Hitler had nothing on these guys.  Jewish mindset or not, it's WWIII
as far as these rusemasters are willing to go.  If Jesus Christ or the
like were to return, they'd have that honest fool or any other such
sucker (even if it's of their own kind) right back on a stick in a
flash.

Come by for a one-on-one personal look-see at their spermware/fuckware
actions.  I kid you not, at least to a Jew it's even funnier than
Christ on a stick.
-
Brad Guth

Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever
I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search
for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.

Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
such things ever tend to get.

I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
agents are assigned to my case?

It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
down to a dead-stop after I've posted a few words.  Sorry about that.

BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
all they can in order to trash my PC.

If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
measure.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever
I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search
for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.

Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
such things ever tend to get.

I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
agents are assigned to my case?

It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
down to a dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  Sorry
about that.

BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
all they can in order to trash my PC.

If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
measure.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

On May 26, 9:15 am, BradGuth  wrote:
> Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever

Usenet hasn't been failing, Loon. Google has been failing. Do yourself
a favour and get a newsreader program. Then you can access usenet
without having to resort to the bckwater of it called Google Groups.

> I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
> gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search

Usenet dosn't have an index stack. Google has an index stack. Don't
use Google if it concerns you where your posts are on the stack.

> for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
> off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.

Because Google is fucked. For all of us. It has become a peice of crap
over the last week. Stop your paranoid nonsene and discover usenet
instead.

> Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
> otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
> such things ever tend to get.
>
> I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
> agents are assigned to my case?

Well... me for one, I guess.

> It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
> server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
> down to a dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  Sorry
> about that.

Sigh! Usenet has not slowed to a crawl. Google has. Google is a
company in California, with servers and software and stuff. Usenet is
*all* the news servers, in *all* the countries connected to the
internet in the world. Get a clue, Dud.

> BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
> all they can in order to trash my PC.

Sure. And the black helicopters will b e there in 10 minutes to take
all the Coke out of your fridge.

> If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
> alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
> fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
> muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
> measure.

Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/

And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;

http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
http://www.ozinsight.com/
http://www.newsreaders.com/
http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm

Shill #312

"GovShill"  wrote in message
news:1180141557.753640.55670@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
> Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;



My favorite news reader is Xnews. I can simultaneously
download up to three different ngs at once from each
of my five servers while viewing pics or writing text.
Great for downloading porn, If I wanted to something
like that, I mean~ Beats outlook express by a country mile
in speed.

http://www.download.com/3000-2164-10144167.html

>
> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
>
> And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
>
> http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> http://www.ozinsight.com/
> http://www.newsreaders.com/
> http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
>
> Shill #312
>

On May 25, 6:05 pm, GovShill  wrote:
> On May 26, 9:15 am, BradGuth  wrote:
>
> > Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever
>
> Usenet hasn't been failing, Loon. Google has been failing. Do yourself
> a favour and get a newsreader program. Then you can access usenet
> without having to resort to the bckwater of it called Google Groups.
>
> > I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
> > gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search
>
> Usenet dosn't have an index stack. Google has an index stack. Don't
> use Google if it concerns you where your posts are on the stack.
>
> > for' "BradGuth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
> > off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.
>
> Because Google is fucked. For all of us. It has become a peice of crap
> over the last week. Stop your paranoid nonsene and discover usenet
> instead.
>
> > Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
> > otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
> > such things ever tend to get.
>
> > I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
> > agents are assigned to my case?
>
> Well... me for one, I guess.
>
> > It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
> > server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
> > down to a dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  Sorry
> > about that.
>
> Sigh! Usenet has not slowed to a crawl. Google has. Google is a
> company in California, with servers and software and stuff. Usenet is
> *all* the news servers, in *all* the countries connected to the
> internet in the world. Get a clue, Dud.
>
> > BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
> > all they can in order to trash my PC.
>
> Sure. And the black helicopters will b e there in 10 minutes to take
> all the Coke out of your fridge.
>
> > If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
> > alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
> > fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
> > muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
> > measure.
>
> Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;
>
> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
>
> And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
>
> http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htmhttp://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.phphttp://www.ozinsight.com/http://www.newsreaders.com/http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
>
> Shill #312

Thanks for what I pretty much already knew existed.

The likes of GOOGLE/NOVA and GOOGLE/Usenet is what the general public
gets to see, that is when and if GOOGLE or the like is up and running.

Besides, since 99.9% of Usenet is a lie or of something far worse, why
would I want gigabytes per day of such crapolla filling up my poor old
PC?

I can't hardly deal with the tens of thousands of sneaky little
cookies and other intentionally bogus spyware that keeps arriving as
is, because the more of that nasty spermware/fuckware stuff I manage
to block or filter out is where the less effective many other aspects
of utilizing the Internet and Usenet gets to be.  As it is, my PC is
saying NO to thousands of attempts to terminate or otherwise skew my
online status.

BTW;  The last time I'd checked, GOOGLE/NOVA and the likes of GOOGLE/
Usenet was still playing the part of being our infomercial spewing
God.  Why should I not be speaking along with such an all-knowing and
powerful God, or of their countless minions of brown-nosed clowns?
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

On May 25, 7:23 pm, "Jonathan"  wrote:
> "GovShill"  wrote in message
>
> news:1180141557.753640.55670@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;
>
> My favorite news reader is Xnews. I can simultaneously
> download up to three different ngs at once from each
> of my five servers while viewing pics or writing text.
> Great for downloading porn, If I wanted to something
> like that, I mean~ Beats outlook express by a country mile
> in speed.
>
> http://www.download.com/3000-2164-10144167.html
>
>
>
>
>
> >http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
>
> > And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
>
> >http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> >http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> >http://www.ozinsight.com/
> >http://www.newsreaders.com/
> >http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
>
> > Shill #312- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

When I get my multi terabyte PC or MAC, I too would be interested in
having the likes of Xnews at my disposal.  However, that's still not
related to what the public is getting to see.

Usenet as such should be for the greater public good, and not for the
greater evil, as it currently is.

The local ISP and of whatever's GOOGLE served are each capable of
knowing where each and every byte is going, and of where each byte
originated.  Their computers know of this because, without such
knowledge is where all that's internet or usenet would soon enough
fail to function.  Ignoring and thereby allowing whatever is known as
being bad for us as end-user clients, is exactly what the likes of
Hitler or worse cults would do, and it's also why we'd long ago
started taking advantage of, poking fun at and of why we're still at
war with those mostly innocent Muslims, along with active plans for an
all out WWIII of global energy domination if necessary against
primarily other Muslims.

Diversions away from the truth of what the planet Venus has to offer,
is just another example of what Usenet and of its Third Reich mindset
is darn good at.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

In alt.conspiracy, GovShill

 wrote
on 25 May 2007 18:05:57 -0700
:
> On May 26, 9:15 am, BradGuth  wrote:
>> Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever
>
> Usenet hasn't been failing, Loon. Google has been failing. Do yourself
> a favour and get a newsreader program. Then you can access usenet
> without having to resort to the bckwater of it called Google Groups.

Pedant Point: he'll need a Usenet server as well.
Teranews might help there.  :-)

>
>> I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
>> gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search
>
> Usenet dosn't have an index stack. Google has an index stack. Don't
> use Google if it concerns you where your posts are on the stack.
>
>> for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
>> off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.
>
> Because Google is fucked. For all of us. It has become a peice of crap
> over the last week. Stop your paranoid nonsene and discover usenet
> instead.
>
>> Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
>> otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
>> such things ever tend to get.
>>
>> I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
>> agents are assigned to my case?
>
> Well... me for one, I guess.

Heh...and you admit it?  :-)  Well, in that case, I'm
another agent.  In fact, I live just down the road from
NASA.  I must be one of ....  them!

Muhahahahahaha!

:-)

(Especially since Brad seems to think I'm a Jewish
Nazi...I've stopped trying to figure that one out.)

>
>> It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
>> server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
>> down to a dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  Sorry
>> about that.
>
> Sigh! Usenet has not slowed to a crawl. Google has. Google is a
> company in California, with servers and software and stuff. Usenet is
> *all* the news servers, in *all* the countries connected to the
> internet in the world. Get a clue, Dud.
>
>> BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
>> all they can in order to trash my PC.
>
> Sure. And the black helicopters will b e there in 10 minutes to take
> all the Coke out of your fridge.

What?  *consults notes* Wait...I thought we were 
just supposed to remove the Pepsi.  Darn!

I'm going to have to leave a drop for my supe.  Should I
use code Alpha Gamma Terra or code Bete Noire Luna?
Or just go for the splunge?

>
>> If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
>> alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
>> fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
>> muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
>> measure.
>
> Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;
>
> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
>
> And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
>
> http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> http://www.ozinsight.com/
> http://www.newsreaders.com/
> http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
>
> Shill #312
>


-- 
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
Linux.  Because Windows' Blue Screen Of Death is just
way too frightening to novice users.

-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On May 25, 7:16 pm, The Ghost In The Machine
 wrote:

> (Especially since Brad seems to think I'm a Jewish
> Nazi...I've stopped trying to figure that one out.)

Actions are of what counts the most, not your silly usenet words.

It was the actions of Hitler and of his smart Jewish minions, not
their words that we had to worry about.

What actions if any are you taking today, that are other than Jewish
Third Reich approved?
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

In article , 
bradguth@gmail.com says...
> On May 25, 7:23 pm, "Jonathan"  wrote:
> > "GovShill"  wrote in message
> >
> > news:1180141557.753640.55670@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> >
> >
> >
> > > Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;
> >
> > My favorite news reader is Xnews. I can simultaneously
> > download up to three different ngs at once from each
> > of my five servers while viewing pics or writing text.
> > Great for downloading porn, If I wanted to something
> > like that, I mean~ Beats outlook express by a country mile
> > in speed.
> >
> > http://www.download.com/3000-2164-10144167.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
> >
> > > And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
> >
> > >http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> > >http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> > >http://www.ozinsight.com/
> > >http://www.newsreaders.com/
> > >http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
> >
> > > Shill #312- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> 
> When I get my multi terabyte PC or MAC, I too would be interested in
> having the likes of Xnews at my disposal.  However, that's still not
> related to what the public is getting to see.
> 
> Usenet as such should be for the greater public good, and not for the
> greater evil, as it currently is.
> 
> The local ISP and of whatever's GOOGLE served are each capable of
> knowing where each and every byte is going, and of where each byte
> originated.  Their computers know of this because, without such
> knowledge is where all that's internet or usenet would soon enough
> fail to function.  Ignoring and thereby allowing whatever is known as
> being bad for us as end-user clients, is exactly what the likes of
> Hitler or worse cults would do, and it's also why we'd long ago
> started taking advantage of, poking fun at and of why we're still at
> war with those mostly innocent Muslims, along with active plans for an
> all out WWIII of global energy domination if necessary against
> primarily other Muslims.
> 
> Diversions away from the truth of what the planet Venus has to offer,
> is just another example of what Usenet and of its Third Reich mindset
> is darn good at.
> -
> Brad Guth
> -
> "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
> 
> 

Your cluelessness about usenet seems to know no bounds. If you subscribe 
to any one of a bunch of newservers, and use any one of any number of 
free news readers, your problems with usenet will disappear magically!

It won't help with your real problem of being mentally ill.

BDK

In alt.conspiracy, BradGuth

 wrote
on 26 May 2007 08:58:22 -0700
:
> On May 25, 7:16 pm, The Ghost In The Machine
>  wrote:
>
>> (Especially since Brad seems to think I'm a Jewish
>> Nazi...I've stopped trying to figure that one out.)
>
> Actions are of what counts the most, not your silly usenet words.
>
> It was the actions of Hitler and of his smart Jewish minions, not
> their words that we had to worry about.
>
> What actions if any are you taking today, that are other than Jewish
> Third Reich approved?

I wouldn't know.  They've not contacted me yet.  I'm pretty
sure they'll be in touch with you first, since you seem
to know more about them than I do. ;-)

> -
> Brad Guth
> -
> "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
>


-- 
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
Linux.  Because it's there and it works.
Windows.  It's there, but does it work?

-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On May 26, 12:18 pm, The Ghost In The Machine
 wrote:
> In alt.conspiracy, BradGuth
> 
>  wrote
> on 26 May 2007 08:58:22 -0700
> :
>
> > On May 25, 7:16 pm, The Ghost In The Machine
> >  wrote:
>
> >> (Especially sinceBradseems to think I'm a Jewish
> >> Nazi...I've stopped trying to figure that one out.)
>
> > Actions are of what counts the most, not your silly usenet words.
>
> > It was the actions of Hitler and of his smart Jewish minions, not
> > their words that we had to worry about.
>
> > What actions if any are you taking today, that are other than Jewish
> > Third Reich approved?
>
> I wouldn't know.  They've not contacted me yet.  I'm pretty
> sure they'll be in touch with you first, since you seem
> to know more about them than I do. ;-)
>
Why of course, you're unlikely to get the official MIB treatment
because, you're one of them.  However, you are aware that they have
been known to put their own kind on a stick, so I wouldn't turn my
back against your own kind if I were you.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

Jonathan, I'm not exactly sure as to why you excluded the intended
crosspostings of "alt.conspiracy, uk.media.newspapers,
rec.arts.sf.science, uk.sci.misc", but thanks once again for what I
pretty much already knew about.

I'm actually hoping that whatever MIB or government spooks keep doing
their usual topic/author tactic of stalking, bashings and
banishments,
as well as their ongoing efforts of contributing their silly
spermware/
fuckware that's clearly intended for terminating my poor old PC, as
that only proves I'm worth the effort.

Keeping my message(s) up for the public to review without custom
encryption, seems the only right thing to be doing.  Unlike yourself
and most others in Usenet, I'm not trying to hide.  Unfortunately, my
home is within friendly fire range of various local DoD training, so
I'm hoping that such mainstream damage-control will not go quite that
far.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

On May 26, 9:39 am, BDK  wrote:
> In article ,
> bradg...@gmail.com says...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 25, 7:23 pm, "Jonathan"  wrote:
> > > "GovShill"  wrote in message
>
> > >news:1180141557.753640.55670@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > > Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;
>
> > > My favorite news reader is Xnews. I can simultaneously
> > > download up to three different ngs at once from each
> > > of my five servers while viewing pics or writing text.
> > > Great for downloading porn, If I wanted to something
> > > like that, I mean~ Beats outlook express by a country mile
> > > in speed.
>
> > >http://www.download.com/3000-2164-10144167.html
>
> > > >http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
>
> > > > And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
>
> > > >http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> > > >http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> > > >http://www.ozinsight.com/
> > > >http://www.newsreaders.com/
> > > >http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
>
> > > > Shill #312- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > When I get my multi terabyte PC or MAC, I too would be interested in
> > having the likes of Xnews at my disposal.  However, that's still not
> > related to what the public is getting to see.
>
> > Usenet as such should be for the greater public good, and not for the
> > greater evil, as it currently is.
>
> > The local ISP and of whatever's GOOGLE served are each capable of
> > knowing where each and every byte is going, and of where each byte
> > originated.  Their computers know of this because, without such
> > knowledge is where all that's internet or usenet would soon enough
> > fail to function.  Ignoring and thereby allowing whatever is known as
> > being bad for us as end-user clients, is exactly what the likes of
> > Hitler or worse cults would do, and it's also why we'd long ago
> > started taking advantage of, poking fun at and of why we're still at
> > war with those mostly innocent Muslims, along with active plans for an
> > all out WWIII of global energy domination if necessary against
> > primarily other Muslims.
>
> > Diversions away from the truth of what the planet Venus has to offer,
> > is just another example of what Usenet and of its Third Reich mindset
> > is darn good at.
> > -
> >BradGuth
> > -
> > "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
>
> Your cluelessness about usenet seems to know no bounds. If you subscribe
> to any one of a bunch of newservers, and use any one of any number of
> free news readers, your problems with usenet will disappear magically!
>
> It won't help with your real problem of being mentally ill.
>
> BDK- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

What's all that mental about sharing the whole truth and nothing but
the truth?

You got a Jewish or some other faith-based naysay problem with the
truth?

I would think that any honest group, especially if it were faith
based, would willingly accept a little responsibility for their
mistakes.  Obviously yourself and of similar borgs of your incest
mutated kind do not agree with that analogy.
-
Brad Guth

On May 24, 9:59 am, BradGuth  wrote:
> Hitler had nothing on these guys.  Jewish mindset or not, it's WWIII
> as far as these rusemasters are willing to go.  If Jesus Christ or the
> like were to return, they'd have that honest fool or any other such
> sucker (even if it's another one of their own kind) right back on a
> stick in a flash.
>
> Come by for a one-on-one personal look-see at their spermware/fuckware
> in action.  I kid you not, at least to a Jew it's even funnier than
> Christ on a stick.
> -BradGuth

Sadly, it get's a little worse.

The good, the bad and the ugly of our sorted past is obviously what
gave birth to the right here and now, and the past of the right here
and now is therefore always of what's in charge of the future.  Skew
and/or exclude even the slightest fact of the past or present, and all
that's perceived as real becomes far less than real, if not a
perpetrated or otherwise carefully orchestrated lie.  Those in charge
of having recorded the past for the official record are the very same
folks in charge of whatever takes place as of the present, and thereby
of no matters what, in charge of the future that once again becomes
that mirror image of the orchestrated past, be it a tad bit distorted/
funny sort of future mirror that can't allow even the slightest
revision of their carefully moderated and/or skewed past without
risking that future of a mirror immage breaking into a million pices,
followed by at least 7 years of seriously bad luck.

"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

George Orwell's catchy phrase of "whoever controls the past, controls
the future" is true to the extent that each matter of fact or that of
each distortion or lie of the past begets another and yet another.

The well orchestrated demise of JFK (his being a serious status quo
trouble maker that more than obviously wasn't Jewish or otherwise
hocus-pocus cult worthy enough) is yet another good example of our
government running with the dark side (such as trying to take Cuba for
the 7th time by whatever means possible, mostly on behalf of the
Bacardi family).  At the time after Hitler's demise, it was pretty
much exactly what the Third Reich and of their Jewish chemical and
rocket-science expertise had to offer, of their being very physics
smart and otherwise well above average as business and banking
powerful minions, as having every intentions of going along with what
they had been accomplishing from the very beginning, with the
unfortunate termination of their WWII being a minor setback as they
switched sides and subsequently pretended or rather outright
perpetrated the notion(s) that in one way or another Russia was out to
get us.  It seems those Germans and typical Third Reich along their
Jewish minions didn't much like Russia, or much less care for the mood
swings within the USSR, of which at the time was anything but Old
Testament friendly.  Perhaps it was because them brave Russians seemed
to realize that those smart and powerful Jews were actually tight with
Hitler, at least up until the point when it looked as though they'd
picked the wrong government to go into partnership with, as such
wasn't looking all that good.

Of course them USSR folks were not fools, nor were they about to pass
up such a nifty cash-cow like the cold-war.  What better way to
keeping their wartime jobs and extended benefits, while getting to
construct and play with those nifty nuclear WMD as the real ultimate
toys of death and collateral damage.  Of going to/from the moon was
simply a little more cold-war pie in the sky, whereas of the further
takings of public loot as to share and share alike was too good to
pass up because, they too could manage to snooker and dumfound their
own general public and of their so-so elected and/or appointed
officials, every bit as easily as eating another piece of our mutually
perpetrated cold-war cake.
-
Brad Guth

I see that GOOGLE/NOVA/Usenet is rather busy at filtering out all the
really bad stuff pertaing to most of anything NASA/Apollo.

Apparently topic/author banishment and otherwise excluding of whatever
boat-rocking evidence is still the mainstream status quo, at least for
a given price.

Seems perfectly Third Reich or otherwise simply Jewish, at least to
me.

Don't supposed there's many of us honest folks willing to take on the
usual gauntlet of official flak.  After all, it can get more than a
little lethal if your boss finds out.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

In article , 
bradguth@gmail.com says...
> On May 26, 9:39 am, BDK  wrote:
> > In article ,
> > bradg...@gmail.com says...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On May 25, 7:23 pm, "Jonathan"  wrote:
> > > > "GovShill"  wrote in message
> >
> > > >news:1180141557.753640.55670@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > > > > Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;
> >
> > > > My favorite news reader is Xnews. I can simultaneously
> > > > download up to three different ngs at once from each
> > > > of my five servers while viewing pics or writing text.
> > > > Great for downloading porn, If I wanted to something
> > > > like that, I mean~ Beats outlook express by a country mile
> > > > in speed.
> >
> > > >http://www.download.com/3000-2164-10144167.html
> >
> > > > >http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
> >
> > > > > And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
> >
> > > > >http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> > > > >http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> > > > >http://www.ozinsight.com/
> > > > >http://www.newsreaders.com/
> > > > >http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
> >
> > > > > Shill #312- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > When I get my multi terabyte PC or MAC, I too would be interested in
> > > having the likes of Xnews at my disposal.  However, that's still not
> > > related to what the public is getting to see.
> >
> > > Usenet as such should be for the greater public good, and not for the
> > > greater evil, as it currently is.
> >
> > > The local ISP and of whatever's GOOGLE served are each capable of
> > > knowing where each and every byte is going, and of where each byte
> > > originated.  Their computers know of this because, without such
> > > knowledge is where all that's internet or usenet would soon enough
> > > fail to function.  Ignoring and thereby allowing whatever is known as
> > > being bad for us as end-user clients, is exactly what the likes of
> > > Hitler or worse cults would do, and it's also why we'd long ago
> > > started taking advantage of, poking fun at and of why we're still at
> > > war with those mostly innocent Muslims, along with active plans for an
> > > all out WWIII of global energy domination if necessary against
> > > primarily other Muslims.
> >
> > > Diversions away from the truth of what the planet Venus has to offer,
> > > is just another example of what Usenet and of its Third Reich mindset
> > > is darn good at.
> > > -
> > >BradGuth
> > > -
> > > "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
> >
> > Your cluelessness about usenet seems to know no bounds. If you subscribe
> > to any one of a bunch of newservers, and use any one of any number of
> > free news readers, your problems with usenet will disappear magically!
> >
> > It won't help with your real problem of being mentally ill.
> >
> > BDK- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> 
> What's all that mental about sharing the whole truth and nothing but
> the truth?
> 

Among a great many things with you, being mental is thinking you're the 
victim of some special conspiracy, when you're actually the victim of 
your own cluelessness. Subscribe to a decent newsserver, and get a good 
newsreader, and the conspiracy against you "evaporates".

> You got a Jewish or some other faith-based naysay problem with the
> truth?

LOL, the jew hatin stuff comes out. Can't you kooks come up with 
something or someone new to hate irrationally?

> 
> I would think that any honest group, especially if it were faith
> based, would willingly accept a little responsibility for their
> mistakes.  Obviously yourself and of similar borgs of your incest
> mutated kind do not agree with that analogy.

What kind is that? Mostly Irish and French?

BDK

> -
> Brad Guth
> 
>

In article , 
bradguth@gmail.com says...
> I see that GOOGLE/NOVA/Usenet is rather busy at filtering out all the
> really bad stuff pertaing to most of anything NASA/Apollo.
> 
> Apparently topic/author banishment and otherwise excluding of whatever
> boat-rocking evidence is still the mainstream status quo, at least for
> a given price.
> 
> Seems perfectly Third Reich or otherwise simply Jewish, at least to
> me.
> 
> Don't supposed there's many of us honest folks willing to take on the
> usual gauntlet of official flak.  After all, it can get more than a
> little lethal if your boss finds out.
> -
> Brad Guth
> -
> "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
> 
> 

Again with the insane whining, when the solution has been given to you 
at least a dozen times..

BDK

On May 27, 7:11 pm, BDK  wrote:
> In article ,
> bradg...@gmail.com says...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 26, 9:39 am, BDK  wrote:
> > > In article ,
> > > bradg...@gmail.com says...
>
> > > > On May 25, 7:23 pm, "Jonathan"  wrote:
> > > > > "GovShill"  wrote in message
>
> > > > >news:1180141557.753640.55670@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > > > > Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;
>
> > > > > My favorite news reader is Xnews. I can simultaneously
> > > > > download up to three different ngs at once from each
> > > > > of my five servers while viewing pics or writing text.
> > > > > Great for downloading porn, If I wanted to something
> > > > > like that, I mean~ Beats outlook express by a country mile
> > > > > in speed.
>
> > > > >http://www.download.com/3000-2164-10144167.html
>
> > > > > >http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
>
> > > > > > And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
>
> > > > > >http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> > > > > >http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> > > > > >http://www.ozinsight.com/
> > > > > >http://www.newsreaders.com/
> > > > > >http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
>
> > > > > > Shill #312- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > When I get my multi terabyte PC or MAC, I too would be interested in
> > > > having the likes of Xnews at my disposal.  However, that's still not
> > > > related to what the public is getting to see.
>
> > > > Usenet as such should be for the greater public good, and not for the
> > > > greater evil, as it currently is.
>
> > > > The local ISP and of whatever's GOOGLE served are each capable of
> > > > knowing where each and every byte is going, and of where each byte
> > > > originated.  Their computers know of this because, without such
> > > > knowledge is where all that's internet or usenet would soon enough
> > > > fail to function.  Ignoring and thereby allowing whatever is known as
> > > > being bad for us as end-user clients, is exactly what the likes of
> > > > Hitler or worse cults would do, and it's also why we'd long ago
> > > > started taking advantage of, poking fun at and of why we're still at
> > > > war with those mostly innocent Muslims, along with active plans for an
> > > > all out WWIII of global energy domination if necessary against
> > > > primarily other Muslims.
>
> > > > Diversions away from the truth of what the planet Venus has to offer,
> > > > is just another example of what Usenet and of its Third Reich mindset
> > > > is darn good at.
> > > > -
> > > >BradGuth
> > > > -
> > > > "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
>
> > > Your cluelessness about usenet seems to know no bounds. If you subscribe
> > > to any one of a bunch of newservers, and use any one of any number of
> > > free news readers, your problems with usenet will disappear magically!
>
> > > It won't help with your real problem of being mentally ill.
>
> > > BDK- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > What's all that mental about sharing the whole truth and nothing but
> > the truth?
>
> Among a great many things with you, being mental is thinking you're the
> victim of some special conspiracy, when you're actually the victim of
> your own cluelessness. Subscribe to a decent newsserver, and get a good
> newsreader, and the conspiracy against you "evaporates".
>
> > You got a Jewish or some other faith-based naysay problem with the
> > truth?
>
> LOL, the jew hatin stuff comes out. Can't you kooks come up with
> something or someone new to hate irrationally?
>
>
>
> > I would think that any honest group, especially if it were faith
> > based, would willingly accept a little responsibility for their
> > mistakes.  Obviously yourself and of similar borgs of your incest
> > mutated kind do not agree with that analogy.
>
> What kind is that? Mostly Irish and French?
>
> BDK
>
>
>
> > -
> > Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Isn't denial a wonderful thing, just like Hitler was in denial, as
well as our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush), and of course those Jews
having put Christ or anyone else they could use better off dead than
alive were getting put on a stick.  What can anyone say that'll top
any of that naysayism that's in such status quo denial.

Whom needs remorse when such a white Jewish God is always on your
side, no matters how badly you treat others (even those of your own
kind), or that of summarily trashing our environment?

Way to go, BDK.

BTW;  you honesty hating folks should learn to read and comprehend
before you type another word of your faith-based incest cultivated
bigotry.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

On May 27, 7:13 pm, BDK  wrote:
> In article ,
> bradg...@gmail.com says...
>
>
>
>
>
> > I see that GOOGLE/NOVA/Usenet is rather busy at filtering out all the
> > really bad stuff pertaing to most of anything NASA/Apollo.
>
> > Apparently topic/author banishment and otherwise excluding of whatever
> > boat-rocking evidence is still the mainstream status quo, at least for
> > a given price.
>
> > Seems perfectly Third Reich or otherwise simply Jewish, at least to
> > me.
>
> > Don't supposed there's many of us honest folks willing to take on the
> > usual gauntlet of official flak.  After all, it can get more than a
> > little lethal if your boss finds out.
> > -
> > Brad Guth
> > -
> > "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
>
> Again with the insane whining, when the solution has been given to you
> at least a dozen times..
>
> BDK- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Again without a freaking clue, BDK sucks and blows on behalf of
sustaining the status quo.

Apparently, of anyone sharing the truth isn't worth squat in BDK's
koran of Old Testament policy.
-
Brad Guth

On May 24, 9:59 am, BradGuth  wrote:
> Hitler had nothing on these guys.  Jewish mindset or not, it's WWIII
> as far as these rusemasters are willing to go.  If Jesus Christ or the
> like were to return, they'd have that honest fool or any other such
> sucker (even if it's another one of their own kind) right back on a
> stick in a flash.
>
> Come by for a one-on-one personal look-see at their spermware/fuckware
> in action.  I kid you not, at least to a Jew it's even funnier than
> Christ on a stick.
> -BradGuth

Of which religion(s) or other faith-based cult isn't running us amuck?
>BDK:
>What group DOES police "it's own kind"? There is a certain percentage of
>Jews, just like every other group that are "Nasty folks". Nasty is a
>relative term anyway, there are different types of "nastiness".

BDK, it's good to hear that at least you agree that not each and every
soul within a given Old Testament or whatever koran thumping cult is
all good and wholesome.  However, in the case of our Skull and Bones
cult, I'm not exactly sure if there's any honest or otherwise decent
soul within that group to behold.  Of course, it always helps greatly
if those few rogue members of a given religion or cult group are
extremely wealthy, well connected and otherwise mob or industry like
powerful in their own way.

Of course, having allowed rogue insiders or best that of getting
others to doing your dirty work, and then blaming such others or that
of an entirely different group for whatever collateral damage and
carnage of the innocent, as for such having been a rather typical
religious and/or governmental puppeteering method of covering thy
butt.  DoD's record and of their dozen or so related agencies or
services, on having failed to disclose friendly fire injuries and
deaths is yet another good example, where at best we're informed of
10% of those situations, and only then most often because of some
other honest soul that's usually external to DoD and/or willing to
risk everything because of their having that speck of remorse, as
having taken the time and effort to uncovering the truth and getting
the word out, as otherwise we wouldn't hear about 1% of those injuries
and deaths via friendly fire.

Christ almighty on another stick, there's all sorts of seriously bad
stuff about WWII and of our mutually perpetrated cold-war that's still
taboo/nondisclosure, or just now (after all those involved are either
dead and gone or sufficiently outside the reach of whatever law that
would have put anyone else on death row, or worse) coming to light.

Religion is really quite good about their having controlled their
version of the recorded past, with the likes of our resident LLPOF
warlord(GW Bush) coming in at a close second to having banished and/or
excluded the most evidence.  World history has often been skewed so
far off-track and thereby away from the truth, so much so that you
can't hardly believe much of anything that's published for the
official record.

Some religions and special interest groups have been just a little
better than others at covering thy butt and at getting their way.  And
this puppet government of ours is very much so another born-again
collective of a faith based mindset that'll do whatever it takes for
getting their way.  The private sector has almost no real controls
over whatever our government does with our resources and hard earned
loot, but for an extra few billions worth of our hard earned loot,
government can certainly be bought.
-

It's also getting rather interesting how GOOGLE's Usenet has been
routinely failing to show wherever I've contributed or even if others
having contributed to one of my topics, as for whatever's being the
most recent, yet much older stuff by others gets to stick on top of
their message index stack.  In fact the 'search for' "Brad Guth"
brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been off-line or
otherwise inactive for months if not nearly a year or more.

I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
agents as official Usenet spooks and moles are assigned to my case?

Of anything that's honestly to do with the planet Venus is simply
getting banished or otherwise bashed, although our own physically dark
and somewhat salty moon, and even of its efficient L1 zone, seems
about as hocus-pocus taboo as such need-to-know things ever tend to
get.

It seems my contributions are also of those using up more than my fair
share of server bandwidth, as at least the GOOGLE/NOVA/Usenet server
gets pulled down to a pathetic crawl if not brought entirely down to a
dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  I also frequently
get the usual message of "An error was encountered while trying to
post, please try again later", or any number of other GOOGLE
transmitted error messages.  Sorry about all that.

BTW;  it seems folks on the inside track of Usenet are still big-time
into trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing all they can in
order to trash my PC.

If you think you can stand the somewhat lethal gauntlet and thereby
help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or alternative measures,
especially if I could return the same warm and fuzzy favor to each of
those nasty senders, with all the love and affection that I can
muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots as aimed
directly at their private parts for good measure.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

In article , 
bradguth@gmail.com says...
> On May 27, 7:11 pm, BDK  wrote:
> > In article ,
> > bradg...@gmail.com says...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On May 26, 9:39 am, BDK  wrote:
> > > > In article ,
> > > > bradg...@gmail.com says...
> >
> > > > > On May 25, 7:23 pm, "Jonathan"  wrote:
> > > > > > "GovShill"  wrote in message
> >
> > > > > >news:1180141557.753640.55670@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > > > > > > Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;
> >
> > > > > > My favorite news reader is Xnews. I can simultaneously
> > > > > > download up to three different ngs at once from each
> > > > > > of my five servers while viewing pics or writing text.
> > > > > > Great for downloading porn, If I wanted to something
> > > > > > like that, I mean~ Beats outlook express by a country mile
> > > > > > in speed.
> >
> > > > > >http://www.download.com/3000-2164-10144167.html
> >
> > > > > > >http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
> >
> > > > > > > And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
> >
> > > > > > >http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> > > > > > >http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> > > > > > >http://www.ozinsight.com/
> > > > > > >http://www.newsreaders.com/
> > > > > > >http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
> >
> > > > > > > Shill #312- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > > > When I get my multi terabyte PC or MAC, I too would be interested in
> > > > > having the likes of Xnews at my disposal.  However, that's still not
> > > > > related to what the public is getting to see.
> >
> > > > > Usenet as such should be for the greater public good, and not for the
> > > > > greater evil, as it currently is.
> >
> > > > > The local ISP and of whatever's GOOGLE served are each capable of
> > > > > knowing where each and every byte is going, and of where each byte
> > > > > originated.  Their computers know of this because, without such
> > > > > knowledge is where all that's internet or usenet would soon enough
> > > > > fail to function.  Ignoring and thereby allowing whatever is known as
> > > > > being bad for us as end-user clients, is exactly what the likes of
> > > > > Hitler or worse cults would do, and it's also why we'd long ago
> > > > > started taking advantage of, poking fun at and of why we're still at
> > > > > war with those mostly innocent Muslims, along with active plans for an
> > > > > all out WWIII of global energy domination if necessary against
> > > > > primarily other Muslims.
> >
> > > > > Diversions away from the truth of what the planet Venus has to offer,
> > > > > is just another example of what Usenet and of its Third Reich mindset
> > > > > is darn good at.
> > > > > -
> > > > >BradGuth
> > > > > -
> > > > > "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
> >
> > > > Your cluelessness about usenet seems to know no bounds. If you subscribe
> > > > to any one of a bunch of newservers, and use any one of any number of
> > > > free news readers, your problems with usenet will disappear magically!
> >
> > > > It won't help with your real problem of being mentally ill.
> >
> > > > BDK- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > What's all that mental about sharing the whole truth and nothing but
> > > the truth?
> >
> > Among a great many things with you, being mental is thinking you're the
> > victim of some special conspiracy, when you're actually the victim of
> > your own cluelessness. Subscribe to a decent newsserver, and get a good
> > newsreader, and the conspiracy against you "evaporates".
> >
> > > You got a Jewish or some other faith-based naysay problem with the
> > > truth?
> >
> > LOL, the jew hatin stuff comes out. Can't you kooks come up with
> > something or someone new to hate irrationally?
> >
> >
> >
> > > I would think that any honest group, especially if it were faith
> > > based, would willingly accept a little responsibility for their
> > > mistakes.  Obviously yourself and of similar borgs of your incest
> > > mutated kind do not agree with that analogy.
> >
> > What kind is that? Mostly Irish and French?
> >
> > BDK
> >
> >
> >
> > > -
> > > Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> 
> Isn't denial a wonderful thing, just like Hitler was in denial, as
> well as our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush), and of course those Jews
> having put Christ or anyone else they could use better off dead than
> alive were getting put on a stick.  

Wasn't Jesus supposed to die, so he could pay for "sins"? It's part of 
the supposed meaning of the story, right? You know, paying for the 
world's sins, etc?


> What can anyone say that'll top
> any of that naysayism that's in such status quo denial.

You kooks are the Kings of reality denial, the truth hurts but you need 
to be told. 

> 
> Whom needs remorse when such a white Jewish God is always on your
> side, no matters how badly you treat others (even those of your own
> kind), or that of summarily trashing our environment?

LOL, WTF are you jabbering about now? 

1. Not Jewish! Sorry to disappoint you. Not everyone who disagrees with 
your 911 "conclusions" are Jews, conservatives, or anything else you 
dream up in your little fantasy world.
2. Not a believer of any kind, never really have been. Religion is made 
up bullshit.
3. I'm not even a conservative! I'm about as left as it gets.

Sorry to screw up your little fantasy, but that's how it goes..

Until you guys come up with ANYTHING remotely possible, the "accepted" 
theory of the WTC collapses is the only way to view it. Wild claims of 
all kinds of stuff that would be hard to accept in a Sci-Fi movie isn't 
going to make anyone come over to your "side".

> 
> Way to go, BDK.

Gee thanks. I love you too, kook.

> 
> BTW;  you honesty hating folks should learn to read and comprehend
> before you type another word of your faith-based incest cultivated
> bigotry.

Who are you talking to now?

More Jew hating bullshit?

LOL, take the pills, they will help you!

BDK

> -
> Brad Guth
> -
> "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
> 
>

In article , 
bradguth@gmail.com says...
> On May 27, 7:13 pm, BDK  wrote:
> > In article ,
> > bradg...@gmail.com says...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > I see that GOOGLE/NOVA/Usenet is rather busy at filtering out all the
> > > really bad stuff pertaing to most of anything NASA/Apollo.
> >
> > > Apparently topic/author banishment and otherwise excluding of whatever
> > > boat-rocking evidence is still the mainstream status quo, at least for
> > > a given price.
> >
> > > Seems perfectly Third Reich or otherwise simply Jewish, at least to
> > > me.
> >
> > > Don't supposed there's many of us honest folks willing to take on the
> > > usual gauntlet of official flak.  After all, it can get more than a
> > > little lethal if your boss finds out.
> > > -
> > > Brad Guth
> > > -
> > > "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
> >
> > Again with the insane whining, when the solution has been given to you
> > at least a dozen times..
> >
> > BDK- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> 
> Again without a freaking clue, BDK sucks and blows on behalf of
> sustaining the status quo.

LOL. You're like a bad comedy record, stuck in a groove.

> 
> Apparently, of anyone sharing the truth isn't worth squat in BDK's
> koran of Old Testament policy.

LOL, I'm still not Jewish, and never have been, in case you try to play 
that kookcard, or a Christian, or member of any other whackjob religion, 
no matter how much you want me to be.

BDK



> -
> Brad Guth
> 
>

In article , 
bradguth@gmail.com says...
> On May 24, 9:59 am, BradGuth  wrote:
> > Hitler had nothing on these guys.  Jewish mindset or not, it's WWIII
> > as far as these rusemasters are willing to go.  If Jesus Christ or the
> > like were to return, they'd have that honest fool or any other such
> > sucker (even if it's another one of their own kind) right back on a
> > stick in a flash.
> >
> > Come by for a one-on-one personal look-see at their spermware/fuckware
> > in action.  I kid you not, at least to a Jew it's even funnier than
> > Christ on a stick.
> > -BradGuth
> 
> Of which religion(s) or other faith-based cult isn't running us amuck?
> >BDK:
> >What group DOES police "it's own kind"? There is a certain percentage of
> >Jews, just like every other group that are "Nasty folks". Nasty is a
> >relative term anyway, there are different types of "nastiness".
> 
> BDK, it's good to hear that at least you agree that not each and every
> soul within a given Old Testament or whatever koran thumping cult is
> all good and wholesome.  

LOL.

> However, in the case of our Skull and Bones
> cult, I'm not exactly sure if there's any honest or otherwise decent
> soul within that group to behold.  

Skull and Bones? BWHAHAHA!

> Of course, it always helps greatly
> if those few rogue members of a given religion or cult group are
> extremely wealthy, well connected and otherwise mob or industry like
> powerful in their own way.

That's the way of the world.

> 
> Of course, having allowed rogue insiders or best that of getting
> others to doing your dirty work, and then blaming such others or that
> of an entirely different group for whatever collateral damage and
> carnage of the innocent, as for such having been a rather typical
> religious and/or governmental puppeteering method of covering thy
> butt.  DoD's record and of their dozen or so related agencies or
> services, on having failed to disclose friendly fire injuries and
> deaths is yet another good example, where at best we're informed of
> 10% of those situations, and only then most often because of some
> other honest soul that's usually external to DoD and/or willing to
> risk everything because of their having that speck of remorse, as
> having taken the time and effort to uncovering the truth and getting
> the word out, as otherwise we wouldn't hear about 1% of those injuries
> and deaths via friendly fire.

You're losing...focus.

> 
> Christ almighty on another stick, there's all sorts of seriously bad
> stuff about WWII and of our mutually perpetrated cold-war that's still
> taboo/nondisclosure, or just now (after all those involved are either
> dead and gone or sufficiently outside the reach of whatever law that
> would have put anyone else on death row, or worse) coming to light.

So?

> 
> Religion is really quite good about their having controlled their
> version of the recorded past, with the likes of our resident LLPOF
> warlord(GW Bush) coming in at a close second to having banished and/or
> excluded the most evidence.  World history has often been skewed so
> far off-track and thereby away from the truth, so much so that you
> can't hardly believe much of anything that's published for the
> official record.

Too bad you just invent stuff to go along with the real stuff, so you 
destroy your credibility on all of it. 

> 
> Some religions and special interest groups have been just a little
> better than others at covering thy butt and at getting their way.  And
> this puppet government of ours is very much so another born-again
> collective of a faith based mindset that'll do whatever it takes for
> getting their way.  The private sector has almost no real controls
> over whatever our government does with our resources and hard earned
> loot, but for an extra few billions worth of our hard earned loot,
> government can certainly be bought.

Hey, you got one right! Congrats.

> -
> 
> It's also getting rather interesting how GOOGLE's Usenet has been
> routinely failing to show wherever I've contributed or even if others
> having contributed to one of my topics, as for whatever's being the
> most recent, yet much older stuff by others gets to stick on top of
> their message index stack.  In fact the 'search for' "Brad Guth"
> brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been off-line or
> otherwise inactive for months if not nearly a year or more.

This has been explained to you so many times. If you subscribed to a 
decent news server, like giganews or many others, and used a decent 
newsreader all this "censorship" would disappear. Claiming you're the 
victim of some sort of conspiracy when you could fix the issue just 
makes you come off as...a kook.
> 
> I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
> agents as official Usenet spooks and moles are assigned to my case?

LOL, do you actually believe you are important enough to warrant the 
$$$ that something like that would cost?

> 
> Of anything that's honestly to do with the planet Venus is simply
> getting banished or otherwise bashed, although our own physically dark
> and somewhat salty moon, and even of its efficient L1 zone, seems
> about as hocus-pocus taboo as such need-to-know things ever tend to
> get.

You really need to get a grip on reality. In more ways than one.


> 
> It seems my contributions are also of those using up more than my fair
> share of server bandwidth, as at least the GOOGLE/NOVA/Usenet server
> gets pulled down to a pathetic crawl if not brought entirely down to a
> dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  I also frequently
> get the usual message of "An error was encountered while trying to
> post, please try again later", or any number of other GOOGLE
> transmitted error messages.  Sorry about all that.

Then STOP USING GOOGLE!!! It's that simple!!

> 
> BTW;  it seems folks on the inside track of Usenet are still big-time
> into trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing all they can in
> order to trash my PC.

LOL, your ego is huge.

> 
> If you think you can stand the somewhat lethal gauntlet and thereby
> help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or alternative measures,
> especially if I could return the same warm and fuzzy favor to each of
> those nasty senders, with all the love and affection that I can
> muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots as aimed
> directly at their private parts for good measure.
> -
> Brad Guth
> -
> "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
> 

Until you help yourself and stop using google for usenet, the problems 
will continue. Repeat that to yourself as many times as it takes to get 
it through your head.

Your stubbornness in sticking with it is admirable, in a way, I guess. I 
myself couldn't take it for long and soon abandoned it.

BDK

On May 28, 12:10 pm, BDK  wrote:
> In article ,
> bradg...@gmail.com says...
>
> > Of course, it always helps greatly
> > if those few rogue members of a given religion or cult group are
> > extremely wealthy, well connected and otherwise mob or industry like
> > powerful in their own way.
>
> That's the way of the world.

You obviously meant to say; "That's the way of the Zionist world"

>
> > Of course, having allowed rogue insiders or best that of getting
> > others to doing your dirty work, and then blaming such others or that
> > of an entirely different group for whatever collateral damage and
> > carnage of the innocent, as for such having been a rather typical
> > religious and/or governmental puppeteering method of covering thy
> > butt.  DoD's record and of their dozen or so related agencies or
> > services, on having failed to disclose friendly fire injuries and
> > deaths is yet another good example, where at best we're informed of
> > 10% of those situations, and only then most often because of some
> > other honest soul that's usually external to DoD and/or willing to
> > risk everything because of their having that speck of remorse, as
> > having taken the time and effort to uncovering the truth and getting
> > the word out, as otherwise we wouldn't hear about 1% of those injuries
> > and deaths via friendly fire.
>
> You're losing...focus.

The only focus that I'm losing is the one which demands that I conform
to your brown nose suckology that's more Third Reich than Hitler
himself.

>
> > Christ almighty on another stick, there's all sorts of seriously bad
> > stuff about WWII and of our mutually perpetrated cold-war that's still
> > taboo/nondisclosure, or just now (after all those involved are either
> > dead and gone or sufficiently outside the reach of whatever law that
> > would have put anyone else on death row, or worse) coming to light.
>
> So?

So, you obviously agree with all that's pro Zionist or pro Third Reich
(not sure if there's any difference).

>
> > Religion is really quite good about their having controlled their
> > version of the recorded past, with the likes of our resident LLPOF
> > warlord(GW Bush) coming in at a close second to having banished and/or
> > excluded the most evidence.  World history has often been skewed so
> > far off-track and thereby away from the truth, so much so that you
> > can't hardly believe much of anything that's published for the
> > official record.
>
> Too bad you just invent stuff to go along with the real stuff, so you
> destroy your credibility on all of it.

The whole truth and nothing but the truth tends to get in your silly
way, doesn't it.

>
> > Some religions and special interest groups have been just a little
> > better than others at covering thy butt and at getting their way.  And
> > this puppet government of ours is very much so another born-again
> > collective of a faith based mindset that'll do whatever it takes for
> > getting their way.  The private sector has almost no real controls
> > over whatever our government does with our resources and hard earned
> > loot, but for an extra few billions worth of our hard earned loot,
> > government can certainly be bought.
>
> Hey, you got one right! Congrats.
>
> > -
>
> > It's also getting rather interesting how GOOGLE's Usenet has been
> > routinely failing to show wherever I've contributed or even if others
> > having contributed to one of my topics, as for whatever's being the
> > most recent, yet much older stuff by others gets to stick on top of
> > their message index stack.  In fact the 'search for' "BradGuth"
> > brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been off-line or
> > otherwise inactive for months if not nearly a year or more.
>
> This has been explained to you so many times. If you subscribed to a
> decent news server, like giganews or many others, and used a decent
> newsreader all this "censorship" would disappear. Claiming you're the
> victim of some sort of conspiracy when you could fix the issue just
> makes you come off as...a kook.

As per usual, you're missing the point.  But then, most Zionist do.

>
> > I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
> > agents as official Usenet spooks and moles are assigned to my case?
>
> LOL, do you actually believe you are important enough to warrant the
> $$$ that something like that would cost?

Cost?????

>
> > Of anything that's honestly to do with the planet Venus is simply
> > getting banished or otherwise bashed, although our own physically dark
> > and somewhat salty moon, and even of its efficient L1 zone, seems
> > about as hocus-pocus taboo as such need-to-know things ever tend to
> > get.
>
> You really need to get a grip on reality. In more ways than one.

Is there something specific that Zionist or the Third Reich doesn't
like about Venus?

>
> > It seems my contributions are also of those using up more than my fair
> > share of server bandwidth, as at least the GOOGLE/NOVA/Usenet server
> > gets pulled down to a pathetic crawl if not brought entirely down to a
> > dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  I also frequently
> > get the usual message of "An error was encountered while trying to
> > post, please try again later", or any number of other GOOGLE
> > transmitted error messages.  Sorry about all that.
>
> Then STOP USING GOOGLE!!! It's that simple!!

Once again, you Zionist folks keep mising the actual point.  Is there
some weird Old Testamant thumping reason for that?

>
> > BTW;  it seems folks on the inside track of Usenet are still big-time
> > into trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing all they can in
> > order to trash my PC.
>
> LOL, your ego is huge.

So is the truth, of which you folks (the mostly incest cultivated
pagans and rusemasters that you are) wouldn't know anything about.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

On May 28, 11:07 am, BDK  wrote:
> In article ,
> bradg...@gmail.com says...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 27, 7:11 pm, BDK  wrote:
> > > In article ,
> > > bradg...@gmail.com says...
>
> > > > On May 26, 9:39 am, BDK  wrote:
> > > > > In article ,
> > > > > bradg...@gmail.com says...
>
> > > > > > On May 25, 7:23 pm, "Jonathan"  wrote:
> > > > > > > "GovShill"  wrote in message
>
> > > > > > >news:1180141557.753640.55670@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > > > > > > Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;
>
> > > > > > > My favorite news reader is Xnews. I can simultaneously
> > > > > > > download up to three different ngs at once from each
> > > > > > > of my five servers while viewing pics or writing text.
> > > > > > > Great for downloading porn, If I wanted to something
> > > > > > > like that, I mean~ Beats outlook express by a country mile
> > > > > > > in speed.
>
> > > > > > >http://www.download.com/3000-2164-10144167.html
>
> > > > > > > >http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
>
> > > > > > > > And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
>
> > > > > > > >http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> > > > > > > >http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> > > > > > > >http://www.ozinsight.com/
> > > > > > > >http://www.newsreaders.com/
> > > > > > > >http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
>
> > > > > > > > Shill #312- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > > When I get my multi terabyte PC or MAC, I too would be interested in
> > > > > > having the likes of Xnews at my disposal.  However, that's still not
> > > > > > related to what the public is getting to see.
>
> > > > > > Usenet as such should be for the greater public good, and not for the
> > > > > > greater evil, as it currently is.
>
> > > > > > The local ISP and of whatever's GOOGLE served are each capable of
> > > > > > knowing where each and every byte is going, and of where each byte
> > > > > > originated.  Their computers know of this because, without such
> > > > > > knowledge is where all that's internet or usenet would soon enough
> > > > > > fail to function.  Ignoring and thereby allowing whatever is known as
> > > > > > being bad for us as end-user clients, is exactly what the likes of
> > > > > > Hitler or worse cults would do, and it's also why we'd long ago
> > > > > > started taking advantage of, poking fun at and of why we're still at
> > > > > > war with those mostly innocent Muslims, along with active plans for an
> > > > > > all out WWIII of global energy domination if necessary against
> > > > > > primarily other Muslims.
>
> > > > > > Diversions away from the truth of what the planet Venus has to offer,
> > > > > > is just another example of what Usenet and of its Third Reich mindset
> > > > > > is darn good at.
> > > > > > -
> > > > > >BradGuth
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
>
> > > > > Your cluelessness about usenet seems to know no bounds. If you subscribe
> > > > > to any one of a bunch of newservers, and use any one of any number of
> > > > > free news readers, your problems with usenet will disappear magically!
>
> > > > > It won't help with your real problem of being mentally ill.
>
> > > > > BDK- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > What's all that mental about sharing the whole truth and nothing but
> > > > the truth?
>
> > > Among a great many things with you, being mental is thinking you're the
> > > victim of some special conspiracy, when you're actually the victim of
> > > your own cluelessness. Subscribe to a decent newsserver, and get a good
> > > newsreader, and the conspiracy against you "evaporates".
>
> > > > You got a Jewish or some other faith-based naysay problem with the
> > > > truth?
>
> > > LOL, the jew hatin stuff comes out. Can't you kooks come up with
> > > something or someone new to hate irrationally?
>
> > > > I would think that any honest group, especially if it were faith
> > > > based, would willingly accept a little responsibility for their
> > > > mistakes.  Obviously yourself and of similar borgs of your incest
> > > > mutated kind do not agree with that analogy.
>
> > > What kind is that? Mostly Irish and French?
>
> > > BDK
>
> > > > -
> > > >BradGuth- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Isn't denial a wonderful thing, just like Hitler was in denial, as
> > well as our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush), and of course those Jews
> > having put Christ or anyone else they could use better off dead than
> > alive were getting put on a stick.  
>
> Wasn't Jesus supposed to die, so he could pay for "sins"? It's part of
> the supposed meaning of the story, right? You know, paying for the
> world's sins, etc?
>
> > What can anyone say that'll top
> > any of that naysayism that's in such status quo denial.
>
> You kooks are the Kings of reality denial, the truth hurts but you need
> to be told.
>
>
>
> > Whom needs remorse when such a white Jewish God is always on your
> > side, no matters how badly you treat others (even those of your own
> > kind), or that of summarily trashing our environment?
>
> LOL, WTF are you jabbering about now?
>
> 1. Not Jewish! Sorry to disappoint you. Not everyone who disagrees with
> your 911 "conclusions" are Jews, conservatives, or anything else you
> dream up in your little fantasy world.
> 2. Not a believer of any kind, never really have been. Religion is made
> up bullshit.
> 3. I'm not even a conservative! I'm about as left as it gets.
>
> Sorry to screw up your little fantasy, but that's how it goes..
>
> Until you guys come up with ANYTHING remotely possible, the "accepted"
> theory of the WTC collapses is the only way to view it. Wild claims of
> all kinds of stuff that would be hard to accept in a Sci-Fi movie isn't
> going to make anyone come over to your "side".
>
>
>
> > Way to go, BDK.
>
> Gee thanks. I love you too, kook.
>
>
>
> > BTW;  you honesty hating folks should learn to read and comprehend
> > before you type another word of your faith-based incest cultivated
> > bigotry.
>
> Who are you talking to now?
>
> More Jew hating bullshit?
>
> LOL, take the pills, they will help you!
>
> BDK
>
>
>
> > -
> >BradGuth
> > -
> > "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

That's all terribly sad, but otherwise so very Zionist special of
yourself.

Your LLPOF Zionist actions are of what makes you what you really are.
You can say that you're not Jewish all you want, and by "Jewish" I
mean the very dark side Zionist type, as otherwise quite unlike
yourself, most other Jews would not hurt a Muslim fly, or even
traumatise any other fly as based upon their good faith that simply
can not manage to police their own kind.

BTW;  Your being another fence jumping atheist (as are all of Usenet's
MI/NSA spooks, moles and rusemasters) doesn't hardly count for much,
other than your being fully Third Reich boot-camp certified, like the
good little stealth Zionist or brown-nosed minion that you are.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

In article , 
bradguth@gmail.com says...
> On May 28, 12:10 pm, BDK  wrote:
> > In article ,
> > bradg...@gmail.com says...
> >
> > > Of course, it always helps greatly
> > > if those few rogue members of a given religion or cult group are
> > > extremely wealthy, well connected and otherwise mob or industry like
> > > powerful in their own way.
> >
> > That's the way of the world.
> 
> You obviously meant to say; "That's the way of the Zionist world"

If you say so, insane loon.

> 
> >
> > > Of course, having allowed rogue insiders or best that of getting
> > > others to doing your dirty work, and then blaming such others or that
> > > of an entirely different group for whatever collateral damage and
> > > carnage of the innocent, as for such having been a rather typical
> > > religious and/or governmental puppeteering method of covering thy
> > > butt.  DoD's record and of their dozen or so related agencies or
> > > services, on having failed to disclose friendly fire injuries and
> > > deaths is yet another good example, where at best we're informed of
> > > 10% of those situations, and only then most often because of some
> > > other honest soul that's usually external to DoD and/or willing to
> > > risk everything because of their having that speck of remorse, as
> > > having taken the time and effort to uncovering the truth and getting
> > > the word out, as otherwise we wouldn't hear about 1% of those injuries
> > > and deaths via friendly fire.
> >
> > You're losing...focus.
> 
> The only focus that I'm losing is the one which demands that I conform
> to your brown nose suckology that's more Third Reich than Hitler
> himself.

LOL. And you're pretty confused.

> 
> >
> > > Christ almighty on another stick, there's all sorts of seriously bad
> > > stuff about WWII and of our mutually perpetrated cold-war that's still
> > > taboo/nondisclosure, or just now (after all those involved are either
> > > dead and gone or sufficiently outside the reach of whatever law that
> > > would have put anyone else on death row, or worse) coming to light.
> >
> > So?
> 
> So, you obviously agree with all that's pro Zionist or pro Third Reich
> (not sure if there's any difference).

As usual, you are jumping to conclusions. Typical Kookthought.

> 
> >
> > > Religion is really quite good about their having controlled their
> > > version of the recorded past, with the likes of our resident LLPOF
> > > warlord(GW Bush) coming in at a close second to having banished and/or
> > > excluded the most evidence.  World history has often been skewed so
> > > far off-track and thereby away from the truth, so much so that you
> > > can't hardly believe much of anything that's published for the
> > > official record.
> >
> > Too bad you just invent stuff to go along with the real stuff, so you
> > destroy your credibility on all of it.
> 
> The whole truth and nothing but the truth tends to get in your silly
> way, doesn't it.

You have to be sane to judge the truth in any meaningful way, so that 
leaves you out.


> 
> >
> > > Some religions and special interest groups have been just a little
> > > better than others at covering thy butt and at getting their way.  And
> > > this puppet government of ours is very much so another born-again
> > > collective of a faith based mindset that'll do whatever it takes for
> > > getting their way.  The private sector has almost no real controls
> > > over whatever our government does with our resources and hard earned
> > > loot, but for an extra few billions worth of our hard earned loot,
> > > government can certainly be bought.
> >
> > Hey, you got one right! Congrats.
> >
> > > -
> >
> > > It's also getting rather interesting how GOOGLE's Usenet has been
> > > routinely failing to show wherever I've contributed or even if others
> > > having contributed to one of my topics, as for whatever's being the
> > > most recent, yet much older stuff by others gets to stick on top of
> > > their message index stack.  In fact the 'search for' "BradGuth"
> > > brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been off-line or
> > > otherwise inactive for months if not nearly a year or more.
> >
> > This has been explained to you so many times. If you subscribed to a
> > decent news server, like giganews or many others, and used a decent
> > newsreader all this "censorship" would disappear. Claiming you're the
> > victim of some sort of conspiracy when you could fix the issue just
> > makes you come off as...a kook.
> 
> As per usual, you're missing the point.  But then, most Zionist do.

No you're stubbornly trying to make the problems google has with a lot 
of posts, regardless of who they are from, or what they are about, into 
something about you! 

LOL, as Dr. Phil would say on TV, "IT'S NOT ABOUT YOU!!!"

> 
> >
> > > I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
> > > agents as official Usenet spooks and moles are assigned to my case?
> >
> > LOL, do you actually believe you are important enough to warrant the
> > $$$ that something like that would cost?
> 
> Cost?????

You think those people would do it for free? Damn, you're further gone 
than I thought! 

> 
> >
> > > Of anything that's honestly to do with the planet Venus is simply
> > > getting banished or otherwise bashed, although our own physically dark
> > > and somewhat salty moon, and even of its efficient L1 zone, seems
> > > about as hocus-pocus taboo as such need-to-know things ever tend to
> > > get.
> >
> > You really need to get a grip on reality. In more ways than one.
> 
> Is there something specific that Zionist or the Third Reich doesn't
> like about Venus?

Again, something that's been explained away so many times, even a 
mindless kook such as yourself would switch tracks to some new kind of 
"proof" when what he's claiming is pretty ridiculous. 

> 
> >
> > > It seems my contributions are also of those using up more than my fair
> > > share of server bandwidth, as at least the GOOGLE/NOVA/Usenet server
> > > gets pulled down to a pathetic crawl if not brought entirely down to a
> > > dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  I also frequently
> > > get the usual message of "An error was encountered while trying to
> > > post, please try again later", or any number of other GOOGLE
> > > transmitted error messages.  Sorry about all that.
> >
> > Then STOP USING GOOGLE!!! It's that simple!!
> 
> Once again, you Zionist folks keep mising the actual point.  Is there
> some weird Old Testamant thumping reason for that?

LOL, forget it, keep using google, keep crying about them picking on 
you. Meanwhile, us people with a clue will use servers that work and 
newsreaders that function correctly and not have any problems.

> 
> >
> > > BTW;  it seems folks on the inside track of Usenet are still big-time
> > > into trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing all they can in
> > > order to trash my PC.
> >
> > LOL, your ego is huge.
> 
> So is the truth, of which you folks (the mostly incest cultivated
> pagans and rusemasters that you are) wouldn't know anything about.

Pagans and rusemasters? BWHAHAHA! I would give myself meltdown points if 
I was still eligible.

Your self importance is amazing. Totally crazy, too.

BDK

> -
> Brad Guth
> -
> "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
> 
>

In article , 
bradguth@gmail.com says...
> On May 28, 11:07 am, BDK  wrote:
> > In article ,
> > bradg...@gmail.com says...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On May 27, 7:11 pm, BDK  wrote:
> > > > In article ,
> > > > bradg...@gmail.com says...
> >
> > > > > On May 26, 9:39 am, BDK  wrote:
> > > > > > In article ,
> > > > > > bradg...@gmail.com says...
> >
> > > > > > > On May 25, 7:23 pm, "Jonathan"  wrote:
> > > > > > > > "GovShill"  wrote in message
> >
> > > > > > > >news:1180141557.753640.55670@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > > > > > > > > Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;
> >
> > > > > > > > My favorite news reader is Xnews. I can simultaneously
> > > > > > > > download up to three different ngs at once from each
> > > > > > > > of my five servers while viewing pics or writing text.
> > > > > > > > Great for downloading porn, If I wanted to something
> > > > > > > > like that, I mean~ Beats outlook express by a country mile
> > > > > > > > in speed.
> >
> > > > > > > >http://www.download.com/3000-2164-10144167.html
> >
> > > > > > > > >http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
> >
> > > > > > > > > And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
> >
> > > > > > > > >http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> > > > > > > > >http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> > > > > > > > >http://www.ozinsight.com/
> > > > > > > > >http://www.newsreaders.com/
> > > > > > > > >http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
> >
> > > > > > > > > Shill #312- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > When I get my multi terabyte PC or MAC, I too would be interested in
> > > > > > > having the likes of Xnews at my disposal.  However, that's still not
> > > > > > > related to what the public is getting to see.
> >
> > > > > > > Usenet as such should be for the greater public good, and not for the
> > > > > > > greater evil, as it currently is.
> >
> > > > > > > The local ISP and of whatever's GOOGLE served are each capable of
> > > > > > > knowing where each and every byte is going, and of where each byte
> > > > > > > originated.  Their computers know of this because, without such
> > > > > > > knowledge is where all that's internet or usenet would soon enough
> > > > > > > fail to function.  Ignoring and thereby allowing whatever is known as
> > > > > > > being bad for us as end-user clients, is exactly what the likes of
> > > > > > > Hitler or worse cults would do, and it's also why we'd long ago
> > > > > > > started taking advantage of, poking fun at and of why we're still at
> > > > > > > war with those mostly innocent Muslims, along with active plans for an
> > > > > > > all out WWIII of global energy domination if necessary against
> > > > > > > primarily other Muslims.
> >
> > > > > > > Diversions away from the truth of what the planet Venus has to offer,
> > > > > > > is just another example of what Usenet and of its Third Reich mindset
> > > > > > > is darn good at.
> > > > > > > -
> > > > > > >BradGuth
> > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
> >
> > > > > > Your cluelessness about usenet seems to know no bounds. If you subscribe
> > > > > > to any one of a bunch of newservers, and use any one of any number of
> > > > > > free news readers, your problems with usenet will disappear magically!
> >
> > > > > > It won't help with your real problem of being mentally ill.
> >
> > > > > > BDK- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > > > What's all that mental about sharing the whole truth and nothing but
> > > > > the truth?
> >
> > > > Among a great many things with you, being mental is thinking you're the
> > > > victim of some special conspiracy, when you're actually the victim of
> > > > your own cluelessness. Subscribe to a decent newsserver, and get a good
> > > > newsreader, and the conspiracy against you "evaporates".
> >
> > > > > You got a Jewish or some other faith-based naysay problem with the
> > > > > truth?
> >
> > > > LOL, the jew hatin stuff comes out. Can't you kooks come up with
> > > > something or someone new to hate irrationally?
> >
> > > > > I would think that any honest group, especially if it were faith
> > > > > based, would willingly accept a little responsibility for their
> > > > > mistakes.  Obviously yourself and of similar borgs of your incest
> > > > > mutated kind do not agree with that analogy.
> >
> > > > What kind is that? Mostly Irish and French?
> >
> > > > BDK
> >
> > > > > -
> > > > >BradGuth- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > Isn't denial a wonderful thing, just like Hitler was in denial, as
> > > well as our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush), and of course those Jews
> > > having put Christ or anyone else they could use better off dead than
> > > alive were getting put on a stick.  
> >
> > Wasn't Jesus supposed to die, so he could pay for "sins"? It's part of
> > the supposed meaning of the story, right? You know, paying for the
> > world's sins, etc?
> >
> > > What can anyone say that'll top
> > > any of that naysayism that's in such status quo denial.
> >
> > You kooks are the Kings of reality denial, the truth hurts but you need
> > to be told.
> >
> >
> >
> > > Whom needs remorse when such a white Jewish God is always on your
> > > side, no matters how badly you treat others (even those of your own
> > > kind), or that of summarily trashing our environment?
> >
> > LOL, WTF are you jabbering about now?
> >
> > 1. Not Jewish! Sorry to disappoint you. Not everyone who disagrees with
> > your 911 "conclusions" are Jews, conservatives, or anything else you
> > dream up in your little fantasy world.
> > 2. Not a believer of any kind, never really have been. Religion is made
> > up bullshit.
> > 3. I'm not even a conservative! I'm about as left as it gets.
> >
> > Sorry to screw up your little fantasy, but that's how it goes..
> >
> > Until you guys come up with ANYTHING remotely possible, the "accepted"
> > theory of the WTC collapses is the only way to view it. Wild claims of
> > all kinds of stuff that would be hard to accept in a Sci-Fi movie isn't
> > going to make anyone come over to your "side".
> >
> >
> >
> > > Way to go, BDK.
> >
> > Gee thanks. I love you too, kook.
> >
> >
> >
> > > BTW;  you honesty hating folks should learn to read and comprehend
> > > before you type another word of your faith-based incest cultivated
> > > bigotry.
> >
> > Who are you talking to now?
> >
> > More Jew hating bullshit?
> >
> > LOL, take the pills, they will help you!
> >
> > BDK
> >
> >
> >
> > > -
> > >BradGuth
> > > -
> > > "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> 
> That's all terribly sad, but otherwise so very Zionist special of
> yourself.
> 
> Your LLPOF Zionist actions are of what makes you what you really are.

LLPOF?? BWHAHAHA! What are you, 12 years old? My actions are my own, no 
jews or zionists involved or needed. Unlike you kooks that swallow every 
anti-jew spew on a webpage. No thought needed, as long as it supports 
your jew hating agenda. Unlike you, I've been around long enough to make 
my own decisions.

> You can say that you're not Jewish all you want, and by "Jewish" I
> mean the very dark side Zionist type, as otherwise quite unlike
> yourself, most other Jews would not hurt a Muslim fly, or even
> traumatise any other fly as based upon their good faith that simply
> can not manage to police their own kind.

Wow, the insanity is taking over what's left of your mind, isn't it? Sad 
for your family, if you have one. Great comedy for us.

> 
> BTW;  Your being another fence jumping atheist (as are all of Usenet's
> MI/NSA spooks, moles and rusemasters) doesn't hardly count for much,
> other than your being fully Third Reich boot-camp certified, like the
> good little stealth Zionist or brown-nosed minion that you are.

Fence jumping atheist?? WTF? Please explain this little phrase. My views 
on religion haven't changed in about 43 years.

Your fantasies about me are pretty far out, but that's expected from a 
jew hating kook like yourself.

BDK


> -
> Brad Guth
> -
> "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
> 
>