Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:35:31 +0000,    group: uk.sci.med.nursing        back       
References   
When putting references in written work - how should one order them? 
Alphabetically by first author, or chonologically by year?

(Barnett et al. 2005; Øvretveit et al. 1997; Watson 2004; )

or

(Øvretveit et al. 1997; Watson 2004; Barnett et al. 2005)

?

I am tending towards the chronological, but I am not sure if there is a 
preference.

All pointers appreciated!
date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:35:31 +0000   author:   Caol MacThòmais

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us