On 30 May 2008 06:43:43 GMT, Klunk  wrote:

>On Thu, 29 May 2008 23:05:31 +0100, judith passed an empty day by writing:
>
>> On 29 May 2008 08:51:29 GMT, Klunk  wrote:
>> 
>>>On Wed, 28 May 2008 21:02:44 +0100, Peter Crosland passed an empty day
>>>by writing:
>>>
>>>
>>>> You are, of course, entitled to your opinion. Peter Crosland
>>>
>>>Indeed, and everyone is entitled to yours. As a theoretical observer -
>>>rather than someone who is in and out of the County Court every couple
>>>of months - I will give your view about as much weight as is due to it.
>>>You are, just like everybody else here, 'an anonymous NG' poster be you
>>>Peter Crosland, Peter Pan, or Peter Pervert.
>> 
>> In what capacity are you in and out of court every couple of months?
>> Have you recovered the costs you are talking about in actual claims?
>
>In answer to your question(s)
>1) That would be confidential.
>2) Yes.


ffs - as I thought.


How about I attended court as :
a litigant in person - claimant
a defendant
a solicitor
a barrister
a magistrate
an expert witness
a reporter
a fuckwit in the public gallery.


I wonder which it was?

Confidential my arse