On Aug 24, 6:18 pm, Weatherlawyer  wrote:
> On Aug 24, 6:06 pm, Weatherlawyer  wrote:
>
>
>
> > So, maybe a Cat 3 aand another massiveish eruption from that
> > damned Kasatochi. Pity. It could have been very interesting.
>
> > How far is that new storm from the Aleutians? 60 degres would
> > do it. I really must clean my placwe up and find my dividers.
>
> > Ah bugger that.
>
> Ha everything come to him who waits, so let those waiting for me to
> die do the cleaning in that case.
>
> 60 degrees from southern Baja to Kasatochi, Andreanof Islands
> 52.177°N, 175.508°W, smack on.

It looks like there is a penchant for developing tropical storms to
move inland before they have time to build into hurricanes and
typhoons when the oceanic oscillations are negative.

That is something worth knowing. Pity I won't remember it for next
time until it catches me with my pants down.

Tropical storms move inland because they tend to go north. And head
out to sea in positive spells, because they tend to go east or west in
those.

The result is that acoustic channeling is driven overland and turns up
as quakes where there are normally few, or swarms where there are
volcanoes.

Now all I have to do is prove it.

Fortumnately I have no need to. I'm not the one who is going to be
embarrassed by being caught sans pantaloon.

I don't even have to worry about Coriolis' error prone supposition.
What an awkward piece of excrement that twaddle is. Surprisingly
pretty maths though.

I wonder if it has a use?

Anyway:
Nice one, god! Ta.