Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 16:22:25 +0000 (UTC),    group: uk.singles        back       
Re: Isn't it odd...   
walksalone  wrote in
news:Xns99AD6E449A527walks@85.114.133.75: 

> john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com> news:2u5le35ne5tmh7n1sp3ng0qmho9tumd6ra@
> 4ax.com pretended to not be the village idiot but the following shows 
> otherwise.
> 
> From: john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
> Subject: Re: Isn't it odd...
> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 07:19:16 -0700
> Message-ID: 
> References: <fcbkil$t03$1@aioe.org>
>  X-Newsreader: Forte Agent
> 2.0/32.652 MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000774-5, 09/13/2007), Outbound message
> X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
> Lines: 35
> Organization: Qwest Communications Corporation
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 48cbe860.news.qwest.net
> X-Trace: DXC=1D<26;2Z3dMh:NJ7LPRBALF85SKJoGf>Dd^=P0OJ_a]Em=:Gl@
> 1G7nHF85SKJoGf>DJMM\>_UBBoJIhjcnG:kA^CCePd8B2b;\O
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@qwest.net
> 
> 
>> x-no-archive: yes
>> On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:01:33 -0400, "Scout Lady"
>>  wrote:
>>  © 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
>> may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
>>>
>>>"John Henry"  wrote in message 
>>>news:fcbkil$t03$1@aioe.org...
>>>> ...that in a thread called "That sucks!", john w is the top
>>>> responder? 
>>>
>>>Not really because "that sucks" and John W are practically
>>>synonymous. 
>>>
>>   Interesting how many adults in here see things they think are "not
>> quite as they believe they ought to be", but they choose to "live and
>> let live" and they say nothing.
> 
> Not as interesting is how many, one in this case, individuals think 
> everybody else should believe as he does, and act accordingly.  Is 
> immaterial to you, whether you ruffle feathers or simply stir the
> bucket to create hate & discontent as long as your name makes it
> temporarily in front of everybody else.  In that case, you don't care
> what you say, & don't feel you need to defend it.
> 
>  
>>   Then there are the spiritual, emotional cripples, the sociopaths.
>> They see things they think are "not quite as they believe they ought
>> to be,", and they make it a point to make ugly remarks every single
>> time.
> 
> Not everybody is related to you, the majority of people are perfectly 
> willing to hold civil discourse on a variety of subjects, and online,
> the title of the song by Ray Stevens, along came Jones, you show up. 



What exactly is your fixation on singers with really bad haircuts? Are 
you invested in a Fantastic Sam's franchise?



> And it's the kiss of death for any intelligent discussion remaining in
> the thread.  Unless people ignore you, or simply cut you out, you will
> disrupt a thread.  Just because you can, which is good enough for you.
> 
>>  Long forgotten is the "if you can't say something nice, don't say
>> anything."  They're ready with their ugly barbs at every moment,
> 
> A saying, you ignore religiously.  In fact, it can be said with some 
> accuracy that you're saying would be if you can't say some thing ugly
> and nasty, make something up.
> 
>> simply "because they can."
> 
> Again, not everybody is related to you, nor do they conduct themselves
> as you do.
>  
>>   I have to wonder if Jesus made every single last ugly remark that
>> occurred to Him. I'm betting he didn't.
> 
> Fictional characters are funny that way, they can do anything, or fail
> to do anything you want.  After all, they are figments of your
> imagination 
>  
>> ==
>> 
>>   The Internet is not always a good thing.
> 
> Especially not for braggarts, but you did not mean the Internet, for
> this is USENET, in entirely different animal that uses the Internet
> backbone as its carrier.  Actually, it uses a very small protocol that
> has nothing to do with news, but I don't want to add to your
> confusion. 


Tell us more, Kimosabe.What pray tell of telnet, for this confuses us 
and causes us anguish.


Your arrogance is boundless, boundless I say.


Pat




>  
>>  john w
> 
> which wannabe this time, Johnny, the one that pretends that everybody
> else acts like he does, and he does not act like he claims they do? Or
> just the pompous little ass hole that likes to wag his tongue and his
> fingers and the truth is unknown to him.
> 
> walksalone who has seen this tap dance from Johnny before, and will
> see it again.  The one where he plays a poor suffering hero who cannot
> understand why everybody acts like he does, but only according to him.
> 
> And now, we have Johnny playing to the fourth wall as he sucks up, to
> a person who no longer active within this particular community.  A
> person that showed some habits, similar to Johnny in his final days. 
> Oh yes, did anybody else notice the poor, pitiful me act at the very
> end? 
> 
> Re: Something about women
> 
> Hey, Deac! Can we be friends?
> 
> We truly are on the same beam so far! PTL!
> 
> (You also never answered me if it's ok to call you "Deac" after my
> Uncle Deke), the 3rd preacher in the family (grandpa, Uncle Deke, and
> me, all the same side of the family--moms')
> 
> I read your thoughts and they read like mine, only yours are better
> flushed out. Perhaps because you don't suffer my mental maladies?
>
date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 16:22:25 +0000 (UTC)   author:   Pat Burke

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us