Ye Old One  writes
>
>You know, I think this has been the longest thread in UKS since before
>christmas. What can we do to keep it going?

<Wipes sweaty brow with oil stained rag>

You could put some bloody overalls on and help me shovel coal into the 
firebox!

I'm quite "chuffed" that I started it.

Leaves the sidings before Simon railroads us into some horrible puns...
-- 
Gordon H
(Remove "Invalid" to reply)

On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 01:43:02 -0800 (PST), maxine
 enriched this group when s/he wrote:

>On 30 Jan, 22:41, Gordon H <Gor...@g3snx.demon.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
>> maxine  writes
>>
>>
>>
>> Gordon wrote:
>> >> >>>>>I'm quite "chuffed" that I started it.
>>
>> >Well Im ded chuffed to see a decent thread for once ;o)
>>
>> >MaX
>>
>> BZZZT!     Repetition.
>
>Damn! This thread is now so long I forgot someone had already said
>it :o(  Great minds and all that though ;o)

Long! You call this long? Why this is only a shortie compared to some
in the past. Millions of posts I tell you, millions there was in some
of um. Mostly started by some spammer or other halfwit and then
hijacked and put to good use.
>
>>
>> ...And as the strains of the Minute Waltz fade away . . .
>>
>> Didn't you and Lee have a couple of birthdays recently?
>> (One each, I mean).
>
>Yup we did, Lee's was on the 10th (same day as Mark G's) and mine was
>a week later.

And why was no birthday cake offered round the group?
>
>MaX

-- 
Bob.

In message , Ye Old One wrote:

> 
> And why was no birthday cake offered round the group?
>
They sent it using RFC1149 methods and it got eaten in transit.
-- 
Dave
mail da ve@llondel.org (without the space)
http://www.llondel.org
So many gadgets, so little time