Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 01:18:56 -0800 (PST),    group: uk.telecom.voip        back       
Re: M I-5,Persecu tion , MI 5 Ha ve Systema tically Destroyed My L ife   
*** Oh no, not this shit again  ***
Update January 1st 2008 (Happy New Year!)

It was in the mid 1990s when I first experienced the ‘Internet 
Phenomenon’, and not soon after I became aware of a character called 
Mike Corley who firmly believed he was being persecuted by the MI5 
through a campaign of covert surveillance, hidden cameras, staged 
encounters and casual remarks uttered by nearby ‘strangers’ (set up by 
MI5) and, spookily, by radio and television presenters and celebrities 
equipped with technology that allowed them to see Mike through his TV 
and radio.

Over the years, Mike’s extraordinary volume of repeat postings on UseNet 
seemed to follow me around, but I dismissed their appearance as random 
and not aimed at me – after all, how could a person that was so angry at 
his harassment inflict similar treatment on not only me, but also the 
entire usenet population? But still, in the back of my mind, I was 
convinced that wherever I looked I could see Mike’s messages – it was as 
if he had access to my webcam and could see which newsgroups I visited, 
thus allowing him to flood them with his repeat messages outlining what 
he believed to be cases of persecution.  I soon discovered how to 
killfile Mike’s postings because he very thoughtfully used groups of the 
same words in his subject line.

But then in late 2007, Mike changed tactics in order to once again 
intrude on me – he started to insert random characters and spaces into 
the subject title, this avoiding my filters. All of a sudden Mike had 
conspired to get back in my life and was making my visits to my 
favourite newsgroups a complete nightmare. I even noticed complete 
strangers near me using words like ‘again’ and ‘more’ – surely they 
aren’t referring to the fact that I was seeing more of his posts again? 
Coincidence? I think not. I even noticed the weather presenters on BBC 
News 24 using the word ‘rain’, which is an anagram of ‘Nair’ – and I 
used to work with someone with that surname about the time I first 
noticed Mike’s postings on UseNet all those years ago – the circle is 
complete.

Mike, what are you trying to do to me? Why do I deserve this? I have 
read your posts, visited your web site, we both know you need help so 
why persecute us innocent usenet people – you are challenging your 
perceived persecution by persecuting others - surely even you can see 
that by adopting the tactics you so abhor many will suggest you have 
turned into the biggest paranoid hypocrite on the Internet? Log off Mike 
and leave me alone – you are ruining my UseNet life!
date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 14:31:50 +0000   author:   Linker3000

comm through phones   
if i have five phones in a small office, and i needed to let them talk
via the LAN already present, how could i do that?

Thanks,
Robert
date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 01:18:56 -0800 (PST)   author:   robert

Re: comm through phones   
On Jan 2, 9:18 am, robert  wrote:
> if i have five phones in a small office, and i needed to let them talk
> via the LAN already present, how could i do that?
>
> Thanks,
> Robert

I assume the phones are IP ones?
date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 01:32:55 -0800 (PST)   author:   speckled hen

Re: comm through phones   
robert was thinking very hard :
> if i have five phones in a small office, and i needed to let them talk
> via the LAN already present, how could i do that?

Bit more info needed.

Are they IP phones or analogue etc?

Do you want them to be able to simply talk to one another? In pairs? 
All at once? to external "normal" telephone numbers?
date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:51:22 GMT   author:   Jono lid

Re: comm through phones   
On 1ÔÂ2ÈÕ, ÏÂÎç5ʱ18·Ö, robert  wrote:
> if i have five phones in a small office, and i needed to let them talk
> via the LAN already present, how could i do that?
>
> Thanks,
> Robert

are they ip phones? If so , there are some solution ,

1, try to find out the peer to peer setting on your ip phone. Maybe it
can support route some calls to other ip phone. At least my IP phone
Jin301(Á´½Ó) support it.
2, if you are using normal pstn phone, you have to chose some ata to
change them into voice over ip. It is nearly same to set up a new ip
phone.

Leon
www.telecomchinasourcing.com
date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 22:46:27 -0800 (PST)   author:   unknown

Re: comm through phones   
here is our JIN 310 Info:
https://host569.ipowerweb.com/~telecomc/osCommerce/catalog/product_info.php/products_id/28?osCsid=3aec508a9e48bc071bd60f857b24c4e7

hope it will help you

Leon
date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 23:04:09 -0800 (PST)   author:   unknown

Re: comm through phones   
On 2 Jan, 17:18, robert  wrote:
> if i have five phones in a small office, and i needed to let them talk
> via the LAN already present, how could i do that?
>
> Thanks,
> Robert

If your phones are SIP phones or can support SIP, I suggest you to try
miniSipServer or Trixbox.

miniSipServer is a SIP server for windows, very easy to use and you
can almost deploy your VOIP network in 1 minute with it.

Trixbox is a PBX for linux, it is powerful but complex. If you are
good at linux, it is a good choice.
date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 03:06:45 -0800 (PST)   author:   Hongtian

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us