On May 1, 1:28 am, Government Shill #2  wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:04:27 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth  wrote:
> >On Apr 2, 2:18 am, Disneygeek  wrote:
> >> On Apr 1, 1:41 pm, BradGuth  wrote:
>
> >> > Disneygeek wrote:
>
> >> > > I am saying what I said. Nothing more, nothing less. I have been
> >> > > reading your posts for quite some time and I've never seen any
> >> > > verification or authentication of ANYTHING you've ever said. As near
> >> > > as I can figure, your argument is that Venus was so breathtakingly
> >> > > obvious, it should have shown up in the photos. Why? They weren't
> >> > > there to take pictures of the sky. There was certainly no thought on
> >> > > anyone's part that they were ever going to need verifiable proof that
> >> > > they'd been there.
>
> >> > First off, you are such a born-again liar of the worst possible kind,
> >> > meaning worse than our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush).
>
> >> > And do tell us again, as to how many thousand frames (including those
> >> > of movie film or video) were obtained, and tell us again as to why
> >> > exactly was it so unlikely to have to so easily failed to include the
> >> > relatively nearby and absolutely vibrant likes of Venus?
>
> >> > If you're going to continually lie your infowar and disinformation
> >> > spewing butt off, at least give us your best 3D interactive orbital
> >> > simulations, of those having at least shared one typical look-see per
> >> > hour, as of missions A11, A14 and A16 taking into account the planet
> >> > Venus, and don't forget those extremely clear and unobstructed FOVs
> >> > from orbit.
> >> > . - Brad Guth
>
> >> I don't lie Brad. I could be wrong, so could you, but I don't lie.
>
> >> Of the thousands of pictures they took, there's no indication that
> >> they took any facing the sun. Venus, if it were in the FOV, would have
> >> to, by nature of it's proximity to the sun, be close to the sun. If it
> >> were at its closest approach to Earth, then it would have the "night
> >> side" facing us (a "new" Venus, if you will). If it were in "full"
> >> mode, it would have to be on the other side of the sun and thus much
> >> further away and smaller.
>
> >> Was Venus visible to the astronauts? I don't know, they had those gold
> >> shields down when outside which probably cut the light quite a bit.
>
> >> Would Venus have been visible on film? Again, I don't know, but you
> >> would have to show me MORE than the fact that Venus was in their FOV.
> >> You would have to show me that they'd taken a picture in the general
> >> direction of Venus (ie, in the general direction of the sun) and it
> >> wasn't where it should have been.
>
> >> Again, with the 360 degrees ofmoonsurface to deal with, the
> >> astronauts tended to shoot pictures facing AWAY from the sun, it's
> >> basic photography.
>
> >Nice try, your playing dumb and dumber, that is.
>
> That'd be you pretend-brainbox. Why would an astronaut on the Moon take a
> picture towards the Sun (and Venus)? Have you ever used a camera?
>
> >BTW, why are we expected to believe anything contributed by a spook/
> >mole going by the name Disneygeek?
> >. - Brad Guth
>
> You can't see the Ed Rhodes plainly displayed in his email address? Weird.
>
> Shill #2
> --
> I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God
> who has endowed us with sense, reason and intellect
> has intended us to forgo their use.
>         Galileo Galilei

You silly spooks and moles of the mainstream status quo may need to
break out your big guns in order to fight the good fight against my
array of lose cannons.

You got that fully interactive 3D orbital simulator to work yet?
(didn't think so)
. - Brad Guth

On Sat, 3 May 2008 19:27:51 -0400, BDK  wrote:

>In article , 
>gov.shill@gmail.com says...
>> On Sat, 3 May 2008 11:36:05 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth  wrote:
>> 
>> >Do all Zionist Jews of a global domination feather have their very own
>> >DARPA certified "loon go round"?
>> >. - Brad Guth
>> 
>> Babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble their very own
>> DARPA babble babble "babble babble babble "?
>> 
>> Shill #2
>> --
>> Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
>>  theobviousgcashman
>> 
>
>The funniest thing is that he seems to get upset when sane people really 
>don't know what the fuck he's talking about.

Well, it probably does make perfect sense in his mind. It must be pretty scary
in there.

Free hint, Brad... your writing is somewhere between "Huh?" and "WTF?" Sane
people can't read it.

>He should have been used to it a long long time ago..on a planet far 
>away..

From the stunned expression on the ward nurses face when he asks "Nurse Babble
babble babble babble?"

Shill #2
--
Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
 theobviousgcashman

On Sat, 3 May 2008 17:30:42 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth  wrote:

>On May 3, 12:34 pm, Government Shill #2  wrote:
>> On Sat, 3 May 2008 11:36:05 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth  wrote:
>> >Do all Zionist Jews of a global domination feather have their very own
>> >DARPA certified "loon go round"?
>> >. - Brad Guth
>>
>> Babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble their very own
>> DARPA babble babble "babble babble babble "?
>>
>> Shill #2
>> --
>> Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
>>  theobviousgcashman
>
>I gave you five gold stars for that one.

Cool!

>You and BDK sound exactly like Hitler whenever one of his messengers
>was merely telling the truth, and shortly thereafter Hitler having
>shot that messenger.   Like our resident warlord(GW Bush), perhaps the
>last thing they ever want to hear is the truth.

If you are writing truth Brad and you want to spread your message to the widest
possible audience, I would suggest you try it in English. Use words that people
outside your ward will understand, in syntax that is generally accepted. At the
moment your scrawling appears to consist of random words, strewn across the
screen.

Shill #2
--
Pfft...English! Who needs that? I'm never going to England.
 Homer J. Simpson

On May 4, 12:41 am, Government Shill #2  wrote:
> On Sat, 3 May 2008 17:30:42 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth  wrote:
> >On May 3, 12:34 pm, Government Shill #2  wrote:
> >> On Sat, 3 May 2008 11:36:05 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth  wrote:
> >> >Do all Zionist Jews of a global domination feather have their very own
> >> >DARPA certified "loon go round"?
> >> >. -BradGuth
>
> >> Babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble their very own
> >> DARPA babble babble "babble babble babble "?
>
> >> Shill #2
> >> --
> >> Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
> >>  theobviousgcashman
>
> >I gave you five gold stars for that one.
>
> Cool!
>
> >You and BDK sound exactly like Hitler whenever one of his messengers
> >was merely telling the truth, and shortly thereafter Hitler having
> >shot that messenger.   Like our resident warlord(GW Bush), perhaps the
> >last thing they ever want to hear is the truth.
>
> If you are writing truthBradand you want to spread your message to the widest
> possible audience, I would suggest you try it in English. Use words that people
> outside your ward will understand, in syntax that is generally accepted. At the
> moment your scrawling appears to consist of random words, strewn across the
> screen.
>
> Shill #2
> --
> Pfft...English! Who needs that? I'm never going to England.
>  Homer J. Simpson

Say "Reverse Speech" whatever?

Did any of that reply have anything to do with physics or science?

Got hard numbers?

Got hard proof-positive?

Got that 3D interactive orbital simulator?

Got any clue as to what this topic is all about?
. - Brad Guth

On May 4, 12:36 am, Government Shill #2  wrote:
> On Sat, 3 May 2008 19:27:51 -0400, BDK  wrote:
> >In article ,
> >gov.sh...@gmail.com says...
> >> On Sat, 3 May 2008 11:36:05 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth  wrote:
>
> >> >Do all Zionist Jews of a global domination feather have their very own
> >> >DARPA certified "loon go round"?
> >> >. -BradGuth
>
> >> Babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble their very own
> >> DARPA babble babble "babble babble babble "?
>
> >> Shill #2
> >> --
> >> Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
> >>  theobviousgcashman
>
> >The funniest thing is that he seems to get upset when sane people really
> >don't know what the fuck he's talking about.
>
> Well, it probably does make perfect sense in his mind. It must be pretty scary
> in there.
>
> Free hint,Brad... your writing is somewhere between "Huh?" and "WTF?" Sane
> people can't read it.
>
> >He should have been used to it a long long time ago..on a planet far
> >away..
>
> From the stunned expression on the ward nurses face when he asks "Nurse Babble
> babble babble babble?"
>
> Shill #2
> --
> Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
>  theobviousgcashman

It's also dyslexic encrypted.  In other words, stop asking those
reverse speech loaded questions, and go fish.
. - Brad Guth

BradGuth  wrote:
>On May 4, 12:36 am, Government Shill #2  wrote:
>> On Sat, 3 May 2008 19:27:51 -0400, BDK  wrote:
>> >In article ,
>> >gov.sh...@gmail.com says...
>> >> On Sat, 3 May 2008 11:36:05 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth 
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >Do all Zionist Jews of a global domination feather have their very own
>> >> >DARPA certified "loon go round"?
>> >> >. -BradGuth
>>
>> >> Babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble their very
>> >> own
>> >> DARPA babble babble "babble babble babble "?
>>
>> >> Shill #2
>> >> --
>> >> Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
>> >>  theobviousgcashman
>>
>> >The funniest thing is that he seems to get upset when sane people really
>> >don't know what the fuck he's talking about.
>>
>> Well, it probably does make perfect sense in his mind. It must be pretty
>> scary
>> in there.
>>
>> Free hint,Brad... your writing is somewhere between "Huh?" and "WTF?" Sane
>> people can't read it.
>>
>> >He should have been used to it a long long time ago..on a planet far
>> >away..
>>
>> From the stunned expression on the ward nurses face when he asks "Nurse
>> Babble
>> babble babble babble?"
>>
>> Shill #2
>> --
>> Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
>>  theobviousgcashman
>
>It's also dyslexic encrypted.  In other words, stop asking those
>reverse speech loaded questions, and go fish.
>. - Brad Guth

Poor Brad, slapped down hard again.

-- 
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
  -- David Tholen

In article , 
gov.shill@gmail.com says...
> On Sat, 3 May 2008 19:27:51 -0400, BDK  wrote:
> 
> >In article , 
> >gov.shill@gmail.com says...
> >> On Sat, 3 May 2008 11:36:05 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth  wrote:
> >> 
> >> >Do all Zionist Jews of a global domination feather have their very own
> >> >DARPA certified "loon go round"?
> >> >. - Brad Guth
> >> 
> >> Babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble their very own
> >> DARPA babble babble "babble babble babble "?
> >> 
> >> Shill #2
> >> --
> >> Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
> >>  theobviousgcashman
> >> 
> >
> >The funniest thing is that he seems to get upset when sane people really 
> >don't know what the fuck he's talking about.
> 
> Well, it probably does make perfect sense in his mind. It must be pretty scary
> in there.
> 
> Free hint, Brad... your writing is somewhere between "Huh?" and "WTF?" Sane
> people can't read it.
> 
> >He should have been used to it a long long time ago..on a planet far 
> >away..
> 
> From the stunned expression on the ward nurses face when he asks "Nurse Babble
> babble babble babble?"
> 
> Shill #2
> --
> Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
>  theobviousgcashman
> 

I was thinking attendants, but ward nurses works fine too. 

I guess he's in communion with Venusian Control and ignores the pesky 
humans who feed and dress him.

BDK

In article <560e4308-f75a-450f-9ed6-685d83db4be4
@j33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>, bradguth@gmail.com says...
> On May 4, 12:36 am, Government Shill #2  wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 May 2008 19:27:51 -0400, BDK  wrote:
> > >In article ,
> > >gov.sh...@gmail.com says...
> > >> On Sat, 3 May 2008 11:36:05 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth  wrote:
> >
> > >> >Do all Zionist Jews of a global domination feather have their very own
> > >> >DARPA certified "loon go round"?
> > >> >. -BradGuth
> >
> > >> Babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble babble their very own
> > >> DARPA babble babble "babble babble babble "?
> >
> > >> Shill #2
> > >> --
> > >> Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
> > >>  theobviousgcashman
> >
> > >The funniest thing is that he seems to get upset when sane people really
> > >don't know what the fuck he's talking about.
> >
> > Well, it probably does make perfect sense in his mind. It must be pretty scary
> > in there.
> >
> > Free hint,Brad... your writing is somewhere between "Huh?" and "WTF?" Sane
> > people can't read it.
> >
> > >He should have been used to it a long long time ago..on a planet far
> > >away..
> >
> > From the stunned expression on the ward nurses face when he asks "Nurse Babble
> > babble babble babble?"
> >
> > Shill #2
> > --
> > Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
> >  theobviousgcashman
> 
> It's also dyslexic encrypted.  In other words, stop asking those
> reverse speech loaded questions, and go fish.
> . - Brad Guth
> 

Reverse speech loaded questions?

BWHAHAHAHAAA! 

There you go again..

BDK