Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:38:50 -0700,    group: uk.sci.misc        back       
Re: Theories reducing to Newtonian gravity: general relativity doesn't   
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:59:20 -0400, Yousuf Khan wrote:

 > KONCHOK.PENDAY wrote:
 >> On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:47:26 -0700, ---- wrote:
 >>
 >> This is very interesting,
 >> BUT COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT!
 >>
 >> *THE* DEFINITIVE WORK ON GRAVITY IS:
 >> ========================================
 >> AETHRO-KINEMATICS BY STEVEN RADO ©1994
 >> ========================================
 >
 >
 > Kooks trying to out-kook each other?
 >
 > 	Yousuf Khan


I GIVE UP!

======================
YOU OUT-KOOKED US ALL!
======================

COMMENTING DISDAINFULLY
ABOUT SOMETHING YOU HAVE
OBVIOUSLY NEVER READ,
BRANDS YOU, NOT JUST
A KOOK, BUT A POMPOUS
RETROGRADE MORON TOO!

==================
KILL YOURSELF NOW!
==================

BEFORE THE ENTIRE WORLD
RIDICULES YOU AT ONCE.

At least you can still escape
the humiliating shame to come!

Salvage what you can!

Do us all a favor and
take the easy way out!

BEGONE, BUFFOON!


                O
                    ---  )
                 \


Net Prophet
[net-prophet.net]
date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:38:50 -0700   author:   KONCHOK.PENDAY

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us