Re: Theories reducing to Newtonian gravity: general relativity doesn't
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:59:20 -0400, Yousuf Khan wrote:
> KONCHOK.PENDAY wrote:
>> On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:47:26 -0700, ---- wrote:
>>
>> This is very interesting,
>> BUT COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT!
>>
>> *THE* DEFINITIVE WORK ON GRAVITY IS:
>> ========================================
>> AETHRO-KINEMATICS BY STEVEN RADO ©1994
>> ========================================
>
>
> Kooks trying to out-kook each other?
>
> Yousuf Khan
I GIVE UP!
======================
YOU OUT-KOOKED US ALL!
======================
COMMENTING DISDAINFULLY
ABOUT SOMETHING YOU HAVE
OBVIOUSLY NEVER READ,
BRANDS YOU, NOT JUST
A KOOK, BUT A POMPOUS
RETROGRADE MORON TOO!
==================
KILL YOURSELF NOW!
==================
BEFORE THE ENTIRE WORLD
RIDICULES YOU AT ONCE.
At least you can still escape
the humiliating shame to come!
Salvage what you can!
Do us all a favor and
take the easy way out!
BEGONE, BUFFOON!
O
--- )
\
Net Prophet
[net-prophet.net]
date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:38:50 -0700
author: KONCHOK.PENDAY
|