Just IMAGING that you could know if your new dating partner LIKES YOU
or not BEFORE contacting him/her..
So at the moment when you decide to send the first message - you
already know one's attitude to you.

New dating service LiveDateSearch.com is based on Flirts:
If you like a person you can send one a Flirt. This way you are saying
that you like him or her.
If another person likes you - one sends a Flirt to you.
The most active users get to the top of the rating.

How LiveDateSearch.com is different from others?
It's easy - it is designed in a way that encourages people to rank
each other.

After the first 3 days every of our new users get from 10 to 50 flirts
from others, depending on one's activity.

The more people you rank by saying "I like!" or "I dont like" - the
higher you are in the rating - the more people rank you.
Some part of them will send you a Flirt by clicking "I like!" on your
profile.

Finally, you can start to send messages to people who like you in
order to get in touch.

Would you like to know who likes you? :-)

We wish you good luck with your Live Date Search :-)

www.LiveDateSearch.com

"LiveDateSearch"  wrote in message
news:1185989249.958450.3600@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
> Just IMAGING that you could know if your new dating partner LIKES YOU

you may have herd that i liek mudkip

In article , anatoliy.kirichenko@gmail.com says...
> Just IMAGING that 
some cretin kept posting spam where it wasn't wanted. 
Would you want to invest in his poxy product? I think not
>

On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 19:55:08 +0100, Gill Matthews <Try the
sig@nospam.com> wrote:

>In article , anatoliy.kirichenko@gmail.com says...
>> Just IMAGING that 
>some cretin kept posting spam where it wasn't wanted. 
>Would you want to invest in his poxy product? I think not
>> 

Aye but spammers and cross-posters are about all that's left in here.
Tell us about yer veggies Gill.   Won any prizes with them this year?

Jen

In article , what@address.co.uk says...
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 19:55:08 +0100, Gill Matthews <Try the
> sig@nospam.com> wrote:
> 
> >In article , anatoliy.kirichenko@gmail.com says...
> >> Just IMAGING that 
> >some cretin kept posting spam where it wasn't wanted. 
> >Would you want to invest in his poxy product? I think not
> >> 
> 
> Aye but spammers and cross-posters are about all that's left in here.
> Tell us about yer veggies Gill.   Won any prizes with them this year?
> 
> Jen
> 
I'm not showing them til September and my onions have been stricken
with disease due to the wet weather, but we do have beans and courgettes
coming out of our ears

Gill

Gill Matthews's best pigeon dodged hawks and farmers' guns to bring me 
the following:
>>
>I'm not showing them til September and my onions have been stricken
>with disease due to the wet weather, but we do have beans and courgettes
>coming out of our ears
>
You should clean your ears more often, they wouldn't have anything to 
grow in then.

-- 
David Reid        David@disarray.org.uk       http://www.disarray.org.uk
.... and moses had a cat, and fed it and looked after it, and the cat
thought "Is it not wonderful how Moses looks after me: it shows how good
I am: I must be a god."

Gill Matthews wrote:
> In article , what@address.co.uk says...
>> On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 19:55:08 +0100, Gill Matthews <Try the
>> sig@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In article , anatoliy.kirichenko@gmail.com says...
>>>> Just IMAGING that 
>>> some cretin kept posting spam where it wasn't wanted. 
>>> Would you want to invest in his poxy product? I think not
>> Aye but spammers and cross-posters are about all that's left in here.
>> Tell us about yer veggies Gill.   Won any prizes with them this year?
>>
>> Jen
>>
> I'm not showing them til September and my onions have been stricken
> with disease due to the wet weather, but we do have beans and courgettes
> coming out of our ears

The wet weather seems to have inflicted enormous numbers of slugs this 
year. As I said to Janet its one of the best arguments against 
creationism - why would Noah have taken slugs on the ark?

Other than that our potatoes are doing well - dug some huge ones out 
tonight, and had them for dinner. No tomatoes yet though.

-- 

John Wright

Time flies like an arrow

John Wright  writes
>
>
>The wet weather seems to have inflicted enormous numbers of slugs this 
>year. As I said to Janet its one of the best arguments against 
>creationism - why would Noah have taken slugs on the ark?
>
>Other than that our potatoes are doing well - dug some huge ones out 
>tonight, and had them for dinner. No tomatoes yet though.
>

I must stop speed-reading, I had you eating slugs . . .
-- 
Gordon H
(Remove invalid to email)

Gordon H wrote:
> John Wright  writes
>>
>>
>> The wet weather seems to have inflicted enormous numbers of slugs this 
>> year. As I said to Janet its one of the best arguments against 
>> creationism - why would Noah have taken slugs on the ark?
>>
>> Other than that our potatoes are doing well - dug some huge ones out 
>> tonight, and had them for dinner. No tomatoes yet though.
>>
> 
> I must stop speed-reading, I had you eating slugs . . .

You must. We try our best *not* to eat the little blighters. They get 
into the cauliflower and have to be soaked out in salt water...
-- 

John Wright

Time flies like an arrow

In uk.singles,  (John Wright) wrote in
<f932i5$hmq$1@news.freedom2surf.net>::

>Gill Matthews wrote:
>> In article , what@address.co.uk says...
>>> On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 19:55:08 +0100, Gill Matthews <Try the
>>> sig@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article , anatoliy.kirichenko@gmail.com says...
>>>>> Just IMAGING that 
>>>> some cretin kept posting spam where it wasn't wanted. 
>>>> Would you want to invest in his poxy product? I think not
>>> Aye but spammers and cross-posters are about all that's left in here.
>>> Tell us about yer veggies Gill.   Won any prizes with them this year?
>>>
>>> Jen
>>>
>> I'm not showing them til September and my onions have been stricken
>> with disease due to the wet weather, but we do have beans and courgettes
>> coming out of our ears
>
>The wet weather seems to have inflicted enormous numbers of slugs this 
>year. As I said to Janet its one of the best arguments against 
>creationism - why would Noah have taken slugs on the ark?

And woodworm- that must have been a tricky one.
-- 
Marc

BT ... is this the only two letter expletive in the English language? - Dave Edwards.

John Wright  wrote:
> Gordon H wrote:

>> I must stop speed-reading, I had you eating slugs . . .
> 
> You must. We try our best *not* to eat the little blighters. They
> get into the cauliflower and have to be soaked out in salt
> water... 

If they're anything like snails, they're a good excuse to eat melted 
butter with garlic.

Stu

, Stuart Bronstein :

>
> If they're anything like snails, they're a good excuse to eat melted 
> butter with garlic.


Miam !

In article , spamtrap@lexregia.com says...
> John Wright  wrote:
> > Gordon H wrote:
> 
> >> I must stop speed-reading, I had you eating slugs . . .
> > 
> > You must. We try our best *not* to eat the little blighters. They
> > get into the cauliflower and have to be soaked out in salt
> > water... 
> 
> If they're anything like snails, they're a good excuse to eat melted 
> butter with garlic.
> 
I should imagine they are quite like snails ISTR a big scandal a while
ago when they found sliced slug being served instead of snail in some
famous restaurant. Possibly due to gastronomic inadequacies on my part
I would probably not notice if they replaced the snails with slices of
inner tube

Gill