maybe the SPA-3103 wil do it, or some other manufacturer sees a niche
> > there ;-)
> 
> An orchid dialler box is very cheap. It's the obvious solution, except 
> that unless you use the version with a PSU, you may lose incoming CLI.

Not always true. I have the PSU version. I lose CLI. :-(

-- 
Regards
Dave Saville

NB Remove nospam. for good email address

Dave Saville wrote:

>> An orchid dialler box is very cheap. It's the obvious solution, except 
>> that unless you use the version with a PSU, you may lose incoming CLI.
> 
> Not always true. I have the PSU version. I lose CLI. :-(
>
Ah, but is there a PSU powering it? I found that the PSU version with no 
PSU running is no better.

On Wed, 7 May 2008 08:24:12 UTC, Iain  wrote:

> Dave Saville wrote:
> 
> >> An orchid dialler box is very cheap. It's the obvious solution, except 
> >> that unless you use the version with a PSU, you may lose incoming CLI.
> > 
> > Not always true. I have the PSU version. I lose CLI. :-(
> >
> Ah, but is there a PSU powering it? I found that the PSU version with no 
> PSU running is no better.
>
Yes it was powering it. Since changing phones to a much smarter one I 
have taken it out of circuit.


-- 
Regards
Dave Saville

NB Remove nospam. for good email address