|
|
|
date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 07:38:38 -0700 (PDT),
group: uk.sci.astronomy
back
Re: so why didnt soviets expose fake moon landing?
On Sep 22, 3:29 pm, BradGuth wrote:
> btw, I've never excluded Apollo or USSR inert stuff from having been
> hard-landed or impact deposited upon the surface of our moon.
>
> ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG
So there are 6 LEM lunar landing stages, several moon rovers and a ton
of miscellaneous Apollo stuff on the moon, including flags, laser
reflectors, etc, etc all "hard landed on the moon by NASA" over a
period of almost 5 years at 6 widely different lunar sites at a cost
of billions of $$US to perpetuate the hoax??
And the moon rocks brought back by Apollo and studied by scientists
all over the world are also a giant hoax?? And the Russians, at the
peak of the Cold War, helped us with the hoax??
You really are out of it. I'd rather debate a bot.
date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 07:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
author: unknown
|
Re: so why didnt soviets expose fake moon landing?
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 22:47:36 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
wrote:
>On Sep 23, 2:01 pm, Yet Another Government Shill
>wrote:
>> BradGuth shat...
>>
>> >Since everything that represents yourself and others of your
>> >Zionist/Nazi kind, is why your reply figures.
>>
>> I don't know who you are, but I know what you are.
>
>How the hell did our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) and company of
>born-again bastards get past your radar?
Babble babble babble babble BBBBB babble (GW Bush) babble babble babble
babble-babble babble babble babble babble?
--
Shill #2
Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
theobviousgcashman
date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:59:29 +0200
author: Government Shill #2
|
|
|