Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 12:45:42 -0800,    group: uk.singles        back       
Re: Feminists Have More Fun by Jeanna Bryner   
On Nov 4, 3:01 pm, ChewsCrayons  shat:
> Actually Andre, I have no idea what you mean by 'fact free cowshit
> claim' always fails.

I am sure that you don't, one mark of the sexist misandrist bigot is
sheer self willed stupidity. But, thats your own problem to deal with.

It means that your fact free *unsupported* claims are meaningless and
empty of fact. Thus, they always fail.

> You feel that I am incorrect in my assumtion that all men and all
> women are different, that men do not all act the same and all women do
> not act the same.

YOUR Straw Whore, fuck her on YOUR own time...

> So, in this - you are saying that all men / or / all women hold the
> same values, are pursuing the same goals and hold the same values?

Idiots cannot see that there are 99 positions between 100 and 0.

> That since this man was behaving this way, all men behave that way and
> since this woman behaved this way, all women behave that way also?

There are trends that show, to NON idiots, which ways are more likely.

> Or is it thought?  Are you saying that all men love to watch sports on
> tv, and all women love to shop?

Most and most, in that order. Feel free to try to PROVE ( Look it up,
I am aware that thats a word utterly foreign to you. ) it wrong.

> I am not really feeling your point here - would you like to give a few
> examples to clarify?

<Laughs> Thank you for proving that you are clueless.

Try looking in any magazine shops, and comparing the publications
for men, with the ones for women. You will find that the ones for men
concern politics, policy, technology, history and economics. Matters
of fact, learning, and relatively immune to empty " opinion ". The
ones
for women are vapid, empty, idiotic, narcissistic, and materialistic
in
the nature of their publications and audiences.

Feel free to try to prove that 50% of Oprah's viewers are men...

Dumbass.

" Baby Feminists is SO *stoopid* ! "

Andre
date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 12:45:42 -0800   author:   Andre Lieven

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us