Hitler had nothing on these guys.  Jewish mindset or not, it's WWIII
as far as these rusemasters are willing to go.  If Jesus Christ or the
like were to return, they'd have that honest fool or any other such
sucker (even if it's of their own kind) right back on a stick in a
flash.

Come by for a one-on-one personal look-see at their spermware/fuckware
actions.  I kid you not, at least to a Jew it's even funnier than
Christ on a stick.
-
Brad Guth

Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever
I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search
for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.

Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
such things ever tend to get.

I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
agents are assigned to my case?

It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
down to a dead-stop after I've posted a few words.  Sorry about that.

BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
all they can in order to trash my PC.

If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
measure.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever
I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search
for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.

Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
such things ever tend to get.

I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
agents are assigned to my case?

It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
down to a dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  Sorry
about that.

BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
all they can in order to trash my PC.

If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
measure.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

On May 26, 9:15 am, BradGuth  wrote:
> Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever

Usenet hasn't been failing, Loon. Google has been failing. Do yourself
a favour and get a newsreader program. Then you can access usenet
without having to resort to the bckwater of it called Google Groups.

> I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
> gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search

Usenet dosn't have an index stack. Google has an index stack. Don't
use Google if it concerns you where your posts are on the stack.

> for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
> off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.

Because Google is fucked. For all of us. It has become a peice of crap
over the last week. Stop your paranoid nonsene and discover usenet
instead.

> Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
> otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
> such things ever tend to get.
>
> I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
> agents are assigned to my case?

Well... me for one, I guess.

> It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
> server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
> down to a dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  Sorry
> about that.

Sigh! Usenet has not slowed to a crawl. Google has. Google is a
company in California, with servers and software and stuff. Usenet is
*all* the news servers, in *all* the countries connected to the
internet in the world. Get a clue, Dud.

> BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
> all they can in order to trash my PC.

Sure. And the black helicopters will b e there in 10 minutes to take
all the Coke out of your fridge.

> If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
> alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
> fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
> muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
> measure.

Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/

And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;

http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
http://www.ozinsight.com/
http://www.newsreaders.com/
http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm

Shill #312

"GovShill"  wrote in message
news:1180141557.753640.55670@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
> Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;



My favorite news reader is Xnews. I can simultaneously
download up to three different ngs at once from each
of my five servers while viewing pics or writing text.
Great for downloading porn, If I wanted to something
like that, I mean~ Beats outlook express by a country mile
in speed.

http://www.download.com/3000-2164-10144167.html

>
> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
>
> And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
>
> http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> http://www.ozinsight.com/
> http://www.newsreaders.com/
> http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
>
> Shill #312
>

Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever
I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search
for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.

Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
such things ever tend to get.

I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
agents are assigned to my case?

It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
down to a dead-stop after I've posted a few words.  Sorry about that.

BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
all they can in order to trash my PC.

If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
measure.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever
I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search
for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.

Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
such things ever tend to get.

I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
agents are assigned to my case?

It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
down to a dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  Sorry
about that.

BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
all they can in order to trash my PC.

If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
measure.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

On May 26, 9:15 am, BradGuth  wrote:
> Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever

Usenet hasn't been failing, Loon. Google has been failing. Do yourself
a favour and get a newsreader program. Then you can access usenet
without having to resort to the bckwater of it called Google Groups.

> I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
> gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search

Usenet dosn't have an index stack. Google has an index stack. Don't
use Google if it concerns you where your posts are on the stack.

> for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
> off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.

Because Google is fucked. For all of us. It has become a peice of crap
over the last week. Stop your paranoid nonsene and discover usenet
instead.

> Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
> otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
> such things ever tend to get.
>
> I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
> agents are assigned to my case?

Well... me for one, I guess.

> It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
> server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
> down to a dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  Sorry
> about that.

Sigh! Usenet has not slowed to a crawl. Google has. Google is a
company in California, with servers and software and stuff. Usenet is
*all* the news servers, in *all* the countries connected to the
internet in the world. Get a clue, Dud.

> BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
> all they can in order to trash my PC.

Sure. And the black helicopters will b e there in 10 minutes to take
all the Coke out of your fridge.

> If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
> alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
> fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
> muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
> measure.

Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/

And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;

http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
http://www.ozinsight.com/
http://www.newsreaders.com/
http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm

Shill #312

"GovShill"  wrote in message
news:1180141557.753640.55670@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
> Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;



My favorite news reader is Xnews. I can simultaneously
download up to three different ngs at once from each
of my five servers while viewing pics or writing text.
Great for downloading porn, If I wanted to something
like that, I mean~ Beats outlook express by a country mile
in speed.

http://www.download.com/3000-2164-10144167.html

>
> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
>
> And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
>
> http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> http://www.ozinsight.com/
> http://www.newsreaders.com/
> http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
>
> Shill #312
>

Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever
I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search
for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.

Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
such things ever tend to get.

I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
agents are assigned to my case?

It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
down to a dead-stop after I've posted a few words.  Sorry about that.

BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
all they can in order to trash my PC.

If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
measure.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever
I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search
for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.

Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
such things ever tend to get.

I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
agents are assigned to my case?

It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
down to a dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  Sorry
about that.

BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
all they can in order to trash my PC.

If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
measure.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

On May 26, 9:15 am, BradGuth  wrote:
> Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever

Usenet hasn't been failing, Loon. Google has been failing. Do yourself
a favour and get a newsreader program. Then you can access usenet
without having to resort to the bckwater of it called Google Groups.

> I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
> gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search

Usenet dosn't have an index stack. Google has an index stack. Don't
use Google if it concerns you where your posts are on the stack.

> for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
> off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.

Because Google is fucked. For all of us. It has become a peice of crap
over the last week. Stop your paranoid nonsene and discover usenet
instead.

> Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
> otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
> such things ever tend to get.
>
> I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
> agents are assigned to my case?

Well... me for one, I guess.

> It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
> server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
> down to a dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  Sorry
> about that.

Sigh! Usenet has not slowed to a crawl. Google has. Google is a
company in California, with servers and software and stuff. Usenet is
*all* the news servers, in *all* the countries connected to the
internet in the world. Get a clue, Dud.

> BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
> all they can in order to trash my PC.

Sure. And the black helicopters will b e there in 10 minutes to take
all the Coke out of your fridge.

> If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
> alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
> fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
> muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
> measure.

Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/

And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;

http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
http://www.ozinsight.com/
http://www.newsreaders.com/
http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm

Shill #312

"GovShill"  wrote in message
news:1180141557.753640.55670@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
> Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;



My favorite news reader is Xnews. I can simultaneously
download up to three different ngs at once from each
of my five servers while viewing pics or writing text.
Great for downloading porn, If I wanted to something
like that, I mean~ Beats outlook express by a country mile
in speed.

http://www.download.com/3000-2164-10144167.html

>
> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
>
> And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
>
> http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> http://www.ozinsight.com/
> http://www.newsreaders.com/
> http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
>
> Shill #312
>

On May 25, 6:05 pm, GovShill  wrote:
> On May 26, 9:15 am, BradGuth  wrote:
>
> > Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever
>
> Usenet hasn't been failing, Loon. Google has been failing. Do yourself
> a favour and get a newsreader program. Then you can access usenet
> without having to resort to the bckwater of it called Google Groups.
>
> > I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
> > gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search
>
> Usenet dosn't have an index stack. Google has an index stack. Don't
> use Google if it concerns you where your posts are on the stack.
>
> > for' "BradGuth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
> > off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.
>
> Because Google is fucked. For all of us. It has become a peice of crap
> over the last week. Stop your paranoid nonsene and discover usenet
> instead.
>
> > Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
> > otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
> > such things ever tend to get.
>
> > I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
> > agents are assigned to my case?
>
> Well... me for one, I guess.
>
> > It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
> > server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
> > down to a dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  Sorry
> > about that.
>
> Sigh! Usenet has not slowed to a crawl. Google has. Google is a
> company in California, with servers and software and stuff. Usenet is
> *all* the news servers, in *all* the countries connected to the
> internet in the world. Get a clue, Dud.
>
> > BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
> > all they can in order to trash my PC.
>
> Sure. And the black helicopters will b e there in 10 minutes to take
> all the Coke out of your fridge.
>
> > If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
> > alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
> > fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
> > muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
> > measure.
>
> Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;
>
> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
>
> And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
>
> http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htmhttp://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.phphttp://www.ozinsight.com/http://www.newsreaders.com/http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
>
> Shill #312

Thanks for what I pretty much already knew existed.

The likes of GOOGLE/NOVA and GOOGLE/Usenet is what the general public
gets to see, that is when and if GOOGLE or the like is up and running.

Besides, since 99.9% of Usenet is a lie or of something far worse, why
would I want gigabytes per day of such crapolla filling up my poor old
PC?

I can't hardly deal with the tens of thousands of sneaky little
cookies and other intentionally bogus spyware that keeps arriving as
is, because the more of that nasty spermware/fuckware stuff I manage
to block or filter out is where the less effective many other aspects
of utilizing the Internet and Usenet gets to be.  As it is, my PC is
saying NO to thousands of attempts to terminate or otherwise skew my
online status.

BTW;  The last time I'd checked, GOOGLE/NOVA and the likes of GOOGLE/
Usenet was still playing the part of being our infomercial spewing
God.  Why should I not be speaking along with such an all-knowing and
powerful God, or of their countless minions of brown-nosed clowns?
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

On May 25, 7:23 pm, "Jonathan"  wrote:
> "GovShill"  wrote in message
>
> news:1180141557.753640.55670@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;
>
> My favorite news reader is Xnews. I can simultaneously
> download up to three different ngs at once from each
> of my five servers while viewing pics or writing text.
> Great for downloading porn, If I wanted to something
> like that, I mean~ Beats outlook express by a country mile
> in speed.
>
> http://www.download.com/3000-2164-10144167.html
>
>
>
>
>
> >http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
>
> > And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
>
> >http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> >http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> >http://www.ozinsight.com/
> >http://www.newsreaders.com/
> >http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
>
> > Shill #312- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

When I get my multi terabyte PC or MAC, I too would be interested in
having the likes of Xnews at my disposal.  However, that's still not
related to what the public is getting to see.

Usenet as such should be for the greater public good, and not for the
greater evil, as it currently is.

The local ISP and of whatever's GOOGLE served are each capable of
knowing where each and every byte is going, and of where each byte
originated.  Their computers know of this because, without such
knowledge is where all that's internet or usenet would soon enough
fail to function.  Ignoring and thereby allowing whatever is known as
being bad for us as end-user clients, is exactly what the likes of
Hitler or worse cults would do, and it's also why we'd long ago
started taking advantage of, poking fun at and of why we're still at
war with those mostly innocent Muslims, along with active plans for an
all out WWIII of global energy domination if necessary against
primarily other Muslims.

Diversions away from the truth of what the planet Venus has to offer,
is just another example of what Usenet and of its Third Reich mindset
is darn good at.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

In alt.conspiracy, GovShill

 wrote
on 25 May 2007 18:05:57 -0700
:
> On May 26, 9:15 am, BradGuth  wrote:
>> Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever
>
> Usenet hasn't been failing, Loon. Google has been failing. Do yourself
> a favour and get a newsreader program. Then you can access usenet
> without having to resort to the bckwater of it called Google Groups.

Pedant Point: he'll need a Usenet server as well.
Teranews might help there.  :-)

>
>> I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
>> gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search
>
> Usenet dosn't have an index stack. Google has an index stack. Don't
> use Google if it concerns you where your posts are on the stack.
>
>> for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
>> off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.
>
> Because Google is fucked. For all of us. It has become a peice of crap
> over the last week. Stop your paranoid nonsene and discover usenet
> instead.
>
>> Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
>> otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
>> such things ever tend to get.
>>
>> I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
>> agents are assigned to my case?
>
> Well... me for one, I guess.

Heh...and you admit it?  :-)  Well, in that case, I'm
another agent.  In fact, I live just down the road from
NASA.  I must be one of ....  them!

Muhahahahahaha!

:-)

(Especially since Brad seems to think I'm a Jewish
Nazi...I've stopped trying to figure that one out.)

>
>> It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
>> server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
>> down to a dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  Sorry
>> about that.
>
> Sigh! Usenet has not slowed to a crawl. Google has. Google is a
> company in California, with servers and software and stuff. Usenet is
> *all* the news servers, in *all* the countries connected to the
> internet in the world. Get a clue, Dud.
>
>> BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
>> all they can in order to trash my PC.
>
> Sure. And the black helicopters will b e there in 10 minutes to take
> all the Coke out of your fridge.

What?  *consults notes* Wait...I thought we were 
just supposed to remove the Pepsi.  Darn!

I'm going to have to leave a drop for my supe.  Should I
use code Alpha Gamma Terra or code Bete Noire Luna?
Or just go for the splunge?

>
>> If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
>> alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
>> fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
>> muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
>> measure.
>
> Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;
>
> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
>
> And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
>
> http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> http://www.ozinsight.com/
> http://www.newsreaders.com/
> http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
>
> Shill #312
>


-- 
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
Linux.  Because Windows' Blue Screen Of Death is just
way too frightening to novice users.

-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On May 25, 7:16 pm, The Ghost In The Machine
 wrote:

> (Especially since Brad seems to think I'm a Jewish
> Nazi...I've stopped trying to figure that one out.)

Actions are of what counts the most, not your silly usenet words.

It was the actions of Hitler and of his smart Jewish minions, not
their words that we had to worry about.

What actions if any are you taking today, that are other than Jewish
Third Reich approved?
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever
I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search
for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.

Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
such things ever tend to get.

I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
agents are assigned to my case?

It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
down to a dead-stop after I've posted a few words.  Sorry about that.

BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
all they can in order to trash my PC.

If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
measure.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever
I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search
for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.

Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
such things ever tend to get.

I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
agents are assigned to my case?

It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
down to a dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  Sorry
about that.

BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
all they can in order to trash my PC.

If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
measure.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

On May 26, 9:15 am, BradGuth  wrote:
> Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever

Usenet hasn't been failing, Loon. Google has been failing. Do yourself
a favour and get a newsreader program. Then you can access usenet
without having to resort to the bckwater of it called Google Groups.

> I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
> gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search

Usenet dosn't have an index stack. Google has an index stack. Don't
use Google if it concerns you where your posts are on the stack.

> for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
> off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.

Because Google is fucked. For all of us. It has become a peice of crap
over the last week. Stop your paranoid nonsene and discover usenet
instead.

> Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
> otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
> such things ever tend to get.
>
> I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
> agents are assigned to my case?

Well... me for one, I guess.

> It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
> server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
> down to a dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  Sorry
> about that.

Sigh! Usenet has not slowed to a crawl. Google has. Google is a
company in California, with servers and software and stuff. Usenet is
*all* the news servers, in *all* the countries connected to the
internet in the world. Get a clue, Dud.

> BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
> all they can in order to trash my PC.

Sure. And the black helicopters will b e there in 10 minutes to take
all the Coke out of your fridge.

> If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
> alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
> fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
> muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
> measure.

Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/

And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;

http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
http://www.ozinsight.com/
http://www.newsreaders.com/
http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm

Shill #312

"GovShill"  wrote in message
news:1180141557.753640.55670@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
> Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;



My favorite news reader is Xnews. I can simultaneously
download up to three different ngs at once from each
of my five servers while viewing pics or writing text.
Great for downloading porn, If I wanted to something
like that, I mean~ Beats outlook express by a country mile
in speed.

http://www.download.com/3000-2164-10144167.html

>
> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
>
> And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
>
> http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> http://www.ozinsight.com/
> http://www.newsreaders.com/
> http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
>
> Shill #312
>

On May 25, 6:05 pm, GovShill  wrote:
> On May 26, 9:15 am, BradGuth  wrote:
>
> > Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever
>
> Usenet hasn't been failing, Loon. Google has been failing. Do yourself
> a favour and get a newsreader program. Then you can access usenet
> without having to resort to the bckwater of it called Google Groups.
>
> > I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
> > gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search
>
> Usenet dosn't have an index stack. Google has an index stack. Don't
> use Google if it concerns you where your posts are on the stack.
>
> > for' "BradGuth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
> > off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.
>
> Because Google is fucked. For all of us. It has become a peice of crap
> over the last week. Stop your paranoid nonsene and discover usenet
> instead.
>
> > Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
> > otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
> > such things ever tend to get.
>
> > I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
> > agents are assigned to my case?
>
> Well... me for one, I guess.
>
> > It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
> > server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
> > down to a dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  Sorry
> > about that.
>
> Sigh! Usenet has not slowed to a crawl. Google has. Google is a
> company in California, with servers and software and stuff. Usenet is
> *all* the news servers, in *all* the countries connected to the
> internet in the world. Get a clue, Dud.
>
> > BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
> > all they can in order to trash my PC.
>
> Sure. And the black helicopters will b e there in 10 minutes to take
> all the Coke out of your fridge.
>
> > If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
> > alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
> > fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
> > muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
> > measure.
>
> Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;
>
> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
>
> And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
>
> http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htmhttp://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.phphttp://www.ozinsight.com/http://www.newsreaders.com/http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
>
> Shill #312

Thanks for what I pretty much already knew existed.

The likes of GOOGLE/NOVA and GOOGLE/Usenet is what the general public
gets to see, that is when and if GOOGLE or the like is up and running.

Besides, since 99.9% of Usenet is a lie or of something far worse, why
would I want gigabytes per day of such crapolla filling up my poor old
PC?

I can't hardly deal with the tens of thousands of sneaky little
cookies and other intentionally bogus spyware that keeps arriving as
is, because the more of that nasty spermware/fuckware stuff I manage
to block or filter out is where the less effective many other aspects
of utilizing the Internet and Usenet gets to be.  As it is, my PC is
saying NO to thousands of attempts to terminate or otherwise skew my
online status.

BTW;  The last time I'd checked, GOOGLE/NOVA and the likes of GOOGLE/
Usenet was still playing the part of being our infomercial spewing
God.  Why should I not be speaking along with such an all-knowing and
powerful God, or of their countless minions of brown-nosed clowns?
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

On May 25, 7:23 pm, "Jonathan"  wrote:
> "GovShill"  wrote in message
>
> news:1180141557.753640.55670@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;
>
> My favorite news reader is Xnews. I can simultaneously
> download up to three different ngs at once from each
> of my five servers while viewing pics or writing text.
> Great for downloading porn, If I wanted to something
> like that, I mean~ Beats outlook express by a country mile
> in speed.
>
> http://www.download.com/3000-2164-10144167.html
>
>
>
>
>
> >http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
>
> > And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
>
> >http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> >http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> >http://www.ozinsight.com/
> >http://www.newsreaders.com/
> >http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
>
> > Shill #312- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

When I get my multi terabyte PC or MAC, I too would be interested in
having the likes of Xnews at my disposal.  However, that's still not
related to what the public is getting to see.

Usenet as such should be for the greater public good, and not for the
greater evil, as it currently is.

The local ISP and of whatever's GOOGLE served are each capable of
knowing where each and every byte is going, and of where each byte
originated.  Their computers know of this because, without such
knowledge is where all that's internet or usenet would soon enough
fail to function.  Ignoring and thereby allowing whatever is known as
being bad for us as end-user clients, is exactly what the likes of
Hitler or worse cults would do, and it's also why we'd long ago
started taking advantage of, poking fun at and of why we're still at
war with those mostly innocent Muslims, along with active plans for an
all out WWIII of global energy domination if necessary against
primarily other Muslims.

Diversions away from the truth of what the planet Venus has to offer,
is just another example of what Usenet and of its Third Reich mindset
is darn good at.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

In alt.conspiracy, GovShill

 wrote
on 25 May 2007 18:05:57 -0700
:
> On May 26, 9:15 am, BradGuth  wrote:
>> Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever
>
> Usenet hasn't been failing, Loon. Google has been failing. Do yourself
> a favour and get a newsreader program. Then you can access usenet
> without having to resort to the bckwater of it called Google Groups.

Pedant Point: he'll need a Usenet server as well.
Teranews might help there.  :-)

>
>> I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
>> gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search
>
> Usenet dosn't have an index stack. Google has an index stack. Don't
> use Google if it concerns you where your posts are on the stack.
>
>> for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
>> off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.
>
> Because Google is fucked. For all of us. It has become a peice of crap
> over the last week. Stop your paranoid nonsene and discover usenet
> instead.
>
>> Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
>> otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
>> such things ever tend to get.
>>
>> I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
>> agents are assigned to my case?
>
> Well... me for one, I guess.

Heh...and you admit it?  :-)  Well, in that case, I'm
another agent.  In fact, I live just down the road from
NASA.  I must be one of ....  them!

Muhahahahahaha!

:-)

(Especially since Brad seems to think I'm a Jewish
Nazi...I've stopped trying to figure that one out.)

>
>> It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
>> server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
>> down to a dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  Sorry
>> about that.
>
> Sigh! Usenet has not slowed to a crawl. Google has. Google is a
> company in California, with servers and software and stuff. Usenet is
> *all* the news servers, in *all* the countries connected to the
> internet in the world. Get a clue, Dud.
>
>> BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
>> all they can in order to trash my PC.
>
> Sure. And the black helicopters will b e there in 10 minutes to take
> all the Coke out of your fridge.

What?  *consults notes* Wait...I thought we were 
just supposed to remove the Pepsi.  Darn!

I'm going to have to leave a drop for my supe.  Should I
use code Alpha Gamma Terra or code Bete Noire Luna?
Or just go for the splunge?

>
>> If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
>> alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
>> fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
>> muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
>> measure.
>
> Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;
>
> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
>
> And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
>
> http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> http://www.ozinsight.com/
> http://www.newsreaders.com/
> http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
>
> Shill #312
>


-- 
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
Linux.  Because Windows' Blue Screen Of Death is just
way too frightening to novice users.

-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On May 25, 7:16 pm, The Ghost In The Machine
 wrote:

> (Especially since Brad seems to think I'm a Jewish
> Nazi...I've stopped trying to figure that one out.)

Actions are of what counts the most, not your silly usenet words.

It was the actions of Hitler and of his smart Jewish minions, not
their words that we had to worry about.

What actions if any are you taking today, that are other than Jewish
Third Reich approved?
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

In article , 
bradguth@gmail.com says...
> On May 25, 7:23 pm, "Jonathan"  wrote:
> > "GovShill"  wrote in message
> >
> > news:1180141557.753640.55670@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> >
> >
> >
> > > Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;
> >
> > My favorite news reader is Xnews. I can simultaneously
> > download up to three different ngs at once from each
> > of my five servers while viewing pics or writing text.
> > Great for downloading porn, If I wanted to something
> > like that, I mean~ Beats outlook express by a country mile
> > in speed.
> >
> > http://www.download.com/3000-2164-10144167.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
> >
> > > And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
> >
> > >http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> > >http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> > >http://www.ozinsight.com/
> > >http://www.newsreaders.com/
> > >http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
> >
> > > Shill #312- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> 
> When I get my multi terabyte PC or MAC, I too would be interested in
> having the likes of Xnews at my disposal.  However, that's still not
> related to what the public is getting to see.
> 
> Usenet as such should be for the greater public good, and not for the
> greater evil, as it currently is.
> 
> The local ISP and of whatever's GOOGLE served are each capable of
> knowing where each and every byte is going, and of where each byte
> originated.  Their computers know of this because, without such
> knowledge is where all that's internet or usenet would soon enough
> fail to function.  Ignoring and thereby allowing whatever is known as
> being bad for us as end-user clients, is exactly what the likes of
> Hitler or worse cults would do, and it's also why we'd long ago
> started taking advantage of, poking fun at and of why we're still at
> war with those mostly innocent Muslims, along with active plans for an
> all out WWIII of global energy domination if necessary against
> primarily other Muslims.
> 
> Diversions away from the truth of what the planet Venus has to offer,
> is just another example of what Usenet and of its Third Reich mindset
> is darn good at.
> -
> Brad Guth
> -
> "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
> 
> 

Your cluelessness about usenet seems to know no bounds. If you subscribe 
to any one of a bunch of newservers, and use any one of any number of 
free news readers, your problems with usenet will disappear magically!

It won't help with your real problem of being mentally ill.

BDK

In alt.conspiracy, BradGuth

 wrote
on 26 May 2007 08:58:22 -0700
:
> On May 25, 7:16 pm, The Ghost In The Machine
>  wrote:
>
>> (Especially since Brad seems to think I'm a Jewish
>> Nazi...I've stopped trying to figure that one out.)
>
> Actions are of what counts the most, not your silly usenet words.
>
> It was the actions of Hitler and of his smart Jewish minions, not
> their words that we had to worry about.
>
> What actions if any are you taking today, that are other than Jewish
> Third Reich approved?

I wouldn't know.  They've not contacted me yet.  I'm pretty
sure they'll be in touch with you first, since you seem
to know more about them than I do. ;-)

> -
> Brad Guth
> -
> "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
>


-- 
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
Linux.  Because it's there and it works.
Windows.  It's there, but does it work?

-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On May 26, 12:18 pm, The Ghost In The Machine
 wrote:
> In alt.conspiracy, BradGuth
> 
>  wrote
> on 26 May 2007 08:58:22 -0700
> :
>
> > On May 25, 7:16 pm, The Ghost In The Machine
> >  wrote:
>
> >> (Especially sinceBradseems to think I'm a Jewish
> >> Nazi...I've stopped trying to figure that one out.)
>
> > Actions are of what counts the most, not your silly usenet words.
>
> > It was the actions of Hitler and of his smart Jewish minions, not
> > their words that we had to worry about.
>
> > What actions if any are you taking today, that are other than Jewish
> > Third Reich approved?
>
> I wouldn't know.  They've not contacted me yet.  I'm pretty
> sure they'll be in touch with you first, since you seem
> to know more about them than I do. ;-)
>
Why of course, you're unlikely to get the official MIB treatment
because, you're one of them.  However, you are aware that they have
been known to put their own kind on a stick, so I wouldn't turn my
back against your own kind if I were you.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever
I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search
for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.

Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
such things ever tend to get.

I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
agents are assigned to my case?

It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
down to a dead-stop after I've posted a few words.  Sorry about that.

BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
all they can in order to trash my PC.

If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
measure.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever
I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search
for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.

Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
such things ever tend to get.

I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
agents are assigned to my case?

It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
down to a dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  Sorry
about that.

BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
all they can in order to trash my PC.

If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
measure.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

On May 26, 9:15 am, BradGuth  wrote:
> Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever

Usenet hasn't been failing, Loon. Google has been failing. Do yourself
a favour and get a newsreader program. Then you can access usenet
without having to resort to the bckwater of it called Google Groups.

> I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
> gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search

Usenet dosn't have an index stack. Google has an index stack. Don't
use Google if it concerns you where your posts are on the stack.

> for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
> off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.

Because Google is fucked. For all of us. It has become a peice of crap
over the last week. Stop your paranoid nonsene and discover usenet
instead.

> Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
> otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
> such things ever tend to get.
>
> I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
> agents are assigned to my case?

Well... me for one, I guess.

> It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
> server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
> down to a dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  Sorry
> about that.

Sigh! Usenet has not slowed to a crawl. Google has. Google is a
company in California, with servers and software and stuff. Usenet is
*all* the news servers, in *all* the countries connected to the
internet in the world. Get a clue, Dud.

> BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
> all they can in order to trash my PC.

Sure. And the black helicopters will b e there in 10 minutes to take
all the Coke out of your fridge.

> If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
> alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
> fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
> muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
> measure.

Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/

And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;

http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
http://www.ozinsight.com/
http://www.newsreaders.com/
http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm

Shill #312

"GovShill"  wrote in message
news:1180141557.753640.55670@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
> Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;



My favorite news reader is Xnews. I can simultaneously
download up to three different ngs at once from each
of my five servers while viewing pics or writing text.
Great for downloading porn, If I wanted to something
like that, I mean~ Beats outlook express by a country mile
in speed.

http://www.download.com/3000-2164-10144167.html

>
> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
>
> And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
>
> http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> http://www.ozinsight.com/
> http://www.newsreaders.com/
> http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
>
> Shill #312
>

On May 25, 6:05 pm, GovShill  wrote:
> On May 26, 9:15 am, BradGuth  wrote:
>
> > Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever
>
> Usenet hasn't been failing, Loon. Google has been failing. Do yourself
> a favour and get a newsreader program. Then you can access usenet
> without having to resort to the bckwater of it called Google Groups.
>
> > I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
> > gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search
>
> Usenet dosn't have an index stack. Google has an index stack. Don't
> use Google if it concerns you where your posts are on the stack.
>
> > for' "BradGuth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
> > off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.
>
> Because Google is fucked. For all of us. It has become a peice of crap
> over the last week. Stop your paranoid nonsene and discover usenet
> instead.
>
> > Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
> > otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
> > such things ever tend to get.
>
> > I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
> > agents are assigned to my case?
>
> Well... me for one, I guess.
>
> > It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
> > server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
> > down to a dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  Sorry
> > about that.
>
> Sigh! Usenet has not slowed to a crawl. Google has. Google is a
> company in California, with servers and software and stuff. Usenet is
> *all* the news servers, in *all* the countries connected to the
> internet in the world. Get a clue, Dud.
>
> > BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
> > all they can in order to trash my PC.
>
> Sure. And the black helicopters will b e there in 10 minutes to take
> all the Coke out of your fridge.
>
> > If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
> > alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
> > fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
> > muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
> > measure.
>
> Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;
>
> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
>
> And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
>
> http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htmhttp://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.phphttp://www.ozinsight.com/http://www.newsreaders.com/http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
>
> Shill #312

Thanks for what I pretty much already knew existed.

The likes of GOOGLE/NOVA and GOOGLE/Usenet is what the general public
gets to see, that is when and if GOOGLE or the like is up and running.

Besides, since 99.9% of Usenet is a lie or of something far worse, why
would I want gigabytes per day of such crapolla filling up my poor old
PC?

I can't hardly deal with the tens of thousands of sneaky little
cookies and other intentionally bogus spyware that keeps arriving as
is, because the more of that nasty spermware/fuckware stuff I manage
to block or filter out is where the less effective many other aspects
of utilizing the Internet and Usenet gets to be.  As it is, my PC is
saying NO to thousands of attempts to terminate or otherwise skew my
online status.

BTW;  The last time I'd checked, GOOGLE/NOVA and the likes of GOOGLE/
Usenet was still playing the part of being our infomercial spewing
God.  Why should I not be speaking along with such an all-knowing and
powerful God, or of their countless minions of brown-nosed clowns?
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

On May 25, 7:23 pm, "Jonathan"  wrote:
> "GovShill"  wrote in message
>
> news:1180141557.753640.55670@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;
>
> My favorite news reader is Xnews. I can simultaneously
> download up to three different ngs at once from each
> of my five servers while viewing pics or writing text.
> Great for downloading porn, If I wanted to something
> like that, I mean~ Beats outlook express by a country mile
> in speed.
>
> http://www.download.com/3000-2164-10144167.html
>
>
>
>
>
> >http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
>
> > And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
>
> >http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> >http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> >http://www.ozinsight.com/
> >http://www.newsreaders.com/
> >http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
>
> > Shill #312- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

When I get my multi terabyte PC or MAC, I too would be interested in
having the likes of Xnews at my disposal.  However, that's still not
related to what the public is getting to see.

Usenet as such should be for the greater public good, and not for the
greater evil, as it currently is.

The local ISP and of whatever's GOOGLE served are each capable of
knowing where each and every byte is going, and of where each byte
originated.  Their computers know of this because, without such
knowledge is where all that's internet or usenet would soon enough
fail to function.  Ignoring and thereby allowing whatever is known as
being bad for us as end-user clients, is exactly what the likes of
Hitler or worse cults would do, and it's also why we'd long ago
started taking advantage of, poking fun at and of why we're still at
war with those mostly innocent Muslims, along with active plans for an
all out WWIII of global energy domination if necessary against
primarily other Muslims.

Diversions away from the truth of what the planet Venus has to offer,
is just another example of what Usenet and of its Third Reich mindset
is darn good at.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

In alt.conspiracy, GovShill

 wrote
on 25 May 2007 18:05:57 -0700
:
> On May 26, 9:15 am, BradGuth  wrote:
>> Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever
>
> Usenet hasn't been failing, Loon. Google has been failing. Do yourself
> a favour and get a newsreader program. Then you can access usenet
> without having to resort to the bckwater of it called Google Groups.

Pedant Point: he'll need a Usenet server as well.
Teranews might help there.  :-)

>
>> I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
>> gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search
>
> Usenet dosn't have an index stack. Google has an index stack. Don't
> use Google if it concerns you where your posts are on the stack.
>
>> for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
>> off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.
>
> Because Google is fucked. For all of us. It has become a peice of crap
> over the last week. Stop your paranoid nonsene and discover usenet
> instead.
>
>> Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
>> otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
>> such things ever tend to get.
>>
>> I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
>> agents are assigned to my case?
>
> Well... me for one, I guess.

Heh...and you admit it?  :-)  Well, in that case, I'm
another agent.  In fact, I live just down the road from
NASA.  I must be one of ....  them!

Muhahahahahaha!

:-)

(Especially since Brad seems to think I'm a Jewish
Nazi...I've stopped trying to figure that one out.)

>
>> It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
>> server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
>> down to a dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  Sorry
>> about that.
>
> Sigh! Usenet has not slowed to a crawl. Google has. Google is a
> company in California, with servers and software and stuff. Usenet is
> *all* the news servers, in *all* the countries connected to the
> internet in the world. Get a clue, Dud.
>
>> BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
>> all they can in order to trash my PC.
>
> Sure. And the black helicopters will b e there in 10 minutes to take
> all the Coke out of your fridge.

What?  *consults notes* Wait...I thought we were 
just supposed to remove the Pepsi.  Darn!

I'm going to have to leave a drop for my supe.  Should I
use code Alpha Gamma Terra or code Bete Noire Luna?
Or just go for the splunge?

>
>> If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
>> alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
>> fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
>> muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
>> measure.
>
> Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;
>
> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
>
> And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
>
> http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> http://www.ozinsight.com/
> http://www.newsreaders.com/
> http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
>
> Shill #312
>


-- 
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
Linux.  Because Windows' Blue Screen Of Death is just
way too frightening to novice users.

-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On May 25, 7:16 pm, The Ghost In The Machine
 wrote:

> (Especially since Brad seems to think I'm a Jewish
> Nazi...I've stopped trying to figure that one out.)

Actions are of what counts the most, not your silly usenet words.

It was the actions of Hitler and of his smart Jewish minions, not
their words that we had to worry about.

What actions if any are you taking today, that are other than Jewish
Third Reich approved?
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

In article , 
bradguth@gmail.com says...
> On May 25, 7:23 pm, "Jonathan"  wrote:
> > "GovShill"  wrote in message
> >
> > news:1180141557.753640.55670@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> >
> >
> >
> > > Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;
> >
> > My favorite news reader is Xnews. I can simultaneously
> > download up to three different ngs at once from each
> > of my five servers while viewing pics or writing text.
> > Great for downloading porn, If I wanted to something
> > like that, I mean~ Beats outlook express by a country mile
> > in speed.
> >
> > http://www.download.com/3000-2164-10144167.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
> >
> > > And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
> >
> > >http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> > >http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> > >http://www.ozinsight.com/
> > >http://www.newsreaders.com/
> > >http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
> >
> > > Shill #312- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> 
> When I get my multi terabyte PC or MAC, I too would be interested in
> having the likes of Xnews at my disposal.  However, that's still not
> related to what the public is getting to see.
> 
> Usenet as such should be for the greater public good, and not for the
> greater evil, as it currently is.
> 
> The local ISP and of whatever's GOOGLE served are each capable of
> knowing where each and every byte is going, and of where each byte
> originated.  Their computers know of this because, without such
> knowledge is where all that's internet or usenet would soon enough
> fail to function.  Ignoring and thereby allowing whatever is known as
> being bad for us as end-user clients, is exactly what the likes of
> Hitler or worse cults would do, and it's also why we'd long ago
> started taking advantage of, poking fun at and of why we're still at
> war with those mostly innocent Muslims, along with active plans for an
> all out WWIII of global energy domination if necessary against
> primarily other Muslims.
> 
> Diversions away from the truth of what the planet Venus has to offer,
> is just another example of what Usenet and of its Third Reich mindset
> is darn good at.
> -
> Brad Guth
> -
> "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
> 
> 

Your cluelessness about usenet seems to know no bounds. If you subscribe 
to any one of a bunch of newservers, and use any one of any number of 
free news readers, your problems with usenet will disappear magically!

It won't help with your real problem of being mentally ill.

BDK

In alt.conspiracy, BradGuth

 wrote
on 26 May 2007 08:58:22 -0700
:
> On May 25, 7:16 pm, The Ghost In The Machine
>  wrote:
>
>> (Especially since Brad seems to think I'm a Jewish
>> Nazi...I've stopped trying to figure that one out.)
>
> Actions are of what counts the most, not your silly usenet words.
>
> It was the actions of Hitler and of his smart Jewish minions, not
> their words that we had to worry about.
>
> What actions if any are you taking today, that are other than Jewish
> Third Reich approved?

I wouldn't know.  They've not contacted me yet.  I'm pretty
sure they'll be in touch with you first, since you seem
to know more about them than I do. ;-)

> -
> Brad Guth
> -
> "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
>


-- 
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
Linux.  Because it's there and it works.
Windows.  It's there, but does it work?

-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On May 26, 12:18 pm, The Ghost In The Machine
 wrote:
> In alt.conspiracy, BradGuth
> 
>  wrote
> on 26 May 2007 08:58:22 -0700
> :
>
> > On May 25, 7:16 pm, The Ghost In The Machine
> >  wrote:
>
> >> (Especially sinceBradseems to think I'm a Jewish
> >> Nazi...I've stopped trying to figure that one out.)
>
> > Actions are of what counts the most, not your silly usenet words.
>
> > It was the actions of Hitler and of his smart Jewish minions, not
> > their words that we had to worry about.
>
> > What actions if any are you taking today, that are other than Jewish
> > Third Reich approved?
>
> I wouldn't know.  They've not contacted me yet.  I'm pretty
> sure they'll be in touch with you first, since you seem
> to know more about them than I do. ;-)
>
Why of course, you're unlikely to get the official MIB treatment
because, you're one of them.  However, you are aware that they have
been known to put their own kind on a stick, so I wouldn't turn my
back against your own kind if I were you.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

Jonathan, I'm not exactly sure as to why you excluded the intended
crosspostings of "alt.conspiracy, uk.media.newspapers,
rec.arts.sf.science, uk.sci.misc", but thanks once again for what I
pretty much already knew about.

I'm actually hoping that whatever MIB or government spooks keep doing
their usual topic/author tactic of stalking, bashings and
banishments,
as well as their ongoing efforts of contributing their silly
spermware/
fuckware that's clearly intended for terminating my poor old PC, as
that only proves I'm worth the effort.

Keeping my message(s) up for the public to review without custom
encryption, seems the only right thing to be doing.  Unlike yourself
and most others in Usenet, I'm not trying to hide.  Unfortunately, my
home is within friendly fire range of various local DoD training, so
I'm hoping that such mainstream damage-control will not go quite that
far.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever
I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search
for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.

Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
such things ever tend to get.

I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
agents are assigned to my case?

It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
down to a dead-stop after I've posted a few words.  Sorry about that.

BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
all they can in order to trash my PC.

If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
measure.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever
I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search
for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.

Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
such things ever tend to get.

I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
agents are assigned to my case?

It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
down to a dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  Sorry
about that.

BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
all they can in order to trash my PC.

If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
measure.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

On May 26, 9:15 am, BradGuth  wrote:
> Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever

Usenet hasn't been failing, Loon. Google has been failing. Do yourself
a favour and get a newsreader program. Then you can access usenet
without having to resort to the bckwater of it called Google Groups.

> I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
> gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search

Usenet dosn't have an index stack. Google has an index stack. Don't
use Google if it concerns you where your posts are on the stack.

> for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
> off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.

Because Google is fucked. For all of us. It has become a peice of crap
over the last week. Stop your paranoid nonsene and discover usenet
instead.

> Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
> otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
> such things ever tend to get.
>
> I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
> agents are assigned to my case?

Well... me for one, I guess.

> It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
> server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
> down to a dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  Sorry
> about that.

Sigh! Usenet has not slowed to a crawl. Google has. Google is a
company in California, with servers and software and stuff. Usenet is
*all* the news servers, in *all* the countries connected to the
internet in the world. Get a clue, Dud.

> BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
> all they can in order to trash my PC.

Sure. And the black helicopters will b e there in 10 minutes to take
all the Coke out of your fridge.

> If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
> alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
> fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
> muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
> measure.

Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/

And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;

http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
http://www.ozinsight.com/
http://www.newsreaders.com/
http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm

Shill #312

"GovShill"  wrote in message
news:1180141557.753640.55670@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
> Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;



My favorite news reader is Xnews. I can simultaneously
download up to three different ngs at once from each
of my five servers while viewing pics or writing text.
Great for downloading porn, If I wanted to something
like that, I mean~ Beats outlook express by a country mile
in speed.

http://www.download.com/3000-2164-10144167.html

>
> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
>
> And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
>
> http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> http://www.ozinsight.com/
> http://www.newsreaders.com/
> http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
>
> Shill #312
>

On May 25, 6:05 pm, GovShill  wrote:
> On May 26, 9:15 am, BradGuth  wrote:
>
> > Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever
>
> Usenet hasn't been failing, Loon. Google has been failing. Do yourself
> a favour and get a newsreader program. Then you can access usenet
> without having to resort to the bckwater of it called Google Groups.
>
> > I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
> > gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search
>
> Usenet dosn't have an index stack. Google has an index stack. Don't
> use Google if it concerns you where your posts are on the stack.
>
> > for' "BradGuth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
> > off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.
>
> Because Google is fucked. For all of us. It has become a peice of crap
> over the last week. Stop your paranoid nonsene and discover usenet
> instead.
>
> > Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
> > otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
> > such things ever tend to get.
>
> > I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
> > agents are assigned to my case?
>
> Well... me for one, I guess.
>
> > It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
> > server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
> > down to a dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  Sorry
> > about that.
>
> Sigh! Usenet has not slowed to a crawl. Google has. Google is a
> company in California, with servers and software and stuff. Usenet is
> *all* the news servers, in *all* the countries connected to the
> internet in the world. Get a clue, Dud.
>
> > BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
> > all they can in order to trash my PC.
>
> Sure. And the black helicopters will b e there in 10 minutes to take
> all the Coke out of your fridge.
>
> > If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
> > alternative measures, especially if I could return the same warm and
> > fuzzy favor to each sender, with all the love and affection that I can
> > muster, and if need be along with a few lose cannon shots for good
> > measure.
>
> Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;
>
> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
>
> And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
>
> http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htmhttp://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.phphttp://www.ozinsight.com/http://www.newsreaders.com/http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
>
> Shill #312

Thanks for what I pretty much already knew existed.

The likes of GOOGLE/NOVA and GOOGLE/Usenet is what the general public
gets to see, that is when and if GOOGLE or the like is up and running.

Besides, since 99.9% of Usenet is a lie or of something far worse, why
would I want gigabytes per day of such crapolla filling up my poor old
PC?

I can't hardly deal with the tens of thousands of sneaky little
cookies and other intentionally bogus spyware that keeps arriving as
is, because the more of that nasty spermware/fuckware stuff I manage
to block or filter out is where the less effective many other aspects
of utilizing the Internet and Usenet gets to be.  As it is, my PC is
saying NO to thousands of attempts to terminate or otherwise skew my
online status.

BTW;  The last time I'd checked, GOOGLE/NOVA and the likes of GOOGLE/
Usenet was still playing the part of being our infomercial spewing
God.  Why should I not be speaking along with such an all-knowing and
powerful God, or of their countless minions of brown-nosed clowns?
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

On May 25, 7:23 pm, "Jonathan"  wrote:
> "GovShill"  wrote in message
>
> news:1180141557.753640.55670@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > Here, dummy. A usenet primer for you;
>
> My favorite news reader is Xnews. I can simultaneously
> download up to three different ngs at once from each
> of my five servers while viewing pics or writing text.
> Great for downloading porn, If I wanted to something
> like that, I mean~ Beats outlook express by a country mile
> in speed.
>
> http://www.download.com/3000-2164-10144167.html
>
>
>
>
>
> >http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/
>
> > And a starting point for newsreader (usenet) software;
>
> >http://www.cyberfiber.com/articles/usenet_software.htm
> >http://www.forteinc.com/agent/index.php
> >http://www.ozinsight.com/
> >http://www.newsreaders.com/
> >http://www.usenet.com/software.cfm
>
> > Shill #312- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

When I get my multi terabyte PC or MAC, I too would be interested in
having the likes of Xnews at my disposal.  However, that's still not
related to what the public is getting to see.

Usenet as such should be for the greater public good, and not for the
greater evil, as it currently is.

The local ISP and of whatever's GOOGLE served are each capable of
knowing where each and every byte is going, and of where each byte
originated.  Their computers know of this because, without such
knowledge is where all that's internet or usenet would soon enough
fail to function.  Ignoring and thereby allowing whatever is known as
being bad for us as end-user clients, is exactly what the likes of
Hitler or worse cults would do, and it's also why we'd long ago
started taking advantage of, poking fun at and of why we're still at
war with those mostly innocent Muslims, along with active plans for an
all out WWIII of global energy domination if necessary against
primarily other Muslims.

Diversions away from the truth of what the planet Venus has to offer,
is just another example of what Usenet and of its Third Reich mindset
is darn good at.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

In alt.conspiracy, GovShill

 wrote
on 25 May 2007 18:05:57 -0700
:
> On May 26, 9:15 am, BradGuth  wrote:
>> Interesting how Usenet has been routinely failing to show wherever
>
> Usenet hasn't been failing, Loon. Google has been failing. Do yourself
> a favour and get a newsreader program. Then you can access usenet
> without having to resort to the bckwater of it called Google Groups.

Pedant Point: he'll need a Usenet server as well.
Teranews might help there.  :-)

>
>> I've contributed, as being the most recent, yet older stuff by others
>> gets to stick on top of the message index stack.  In fact the 'search
>
> Usenet dosn't have an index stack. Google has an index stack. Don't
> use Google if it concerns you where your posts are on the stack.
>
>> for' "Brad Guth" brings up some really old Usenet stuff that has been
>> off-line or otherwise dead for months if not nearly a year or more.
>
> Because Google is fucked. For all of us. It has become a peice of crap
> over the last week. Stop your paranoid nonsene and discover usenet
> instead.
>
>> Of anything to honestly do with Venus is simply getting banished or
>> otherwise bashed, although our own moon seems about as hocus-pocus as
>> such things ever tend to get.
>>
>> I wonder what number of MI/NSA~NASA or the like of damage-control
>> agents are assigned to my case?
>
> Well... me for one, I guess.

Heh...and you admit it?  :-)  Well, in that case, I'm
another agent.  In fact, I live just down the road from
NASA.  I must be one of ....  them!

Muhahahahahaha!

:-)

(Especially since Brad seems to think I'm a Jewish
Nazi...I've stopped trying to figure that one out.)

>
>> It seems my contributions are also using up more than my fair share of
>> server bandwidth, as GOOGLE/Usenet gets down to a crawl if not brought
>> down to a dead-stop shortly after I've posted a few words.  Sorry
>> about that.
>
> Sigh! Usenet has not slowed to a crawl. Google has. Google is a
> company in California, with servers and software and stuff. Usenet is
> *all* the news servers, in *all* the countries connected to the
> internet in the world. Get a clue, Dud.
>
>> BTW;  folks are still trashing my email accounts, and otherwise doing
>> all they can in order to trash my PC.
>
> Sure. And the black helicopters will b e there in 10 minutes to take
> all the Coke out of your fridge.

What?  *consults notes* Wait...I thought we were 
just supposed to remove the Pepsi.  Darn!

I'm going to have to leave a drop for my supe.  Should I
use code Alpha Gamma Terra or code Bete Noire Luna?
Or just go for the splunge?

>
>> If you can help, I'd be interested in seeing those ideas or
>> alternative measures, especially if I cou