On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:54:29 +0100, judith passed an empty day by writing:

> On 30 May 2008 06:43:43 GMT, Klunk  wrote:
> 
>>On Thu, 29 May 2008 23:05:31 +0100, judith passed an empty day by
>>writing:
>>
>>> On 29 May 2008 08:51:29 GMT, Klunk  wrote:
>>> 
>>>>On Wed, 28 May 2008 21:02:44 +0100, Peter Crosland passed an empty day
>>>>by writing:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You are, of course, entitled to your opinion. Peter Crosland
>>>>
>>>>Indeed, and everyone is entitled to yours. As a theoretical observer -
>>>>rather than someone who is in and out of the County Court every couple
>>>>of months - I will give your view about as much weight as is due to
>>>>it. You are, just like everybody else here, 'an anonymous NG' poster
>>>>be you Peter Crosland, Peter Pan, or Peter Pervert.
>>> 
>>> In what capacity are you in and out of court every couple of months?
>>> Have you recovered the costs you are talking about in actual claims?
>>
>>In answer to your question(s)
>>1) That would be confidential.
>>2) Yes.
> 
> 
> ffs - as I thought.
> 
> 
> How about I attended court as :
> a litigant in person - claimant
> a defendant
> a solicitor
> a barrister
> a magistrate
> an expert witness
> a reporter
> a fuckwit in the public gallery.
> 
> 
> I wonder which it was?
> 
> Confidential my arse

You would be the last in the list, as you should know there is no public 
gallery as a rule in the average County Court.

Is there anything else I can help you with or are you done?