Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:15:53 -0700 (PDT),    group: uk.telecom        back       
Re: BT plans UK's largest ever investment in super-fast broadband   
> That begs the question - why would BT invest billions
> to replicate what VirginMedia's predecessors have done
> already, no doubt to the same high-density,
> residential areas?

Well BT is not stupid, it did try to get access to VM's network but it
failed. It makes no sense to lay more fibre in places where it already
exists, but the fibre is not available to be used by BT so it will
have to sort out its own. Secondly the Customer service relating to a
Cable connection and repairs is not as good as BT's and it will turn
into a scenario like LLU Phone providers, where faults take ages to
get repaired.
date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:15:53 -0700 (PDT)   author:   naza

Re: BT plans UK's largest ever investment in super-fast broadband   
In article <CP2dnfqDAOjSIBjVnZ2dnUVZ8hydnZ2d@posted.metronet>,
Jim   wrote:

>How would LLU work for VM's network?  Their cabinets 
>aren't really big enough to hold other networks' 
>equipment!  If access is at the cable head-end, then 
>that's not really loop access.  Maybe VM could be 
>forced to lease bandwidth for other multiplexes or 
>data use.

I don't think it really matters whether it's really loop access.
The point is that they have a monopoly on the infrastructure and
that should not be allowed.

-- Richard

-- 
Please remember to mention me / in tapes you leave behind.
date: 22 Jul 2008 11:23:11 GMT   author:   (Richard Tobin)

Re: BT plans UK's largest ever investment in super-fast broadband   
Richard Tobin wrote:
> In article <CP2dnfqDAOjSIBjVnZ2dnUVZ8hydnZ2d@posted.metronet>,
> Jim   wrote:
> 
>> How would LLU work for VM's network?  Their cabinets 
>> aren't really big enough to hold other networks' 
>> equipment!  If access is at the cable head-end, then 
>> that's not really loop access.  Maybe VM could be 
>> forced to lease bandwidth for other multiplexes or 
>> data use.
> 
> I don't think it really matters whether it's really loop access.
> The point is that they have a monopoly on the infrastructure and
> that should not be allowed.
> 
Time to sue the government for having a monopoly on public roads 
methinks..and the gas pipe companies..and the water utilities. Oh dear. 
Lets see..45 different pipes coming into my house and a plumber every 
time I need to change suppliers..and a choice of 5 different roads all 
chargeable, from my front door.

You KNOW it makes sense.



> -- Richard
>
date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:24:32 +0100   author:   The Natural Philosopher a@b.c

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us