Hi there!!! im Rebecca from scotland here new in london looking to
meet new people im open minded i like girls and boys im a beach babe i
like going to movies clubs & bars as well as good food restaurants and
coffee shops, anyone who's interested email me i dont care which race
or nationality you have you will find me very friendly and down to
earth soft spoken person.
http://www.NightOutBoys.com/Rebecca

On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:23:42 -0700 (PDT), rebecca
 enriched this group when s/he wrote:

>Hi there!!! im Rebecca from scotland here new in london looking to
>meet new people im open minded i like girls and boys im a beach babe i
>like going to movies clubs & bars as well as good food restaurants and
>coffee shops, anyone who's interested email me i dont care which race
>or nationality you have you will find me very friendly and down to
>earth soft spoken person.
>http://www.NightOutBoys.com/Rebecca


Please take English lessons.

-- 
Bob.

Ye Old One wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:23:42 -0700 (PDT), rebecca
>  enriched this group when s/he wrote:
> 
>> Hi there!!! im Rebecca from scotland here new in london looking to
>> meet new people im open minded i like girls and boys im a beach babe i
>> like going to movies clubs & bars as well as good food restaurants and
>> coffee shops, anyone who's interested email me i dont care which race
>> or nationality you have you will find me very friendly and down to
>> earth soft spoken person.
>> http://www.SpamSpamSpam.com/Rebecca
> 
> 
> Please take English lessons.
> 

Oh have some heart Bob. The girl only has about two dozen errors in her 
post.

Nev :-)

On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:20:47 +0100, nev young
 enriched this group when s/he wrote:

>Ye Old One wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:23:42 -0700 (PDT), rebecca
>>  enriched this group when s/he wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi there!!! im Rebecca from scotland here new in london looking to
>>> meet new people im open minded i like girls and boys im a beach babe i
>>> like going to movies clubs & bars as well as good food restaurants and
>>> coffee shops, anyone who's interested email me i dont care which race
>>> or nationality you have you will find me very friendly and down to
>>> earth soft spoken person.
>>> http://www.SpamSpamSpam.com/Rebecca
>> 
>> 
>> Please take English lessons.
>> 
>
>Oh have some heart Bob. The girl only has about two dozen errors in her 
>post.
>
>Nev :-)

Only? I must admit I went "1, 2, bugger she's illiterate." :)

How is Uncle Nev?

-- 
Bob.

Ye Old One wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:20:47 +0100, nev young
>  enriched this group when s/he wrote:
> 
>> Ye Old One wrote:

>>> Please take English lessons.
>>>
>> Oh have some heart Bob. The girl only has about two dozen errors in her 
>> post.
> 
> Only? I must admit I went "1, 2, bugger she's illiterate." :)
> 
> How is Uncle Nev?
> 
Not dead yet.

Nev

On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:14:26 +0100, nev young
 enriched this group when s/he wrote:

>Ye Old One wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:20:47 +0100, nev young
>>  enriched this group when s/he wrote:
>> 
>>> Ye Old One wrote:
>
>>>> Please take English lessons.
>>>>
>>> Oh have some heart Bob. The girl only has about two dozen errors in her 
>>> post.
>> 
>> Only? I must admit I went "1, 2, bugger she's illiterate." :)
>> 
>> How is Uncle Nev?
>> 
>Not dead yet.

Prove it!
>
>Nev

Rosie sends her love.

-- 
Bob.

Ye Old One wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:14:26 +0100, nev young
>  enriched this group when s/he wrote:
> 
>> Not dead yet.
> Prove it!

Alas I am unable to prove that I am not dead. I merely think I am not 
dead and so claim it to be so. I agree this may be an incorrect 
assumption on my part. Indeed it may be that I have never, in fact, been 
alive and the sensations that I think I experience, which give me the 
impression of life, may be erroneous.

> 
> Rosie sends her love.
yummy.
I (think) I send mine back.

Nev

On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:44:34 +0100, nev young
 enriched this group when s/he wrote:

>Ye Old One wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:14:26 +0100, nev young
>>  enriched this group when s/he wrote:
>> 
>>> Not dead yet.
>> Prove it!
>
>Alas I am unable to prove that I am not dead. I merely think I am not 
>dead and so claim it to be so. I agree this may be an incorrect 
>assumption on my part. Indeed it may be that I have never, in fact, been 
>alive and the sensations that I think I experience, which give me the 
>impression of life, may be erroneous.

Mmmm. I think I remember a time when you were alive. Chasing sheep in
Yorkshire springs to mind :) 
>
>> 
>> Rosie sends her love.
>yummy.
>I (think) I send mine back.

She and Annie* are out at the cinema so I'll have to pass it on in the
morning.
>
>Nev

* it be her birfyday today - my little girl is tirtytwee today, and
number one grandson is four years old today :)  What a busy day I've
had - lots of birthday cake though :)

-- 
Bob.

Ye Old One wrote:

> Mmmm. I think I remember a time when you were alive. Chasing sheep in
> Yorkshire springs to mind :) 

and paddling through caves.

> * it be her birfyday today - my little girl is tirtytwee today, and
Crikey! We must be old if not dead. She's still fortween in my head.

> number one grandson is four years old today :)  What a busy day I've
> had - lots of birthday cake though :)
cake. Hmmmmmmmmm.

Nev

On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:24:01 +0100, nev young
 enriched this group when s/he wrote:

>Ye Old One wrote:
>
>> Mmmm. I think I remember a time when you were alive. Chasing sheep in
>> Yorkshire springs to mind :) 
>
>and paddling through caves.

Ah! The good old days :)
>
>> * it be her birfyday today - my little girl is tirtytwee today, and
>Crikey! We must be old if not dead. She's still fortween in my head.

Yep.
>
>> number one grandson is four years old today :)  What a busy day I've
>> had - lots of birthday cake though :)
>cake. Hmmmmmmmmm.

Rosie's home made :)
>
>Nev
-- 
Bob.

Ye Old One wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:24:01 +0100, nev young
>  enriched this group when s/he wrote:

>> Crikey! We must be old if not dead. She's still fortween in my head.
> 
> Yep.

Don't suppose you wanna buy a good condition stair lift?

We need to get rid of the one in mum's house before we get the estate 
agents round.

Nev

On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:20:04 +0100, nev young
 enriched this group when s/he wrote:

>Ye Old One wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:24:01 +0100, nev young
>>  enriched this group when s/he wrote:
>
>>> Crikey! We must be old if not dead. She's still fortween in my head.
>> 
>> Yep.
>
>Don't suppose you wanna buy a good condition stair lift?
>
>We need to get rid of the one in mum's house before we get the estate 
>agents round.
>
>Nev

Mum already has one, and (as yet) I don't need one - unless it is
turbo charged. Cos bugger is Mum's slow. Naught to five in two weeks:(

BTW, today is my 37th Wedding Anniversary :)

-- 
Bob.

Ye Old One  wrote:
 
> BTW, today is my 37th Wedding Anniversary :)

Congratulations, Bob.  Or is that condolences?

Stu

Ye Old One wrote:

> Mum already has one, and (as yet) I don't need one - unless it is
> turbo charged. Cos bugger is Mum's slow. Naught to five in two weeks:(
speedy !
> 
> BTW, today is my 37th Wedding Anniversary :)
Hmmm I guess that makes it one of mine too. :-(

Nev

nev young  wrote:
> Ye Old One wrote:
> 
>> Mum already has one, and (as yet) I don't need one - unless it is
>> turbo charged. Cos bugger is Mum's slow. Naught to five in two
>> weeks:( 
> speedy !
>> 
>> BTW, today is my 37th Wedding Anniversary :)
>
> Hmmm I guess that makes it one of mine too. :-(

This month would have been my 33rd if I'd married the right person.  
Fortunately I only wasted 17 years of my time (and ended up with two 
great kids - that's human children - in the bargain), so it could have 
been worse.

Stu

Stuart Bronstein wrote:

> This month would have been my 33rd if I'd married the right person.  
> Fortunately I only wasted 17 years of my time (and ended up with two 
> great kids - that's human children - in the bargain), so it could have 
> been worse.
> 
Kn'ell Stu. wot a co-incidence. I was with my 1st partner for 17 years 
and got two kids. It would have been 33 years this year.

I wasn't married to you was I?

Nev

nev young  wrote:
> Stuart Bronstein wrote:
> 
>> This month would have been my 33rd if I'd married the right
>> person.  Fortunately I only wasted 17 years of my time (and ended
>> up with two great kids - that's human children - in the bargain),
>> so it could have been worse.
>> 
> Kn'ell Stu. wot a co-incidence. I was with my 1st partner for 17
> years and got two kids. It would have been 33 years this year.
> 
> I wasn't married to you was I?

I don't think so - you had much better nails.

Stu

In message , Ye Old One 
 writes
>
>
>BTW, today is my 37th Wedding Anniversary :)
>
Tomorrow would have been my 49th, but it's yesterday now, IYSWIM.
-- 
Gordon H

Gordon H  wrote:
> Ye Old One  writes
>>
>>BTW, today is my 37th Wedding Anniversary :)
>>
> Tomorrow would have been my 49th, but it's yesterday now, IYSWIM.

Yes, and I'm so sorry for your loss.  There are some losses we never 
really get over, but just learn to cope with.

How are your kids, by the way?

Stu

In article ,
Ye Old One   wrote:
>On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:20:04 +0100, nev young
> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
>
>>Ye Old One wrote:
>>> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:24:01 +0100, nev young
>>>  enriched this group when s/he wrote:
>>
>>>> Crikey! We must be old if not dead. She's still fortween in my head.
>>> 
>>> Yep.
>>
>>Don't suppose you wanna buy a good condition stair lift?
>>
>>We need to get rid of the one in mum's house before we get the estate 
>>agents round.
>>
>>Nev
>
>Mum already has one, and (as yet) I don't need one - unless it is
>turbo charged. Cos bugger is Mum's slow. Naught to five in two weeks:(
>
>BTW, today is my 37th Wedding Anniversary :)

Happy anniversary, Bob, and many of 'em (weddings or anniversaries,
your pick).

Nick
-- 
Serendipity: http://www.leverton.org/blosxom (last update 6th June 2008)
        "The Internet, a sort of ersatz counterfeit of real life"
                -- Janet Street-Porter, BBC2, 19th March 1996

On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:57:54 +0000 (UTC), Nick Leverton
 enriched this group when s/he wrote:

>In article ,
>Ye Old One   wrote:
>>On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:20:04 +0100, nev young
>> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
>>
>>>Ye Old One wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:24:01 +0100, nev young
>>>>  enriched this group when s/he wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Crikey! We must be old if not dead. She's still fortween in my head.
>>>> 
>>>> Yep.
>>>
>>>Don't suppose you wanna buy a good condition stair lift?
>>>
>>>We need to get rid of the one in mum's house before we get the estate 
>>>agents round.
>>>
>>>Nev
>>
>>Mum already has one, and (as yet) I don't need one - unless it is
>>turbo charged. Cos bugger is Mum's slow. Naught to five in two weeks:(
>>
>>BTW, today is my 37th Wedding Anniversary :)
>
>Happy anniversary, Bob, and many of 'em (weddings or anniversaries,
>your pick).

I've often tried to persuade Rose that a couple of extra wives would
make life easier. But women seem to have this funny idea that one wife
is all a man should have at one time. Can't understand the logic
myself - but then, that's women for you.
>
>Nick
-- 
Bob.

Ye Old One wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:57:54 +0000 (UTC), Nick Leverton
>  enriched this group when s/he wrote:
> 
>> Happy anniversary, Bob, and many of 'em (weddings or anniversaries,
>> your pick).
> 
> I've often tried to persuade Rose that a couple of extra wives would
> make life easier. But women seem to have this funny idea that one wife
> is all a man should have at one time. Can't understand the logic
> myself - but then, that's women for you.

Ah Bob, you must be doing summat wrong. I've had loads of wives. Two of 
them were mine. (but none were yours  :-(  )

But now I'm old and can only manage two or three at a time.
I'm content with the current arrangement of:
	one living in and one living out

-- 
Nev
wondering if I should x-post to a poly-amorous froup

On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 06:24:56 +0100, nev young
 enriched this group when s/he wrote:

>Ye Old One wrote:
>> On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:57:54 +0000 (UTC), Nick Leverton
>>  enriched this group when s/he wrote:
>> 
>>> Happy anniversary, Bob, and many of 'em (weddings or anniversaries,
>>> your pick).
>> 
>> I've often tried to persuade Rose that a couple of extra wives would
>> make life easier. But women seem to have this funny idea that one wife
>> is all a man should have at one time. Can't understand the logic
>> myself - but then, that's women for you.
>
>Ah Bob, you must be doing summat wrong. I've had loads of wives. Two of 
>them were mine. (but none were yours  :-(  )
>
>But now I'm old and can only manage two or three at a time.
>I'm content with the current arrangement of:
>	one living in and one living out

Lucky fatherless son.

-- 
Bob.

In message , Stuart 
Bronstein  writes
>Gordon H  wrote:
>> Ye Old One  writes
>>>
>>>BTW, today is my 37th Wedding Anniversary :)
>>>
>> Tomorrow would have been my 49th, but it's yesterday now, IYSWIM.
>
>Yes, and I'm so sorry for your loss.  There are some losses we never
>really get over, but just learn to cope with.
>
Appreciated, Stu, I have been "living for two" for 13 years now, but 
it's getting too exhausting for me.   ;-)

>How are your kids, by the way?
>
Fine, thanks, Sue is on en route for a holiday in Thailand with Steve; 
they should be in the air as I write...
They took a scuba course a few months ago, so will be exploring the 
seas, I expect.
Christine has sold about $600 of her paintings, but says that just about 
covers the cost of her hobby.

Graham in Oz is trying to build up the business before selling, and 
wants to go into the teaching side of chef-ery.   The hours are better. 
:)

A few days ago I was glancing through some photos of one of our visits, 
where you joined us at Chris and Colin's place.
I had to recover them from backup after my No1 PC died, and I couldn't 
even reinstall XP.    Fortunately I have this old machine which has a 
history of Windows ME, W98, and now XP.   ;-)

I bought a new desktop and also a laptop, and when I get the confidence 
I'll set them up as a Wireless network, I'm not happy with teh security 
of this modem router.
-- 
Gordon H

In message <g3knke$una$1@aioe.org>, nev young 
 writes
>Ye Old One wrote:
>> On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:57:54 +0000 (UTC), Nick Leverton
>>  enriched this group when s/he wrote:
>>
>>> Happy anniversary, Bob, and many of 'em (weddings or anniversaries,
>>> your pick).
>>  I've often tried to persuade Rose that a couple of extra wives would
>> make life easier. But women seem to have this funny idea that one wife
>> is all a man should have at one time. Can't understand the logic
>> myself - but then, that's women for you.
>
>Ah Bob, you must be doing summat wrong. I've had loads of wives. Two of 
>them were mine. (but none were yours  :-(  )
>
>But now I'm old and can only manage two or three at a time.
>I'm content with the current arrangement of:
>       one living in and one living out
>
I've settled for one living out, and a free-anytime phone account.
;-)
-- 
Gordon H

Ye Old One wrote:
> Lucky fatherless son.
> 
Indeed, it's 19 years this month that dad died.

Oh ... you meant ....

never mind.


Nev

Gordon H wrote:
> I've settled for one living out, and a free-anytime phone account.
> ;-)

AH now that is a bit of a problem.

Jean (she who lives without) only has a mobile phone.

I've offered to have a land line installed at her place and pay for it 
but she says no!  I can not get her to understand that doing that would 
be cheaper for me than calling her on the mobile as calls to a land line 
are free.

Still, it's not her financial skills that I love her for.

-- 
Nev
Women! it would be a queer world without them.

In message <g3lgc8$hul$1@aioe.org>, nev young 
 writes
>Gordon H wrote:
>> I've settled for one living out, and a free-anytime phone account.
>> ;-)
>
>AH now that is a bit of a problem.
>
>Jean (she who lives without) only has a mobile phone.
>
>I've offered to have a land line installed at her place and pay for it 
>but she says no!  I can not get her to understand that doing that would 
>be cheaper for me than calling her on the mobile as calls to a land 
>line are free.
>
>Still, it's not her financial skills that I love her for.
>
;-)
I don't get free calls to mobiles, nor to certain special numbers, but 
for national and local calls it enables me to contact folk more 
frequently.   (To Sue's dismay).

Got a txt to say they arrived ok in Bangkok, it's hot, and she has her 
mother's ankles, ie swollen like balloons.    :-(
-- 
Gordon H

On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:27:17 +0100, nev young
 enriched this group when s/he wrote:

>Gordon H wrote:
>> I've settled for one living out, and a free-anytime phone account.
>> ;-)
>
>AH now that is a bit of a problem.
>
>Jean (she who lives without) only has a mobile phone.
>
>I've offered to have a land line installed at her place and pay for it 
>but she says no!  I can not get her to understand that doing that would 
>be cheaper for me than calling her on the mobile as calls to a land line 
>are free.
>
>Still, it's not her financial skills that I love her for.

Let's face it, the only financial skills any of your women have is the
ability to spend your money :)

-- 
Bob.

Ye Old One  wrote:
 
> I've often tried to persuade Rose that a couple of extra wives
> would make life easier. But women seem to have this funny idea
> that one wife is all a man should have at one time. Can't
> understand the logic myself - but then, that's women for you.

From Around the World in 80 days, when they were in Utah and spoke with 
a Mormon:

"When the Mormon had recovered his breath, Passepartout ventured to ask 
him politely how many wives he had; for, from the manner in which he 
had decamped, it might be thought that he had twenty at least. 

"'One, sir,' replied the Mormon, raising his arms heavenward --'one, 
and that was enough!'" 

Stu

Gordon H  wrote:

> Got a txt to say they arrived ok in Bangkok, it's hot, and she has
> her mother's ankles, ie swollen like balloons.    :-(

I hope their trip is satisfactory otherwise.

Stu