As title.

Now if only we could get rid of him from here as well :-(

"Al Paca"  wrote in message 
news:3358m3pedal22osqbpeqk5bcbgnkgh1mli@news.individual.de...
> As title.
>
> Now if only we could get rid of him from here as well :-(
>
You can do, just put him in your blocked senders list, and if he changes 
his identity, just add the new identity to the list, it only takes a 
couple of seconds. Unfortunately, I have had to put Ivor in as well, 
because he kept replying to him, and included Ron's rantings in his 
replies, but since doing that, I very very rarely see any of Ron's 
rubbish now, and the group seems much better for it.

"Harry Stottle"  wrote in message 
news:iPU8j.9435$h35.2705@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net...
>
> "Al Paca"  wrote in message 
> news:3358m3pedal22osqbpeqk5bcbgnkgh1mli@news.individual.de...
>> As title.
>>
>> Now if only we could get rid of him from here as well :-(
>>
> You can do, just put him in your blocked senders list, and if he changes 
> his identity, just add the new identity to the list, it only takes a 
> couple of seconds. Unfortunately, I have had to put Ivor in as well, 
> because he kept replying to him, and included Ron's rantings in his 
> replies, but since doing that, I very very rarely see any of Ron's rubbish 
> now, and the group seems much better for it.
>
Yes, an old problem. We have two very nasty individuals on aus.electronics. 
Of course, I put them in my blocked list but others will keep replying and 
quoting them in full, and thus their nastiness still invades my desktop. I 
grumbled about this only to be told "who are you to censor?". Fair point I 
suppose but sigh...

Harry Stottle wrote:
> "Al Paca"  wrote in message
> news:3358m3pedal22osqbpeqk5bcbgnkgh1mli@news.individual.de...
>> As title.
>>
>> Now if only we could get rid of him from here as well :-(
>>
> You can do, just put him in your blocked senders list, and if he
> changes his identity, just add the new identity to the list, it only
> takes a couple of seconds. Unfortunately, I have had to put Ivor in
> as well, because he kept replying to him, and included Ron's rantings
> in his replies, but since doing that, I very very rarely see any of
> Ron's rubbish now, and the group seems much better for it.


Same here, they are both blocked, and as you say, this place is so much 
better for it.


-- 
Worried about debt?
http://www.cccs.co.uk

On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 18:13:34 GMT, "Harry Stottle"
 wrote:

>You can do, just put him in your blocked senders list, and if he changes 
>his identity, just add the new identity to the list, it only takes a 
>couple of seconds.

I've already done this and it's fine in theory but falls down for two
reasons.

1) People keep replying to him instead of ignoring the drivel, and

2) People keep quoting large blocks or entire messages of his.

If we could train ourselves not to do this the group could get on with
it's original charter purpose.

On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:53:25 +0000, Al Paca
 wrote:

>As title.
>
>Now if only we could get rid of him from here as well :-(
>
Get your facts right before you post total nonsense PILLOCK
I was in the forum less than a hour ago .

"{{{{{Welcome}}}}}"  wrote in message 
news:MhW8j.63437$c_1.57046@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> -- 
> Worried about debt?
> http://www.cccs.co.uk

Not wishing this to appear as spamming, and it's OT, but picking up on your 
sig, another very useful site for those having problems with credit card 
debt and similar is http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk
or more specifcally http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/ 
where you will find many people challenging the legality of the enforcement 
of their debts by various creditors and Debt Collection Agencies, and 
winning!

Rob

On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:48:52 GMT, mymail@hotmail.com wrote:

>Get your facts right before you post total nonsense PILLOCK

'Sticks and stones'

Anyone can read it Ronnie boy, but you have been banned from posting
there due to your unnecessary abusive inaccurate attacks on the
company.

My facts are without doubt.

"Al Paca"  wrote in message 
news:skbcm3hb023l1af4ujobnjrncb47n8ec68@news.individual.de...
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:48:52 GMT, mymail@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>>Get your facts right before you post total nonsense PILLOCK
>
> 'Sticks and stones'
>
> Anyone can read it Ronnie boy, but you have been banned from posting
> there due to your unnecessary abusive inaccurate attacks on the
> company.
>
> My facts are without doubt.
>
This thread is getting boring. Haven't you all got something better to do?

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:34:52 +1100, "Suzy" <not@valid> wrote:

>
>"Al Paca"  wrote in message 
>news:skbcm3hb023l1af4ujobnjrncb47n8ec68@news.individual.de...
>> On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:48:52 GMT, mymail@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>>Get your facts right before you post total nonsense PILLOCK
>>
>> 'Sticks and stones'
>>
>> Anyone can read it Ronnie boy, but you have been banned from posting
>> there due to your unnecessary abusive inaccurate attacks on the
>> company.
>>
>> My facts are without doubt.
>>
>This thread is getting boring. Haven't you all got something better to do? 
>
Course we have I have resolved to give and get voip.co.uk as much bad
publicity has I can they are a lying shower of bastards and also place
one particular contributor in my KF because it doesn't know what it is
talking about and tells untruths .Hell I thought Sipgate was bad but
the shower at uk voip make Sipgate look almost decent .

wrote in message 
news:vnjcm3hliulubgp6qjpnjiv3r4bgs9vi8k@4ax.com...

> Course we have I have resolved to give and get voip.co.uk as much bad
> publicity has I can they are a lying shower of bastards and also place
> one particular contributor in my KF because it doesn't know what it is
> talking about and tells untruths .Hell I thought Sipgate was bad but
> the shower at uk voip make Sipgate look almost decent .

So who recommended voip.co.uk to you in the first place?  Are we right in 
believing that you will now subject them to years of torrents of abuse and 
petty name-calling?

Or did you just decide they were good enough for you to use all on your 
lonesome, in which case you can call yourself a twat for evermore.

Rob