Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:37:52 -0700 (PDT),    group: uk.sci.astronomy        back       
Re: so why didnt soviets expose fake moon landing?   
On Sep 22, 7:07 am, "M104gal...@gmail.com" 
wrote:
> On Sep 22, 12:48 am, BradGuth  wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sep 21, 2:09 pm, "M104gal...@gmail.com" 
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Sep 21, 2:43 pm, BradGuth  wrote:
>
> > > > “What exactly is it about US and USSR government, military and of
> > > > nearly countless civil service related job security with vast benefits
> > > > that you and others of your mainstream status quo kind do not
> > > > understand?”
> > > >  ~ BG
>
> > > As a former NASA employee who worked in the Office of Manned Space
> > > Flight in the 60ties while attending GU law school, I can state
> > > without reservation that you are a nutcase!
>
> > No you can't.
>
> > > Hundreds of thousands of government employees and contractors could
> > > keep such a secret for 30 years with no leaks??
>
> > What's to leak if you and 99.9% of all others didn't know squat to
> > begin with?
>
> > > You have no clue as to
> > > how the federal government operates; "leaks" are a tactical, political
> > > tool and Washington way of life frequently used for a variety of
> > > nefarious objectives.
>
> > Are you suggesting that our government doesn't create and publish all
> > sorts of disinformation?
>
> > >  Do you also believe the government is hiding little green men?? Alien
> > > space ships??
>
> > I believe our government lies and otherwise tells us only whatever
> > they want to share.
>
> > > BTW, I have no "job security or benefits" to worry about--I have
> > > accumulated a rather large sum of money in savings over the last 40
> > > years.
>
> > Most all of which being of public loot, I suspect.
>
> > Would you care to share a copy of your various nondisclosure policies
> > that you and others had to sign in your own blood?
>
> >  ~ BG
>
> I had a top secret clearance and DID NOT sign a non-disclosure policy.
>
> And you are suggesting that only .1% of the folks would have known the
> lunar landings were fake?? You are totally clueless. Nobody can be
> that dumb; you are either a troll having fun stirring people up or you
> have a serious mental problem.
>
> Top management of the manned lunar program during the mid-60ties were
> virtually all outside private industry top managers from companies
> such as IBM and Raytheon, not "government civil servants worried about
> pensions". I know; I helped recruit them and devise ways to short-
> circuit the burdensome civil service hiring procedures.
>
> Do the names Brainard Holmes, Jim Turnock, Mike Yarymovich, etc, etc
> mean anything to you.  Geez!

No they do not.  Were they another part of DARPA?

btw,  I didn't realize that so much of our moon had such a relatively
smooth/clean surface albedo of greater than 0.65, whereas in many of
those Apollo Kodak moments our Selene/moon surface looks as though its
albedo was worth nearly 0.75, and xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated
at that.

Too bad our physically dark as coal Selene/moon is otherwise so gamma
saturated, as having been gamma bandpass imaged from our side of the
magnetosphere.

 ~ BG
date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:37:52 -0700 (PDT)   author:   BradGuth

Re: so why didnt soviets expose fake moon landing?   
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:44:36 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth 
wrote:

>On Sep 23, 7:38 am, "M104gal...@gmail.com" 
>wrote:
>> On Sep 22, 3:29 pm, BradGuth  wrote:
>>
>> > btw,  I've never excluded Apollo or USSR inert stuff from having been
>> > hard-landed or impact deposited upon the surface of our moon.
>>
>> >   ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG
>>
>> So there are 6 LEM lunar landing stages, several moon rovers and a ton
>> of miscellaneous Apollo stuff on the moon, including flags, laser
>> reflectors, etc, etc  all "hard landed on the moon by NASA" over a
>> period of almost 5 years at 6 widely different lunar sites at a cost
>> of billions of $$US  to perpetuate the hoax??
>>
>> And the moon rocks brought back by Apollo and studied by scientists
>> all over the world are also a giant hoax?? And the Russians, at the
>> peak of the Cold War, helped us with the hoax??
>>
>> You really are out of it. I'd rather debate a bot.
>
>Yourself as part of the military and civil service cabal/cartel are
>clearly limited as to whatever your closely moderated and otherwise
>cultivated mindset can accept or share.  Don't expect little old me to
>change what has been done over and over to your mindset until the
>point of no return.
>
>I've never once stipulated or having otherwise suggested that our
>DARPA and their crack NASA/Apollo team wasn't trying every good or bad
>trick within their Zionist/Nazi book, for getting themselves safely to/
>from the surface of our moon.  Them dirty rotten Russians were
>obviously doing the same, and for the exact same government, military
>and civil service job security with loads of benefit reasons, as that
>which our side of this mutually perpetrated cold-war had been trying
>to pull off.

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

Fantastic ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG, just fantastic. Best
laugh of the day.

Way to kOOk!

--
Shill #2

Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
 theobviousgcashman
date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:48:45 +0200   author:   Government Shill #2

Re: so why didnt soviets expose fake moon landing?   
On Sep 23, 10:48 am, Government Shill #2  wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:44:36 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth 
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >On Sep 23, 7:38 am, "M104gal...@gmail.com" 
> >wrote:
> >> On Sep 22, 3:29 pm, BradGuth  wrote:
>
> >> > btw,  I've never excluded Apollo or USSR inert stuff from having been
> >> > hard-landed or impact deposited upon the surface of our moon.
>
> >> >   ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG
>
> >> So there are 6 LEM lunar landing stages, several moon rovers and a ton
> >> of miscellaneous Apollo stuff on the moon, including flags, laser
> >> reflectors, etc, etc  all "hard landed on the moon by NASA" over a
> >> period of almost 5 years at 6 widely different lunar sites at a cost
> >> of billions of $$US  to perpetuate the hoax??
>
> >> And the moon rocks brought back by Apollo and studied by scientists
> >> all over the world are also a giant hoax?? And the Russians, at the
> >> peak of the Cold War, helped us with the hoax??
>
> >> You really are out of it. I'd rather debate a bot.
>
> >Yourself as part of the military and civil service cabal/cartel are
> >clearly limited as to whatever your closely moderated and otherwise
> >cultivated mindset can accept or share.  Don't expect little old me to
> >change what has been done over and over to your mindset until the
> >point of no return.
>
> >I've never once stipulated or having otherwise suggested that our
> >DARPA and their crack NASA/Apollo team wasn't trying every good or bad
> >trick within their Zionist/Nazi book, for getting themselves safely to/
> >from the surface of our moon.  Them dirty rotten Russians were
> >obviously doing the same, and for the exact same government, military
> >and civil service job security with loads of benefit reasons, as that
> >which our side of this mutually perpetrated cold-war had been trying
> >to pull off.
>
> Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
>
> Fantastic ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG, just fantastic. Best
> laugh of the day.
>
> Way to kOOk!

I'm not interested in your perpetual excuses or in entertaining the
masses.  Just start sharing the best available science before it's too
late (such as right about not would be a good time).

There's nothing so terribly wrong with our having pulled off the
greatest perpetrated cold-war sting of the century, as long as the
rest of us don't have to forever keep paying for the consequences or
avoiding the remorse from our mutual collateral damage to our
environment and humanity.

Your idea of forever sustaining truth-lag is not acceptable.

  ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG
date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:09:35 -0700 (PDT)   author:   BradGuth

Re: so why didnt soviets expose fake moon landing?   
In article , 
gov.shill@gmail.com says...
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:44:36 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth 
> wrote:
> 
> >On Sep 23, 7:38 am, "M104gal...@gmail.com" 
> >wrote:
> >> On Sep 22, 3:29 pm, BradGuth  wrote:
> >>
> >> > btw,  I've never excluded Apollo or USSR inert stuff from having been
> >> > hard-landed or impact deposited upon the surface of our moon.
> >>
> >> >   ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG
> >>
> >> So there are 6 LEM lunar landing stages, several moon rovers and a ton
> >> of miscellaneous Apollo stuff on the moon, including flags, laser
> >> reflectors, etc, etc  all "hard landed on the moon by NASA" over a
> >> period of almost 5 years at 6 widely different lunar sites at a cost
> >> of billions of $$US  to perpetuate the hoax??
> >>
> >> And the moon rocks brought back by Apollo and studied by scientists
> >> all over the world are also a giant hoax?? And the Russians, at the
> >> peak of the Cold War, helped us with the hoax??
> >>
> >> You really are out of it. I'd rather debate a bot.
> >
> >Yourself as part of the military and civil service cabal/cartel are
> >clearly limited as to whatever your closely moderated and otherwise
> >cultivated mindset can accept or share.  Don't expect little old me to
> >change what has been done over and over to your mindset until the
> >point of no return.
> >
> >I've never once stipulated or having otherwise suggested that our
> >DARPA and their crack NASA/Apollo team wasn't trying every good or bad
> >trick within their Zionist/Nazi book, for getting themselves safely to/
> >from the surface of our moon.  Them dirty rotten Russians were
> >obviously doing the same, and for the exact same government, military
> >and civil service job security with loads of benefit reasons, as that
> >which our side of this mutually perpetrated cold-war had been trying
> >to pull off.
> 
> Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
> 
> Fantastic ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG, just fantastic. Best
> laugh of the day.
> 
> Way to kOOk!
> 
> --
> Shill #2
> 
> Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
>  theobviousgcashman
> 


It was pretty good, he's one with the kookside, always.
-- 
BDK

BDK Klan leader?
kOOk Magnet!
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster
date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:59:52 -0400   author:   BDK

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us