On Nov 5, 8:39 pm, ChewsCrayons <chews.cray...@learns.zilch> whined:
> > Because foul, bigoted, sexist, and ignorant views that you espouse
> > EARN such forthright derision. Its called " consequences ". If you
> > don't LIKE opposition on a *public forum*, turn off your computer and
> > hide your bigoted skank ass ignorance all alone, in private.
>
> > Andre
>
> --------------
> dude?  Foul?  You are the one cursing here....

<Laughs> Its called emphasis, twinkie, look it up.

> Sexist?

AND willfully *ignorant*, don't forget that truth about your views:

" I actually do not watch that TV show but again, it is just faux
entertainment, nothing real about it, it is imaginary. " When trying
to
reply to the fact that most teevee shows are misandrous.

> No, not me -
> I think men and women are equal... oh.... uh... but you do not so that
> makes me sexist?

<Laughs> No, its WOMEN who REFUSE Equality, whenever it means that
they would have to GIVE, to PERFORM, rather than GET...

I'm only helping to point out that truth that women HATE Equality.

> Ignorant - well, just because you do not take a fancy to my views does
> not mean they are ignorant.. or are we talking about my posts here?

All of it: You are happy to blabber on about issues which even you
ADMIT
that you know NOTHING about: I guess you just like " talking... to
talk. "

> Bigoted? I am not a bigot - again, I feel people should all be equal,

<Laughs> LIE. If you did believe that, you would NOT be trying to DENY
huge social misandry in a field *where you admit that you know
NOTHING*...

No, thats the mark of the bigoted, sexist, WomenFirster.

> in everything - such as the ability to make the same wage, be treated
> fairly, and etc.. so how I am I being a bigot?  I uh.. do not see it.

I am happy to stipulate all of your failings that you wish to put on
display...

> Skank - well, what defines a skank exactly?  Would that not be
> sleeping around?  Seeing that I have not had even one date since my
> divorce (in 2003) I think you err.  I dress in loose pants, my shirt
> is buttoned up, and I am actually dress more like a librarian, and I
> even wear loafers.. So now that we established I do not sleep around,
> I do not dress to display, then what leads you to say I am a skank?

Whorish views, as expressed by YOU...

> Seeing that so far you have called me a:
>
> * sexist
> * bigot
> * skank
>
> and are wrong

<Laughs> You mean, other than having been right...

> and have brought forward no proof on all three accounts,

<Laughs> YOU snipped it all out. Coward much ?

> than what makes me believe that you are right about other things you
> say - other issues you bring up?

I don't particularly care if you believe that I am " right " or not.
Providing
WomenFirster sexist bigots with even a small amount of the derision
that
they so richly EARN is pleasure enough for me.

Now, if you had WANTED to *learn* something about the topic at hand,
you could look up some books that have been cited here many times
before. Such as Nathanson & Young's fine " Spreading Misandry; The
Teaching of Contempt For Men in Popular Culture ", which, BTW, makes
utter hash out of your ignorant bleat that teevee isn't mostly
misandrist.
With these little things called FACTS on the side of their well
reasoned
and footnoted argument, no less.

> or are you just talking .. to talk?

No, thats what gurls do... That what you just did.

But, thanks for adding to the mounds of proof to the truth of:

" Baby Feminists is SO *stoopid* ! "

And, while I don't usually read " Avenger's " screeds, his statement
that
the chyks in Sex & The City are all whorish is factual. As well as the
fact that that show was quite anti marriage. It offered a view of
women
where said idiot women waste lots of years when they are fertile, to
party and repeat their MS-takes, over and over again.

In one plot line, Carrie ( The nominal *heroine* and POV character
of the show ) not only has an adulterous affair ( Which really disses
a
marriage, when one does such a thing: " If she'll do it with you,
she'll
do it *to you*... "), but by the end of the show, shes with the guy
who
cheated with her on his wife. Wow, what a moral couple that it: a pair
of cheaters. How pro marriage... <sarcasm mode off>.

( I did watch that show, because it so wonderfully put on display all
of the unmarryable awfulness and immoral venality of modern American
women. It was fun watching them cluelessly fuck up their lives. Ah,
Feminism, the *ultimate in misogyny*... )

Andre