Reading the instructions that came with the Iplate kindly supplied FOC by 
Plusnet I was puzzled by the fact that they said it should only be fitted to 
NTE5 faceplates with the BT logo, and not the ones badged Openreach. So I 
decided to investigate further. What I have established is that the fixed 
part, that which is screwed to the wall, of the BT and Openreach NTE5 units 
are identical both physically and electrically other than the logo.



I then looked inside the removable part of the NTE5 set. These differ both 
physically and electrically. The Openreach one can be distinguished without 
dismantling by a small moulded cylindrical protrusion below, and to the 
right of the 4 way connector for wires. This allows clearance for an 
additional capacitor that isolates the bell wire.



The Iplate has an inductor and a capacitor. Both the BT and Openreach 
versions of the removable faceplate physically fit the Iplate but since the 
instructions say not to use it I assume that there would be some undesirable 
electrical interaction with the Openreach version.



As I don't have access to the necessary test gear I can't investigate 
further and with the parlous state of my ADSL connection I don't intend to 
experiment with it. The two types of NTE5 were kindly made available for 
examination by a friendly builder who had salvaged them from buildings that 
were being renovated.



I would be interested to hear from anyone who has any relevant detailed 
knowledge of the IPlate design and application.

The email address is valid if you don't wish to comment publically.

Peter Crosland

Peter Crosland wrote:
> Reading the instructions that came with the Iplate kindly supplied
> FOC by Plusnet I was puzzled by the fact that they said it should
> only be fitted to NTE5 faceplates with the BT logo, and not the
> ones badged Openreach. So I decided to investigate further. What I
> have established is that the fixed part, that which is screwed to
> the wall, of the BT and Openreach NTE5 units are identical both
> physically and electrically other than the logo.
>
>
> I then looked inside the removable part of the NTE5 set. These
> differ both physically and electrically. The Openreach one can be
> distinguished without dismantling by a small moulded cylindrical
> protrusion below, and to the right of the 4 way connector for
> wires. This allows clearance for an additional capacitor that
> isolates the bell wire.
>
>
> The Iplate has an inductor and a capacitor. Both the BT and
> Openreach versions of the removable faceplate physically fit the
> Iplate but since the instructions say not to use it I assume that
> there would be some undesirable electrical interaction with the
> Openreach version.
>
>
> As I don't have access to the necessary test gear I can't
> investigate further and with the parlous state of my ADSL
> connection I don't intend to experiment with it. The two types of
> NTE5 were kindly made available for examination by a friendly
> builder who had salvaged them from buildings that were being
> renovated.
>
>
> I would be interested to hear from anyone who has any relevant
> detailed knowledge of the IPlate design and application.
>
> The email address is valid if you don't wish to comment publically.
>
> Peter Crosland

Think you'll find the the Iplate & the Openreach faceplate do exactly the 
same job which is to choke any interference picked up by the bell wire 
reducing your bandwidth.  that's what I've gleaned from asking around but 
like everybody else we're being kept in the dark.

One suggestion though do not pay to have it fitted as it would probably be a 
complete waste of money (the fitting charge that is)

-- 
Peter Crosland
"kraftee" <kraftee@b&e-cottee.me.uk> wrote in message 
news:DbSdnbP0koD21snVRVnyvwA@bt.com...
> Peter Crosland wrote:
>> Reading the instructions that came with the Iplate kindly supplied
>> FOC by Plusnet I was puzzled by the fact that they said it should
>> only be fitted to NTE5 faceplates with the BT logo, and not the
>> ones badged Openreach. So I decided to investigate further. What I
>> have established is that the fixed part, that which is screwed to
>> the wall, of the BT and Openreach NTE5 units are identical both
>> physically and electrically other than the logo.
>>
>>
>> I then looked inside the removable part of the NTE5 set. These
>> differ both physically and electrically. The Openreach one can be
>> distinguished without dismantling by a small moulded cylindrical
>> protrusion below, and to the right of the 4 way connector for
>> wires. This allows clearance for an additional capacitor that
>> isolates the bell wire.
>>
>>
>> The Iplate has an inductor and a capacitor. Both the BT and
>> Openreach versions of the removable faceplate physically fit the
>> Iplate but since the instructions say not to use it I assume that
>> there would be some undesirable electrical interaction with the
>> Openreach version.
>>
>>
>> As I don't have access to the necessary test gear I can't
>> investigate further and with the parlous state of my ADSL
>> connection I don't intend to experiment with it. The two types of
>> NTE5 were kindly made available for examination by a friendly
>> builder who had salvaged them from buildings that were being
>> renovated.
>>
>>
>> I would be interested to hear from anyone who has any relevant
>> detailed knowledge of the IPlate design and application.

> Think you'll find the the Iplate & the Openreach faceplate do exactly the 
> same job which is to choke any interference picked up by the bell wire 
> reducing your bandwidth.  that's what I've gleaned from asking around but 
> like everybody else we're being kept in the dark.

It seems that the two devices should do the same but why does the IPlate 
need the addition of the wire wound inductor?

> One suggestion though do not pay to have it fitted as it would probably be 
> a complete waste of money (the fitting charge that is)

Agreed but it has been designed so that it is very easy to fit assuming one 
has a screwdriver and the ability to use it!

Peter Crosland

Peter Crosland wrote:
>> Peter Crosland wrote:
>>> Reading the instructions that came with the Iplate kindly supplied
>>> FOC by Plusnet I was puzzled by the fact that they said it should
>>> only be fitted to NTE5 faceplates with the BT logo, and not the
>>> ones badged Openreach. So I decided to investigate further. What I
>>> have established is that the fixed part, that which is screwed to
>>> the wall, of the BT and Openreach NTE5 units are identical both
>>> physically and electrically other than the logo.
>>>
>>>
>>> I then looked inside the removable part of the NTE5 set. These
>>> differ both physically and electrically. The Openreach one can be
>>> distinguished without dismantling by a small moulded cylindrical
>>> protrusion below, and to the right of the 4 way connector for
>>> wires. This allows clearance for an additional capacitor that
>>> isolates the bell wire.
>>>
>>>
>>> The Iplate has an inductor and a capacitor. Both the BT and
>>> Openreach versions of the removable faceplate physically fit the
>>> Iplate but since the instructions say not to use it I assume that
>>> there would be some undesirable electrical interaction with the
>>> Openreach version.
>>>
>>>
>>> As I don't have access to the necessary test gear I can't
>>> investigate further and with the parlous state of my ADSL
>>> connection I don't intend to experiment with it. The two types of
>>> NTE5 were kindly made available for examination by a friendly
>>> builder who had salvaged them from buildings that were being
>>> renovated.
>>>
>>>
>>> I would be interested to hear from anyone who has any relevant
>>> detailed knowledge of the IPlate design and application.
>
>> Think you'll find the the Iplate & the Openreach faceplate do
>> exactly the same job which is to choke any interference picked up
>> by the bell wire reducing your bandwidth.  that's what I've
>> gleaned from asking around but like everybody else we're being
>> kept in the dark.
>
> It seems that the two devices should do the same but why does the
> IPlate need the addition of the wire wound inductor?

True, but remember the NTE faceplate will be free whilst you have to pay for 
the Iplate so it's just got to be better (tongue in check sarcastic mode 
off)
>
>> One suggestion though do not pay to have it fitted as it would
>> probably be a complete waste of money (the fitting charge that is)
>
> Agreed but it has been designed so that it is very easy to fit
> assuming one has a screwdriver and the ability to use it!

You'd be amazed how many people don't want to even take their own faceplate 
off, even thought it could save them (quite literally) hundreds of pounds so 
I'll wouldn't be suprised if some do want to pay to have the Iplate fitted. 
Can't help but wonder about all those who have got the latest NTE who then 
go on to buy/have fitted an Iplate as they are supposed to be mutually 
exclusive.  I can see more fun & games in the future

On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 23:22:12 +0100, "Peter Crosland"
 wrote:

>Reading the instructions that came with the Iplate kindly supplied FOC by 
>Plusnet [snipped]

Can anyone tell me where I can buy an Iplate?

Thanks,
Terry_P

On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:28:21 +0100, Terry_P passed an empty day by
writing:

> On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 23:22:12 +0100, "Peter Crosland" 
> wrote:
> 
>>Reading the instructions that came with the Iplate kindly supplied FOC
>>by Plusnet [snipped]
> 
> Can anyone tell me where I can buy an Iplate?
> 
> Thanks,
> Terry_P

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Faster-Broadband-BT-
IPlate_W0QQitemZ320264994574QQihZ011QQcategoryZ67857QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

-- 
begin  oefixed_in_2005.exe

I have an Iplate, purchased on Ebay at huge expense, and I am getting
up to 1.5MB increase in download speeds.  It takes a little while to
rebalance itself but I seem to have moved from about 1.8MB to 3.3MB.

One question a friend has posed to me is - my Iplate is in the Master
BT Socket.  My Broadband is connected directly into that socket.  My
friend has a BT Master socket, but his internet is connected directly
into an extension socket.  What benefit would an iplate be to him?

Roger

On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:48:26 -0700 (PDT),
mac-google@ho-hum.demon.co.uk wrote:

>I have an Iplate, purchased on Ebay at huge expense, and I am getting
>up to 1.5MB increase in download speeds.  It takes a little while to
>rebalance itself but I seem to have moved from about 1.8MB to 3.3MB.
>
>One question a friend has posed to me is - my Iplate is in the Master
>BT Socket.  My Broadband is connected directly into that socket.  My
>friend has a BT Master socket, but his internet is connected directly
>into an extension socket.  What benefit would an iplate be to him?
>
>Roger

That is a question I would like answered too. I have a new house with
integral garage and the BT Master socket is in the garage. I connect
my router into the socket in the bedroom above and it is the first
socket from the BT master socket. Would there be any benefit from an
Iplate in this situation?

TIA,
Terry_P

Terry_P wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:48:26 -0700 (PDT),
> mac-google@ho-hum.demon.co.uk wrote:
> 
> 
>>I have an Iplate, purchased on Ebay at huge expense, and I am getting
>>up to 1.5MB increase in download speeds.  It takes a little while to
>>rebalance itself but I seem to have moved from about 1.8MB to 3.3MB.
>>
>>One question a friend has posed to me is - my Iplate is in the Master
>>BT Socket.  My Broadband is connected directly into that socket.  My
>>friend has a BT Master socket, but his internet is connected directly
>>into an extension socket.  What benefit would an iplate be to him?
>>
>>Roger
> 
> 
> That is a question I would like answered too. I have a new house with
> integral garage and the BT Master socket is in the garage. I connect
> my router into the socket in the bedroom above and it is the first
> socket from the BT master socket. Would there be any benefit from an
> Iplate in this situation?
> 
> TIA,
> Terry_P

I don't profess to be an expert on the iplate but as I understand it, it 
adds a high pass filter to the 'ring wire' so that ADSL data only goes 
down the proper twisted pair to extensions (unless there has also been a 
NTE filter plate at the master socket) and no 'one-legged' version of 
the data escapes down the ring wire - causing an unbalance in the data 
being sent around the house to extension sockets.
The whole advantage of fitting the NTE filter plate is that the ADSL 
data is taken off the line at the earliest opportunity and not sent 
around the house to multiple sockets. Each one of these can provide a 
'mis-termination' to the data which can cause interference and 
distortion to the ADSL signals or act as a pick-up of unwanted 
interfering signals from electrical appliances etc.
(think like a ripple in a pond where anything sticking up out of the 
water causes reflections which can cancel out the waves completely - 
just the same in electrical signals in wires)

I am sure there will gradually appear people's experiences with the iplate.

In your situation, I should (temporarily?) connect your router (via a 
filter) to the test socket behind the lower plate of the NTE.
If that makes a significant improvement in performance, consider fitting 
a NTE filter and running a separate RJ11 up to your bedroom.
Maplin or CPC sell long RJ11 cables. No need to be ripped off in PC W****d

Mike

In article , mikej@tiscali.co.uk says...

> 
> In your situation, I should (temporarily?) connect your router (via a 
> filter) to the test socket behind the lower plate of the NTE.
> If that makes a significant improvement in performance, consider fitting 
> a NTE filter and running a separate RJ11 up to your bedroom.
> Maplin or CPC sell long RJ11 cables. No need to be ripped off in PC W****d

I agree with this approach with one proviso - don't use a normal "flat" 
RJ11 extension cable.  

The OP should look at fitting a master socket faceplate filter of the 
type that has a through connection from the back of the faceplate, 
allowing the unfiltered ADSL signal to be connected pernamently e.g. 
ADLnation XTE2005. Then connect the current twisted-pair phone cable to 
the bedroom computer to the straight through connection and all the rest 
of the home wiring to the filtered connection.  This will remove the 
ADSL signal from all the house wiring at the master socket, except on 
the cable to the computer.  This cable should only connect the A and B 
wires to a single, twisted pair, with *no* other wires connected.  The 
socket in the bedroom should then be replaced with an RJ11 type so it 
won't accept a dumb telephone, or with a filtered socket (e.g. XTF85), 
if a local phone/fax modem is needed.

I find this to be much better than trying to run a plain RJ11 or a phone 
extension cable, especially where this isn't twisted pair, all the way 
back to the master socket's RJ11 ADSL socket.  If you do want to use an 
extension cable, you can get twisted pair RJ11s which do work - I've 
even improved installations replacing only the cheap, flat RJ11 cable 
supplied with the modem/router. It's (not) suprising the noise picked up 
by this standard "ADSL modem" cable between the wall socket and the 
modem/router, especaily when it is simply dropped down the back of the 
computer with all the other noisy cables...

-- 
John W
To mail me replace the obvious with co.uk twice

John D.W. wrote:

> 
> The OP should look at fitting a master socket faceplate filter of the 
> type that has a through connection from the back of the faceplate, 
> allowing the unfiltered ADSL signal to be connected pernamently e.g. 
> ADLnation XTE2005. Then connect the current twisted-pair phone cable to 
> the bedroom computer to the straight through connection and all the rest 
> of the home wiring to the filtered connection.  This will remove the 
> ADSL signal from all the house wiring at the master socket, except on 
> the cable to the computer.  This cable should only connect the A and B 
> wires to a single, twisted pair, with *no* other wires connected.  The 
> socket in the bedroom should then be replaced with an RJ11 type so it 
> won't accept a dumb telephone, or with a filtered socket (e.g. XTF85), 
> if a local phone/fax modem is needed.
> 


Interesting John

Hadn't come across this product. As you say it makes extension of the 
ADSL part on a separate twisted pair cable (mayb even CAT V with it's 
heavier construction than regular phone cable) easy.
Clever having the AB leg at the rear - I guess this is a filtered A/B 
leg rather than a direct connection to the BT A/B line.
Pity they can't spell in the website though:-
Quote:-

The XTE-2005 professional quality master socket filter, centerlaized 
filtration with maximum compatibility & performance  (SIC)

Mike

On 04/07/2008 11:17, m wrote:

> Clever having the AB leg at the rear - I guess this is a filtered A/B 
> leg rather than a direct connection to the BT A/B line.

No, it *IS* a direct connection to the A/B.

Phones/dial-up modems/faxes/skyboxes are be connected through the 
filter, adsl modems/routers need to connect to the non-filtered line.

In article , mikej@tiscali.co.uk says...

> 
> Interesting John
> 
> Hadn't come across this product. As you say it makes extension of the 
> ADSL part on a separate twisted pair cable (mayb even CAT V with it's 
> heavier construction than regular phone cable) easy.
> Clever having the AB leg at the rear - I guess this is a filtered A/B 
> leg rather than a direct connection to the BT A/B line.
> Pity they can't spell in the website though:-
> Quote:-
> 
> The XTE-2005 professional quality master socket filter, centerlaized 
> filtration with maximum compatibility & performance  (SIC)
 
Mike

The "ADSL filter" does *nothing* on the ADSL side, other than providing 
the RJ11 socket. The "ADSL filter", getting the ADSL signal separated 
from the telephone signals, is actually part of the ADSL modem's design.

The ADSL filter really a "phone filter", in that it is a low-pass filter 
that sits on the phone side to prevent the ADSL part of the signal (up 
to more than 1MHz) being sent to the unmatched telephone-type devices. 
It also has the function of preventing high frequency noise picked up or 
generated by the telephony devices interfering with the low-level ADSL 
signal. For more information see the circut diagram at the bottom of: 
http://www.adslnation.com/support/filters.php.  From this page, you'll 
see that not all ADSL filters are alike. Personally. I've probably 
thrown away more "plug-in" filters that I've done fixes, especially 
those provided "free"...

The fact that the filter does nothing on the ADSL side is the reason for 
installing one good filter as close to the incoming line as possible. 
Practically, this means using one of the master-socket faceplate 
replacement types.  With this, you prevent the ADSL signal being sent 
all over your house wiring, where it has to contend with all sorts of 
high frequency interference sources, not to mention having to run 
alongside an unbalanced "ring" wire acting like an aerial.

There's a good blog on ADSL wiring at: <http://yarwell.blogspot.com/2005
_08_01_yarwell_archive.html> and a page at: 
<http://www.readman.dsl.pipex.com/other/UKphonecatwiring.htm>

-- 
John W
To mail me replace the obvious with co.uk twice

For anyone else still looking for a BT Iplate here are 2 sources:

http://www.vispashop.com/broadband/bt-iplate-faster-broadband-/prod_144.html

Alternatively, search ebay.co.uk for "iplate".

Terry_P

On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 07:06:01 +0100, Terry_P  wrote:

>For anyone else still looking for a BT Iplate here are 2 sources:
>
>http://www.vispashop.com/broadband/bt-iplate-faster-broadband-/prod_144.html
>
>Alternatively, search ebay.co.uk for "iplate".
>
>Terry_P

 I have just fitted my new BT Iplate and the SN margin has more than
doubled from 9.5 to 22!

Terry_P wrote:
> For anyone else still looking for a BT Iplate here are 2 sources:
> 
> http://www.vispashop.com/broadband/bt-iplate-faster-broadband-/prod_144.html

Bit cheaper here:

http://www.buyaniplate.co.uk/

-- 
|Bob Pullen                   Broadband Solutions for
|Support                            Home & Business @
|PlusNet plc.                            www.plus.net
+------ PlusNet - The smarter way to broadband ------

"PlusNet Support Team"  wrote in message 
news:CfSdne4reLuRHR3VnZ2dnUVZ8u2dnZ2d@posted.plusnet...
>
> Terry_P wrote:
>> For anyone else still looking for a BT Iplate here are 2 sources:
>>
>> http://www.vispashop.com/broadband/bt-iplate-faster-broadband-/prod_144.html
>
> Bit cheaper here:
>
> http://www.buyaniplate.co.uk/

Thanks for the link, Bob.
I ordered one yesterday and it arrived in the post today.
Fitted it a few minutes ago and - bingo! Speed has gone from its usual 1 Meg 
to 1.9 Meg immediately!.
Well worth the money.
Now to buy a decent router and get rid of my USB "frog"...

George

In news:6edv86F6meftU1@mid.individual.net,
George Weston  typed, for some strange, 
unexplained reason:

[snip]

: Thanks for the link, Bob.
: I ordered one yesterday and it arrived in the post today.
: Fitted it a few minutes ago and - bingo! Speed has gone from its
: usual 1 Meg to 1.9 Meg immediately!.
: Well worth the money.
: Now to buy a decent router and get rid of my USB "frog"...
:
: George

If you're at all interested in making use of VoIP telephony, I can 
thoroughly recommend the AVM Fritz!Box range:

http://www.fritzbox.eu/en/index.php


Ivor

George Weston wrote:
> "PlusNet Support Team"  wrote in message 
> news:CfSdne4reLuRHR3VnZ2dnUVZ8u2dnZ2d@posted.plusnet...
>> Terry_P wrote:
>>> For anyone else still looking for a BT Iplate here are 2 sources:
>>>
>>> http://www.vispashop.com/broadband/bt-iplate-faster-broadband-/prod_144.html
>> Bit cheaper here:
>>
>> http://www.buyaniplate.co.uk/
> 
> Thanks for the link, Bob.

No probs. It's actually one of my ex work colleagues who's selling them 
via that website so it's a bit of a shameless plug if I'm honest ;)

> I ordered one yesterday and it arrived in the post today.
> Fitted it a few minutes ago and - bingo! Speed has gone from its usual 1 Meg 
> to 1.9 Meg immediately!.

I fitted mine this morning. Instant increase in sync rate from about 
2500kbps to 5000kbps. Just waiting on BT Wholesale's DLM kit to increase 
my throughput now.

> Well worth the money.

Agreed, I'm well happy with the above results! :)

-- 
|Bob Pullen                   Broadband Solutions for
|Support                            Home & Business @
|PlusNet plc.                            www.plus.net
+------ PlusNet - The smarter way to broadband ------

On 2008-07-19, George Weston  wrote:
>
> "PlusNet Support Team"  wrote in message 
> news:CfSdne4reLuRHR3VnZ2dnUVZ8u2dnZ2d@posted.plusnet...
>>
>> Terry_P wrote:
>>> For anyone else still looking for a BT Iplate here are 2 sources:
>>>
>>> http://www.vispashop.com/broadband/bt-iplate-faster-broadband-/prod_144.html
>>
>> Bit cheaper here:
>>
>> http://www.buyaniplate.co.uk/
>
> Thanks for the link, Bob.
> I ordered one yesterday and it arrived in the post today.
> Fitted it a few minutes ago and - bingo! Speed has gone from its usual 1 Meg 
> to 1.9 Meg immediately!.
> Well worth the money.
> Now to buy a decent router and get rid of my USB "frog"...

As a result of this thread, I ordered one too, got it today.  My sync 
speed has jumped from 1856Kbps to 2272. If my memory of the thresholds 
is right, if the router can hold the connection that'll give me a 2MB 
link up from 1.5. Not bad for 15 quid. :)

(I already run my line with a lower-than-usual SNR ratio, I've seen it 
hold a connection at just 2dB and VoIP works fine there. Mind you, the 
previous firmware on my DG834GT used to fall over at around 4dB. I'm 
running 1.02.09-UberGT)

-- 
-- Michael "Soruk" McConnell         Eridani Star System
   MailStripper - http://www.MailStripper.eu/ - SMTP spam filter
   Second Number - http://secondnumber.matrixnetwork.co.uk/

On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:43:54 +0000 (UTC), Soruk
 wrote:

>On 2008-07-19, George Weston  wrote:
>>
>> "PlusNet Support Team"  wrote in message 
>> news:CfSdne4reLuRHR3VnZ2dnUVZ8u2dnZ2d@posted.plusnet...
>>>
>>> Terry_P wrote:
>>>> For anyone else still looking for a BT Iplate here are 2 sources:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.vispashop.com/broadband/bt-iplate-faster-broadband-/prod_144.html
>>>
>>> Bit cheaper here:
>>>
>>> http://www.buyaniplate.co.uk/
>>
>> Thanks for the link, Bob.
>> I ordered one yesterday and it arrived in the post today.
>> Fitted it a few minutes ago and - bingo! Speed has gone from its usual 1 Meg 
>> to 1.9 Meg immediately!.
>> Well worth the money.
>> Now to buy a decent router and get rid of my USB "frog"...
>
>As a result of this thread, I ordered one too, got it today.  My sync 
>speed has jumped from 1856Kbps to 2272. If my memory of the thresholds 
>is right, if the router can hold the connection that'll give me a 2MB 
>link up from 1.5. Not bad for 15 quid. :)
>
>
How does that work if you already have an ADSLNation filtered
faceplate .?

On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:29:23 +0100, NOSPAMnet@gmail.com wrote:

>On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:43:54 +0000 (UTC), Soruk
> wrote:
>
>>On 2008-07-19, George Weston  wrote:
>>>
>>> "PlusNet Support Team"  wrote in message 
>>> news:CfSdne4reLuRHR3VnZ2dnUVZ8u2dnZ2d@posted.plusnet...
>>>>
>>>> Terry_P wrote:
>>>>> For anyone else still looking for a BT Iplate here are 2 sources:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.vispashop.com/broadband/bt-iplate-faster-broadband-/prod_144.html
>>>>
>>>> Bit cheaper here:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.buyaniplate.co.uk/
>>>
>>> Thanks for the link, Bob.
>>> I ordered one yesterday and it arrived in the post today.
>>> Fitted it a few minutes ago and - bingo! Speed has gone from its usual 1 Meg 
>>> to 1.9 Meg immediately!.
>>> Well worth the money.
>>> Now to buy a decent router and get rid of my USB "frog"...
>>
>>As a result of this thread, I ordered one too, got it today.  My sync 
>>speed has jumped from 1856Kbps to 2272. If my memory of the thresholds 
>>is right, if the router can hold the connection that'll give me a 2MB 
>>link up from 1.5. Not bad for 15 quid. :)
>>
>>
>How does that work if you already have an ADSLNation filtered
>faceplate .?

Just seen this
"Not compatible with pre-filtered faceplates "

On Jul 19, 6:50 am, "George Weston" 
wrote:
> "PlusNet Support Team"  wrote in messagenews:CfSdne4reLuRHR3VnZ2dnUVZ8u2dnZ2d@posted.plusnet...
>
>
>
> > Terry_P wrote:
> >> For anyone else still looking for a BT Iplate here are 2 sources:
>
> >>http://www.vispashop.com/broadband/bt-iplate-faster-broadband-/prod_1..> > Bit cheaper here:
>
> >http://www.buyaniplate.co.uk/
>
> Thanks for the link, Bob.
> I ordered one yesterday and it arrived in the post today.
> Fitted it a few minutes ago and - bingo! Speed has gone from its usual 1 Meg
> to 1.9 Meg immediately!.
> Well worth the money.
> Now to buy a decent router and get rid of my USB "frog"...
>
> George

You can get a replacement faceplate for the NTE5 here which does the
same job as an iplate!

http://www.run-it-direct.co.uk/BTsocketNTE5.html

On Jul 23, 9:04 pm, NOSPAM...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:29:23 퍝, NOSPAM...@gmail.com wrote:
> >On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:43:54 퍍 (UTC), Soruk
> > wrote:
>
> >>On 2008-07-19, George Weston  wrote:
>
> >>> "PlusNet Support Team"  wrote in message
> >>>news:CfSdne4reLuRHR3VnZ2dnUVZ8u2dnZ2d@posted.plusnet...
>
> >>>> Terry_P wrote:
> >>>>> For anyone else still looking for a BT Iplate here are 2 sources:
>
> >>>>>http://www.vispashop.com/broadband/bt-iplate-faster-broadband-/prod_1...
>
> >>>> Bit cheaper here:
>
> >>>>http://www.buyaniplate.co.uk/
>
> >>> Thanks for the link, Bob.
> >>> I ordered one yesterday and it arrived in the post today.
> >>> Fitted it a few minutes ago and - bingo! Speed has gone from its usual 1 Meg
> >>> to 1.9 Meg immediately!.
> >>> Well worth the money.
> >>> Now to buy a decent router and get rid of my USB "frog"...
>
> >>As a result of this thread, I ordered one too, got it today.  My sync
> >>speed has jumped from 1856Kbps to 2272. If my memory of the thresholds
> >>is right, if the router can hold the connection that'll give me a 2MB
> >>link up from 1.5. Not bad for 15 quid. :)
>
> >How does that work if you already have an ADSLNation filtered
> >faceplate .?
>
> Just seen this
> "Not compatible with pre-filtered faceplates "- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

There is no need for it with the filtered faceplates we sell-these are
made by the same people who have made the initial batch of iPlates.

Filtered faceplate here :-

http://www.run-it-direct.co.uk/BTNTE5ADSLfaceplate.html