On 26 Oct, 01:39, pandora  wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:48:27 -0700, Rob wrote:
> > On 25 Oct, 07:38, "Avenger"  wrote:
> >> ">> Feminists Have More Fun
>
> >> >> By Jeanna Bryner, LiveScience Staff Writer posted: 17 October 2007
> >> >> 08:00 am ET
> >> >> Share this story [...]
>
> >> > Where's the link?
>
> >> > I heard a 10 second blurb about this on the A.P. Radio news service's
> >> > top-of-the-hour rip-and-read segment.  I suspect some heavy spin at
> >> > work.
>
> >> >   [What] feminism pretends to be is nothing more than a demand for
> >> >   fair treatment for women. But I have never met a man who disagreed
> >> >   with this principle. ... So the rational reply must be that you
> >> >   don't need to be a feminist to believe in equity or even to support
> >> >   a struggle for it.
>
> >> I'm against equality, it is a silly abstract idea which is out of touch
> >> with Natural Law. Sure, we want to have some sort of fairness if only to
> >> placate the proles but just remember that 99% of the people you extend
> >> fairness to would gladly be a tyrant over you if they had the brains or
> >> opportunity.
>
> > Its not really about who is 'for' it and who is 'against' it. Its about
> > what works. Feminism diverts its adherents away from reproducing.
>
> Now I know you're a loon.  I, and other feminists of my acquaintance, have
> ALL *reproduced*, thanks.  We just had other fish to fry as well.  Sorta
> like men.

Dream on.
Indigenous Western birth rates are well below the replacement rate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sub-replacement_fertility
or, if you want the detail by country:
http://www.prb.org/pdf07/07WPDS_Eng.pdf

--
Rob
There's no gender equality without paternal certainty and 50/50
physical child custody.