|
|
|
date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 17:44:34 -0000,
group: uk.sci.weather
back
MetO "fax" charts - day 4 and 5 back again?
Back in March the "fax" charts for T+96 and T+120 (issued for the 12z run)
and for T+108 and T+132 (from the 0z run) ceased, ostensibly because their
accuracy wasn't good enough.
However, I see that:
http://91.121.93.17/pics/brack3.gif
and
http://91.121.93.17/pics/brack4.gif
were updated yesterday. There are no equivalents from the 0z run today.
Was that a one off, a blip? Or have the MetO resumed issuing those charts?
Hopefully it's the latter, they're the cause of much speculation in winter!
date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 17:44:34 -0000
author: Darren Prescott
|
Re: MetO "fax" charts - day 4 and 5 back again?
On Aug 8, 6:44 pm, "Darren Prescott" wrote:
> Back in March the "fax" charts for T and T흭 (issued for the 12z run> and for T흏 and T흽 (from the 0z run) ceased, ostensibly because their
> accuracy wasn't good enough.
>
> However, I see that:
>
> http://91.121.93.17/pics/brack3.gif
>
> and
>
> http://91.121.93.17/pics/brack4.gif
>
> were updated yesterday. There are no equivalents from the 0z run today.
>
> Was that a one off, a blip? Or have the MetO resumed issuing those charts> Hopefully it's the latter, they're the cause of much speculation in winter!
Only the T흏 and T흽 were dropped. T and T흭 have continued
to be generated throughout.
Steve.
www.rockbeareweather.co.uk
date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
author: Steve Willington
|
Re: MetO "fax" charts - day 4 and 5 back again?
"Steve Willington" wrote in message
news:db9885a3-cd84-4398-801d-84f13f4b685b@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 8, 6:44 pm, "Darren Prescott" wrote:
> Back in March the "fax" charts for T+96 and T+120 (issued for the
> 12z run)
> and for T+108 and T+132 (from the 0z run) ceased, ostensibly because
> their
> accuracy wasn't good enough.
>
> However, I see that:
>
> http://91.121.93.17/pics/brack3.gif
>
> and
>
> http://91.121.93.17/pics/brack4.gif
>
> were updated yesterday. There are no equivalents from the 0z run
> today.
>
> Was that a one off, a blip? Or have the MetO resumed issuing those
> charts?
>
> Hopefully it's the latter, they're the cause of much speculation in
> winter!
Only the T+108 and T+132 were dropped. T+96 and T+120 have continued
to be generated throughout.
... and it wasn't really to do with accuracy - more economics.
Martin.
--
Martin Rowley
West Moors, East Dorset (UK): 17m (56ft) amsl
Lat: 50.82N Long: 01.88W
NGR: SU 082 023
date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 18:56:25 +0100
author: Martin Rowley
|
|
|