mymail@hotmail.com wrote:

> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:02:17 +0000, Linker3000
>  wrote:
> 
> >It strikes me that they are maybe one and the same person having a 
> >public tussle with their internal alter egos?
> How dare you class me has a greasy biker who supports a totally usless
> voip provider . 

At least he knows how to write coherent English and type
correctly!

>> >It strikes me that they are maybe one and the same person having a
>> >public tussle with their internal alter egos?
>> How dare you class me has a greasy biker who supports a totally usless
>> voip provider .
>
> At least he knows how to write coherent English and type
> correctly!

And would have the moral high ground, if he would only learn to
treat Ron's comments with the contempt they deserve instead
of always childishly wanting to have the last word.
[Norman's pointless x-post removed]

-- 
Graham

%Profound_observation%

Graham. explained on 01/12/2007 :
>>> >It strikes me that they are maybe one and the same person having a
>>> >public tussle with their internal alter egos?
>>> How dare you class me has a greasy biker who supports a totally usless
>>> voip provider .
>>
>> At least he knows how to write coherent English and type
>> correctly!
>
> And would have the moral high ground, if he would only learn to
> treat Ron's comments with the contempt they deserve instead
> of always childishly wanting to have the last word.
> [Norman's pointless x-post removed]

And, icreasingly more often these days, the /first/ word.

"Jono" <nothanks@blueyonder.invalid> wrote in message 
news:mn.0a687d7c859aaff7.48968@blueyonder.invalid...
> Graham. explained on 01/12/2007 :
>>>> >It strikes me that they are maybe one and the same person having a
>>>> >public tussle with their internal alter egos?
>>>> How dare you class me has a greasy biker who supports a totally 
>>>> usless
>>>> voip provider .
>>>
>>> At least he knows how to write coherent English and type
>>> correctly!
>>
>> And would have the moral high ground, if he would only learn to
>> treat Ron's comments with the contempt they deserve instead
>> of always childishly wanting to have the last word.
>> [Norman's pointless x-post removed]
>
> And, icreasingly more often these days, the /first/ word.

Hmm, well that's a matter of opinion. And believe me, I most definitely 
treat Ron and his comments with the utmost contempt..!

And I still don't see it as childish to defend oneself against attack. If 
that means having the last word, so be it.


Ivor

on 01/12/2007, Ivor Jones supposed :
> "Jono" <nothanks@blueyonder.invalid> wrote in message 
> news:mn.0a687d7c859aaff7.48968@blueyonder.invalid...
>> Graham. explained on 01/12/2007 :
>>>>> >It strikes me that they are maybe one and the same person having a
>>>>> >public tussle with their internal alter egos?
>>>>> How dare you class me has a greasy biker who supports a totally usless
>>>>> voip provider .
>>>>
>>>> At least he knows how to write coherent English and type
>>>> correctly!
>>>
>>> And would have the moral high ground, if he would only learn to
>>> treat Ron's comments with the contempt they deserve instead
>>> of always childishly wanting to have the last word.
>>> [Norman's pointless x-post removed]
>>
>> And, icreasingly more often these days, the /first/ word.
>
> Hmm, well that's a matter of opinion. 

It's true, though. Many a time you "bring something up" first.

I think you enjoy it, in a strange way.

> And believe me, I most definitely treat 
> Ron and his comments with the utmost contempt..!

I know. I cannot see the point in getting all het up, though.

> And I still don't see it as childish to defend oneself against attack. If 
> that means having the last word, so be it.

But you're both like playground adversaries.....why an obviously 
intelligent chap would waste time & effort is beyond me.

"Jono" <nothanks@blueyonder.invalid> wrote in message 
news:mn.0d727d7cc8b1d6a0.48968@blueyonder.invalid...
> on 01/12/2007, Ivor Jones supposed :

[snip]

>> Hmm, well that's a matter of opinion.
>
> It's true, though. Many a time you "bring something up" first.
>
> I think you enjoy it, in a strange way.

Think away. You'd be wrong though.

>> And believe me, I most definitely treat Ron and his comments with the 
>> utmost contempt..!
>
> I know. I cannot see the point in getting all het up, though.

I don't get het up. I defend myself against false allegations, such as the 
one that he persists in where I work for Sipgate. I wish I did, they'd 
probably pay a lot more than I get now, although if they read this I doubt 
they'd take me on..!

>> And I still don't see it as childish to defend oneself against attack. 
>> If that means having the last word, so be it.
>
> But you're both like playground adversaries.....why an obviously 
> intelligent chap would waste time & effort is beyond me.

It's not completely wasted. Some of it sticks. Little by little, as they 
say.

Ivor