http://www.nypost.com/seven/05312007/gossip/pagesix/royal_servant_pagesix_.htm

May 31, 2007 -- CAMILLA Parker-Bowles blew her chance to wed Prince Charles 
in the late 1960s because she wasn't a virgin, according to a new 
documentary. "Queen Camilla," airing tomorrow in Britain, reports the 
Duchess of Cornwall lost her innocence at age 17 at the end of a debutante 
ball. In continuing her affair with Charles while he was married to Diana, 
she followed in the footsteps of her great-grandmother Alice Keppel, who was 
the mistress of Edward VII. Windsor-family expert Gyles Brandreth says, 
"[Camilla] comes from a family that has, in the best sense of the word, been 
servicing royalty for many generations

On May 31, 2:33 pm, "Avenger"  wrote:
> http://www.nypost.com/seven/05312007/gossip/pagesix/royal_servant_pag...
>
> May 31, 2007 -- CAMILLA Parker-Bowles blew her chance to wed Prince Charles
> in the late 1960s because she wasn't a virgin, according to a new
> documentary. "Queen Camilla," airing tomorrow in Britain, reports the
> Duchess of Cornwall lost her innocence at age 17 at the end of a debutante
> ball. In continuing her affair with Charles while he was married to Diana,
> she followed in the footsteps of her great-grandmother Alice Keppel, who was
> the mistress of Edward VII. Windsor-family expert Gyles Brandreth says,
> "[Camilla] comes from a family that has, in the best sense of the word, been
> servicing royalty for many generations

I hate to be cynical, as you know Avenger, but I don't know many women
who aren't "Royal Ho's".  Isn't it kind of in the genes?  Darling
Regan on soc.men keeps saying she isn't, but how believable is she as
a "Royal Feminist Ho"?

Smitty

On May 31, 2:33 pm, "Avenger"  wrote:
> http://www.nypost.com/seven/05312007/gossip/pagesix/royal_servant_pag...
>
> May 31, 2007 -- CAMILLA Parker-Bowles blew her chance to wed Prince Charles
> in the late 1960s because she wasn't a virgin, according to a new
> documentary. "Queen Camilla," airing tomorrow in Britain, reports the
> Duchess of Cornwall lost her innocence at age 17 at the end of a debutante
> ball. In continuing her affair with Charles while he was married to Diana,
> she followed in the footsteps of her great-grandmother Alice Keppel, who was
> the mistress of Edward VII. Windsor-family expert Gyles Brandreth says,
> "[Camilla] comes from a family that has, in the best sense of the word, been
> servicing royalty for many generations

I hate to be cynical, as you know Avenger, but I don't know many women
who aren't "Royal Ho's".  Isn't it kind of in the genes?  Darling
Regan on soc.men keeps saying she isn't, but how believable is she as
a "Royal Feminist Ho"?

Smitty

"Masculist"  wrote in message 
news:1180648386.428791.23730@a26g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
> On May 31, 2:33 pm, "Avenger"  wrote:
>> http://www.nypost.com/seven/05312007/gossip/pagesix/royal_servant_pag...
>>
>> May 31, 2007 -- CAMILLA Parker-Bowles blew her chance to wed Prince Charles
>> in the late 1960s because she wasn't a virgin, according to a new
>> documentary. "Queen Camilla," airing tomorrow in Britain, reports the
>> Duchess of Cornwall lost her innocence at age 17 at the end of a debutante
>> ball. In continuing her affair with Charles while he was married to Diana,
>> she followed in the footsteps of her great-grandmother Alice Keppel, who was
>> the mistress of Edward VII. Windsor-family expert Gyles Brandreth says,
>> "[Camilla] comes from a family that has, in the best sense of the word, been
>> servicing royalty for many generations
>
> I hate to be cynical, as you know Avenger, but I don't know many women
> who aren't "Royal Ho's".  Isn't it kind of in the genes?  Darling
> Regan on soc.men keeps saying she isn't, but how believable is she as
> a "Royal Feminist Ho"?
>
> Smitty
>
Nuffin Royal about the DR piggy, she's just a plain ordinary bitch ho! ;-)

On May 31, 2:33 pm, "Avenger"  wrote:
> http://www.nypost.com/seven/05312007/gossip/pagesix/royal_servant_pag...
>
> May 31, 2007 -- CAMILLA Parker-Bowles blew her chance to wed Prince Charles
> in the late 1960s because she wasn't a virgin, according to a new
> documentary. "Queen Camilla," airing tomorrow in Britain, reports the
> Duchess of Cornwall lost her innocence at age 17 at the end of a debutante
> ball. In continuing her affair with Charles while he was married to Diana,
> she followed in the footsteps of her great-grandmother Alice Keppel, who was
> the mistress of Edward VII. Windsor-family expert Gyles Brandreth says,
> "[Camilla] comes from a family that has, in the best sense of the word, been
> servicing royalty for many generations

I hate to be cynical, as you know Avenger, but I don't know many women
who aren't "Royal Ho's".  Isn't it kind of in the genes?  Darling
Regan on soc.men keeps saying she isn't, but how believable is she as
a "Royal Feminist Ho"?

Smitty

"Masculist"  wrote in message 
news:1180648386.428791.23730@a26g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
> On May 31, 2:33 pm, "Avenger"  wrote:
>> http://www.nypost.com/seven/05312007/gossip/pagesix/royal_servant_pag...
>>
>> May 31, 2007 -- CAMILLA Parker-Bowles blew her chance to wed Prince Charles
>> in the late 1960s because she wasn't a virgin, according to a new
>> documentary. "Queen Camilla," airing tomorrow in Britain, reports the
>> Duchess of Cornwall lost her innocence at age 17 at the end of a debutante
>> ball. In continuing her affair with Charles while he was married to Diana,
>> she followed in the footsteps of her great-grandmother Alice Keppel, who was
>> the mistress of Edward VII. Windsor-family expert Gyles Brandreth says,
>> "[Camilla] comes from a family that has, in the best sense of the word, been
>> servicing royalty for many generations
>
> I hate to be cynical, as you know Avenger, but I don't know many women
> who aren't "Royal Ho's".  Isn't it kind of in the genes?  Darling
> Regan on soc.men keeps saying she isn't, but how believable is she as
> a "Royal Feminist Ho"?
>
> Smitty
>
Nuffin Royal about the DR piggy, she's just a plain ordinary bitch ho! ;-)

On May 31, 2:33 pm, "Avenger"  wrote:
> http://www.nypost.com/seven/05312007/gossip/pagesix/royal_servant_pag...
>
> May 31, 2007 -- CAMILLA Parker-Bowles blew her chance to wed Prince Charles
> in the late 1960s because she wasn't a virgin, according to a new
> documentary. "Queen Camilla," airing tomorrow in Britain, reports the
> Duchess of Cornwall lost her innocence at age 17 at the end of a debutante
> ball. In continuing her affair with Charles while he was married to Diana,
> she followed in the footsteps of her great-grandmother Alice Keppel, who was
> the mistress of Edward VII. Windsor-family expert Gyles Brandreth says,
> "[Camilla] comes from a family that has, in the best sense of the word, been
> servicing royalty for many generations

The position of "mistress" has many many advantages over that of
"wife".

Cat

On May 31, 2:33 pm, "Avenger"  wrote:
> http://www.nypost.com/seven/05312007/gossip/pagesix/royal_servant_pag...
>
> May 31, 2007 -- CAMILLA Parker-Bowles blew her chance to wed Prince Charles
> in the late 1960s because she wasn't a virgin, according to a new
> documentary. "Queen Camilla," airing tomorrow in Britain, reports the
> Duchess of Cornwall lost her innocence at age 17 at the end of a debutante
> ball. In continuing her affair with Charles while he was married to Diana,
> she followed in the footsteps of her great-grandmother Alice Keppel, who was
> the mistress of Edward VII. Windsor-family expert Gyles Brandreth says,
> "[Camilla] comes from a family that has, in the best sense of the word, been
> servicing royalty for many generations

I hate to be cynical, as you know Avenger, but I don't know many women
who aren't "Royal Ho's".  Isn't it kind of in the genes?  Darling
Regan on soc.men keeps saying she isn't, but how believable is she as
a "Royal Feminist Ho"?

Smitty

"Masculist"  wrote in message 
news:1180648386.428791.23730@a26g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
> On May 31, 2:33 pm, "Avenger"  wrote:
>> http://www.nypost.com/seven/05312007/gossip/pagesix/royal_servant_pag...
>>
>> May 31, 2007 -- CAMILLA Parker-Bowles blew her chance to wed Prince Charles
>> in the late 1960s because she wasn't a virgin, according to a new
>> documentary. "Queen Camilla," airing tomorrow in Britain, reports the
>> Duchess of Cornwall lost her innocence at age 17 at the end of a debutante
>> ball. In continuing her affair with Charles while he was married to Diana,
>> she followed in the footsteps of her great-grandmother Alice Keppel, who was
>> the mistress of Edward VII. Windsor-family expert Gyles Brandreth says,
>> "[Camilla] comes from a family that has, in the best sense of the word, been
>> servicing royalty for many generations
>
> I hate to be cynical, as you know Avenger, but I don't know many women
> who aren't "Royal Ho's".  Isn't it kind of in the genes?  Darling
> Regan on soc.men keeps saying she isn't, but how believable is she as
> a "Royal Feminist Ho"?
>
> Smitty
>
Nuffin Royal about the DR piggy, she's just a plain ordinary bitch ho! ;-)

On May 31, 2:33 pm, "Avenger"  wrote:
> http://www.nypost.com/seven/05312007/gossip/pagesix/royal_servant_pag...
>
> May 31, 2007 -- CAMILLA Parker-Bowles blew her chance to wed Prince Charles
> in the late 1960s because she wasn't a virgin, according to a new
> documentary. "Queen Camilla," airing tomorrow in Britain, reports the
> Duchess of Cornwall lost her innocence at age 17 at the end of a debutante
> ball. In continuing her affair with Charles while he was married to Diana,
> she followed in the footsteps of her great-grandmother Alice Keppel, who was
> the mistress of Edward VII. Windsor-family expert Gyles Brandreth says,
> "[Camilla] comes from a family that has, in the best sense of the word, been
> servicing royalty for many generations

The position of "mistress" has many many advantages over that of
"wife".

Cat