Hey Muttley.
I'm syncing at 8064 kbps now. Just -0.8% down on the theoretical max.
Graham
date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 02:19:17 +0100
author: Eeyore
|
Re: Hey Muttley.
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 02:19:17 +0100, Eeyore
wrote:
>I'm syncing at 8064 kbps now. Just -0.8% down on the theoretical max.
>
>Graham
And i'm still d/loading at 20 meg 0.00% short of the max.
date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 07:05:31 GMT
author: Muttley
|
Re: Hey Muttley.
Muttley wrote:
> Eeyore wrote:
>
> >I'm syncing at 8064 kbps now. Just -0.8% down on the theoretical max.
> >
> >Graham
>
> And i'm still d/loading at 20 meg 0.00% short of the max.
Can you prove that ? I can prove my rate.
Graham
date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 08:28:40 +0100
author: Eeyore
|
Re: Hey Muttley.
Eeyore wrote:
> Muttley wrote:
>
>> Eeyore wrote:
>>
>>> I'm syncing at 8064 kbps now. Just -0.8% down on the theoretical
>>> max.
>>>
>>> Graham
>>
>> And i'm still d/loading at 20 meg 0.00% short of the max.
>
> Can you prove that ? I can prove my rate.
>
> Graham
No point. You wouldn't believe him and say he was lying and faking the
figures anyway.
--
Carl Waring
DigiGuide:
Full: http://getdigiguide.com/?p=1&r=1495
Web-based: http://getdigiguide.com/?p=3&r=1495
date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:02:46 +0100
author: Carl Waring
|
Re: Hey Muttley.
Carl Waring wrote:
> Eeyore wrote:
> > Muttley wrote:
> >> Eeyore wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'm syncing at 8064 kbps now. Just -0.8% down on the theoretical
> >>> max.
> >>
> >> And i'm still d/loading at 20 meg 0.00% short of the max.
> >
> > Can you prove that ? I can prove my rate.
>
> No point. You wouldn't believe him and say he was lying and faking the
> figures anyway.
I'd like to see even HOW he could prove it !
Graham
date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:28:08 +0100
author: Eeyore
|
Re: Hey Muttley.
"Muttley" wrote in message
news:svgbe4lh2b2fvcn1qb7eg7ljami39ipbir@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 02:19:17 +0100, Eeyore
> wrote:
>
>>I'm syncing at 8064 kbps now. Just -0.8% down on the theoretical max.
>>
>>Graham
>
> And i'm still d/loading at 20 meg 0.00% short of the max.
And I'm still working at my usual two-and-a-half megs, and don't really give
a monkey's!
;-)
George
date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 15:18:58 +0100
author: George Weston
|
Re: Hey Muttley.
Eeyore wrote:
>
> Carl Waring wrote:
>
>> Eeyore wrote:
>>> Muttley wrote:
>>>> Eeyore wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm syncing at 8064 kbps now. Just -0.8% down on the theoretical
>>>>> max.
>>>> And i'm still d/loading at 20 meg 0.00% short of the max.
>>> Can you prove that ? I can prove my rate.
>> No point. You wouldn't believe him and say he was lying and faking the
>> figures anyway.
>
> I'd like to see even HOW he could prove it !
>
> Graham
>
Oh, thats reasonably easy I think. Compare his NNTP posting address with
a download record off some server. Lots of them preserve who you are IP
wise.
date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:36:40 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
Re: Hey Muttley.
George Weston wrote:
> "Muttley" wrote in message
> news:svgbe4lh2b2fvcn1qb7eg7ljami39ipbir@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 02:19:17 +0100, Eeyore
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm syncing at 8064 kbps now. Just -0.8% down on the theoretical max.
>>>
>>> Graham
>> And i'm still d/loading at 20 meg 0.00% short of the max.
>
> And I'm still working at my usual two-and-a-half megs, and don't really give
> a monkey's!
> ;-)
Well I've had 4032k raw for several weeks, BUT the SNR is fading fast
(1.5db reported) with the outside temperature..don't think it will hold!
>
> George
>
>
date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:38:34 +0100
author: The Natural Philosopher a@b.c
|
